Ides of March
March 15th, 2005
Gregory J. Glennon Kevin J. Mahoney
51 Nottinghill Rd. 545 Concord Avenue, Suite 22
Boston, MA 02135 Cambridge, MA 02138
Timothy N. Schofield Thomas M. O'Brien
120A Sutherland Rd., 89 Hobart St.
Boston, MA 02135 Boston, MA 02135
RE: Public Corruption with the malicious assistance of your Profession
Hey Dudes,
I must say that I am a very happy man not to be in your shoes today as you look around and wonder about your friends and associates. Three of you bastards act like you work diligently in defence of people charged with crimes. The fourth works just as diligently for Tom Reilly who is trying to imprison me for simply seeking justice served upon him. Three seek political office to uphold the Public Trust when as lawyers you have already proven to me you have no understanding of how to uphold the law.
The fourth amongst you don’t give a good goddamn about anything except his own pursuit of lucre. He pisses and moans about the injustices in the system he makes his living within while he fishes on the internet for new clients. However once he encounters a layman far more ethical than the man he claims to be, he is quick to offend and run for cover by hanging up the phone. Mahoney, you solicited my phone call. You returned it and I saved your voicemail. In your hustle you offer a 25-minute consultation for free yet were hostile to me out of the gate? Methinks that you knew exactly who I was and were attempting to scare me off. Two minutes and a quick fuck you, don’t hold for me. It just pissed me off. So in return I play you like a fiddle. If you do not appreciate my choice of words, sue me. I dare ya. It will save me the costs of filing on you. I think you are scum and would dearly love to argue you in front of a jury of my peers in a federal court.
After calling each of you March 2nd and managing to speak to two of you personally, obviously there is no need to explain why I have sent you this material. I am remaining true to my word, which is something none of you will ever understand. To supplement the emails already sent, I have enclosed exact copies of the same material I served upon two Solicitor Generals last year before I ran for Parliament and was sent straight to jail for my efforts. The CD of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as "officers of the court" in order that it may be properly investigated. The Yankee Solicitor General, Teddy Olson quit his job while I was campaigning up home last June but the Canadian Solicitor General, Landslide Annie has thus far hung on to hers. If any of you can explain to me in an ethical fashion, in writing, signed in your hand how the US Attorney could legally edit the Defendant, Cardinal Law from my complaint before filing his ridiculous "ex parte" motion, I will eat your hat and let you off the hook. Good luck.
If you dudes have any questions about my concerns and allegations take it up with your Congressman, Mikey Capuano. His answer to me is hereto attached for your review. Rest assured I will be suing him. Join him if you wish. Better yet for your own benefit ask the Suffolk County ADA Alicia McDonnell if you can view her files to see if I am a liar. If she won’t show you, ask yourself why. I ain’t talking to any more Yankee lawyers until after my pending criminal trial is over and I begin suing the bastards including her.
I will take up my concerns with our brand new Canadian Ambassador in Washington, Franky McKenna to see if he wishes to act within the scope of his Employment and protect my righteously dumb arse. Yankees are about to see something quite special as two pigheaded Maritimers from the same point on the map but from different planets argue tooth and nail about pork etc. It should be quite an entertaining circus no matter who prevails between Franky and I. We are both fairly adept showmen and neither of us pull our punches. His has power and money. I have the truth. Veritas Vincit EH? Maybe. Who knows, but you can’t blame me for trying. Yankee lawyers claim that they seek Truth, Justice and the American Way all the time. As you view my material you can see that Clark Kent Irvin Inspector General Department Homeland Security forever proven that to be untrue. Maybe an alien layman will get the job done despite all the apathy.
Shame on each of you. When I called you I was seeking friends not foes. What would you do if you were I and you had been sent byway of an illegal complaint made by a clerk to the Physc Ward of a Downtown Boston jail controlled by the very Sheriff that had supported perjury against you in federal court? Think fast before I sue you too. I do not have to wait six months for an answer like I do a FED. What say I put you dudes on my witness list? If you were hostile, I would have fun making you try to keep your stories straight. I am used to your tricks. As you no doubt can tell, I have a very low tolerance for liars that are lawyers. My contempt towards your profession is well known and justified. Hell, read Mahoney’s words within his web site. He goes on and on about it more than I do. I saved his words just in case I need to use them against him some day.
FYI, if any of you do not prove to me that you have contacted the FBI and the US Attorney with your newfound knowledge of crime ASAP, I will be suing you in a New York minute once my Criminal Trial is over. If you opt to bounce back this material your malice will be proven. You will merely afford me the opportunity to recycle expensive materials to screw another nasty lawyer with. I am accustomed to that trick as well. Why not act just act ethically according to the Rules of Professional Conduct that allow you to practice law for a fee before someone else does so and forever embarrasses you right out your profession? Can you really trust a lawyer not to turncoat on his friends to protect his own rep and pocketbook? This is not an ethical dilemma but is certainly one Hell of a Catch 22 for any lawyer or politician to receive. EH?
Cya'll in Court :)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, David A. Woodman of South Acworth hereby certify that on March 15th, 2005 the Ides of March and Primary day for a few political wannabes I served upon the following lawyers at the addresses stated below a true copy of the attached document and the material provided by the fool, David R. Amos. This was done with two witnesses and pictures were taken to prove that it was done and record our fun.
Gregory J. Glennon Kevin J. Mahoney
51 Nottinghill Rd. 545 Concord Avenue, Suite 22
Boston, MA 02135 Cambridge, MA 02138
Timothy N. Schofield Thomas M. O'Brien
120A Sutherland Rd., 89 Hobart St.
Boston, MA 02135 Boston, MA 02135
David A. Woodman
P.O. Box 2
South Acworth. NH 03607
Gregory J. Glennon Kevin J. Mahoney
51 Nottinghill Rd. 545 Concord Avenue, Suite 22
Boston, MA 02135 Cambridge, MA 02138
Timothy N. Schofield Thomas M. O'Brien
120A Sutherland Rd., 89 Hobart St.
Boston, MA 02135 Boston, MA 02135
RE: Public Corruption with the malicious assistance of your Profession
Hey Dudes,
I must say that I am a very happy man not to be in your shoes today as you look around and wonder about your friends and associates. Three of you bastards act like you work diligently in defence of people charged with crimes. The fourth works just as diligently for Tom Reilly who is trying to imprison me for simply seeking justice served upon him. Three seek political office to uphold the Public Trust when as lawyers you have already proven to me you have no understanding of how to uphold the law.
The fourth amongst you don’t give a good goddamn about anything except his own pursuit of lucre. He pisses and moans about the injustices in the system he makes his living within while he fishes on the internet for new clients. However once he encounters a layman far more ethical than the man he claims to be, he is quick to offend and run for cover by hanging up the phone. Mahoney, you solicited my phone call. You returned it and I saved your voicemail. In your hustle you offer a 25-minute consultation for free yet were hostile to me out of the gate? Methinks that you knew exactly who I was and were attempting to scare me off. Two minutes and a quick fuck you, don’t hold for me. It just pissed me off. So in return I play you like a fiddle. If you do not appreciate my choice of words, sue me. I dare ya. It will save me the costs of filing on you. I think you are scum and would dearly love to argue you in front of a jury of my peers in a federal court.
After calling each of you March 2nd and managing to speak to two of you personally, obviously there is no need to explain why I have sent you this material. I am remaining true to my word, which is something none of you will ever understand. To supplement the emails already sent, I have enclosed exact copies of the same material I served upon two Solicitor Generals last year before I ran for Parliament and was sent straight to jail for my efforts. The CD of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as "officers of the court" in order that it may be properly investigated. The Yankee Solicitor General, Teddy Olson quit his job while I was campaigning up home last June but the Canadian Solicitor General, Landslide Annie has thus far hung on to hers. If any of you can explain to me in an ethical fashion, in writing, signed in your hand how the US Attorney could legally edit the Defendant, Cardinal Law from my complaint before filing his ridiculous "ex parte" motion, I will eat your hat and let you off the hook. Good luck.
If you dudes have any questions about my concerns and allegations take it up with your Congressman, Mikey Capuano. His answer to me is hereto attached for your review. Rest assured I will be suing him. Join him if you wish. Better yet for your own benefit ask the Suffolk County ADA Alicia McDonnell if you can view her files to see if I am a liar. If she won’t show you, ask yourself why. I ain’t talking to any more Yankee lawyers until after my pending criminal trial is over and I begin suing the bastards including her.
I will take up my concerns with our brand new Canadian Ambassador in Washington, Franky McKenna to see if he wishes to act within the scope of his Employment and protect my righteously dumb arse. Yankees are about to see something quite special as two pigheaded Maritimers from the same point on the map but from different planets argue tooth and nail about pork etc. It should be quite an entertaining circus no matter who prevails between Franky and I. We are both fairly adept showmen and neither of us pull our punches. His has power and money. I have the truth. Veritas Vincit EH? Maybe. Who knows, but you can’t blame me for trying. Yankee lawyers claim that they seek Truth, Justice and the American Way all the time. As you view my material you can see that Clark Kent Irvin Inspector General Department Homeland Security forever proven that to be untrue. Maybe an alien layman will get the job done despite all the apathy.
Shame on each of you. When I called you I was seeking friends not foes. What would you do if you were I and you had been sent byway of an illegal complaint made by a clerk to the Physc Ward of a Downtown Boston jail controlled by the very Sheriff that had supported perjury against you in federal court? Think fast before I sue you too. I do not have to wait six months for an answer like I do a FED. What say I put you dudes on my witness list? If you were hostile, I would have fun making you try to keep your stories straight. I am used to your tricks. As you no doubt can tell, I have a very low tolerance for liars that are lawyers. My contempt towards your profession is well known and justified. Hell, read Mahoney’s words within his web site. He goes on and on about it more than I do. I saved his words just in case I need to use them against him some day.
FYI, if any of you do not prove to me that you have contacted the FBI and the US Attorney with your newfound knowledge of crime ASAP, I will be suing you in a New York minute once my Criminal Trial is over. If you opt to bounce back this material your malice will be proven. You will merely afford me the opportunity to recycle expensive materials to screw another nasty lawyer with. I am accustomed to that trick as well. Why not act just act ethically according to the Rules of Professional Conduct that allow you to practice law for a fee before someone else does so and forever embarrasses you right out your profession? Can you really trust a lawyer not to turncoat on his friends to protect his own rep and pocketbook? This is not an ethical dilemma but is certainly one Hell of a Catch 22 for any lawyer or politician to receive. EH?
Cya'll in Court :)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, David A. Woodman of South Acworth hereby certify that on March 15th, 2005 the Ides of March and Primary day for a few political wannabes I served upon the following lawyers at the addresses stated below a true copy of the attached document and the material provided by the fool, David R. Amos. This was done with two witnesses and pictures were taken to prove that it was done and record our fun.
Gregory J. Glennon Kevin J. Mahoney
51 Nottinghill Rd. 545 Concord Avenue, Suite 22
Boston, MA 02135 Cambridge, MA 02138
Timothy N. Schofield Thomas M. O'Brien
120A Sutherland Rd., 89 Hobart St.
Boston, MA 02135 Boston, MA 02135
David A. Woodman
P.O. Box 2
South Acworth. NH 03607
posted by David R. Amos at 4:46 PM
39 Comments:
Seeing as you ran as an independant during the last election. I thought this might interest you. Just a thought I had.
Vote Independent for independence!
It is the only way within the system we have right now, to make your voice and concerns be heard above the party line.
Slogan:
Divided as independents the people stand, United as partisan politics the people fall!
Start a group, organization, coalition, or party if you will to support independents. Similar to a co-op unsure about the co-op fees issue partisan and sponsorship issues? (Sponsorship pun intended)
Statement of intent!
-Municipal politics principles and format.
-Everybody votes independently in the House of Commons.
-Leader is chosen voted on from among the elected independents by the elected independents.
-Could even go one further and have municipal electees voted amongst them selves to represent province or federal?
-If possible a common set of base goals and policies. This may not be appropriate detract from the independent spirit?
Shared objectives and campaigning practices
-Centralized Fund raising
-Centralized list of candidates, emails, Ph numbers, Web pages
-Help Enlist candidates
-Enlist volunteers to help independents
-Sharing of thoughts and ideas discussion to hone campaign platforms
-Internet fund raising centralized and accountable with all books open and published online.
-Dissemination of funds according to number of constituents or possibility of election?
-Bulk advertising cheaper.
-Centralized head quarters for all candidates.
Make no mistake: Our mission at Tip Top Equities is to sift through the thousands of underperforming companies out there to find the golden needle in the haystack. A stock worthy of your investment. A stock with the potential for big returns. More often than not, the stocks we profile show a significant increase in stock price, sometimes in days, not months or years. We have come across what we feel is one of those rare deals that the public has not heard about yet. Read on to find out more.
Nano Superlattice Technology Inc. (OTCBB Symbol: NSLT) is a nanotechnology company engaged in the coating of tools and components with nano structured PVD coatings for high-tech industries.
Nano utilizes Arc Bond Sputtering and Superlattice technology to apply multi-layers of super-hard elemental coatings on an array of precision products to achieve a variety of physical properties. The application of the coating on industrial products is designed to change their physical properties, improving a product's durability, resistance, chemical and physical characteristics as well as performance. Nano's super-hard alloy coating materials were especially developed for printed circuit board drills in response to special market requirements
The cutting of circuit boards causes severe wear on the cutting edge of drills and routers. With the increased miniaturization of personal electronics devices the dimensions of holes and cut aways are currently less than 0.2 mm. Nano coats tools with an ultra thin coating (only a few nanometers in thickness) of nitrides which can have a hardness of up to half that of diamond. This has proven to increase tool life by almost ten times. Nano plans to continue research and development into these techniques due to the vast application range for this type of nanotechnology
We believe that Nano is a company on the move. With today�s steady move towards miniaturization we feel that Nano is a company with the right product at the right time. It is our opinion that an investment in Nano will produce great returns for our readers.
Online Stock trading, in the New York Stock Exchange, and Toronto Stock Exchange, or any other stock market requires many hours of stock research. Always consult a stock broker for stock prices of penny stocks, and always seek proper free stock advice, as well as read a stock chart. This is not encouragement to buy stock, but merely a possible hot stock pick. Get a live stock market quote, before making a stock investment or participating in the stock market game or buying or selling a stock option.
I read over your blog, and i found it inquisitive, you may find My Blog interesting. My blog is just about my day to day life, as a park ranger. So please Click Here To Read My Blog
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: The game is on
To: "aleblanc" aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, mail@ccla.org, advocacycollective@yahoo.com, frederictonartsalliance@yahoo.ca, wassef@nb.sympatico.ca, Premier@gnb.ca, michael.malley@gnb.ca, Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca, Shawn.GRAHAM@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca, roy.boudreau@gnb.ca, hedard.albert@gnb.ca, smcready@nbnet.nb.ca, Info@jackcarr.ca
CC: socialsciences@mta.ca, fdykeman@mta.ca, roly.macintyre@gnb.ca, Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, frank.branch@gnb.ca, rosemay.poirier@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca, David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, tony.huntjens@gnb.ca, Elvy.ROBICHAUD@gnb.ca, milt.sherwood@gnb.ca, Eric.ALLABY@gnb.ca, Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, dale.graham@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca, brad.green@gnb.ca, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca, leroy.armstrong@gnb.ca, mikemurphymla@hotmail.com, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca
Hey Abe Baby LeBlanc
Sometimes less is more EH? Thus I was silent for a while but you really did't think you had run me off. Did ya? I have been kinda busy writing a lot of important stuff to screw the Crown with in federal Court.
That said, remember not too long ago when you told me to go fuck myself on a phone that I could not prove contact with? Well as soon as you hung up I talked about it live on Tom Young's radio show with the Bill Carr dude who was speaking for him while he took a little time off. As i was speaking apparently one of John Bragg's lawyers downstairs in Eastlink thought there was a bomb in the building when there was not. The real bomb no doubt went off a couple of days when Tanker farted in your face as you kissed his nasty arse. Now that I have read Tommy Boy's malevolent opinions of the Super Tanker sinking our little Lord's boat that could never have floated without liberal support merely because all you smiling bastards just what a pension you did not earn. The scene recorded in the Irving rag is not the truth at all. Even a kissarse like you knows as well as I, Abe Baby that it is private conversations in backroom deals just like the one you and I had that stops the shit from hitting the fan and spreading it all over you crooked bastards.
For the record Abe. As you well know I ain't a shy man and I don't mince words with crooks. So let me clearly state for the record before I begin to sue the Crown that You and all your nasty friends and sneaky foes can go fuck yourselves as well.
Click "Read on'" in this blog Frenchie. Yankees are starting to bullshit about us too. The Yankee is a liar but I will swear by every word of my email that that crooked bastard posted within his blog.
http://www.freespeech.com/index.php?/weblog/i_find_myself_being_mentioned_in_parliamentary_circles_in_canada/
Veritas vincit
David Raymond Amos
Wrong answer Abe especially after our little spit and chew on the phone on Friday afternoon Say hey to your buddies Chucky LeBlanc (no doubt your kinsman) and the fat bastard called Tanker.
If you don't like my words please sue me. Saves me the costs of filing against you and your cohorts who want a fine pension at the expense of the public interest.
Love and Kisses (for Chucky's benefit)
Dave
aleblanc aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com wrote:
I would prefer not receiving your e-mails please remove my name from your list.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
Sent: April 3, 2006 7:37 PM
To: charles leblanc; mail@ccla.org; advocacycollective@yahoo.com; frederictonartsalliance@yahoo.ca; wassef@nb.sympatico.ca; Premier@gnb.ca; michael.malley@gnb.ca; Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca; Shawn.GRAHAM@gnb.ca; brian.kenny@gnb.ca; roy.boudreau@gnb.ca; hedard.albert@gnb.ca
Cc: socialsciences@mta.ca; fdykeman@mta.ca; aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com; roly.macintyre@gnb.ca; Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca; frank.branch@gnb.ca; rosemay.poirier@gnb.ca; Jody.CARR@gnb.ca; Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca; tony.huntjens@gnb.ca; Elvy.ROBICHAUD@gnb.ca; milt.sherwood@gnb.ca; Eric.ALLABY@gnb.ca; Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca; dale.graham@gnb.ca; wally.stiles@gnb.ca; kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca; brad.green@gnb.ca; eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca; bev.harrison@gnb.ca; leroy.armstrong@gnb.ca; mikemurphymla@hotmail.com; T.J.Burke@gnb.ca
Subject: The game is on
While Andre Arthur is tipping a glass with the Speaker I predicted would prevail I must begin writing my first complaint to file in Federal Court Fredericton because this is the Province in which I was born and raised. Chucky knows I come from down the road from him in Dorchester and moved to Fredericton with my father's family when Louis Robichaud centralized the government years ago. A fellow Maritimer should understand why I have no wish to bump bellies with Upper Canadian lawyers like Peter Millikin or Billy Graham until I absolutely have to.
Petey Baby kept his job as Speaker today simply because he is logically the second best choice for Stevey Boy Harper to have. I still maintain as I said on Ground Hog Day that he should have got Andre Arthur to take the chair just as Bernie Lord did with Tanker. Who knows what deals were struck behind closed doors but I know for certain I laid down the law to Arthur's assistant whilst he watched the Circus tent unfold today. Tomorrow Michelle Jean pitches it and then the Circus begins. both in Parliament Hill and in Federal Court in Fredericton.
Maybe Arthur will call me back after he has had a drink or two but I doubt it. In my book he is already way past too late for me not to mention his name within my complaint. Arthur should have called me back months ago when I stuck my hand out to him as a fellow Independent months ago. However he really should have called me ASAP as soon as the UPS man landed at his door one week ago. Last week was an eternity for me because of what happened to my Clan in Beantown USA.
Even though Stevey Boy Harper got his wish in another seat or two advantage in the House piggies made of straw. It still ain't enough of an advantage to allow his government to stand if any sort of scandal breaks out byway of some lone wolf like me or Byron Prior blowing as hard as hell.
What happened today on the Hill or in Fredericton on the 28th was just the same shit different day tis all. Our little local Lord has the same problem as Harper if somebody blinks and his government topples. Believe it or not what happened in chucky blog is a far different kettle of fish and really rather unusual in the cyber world of blogger. Chucky just may get his wish and become famous after all. In my humble opinion he should not delete the blog he threatens to. He should promote it to make himself a the hero he lusts to be. Chucky can do what he wishes. It is my job to throw mud in the eyes of the people who supported my false imprisonment for their own gain.
Is anybody having any fun yet? I doubt it too. Even I am feeling as mean as snake and yet I am still laughing at the nonsense of it all. The masks of virtue that the talking heads display on the TV don't fool silly little me. I may be rude but at least I am honest. The smiling bastards on TV have great manners and no integrity whatsoever. I have gone to great lengths to prove it. I just need to entertain ordinary folks like me to make them want to watch me have some fun poking holes in the stuffed shirts. If I get Maritimers talking and laughing enough my concerns will be resolved as a matter of political will and justice will be served in the usual fashion. The trick is to make the smiling bastards worry about their own interests and the Maritimers mad about how theirs are being abused. The smiling bastards have proven many times they have no regard whatsoever for the public trust placed in them to protect the public interests. I just have to remind everyone of the awful truth and the political house of cards will fall just like the little piggies houses of straw. The only thing the Speakers of any House worry about is their power, wages and pension. Tanker should speak up . If he did I have no doubt hthe people he represents would applaud and reelect him as some sort of righteous Independent. Only you me and the other dudes that get this email will have another tale to tell Eh Chucky? The obvious question is whay don't you tell it first in your Blog? Tanker won't sue ya because he knows you would call me as witness. After all I wrote it didn't I. You blog it and quote me thats all. Interesting EH? Tis time for you to think about something. EH? Wouldn't it be fun to prove that you were the one to make somebody blink? Steal my thunder I quite simply don't care. you have about a day or so to decide. Then maybe I will blog it myself as you suggested.
Now I must address you buddy Vaughn's questions. just like a lawyer the unnamed blogger has neither confirmed nor denied that he is the person I think is asking the questions within you blog. However I am glad that they are being ask even though his sarcasm pisses me off. He know full well what I am talking about and what I am saying is true. If it is not Vaughn doing your bidding byway of the blog he has gotten the last couple of email you did anyway. Most importantly Vaughn confirmed way back in 2004 that he was in possession of the very same material dudes such as Cleveland Allaby and your buddy Danny Boy Bussieres got last Monday. Quite frankly it does not matter to me if this dude is Vaughn or not. Vaughn is already an important witness for me. He should be thankful he is not a lawyer no matter how much he pretends to be one. i have enough enemies it is only lawyers or laymen who choose to attack me that I am preparing to sue. Check my work I have sued some pretty big bad bastards before. Don't think that I will not do it again once I have my ducks lined up.
Anyway chucky here is your unnamed blogger's questions. My answer follows.
Well, that makes some sense anyway. So how are these New Brunswick lawyers involved? Are you saying that none of them will represent you or what? You are sending them this wiretap evidence for what reason? If it's federal court why are you even in New Brunswick, all the lawyers in this province are idiots and irving lackeys. Why not go to Toronto where there are at least some civil liberties lawyers.
The trouble is, I don't know of any legal grounds that 'forces' the canadian government to intervene in a foreign country's legal system. If somebody plants coke on you in columbia and you get caught, then plead with canada to help you out, you'll be out of luck. Under the charter canadians have fewer rights than americans.
Our 'terror laws' are the mirror image of the US's, but never even had moranda rights or anything ike that. In Canada, you are simply f&&&&& if you cross the state, as any native, environmentalist, protestor, or civil rights attorney will tell you. I don't know of a single case where somebody successfully sued, even David Milgaard was given a settlement since it was dragging out so long. Natives have tried suing for years. However, it's easy to talk from the outside. But if Ernst Zundel couldn't sue for being held for almost a decade with no charges against him in Canada, I don't see how far a lawsuit against Canada for not intervening in a foreign country will go.
# posted by Anonymous : 2:15 PM
The tif file attached should answer Vaughn's quandary in Chucky's blog about why I think my lawsuit should prevail. Obviously September 11th, 2004. Talk to the Arar crowd of lawyers making the score with their fees if you do not understand me. The Canadian government did intervene. It willfully and maliciously assisted in my false imprisonment in the USA. The Crown is accountable.
Here is what happened. Prior to returning home to Canada I was inspired to run for a seat because of the answer I had received from the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety the long gone Landslide Annie McLellan. Her answer informed me that I must go political ASAP or my family would lose everything. If you had bothered to contact me back in 2004 Vaughn I would have shown you another complaint from 2002 that not many people have seen. It proved long ago I had this plan in mind. I know that matters are dismissed all the time and nobody gets justice. Only political will will ever make the justice dept pretend that they conduct themselves ethically for awhile.
Anyway while I was running for a seat in the 38th Parliament I was summoned across the yankee border to be arraigned in a criminal matter. The complaint was unsigned because everybody knew it was illegal and fraudulent to boot. All they wanted was for me to come to the border and the DHS could come into play and take me away under the prior false allegations of a presidential threat. they use the better safe than sorry policy all the time. I could not be in Boston stalking a lawyer whilst running for Parliament in Canada further. Everybody knew the lawyer making false allegations against me was a lair. My arguments with her in courts proving her own perjury has caused her to be fired from three law firms thus far as they try hard to disassociate themselves from her actions. She and her former law firms admit it kinda sorta in the usual way legal liars do. The feds wanted rid of me once and for all because I was causing quite a little stink in the backrooms up hear plus everybody knew I was sniffing around for Whitey Bulger. Talk to Constable Jim Case or Byron Prior in Newfoundland if you don't believe me.
I covered my arse big time up here and then I went go to the Yankee court to answer the arraignment as summoned with glee. I loved the prospect of finally getting a jury of my peers as is my right when labelled as a criminal. All I was demanding was for the matter to be heard in the proper jurisdiction and venue as is my right as well. When I stood before that court I did not recognize its jurisdiction over me because it was just a sub court of a municipal court. I demanded to know what the matter was about because I was not given any information about what the matter was about and the police and the district attorney had refused to speak to me. the DA had claimed in writing that they were not involved.
The man who had laid the charges against me was a clerk magistrate and not even a lawyer. It had been already argued to the Supreme Court and proven that it was very illegal for a clerk magistrate of a municipal court to lay charges against a man not in jail let alone running for a seat in Parliament in another country. I got all the necessary documents from the court to prove that the attempted prosecution of me was malicious on Sept 3rd, 2004. I then returned to Canada and served upon many Canadian law enforcement authorities the proof of the malice. It was just what I had predicted would happen to the New Brunswick Police Commission before leaving Canada on sept 2nd. The most notable person i sent my material to would have to be Ms, Longo the General Cousel of the Crown Corp known as the RCMP. another Crown Corp known as Canada post took the money and gave a receipt but refused to deleiver the material or send it back and has deneied to this very day that the parcel was ever sent despite the fact i have a receipt. they just challenge me to sue them. Rest assured i shall but that is why Andre Authur and John shuttle got the same material byway of the Yankee firm known as the UPS. It seems they may have a valid complaint because i know for a fact the Canada post is very political. Under the charter I have the right to privacy with my papers don't I. Well where is my god damned mail. Hell I even filed it all attached to my affadavit in a matter in Sussex Provincial Court on Sept 9th and gave the Sussex RCMP some wiretap tapes to seal the deal.
On Sept 3rd the Yankee Judge named Coffey who my wife informed me later was my neighbor had heard the District Attorney admit that I had just given them 9 original wiretap tapes. he was quick to ask me for a motion to dismiss because he did not want to hear anymore. I refused because if I did that would recognize that court's jurisdiction and I demanded that the malicious prosection be exposed in a US Federal Court during the due process of law so to speak. So he and i agreed to have a hearing on Oct 1st about the matter and i could file an affidavit stateing my issues and filing more evidence in order to remove the matter to federal court and far away from his bench. On Oct 1st I returned and after having the judge witness my signature and my filing the affidavit with a great deal of documentation to support my defence. I informed the judge he should recuse himself because of the fact that we were neighbours. Coffey properly did so immediately. the matter was delayed to much later in the day when the court was largely cleared of ordinary folks as witnesses and the a very malevolent circus started between me and one of Massachusetts nastiest judges. She is the judge that Janet Reno gave two million dollars to back in 1999 in order to torture men. The hoedown between me and Judge Sidney Hanlon is well remembered by many ordinary folks that witnessed our arguments in Dorchester.
As far as what happened on Oct 1st I still do not know all that was said or why I went to jail. One minute I was arguing and embarrassing the ADA and the next minute I was in a glass cage and could not hear a thing. my next stop was the downtown boston Psych Ward of a city jail and the jailors could not tell me why I was there simply because they did not know. I had not been arrested and there was no bail order. they were in the dark as much as I. In fact after the Canadian consulate came to see me three guards came into my cell in the middle of the night to ask me what the hell was going on. I asked them had they never met a political prisoner before and explained to them that they would be called as witnesses someday and that I bore them no malice even though I had been pretty fierce with them. taking away my freedom is one thing but deny me coffee and cigarettes too and you have an animal on your hands. Their problem was I knew my rights and would not allow them to make a false move. After they unlocked the door to the hole. they shoved me in i still would not come out until they asked me nicely kinda like Chucky just did.
That said the Canadian Consulate in Boston finally felt compelled to visit me in jail after my friends raised a lot of hell up here and my wife had served them a copy of the pile of documents that were sent to them the week before had been forwarded by the US mail to somewhere else that they could not say because it was a matter of public safety to even receive mail from me. the Canadians in Boston accepted the document from my wife but refused to take the wiretap tape she tried to given for no stated reason. When i was visited by the Consulate I demanded to know why i was in jail because all my jailer's computer's said was "other" The Canadian consulate were quick to say I was in jail because I had threatened Judge Coffey and gave me the documents to support signed in Judge Sidney Hanlon's hand. I took the documents gratefully and then demanded to know why they refused the wiretap tape s from my wife. they refused to tell me to so I threw them out of my god damned jail and went back to my cell pissed off. Later i was bailed out by good buddies and i stood before Judge Hanlon once again. I asked her directly why i was in jail and she would not say. I told her what the Canadian Consulate said and she said it was untrue and that I did not threaten Judge Coffey. then i showed her the documents signed in her own hand and the facts she stated were not only absurd but out right lies. If I had threatened Judge Coffey he would have handled it immediately it would not be necessary for another Judge to Claim it days later. The plan between Canada and the USA to be rid of me was in my face obvious when the Judge attempted to keep the papers the Canadian Consulate had given me. Trust that that is just the beginning of a 22 month legal battle to get a jury in the USA in the proper court with jurisdiction.
Never mind my said but true tale for a minute because I I know for a fact most folks only care about things if it affects them other wise the rest of the world can go to Hell right?
Well that is my rant but think about this real slow Vaughn you are the activist not me. However the Feds can never deny my evidence of Bank Fraud, securities Fraud and Tax Fraud. All issues are under the federal code of the USA. However Canadian interests are bought and on Yankee stock markets every day. We have an interest in the fact that the Yankee entities such as the SEC and the FTC etc are filled with crooks who help global corp rape and pillage our assests under the guise of such things as NAFTA. A wannabe lawyer and actvist such as your self would be impressed at how far i have gone proving the wickedness in the games that you protest. The best way i know of the get the bastards is to make them eat their own words and then fall on their own swords. All of the evil in this old world is dreamt up or supported by the profession you wish to be a part of. Perhaps you should reconsider and do as I do. Take some of my evidence of foul play check and make certain it is true and attack them Pro Se. Two fellas attacking the same bastards separately can have more effect than one. Near as I can gather you tried to run for city council or whatever because Bruce Noble stopped you from becoming a lawyer. Is that true? If so why not let me help you embarrass that fat bastard. He was in the same classes as me in high School and he was far from memorable then. Brucy Baby’s wits do not intimidate me. I would love to argue him in fact that is why I played hard ball with the Fredericton Police dept when they broke the law in their actions against me.
Hows that for an answer Vaughn? Now read the tiff file and study what I gave Chucky years ago. Will ya?
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 08:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Attn Kent Morris and Ernie Reid does any Newfy lawyer wish to call me a liar BEFORE we meet in Court?
To: EREID@smss.com, morrislaw@nf.aibn.com, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca,
Manning.F@parl.gc.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Simms.S@parl.gc.ca,
Russell.T@parl.gc.ca, Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca, Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca,
Moore.R@parl.gc.ca, davies.carl@nbpub.com
CC: greg@currentmag.ca, mgeist@uottawa.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, Deb_Nobes@cbc.ca, spinks08@hotmail.com,
Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca, PoliticsNB@hotmail.com,
dchafe@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
news@kingscorecord.com
Mr Morris it has been over two weeks and you did not do me the simple courtesy of calling me back or answering one email. So much for the jealous defence of your client EH? Rest assured I was not surprised.However many others did respond and some intersting computers did as well. As you scroll down through this email you can easily see Ernie Reid's computer answered an important email of mine in support of Byron Prior in January of 2005. Clearly Ernie's computer is faar more ethical than any lawyer in his whole god damned Maritime law firm. That holds true for his partners in New Brunswick John Wallace and J. Gordon Petrie in Stewart McKelvey particular. they received hard copy of the proof of many crimes just like Danny Williams and Greg Byrne did in hand to their offices in Fredericton while I was running against the dumb MP Andy Scott. They can't say they didn't get I had a witness and took pictures just like the blogger Chucky Leblanc does. Methinks Chucky longs to be famous but it seems he may have to settle for infamous instead. Close but no cigar EH Chucky?
My problem with you Mr. Morris is that you and every other Newfy lawyer received the same email at the same time. Many responded and others such as Lois Skanes just bitched to Stevey Boy May *Check his words within his affidavit at the bottom of this email. May filed it only after Judge Derek Green put a lid on the can of worms and filed the matter under seal in order to attempt to save his butt from litigation. Obviously Stevey Boy May was bailing out on Johny Crosbie but only doing so off the public record with the help of the crook Derek Green EH?.
Since that time in January of 2005 I have lost my family and they have lost their home because no law enforcement officer or officer of the court in Canada or the USA was willing to uphold the law and assist me in the defence against the malicious prosecution of my Clan. I know nobody cares not even Byron Prior who had asked for my help and then just as quickly kicked me in the nuts because no doubt some lawyer falsely claimed that I was a Fed. It appears that the brotherhood of the bar thought they could pound one pigheaded Maritimer into the ground without him making an ethical effort to seek relief in court after a little fierce politicking EH? Newfys such as Johnny Crosbie should know better than to underestimate the tenacity of a son of the Keith Clan. The apple does not fall to far from the tree EH? Well Inow that I have played at politics just like my forefathers did in two provincial elections and two federal ones. Tis time to Cya'll in Court EH? Lets see if history repeats itself.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.S. Hey Chucky Leblanc look for this email in the Blogs and say hey to your arsekissing cousin Abeby Baby Leblanc and your blogger pals or me will ya? This email will be posted as a comment right under the email I sent Abeby Baby and his pal Bernie Lord not long after he kissed Tanker's fat nasty arse so that he could stay in the Old Maison and on the gravy trian a while longer. I have seen many of your pals around town over the past two weeks but I did not take many pictures. You take enough for both of us N'est Pas?
Unlike you I prefer that people do not know what I look like and what I am up to. I love it when the crooks often presume that my faithful Indian companion is me. Now that Woody is back in the USA with my Durable Power of Attorney in hand, do you have one clue as to what I am up now? I doubt it too.
Here is where to find this email on the internet just in case your WCIE Techy and the other NB bloggers can't do it on their own.
.http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2005/03/ides-of-march.html
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: This email is the proof I forwarded the text of your webpage the all the MPs
To: Byron Prior alltrue@nl.rogers.com, morrislaw@nf.aibn.com
CC: editor@notacolony.ca, stephen@downes.ca, info@ottawapolice.ca,
radar_cdn@yahoo.com, prevention@psepc.gc.ca, swanson@storm.ca,
Day.S@parl.gc.ca, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca, OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca,
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, smay@pattersonpalmer.ca,
jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca, Deb_Nobes@cbc.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca,
ombudsman@cbc.ca, bsharpe@nl.rogers.com, rgfaloon@pattersonpalmer.ca,
news@dailygleaner.com, kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, davies.carl@nbpub.com,
tony.whalen@fredericton.ca,
david.kelly@fredericton.ca,
brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca,
mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, police@fredericton.ca,
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, scotta@parl.gc.ca,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, advocacycollective@yahoo.com, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca,
Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, cityadmin@fredericton.ca, Wiesen@mintz.com,
bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, rchedore@mosherchedore.ca,
Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us, Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us,
spinks08@hotmail.com, Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca,
btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca, mackay01@canada.com, PoliticsNB@hotmail.com,
oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com, pat.bonner@saintjohn.ca
Byron
I just called the Morris law office but after we talked a few minutes it appears he hung up suddenly. However the same thing happened yesterday when I was talking to a politcal priest in New Brunswick who is running for the NDP up on the Mirimichi. I suspect the Feds are playing games with me as usual. That said I did manage to tell Mr Morris I will send him a few emails to aid in his defence of his clieit. If he wishes he can call my number (506 434 1379) and deal with my voicemail, then let me know when is a good time to call him back. At the very least he can never say he does not know of my support of you way back in 2004 before I ran for a seat in Parliament the first time anound. Since then I ran in the 2006 federal election, the election in June in Nova Scotia and I am now running in the present election in New Brunswick. I plan to file the first of many lawsuits against the Crown this week.
To aid in your friend's defence I will forward to his lawyer and obviously many others my answers to his spoof emails. At the very least I am a witness against the Newfy Justice system's actions against him. He needs to be very careful because I suspect they are employing criminal chages that could involve imprisonment. You must remember what the Yankees did to me in order to coverup their wrongs against my Clan. Don't think the same cannot happen to the young fella supporting you.
I recognized his game as soon as I read what he sent to me and many others. In fact he explained what he was up to within the spoof emails. This young fella has big balls. I liked his open and honest stlye of taking on the smiling bastards.I supported him immediately by answering the emails and adding some stuff gleaned from the web about you. I also sent him an email with some of my stuff attached to help him out as soon as I read the following CBC news report and his name was mentioned. however methinks that the cops quite likely had his computer by then and kept that email to themselves because I was complaining of them at the same time for their cover up of my concerns and allegations.
This is the best I can do for now from afar. After this particular election is over I just may catch a boat to the Rock and idle around St John's Newfoundland a while on my old Harley in order to jerk some chains myself. I really should sue some lawyers would failed to uphold the Law Society Act. That Rhodes Scholar named Danny Williams is at the top of my list of lawyers I hope to sue someday after i take on the Crown. His Attorney General Tommy Boy Marshall and all the corrupt cops who support them do not scare me one little bit. If they get for some trumped up charge they will have a hell of an argument coming from a Pro se defendent just like Michael bray laments of over here after the CBA meeting over on the Rock. If I some how quit breathing my ghost will get even with all the smiling bastards for me. Trust that simple fact. You know I keep good
records and they are far more complete and accurate than any crooked clerk's of any court..
Veritas Vincit.
Dave
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2006/08/10/spoof-emails.html
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 06:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Attn Chief Barry McKnight of Fred City
To: brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, police@fredericton.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, Deb_Nobes@cbc.ca,
spinks08@hotmail.com, Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca,
btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca, mackay01@canada.com, PoliticsNB@hotmail.com,
norm.mcfarlane@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.court@saintjohn.ca,
oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com, pat.bonner@saintjohn.ca,
advocacycollective@yahoo.com
CC: dchafe@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
kingseastPC@nb.aibn.com, news@kingscorecord.com, news@dailygleaner.com,
kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, davies.carl@nbpub.com,
dannyrobichaud@nb.aibn.com, vote4idee@hotmail.com,
urquhart.mia@telegraphjournal.com, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca,
William.Gould@gnb.ca
Hey Barry
If you or you underlings bother to scroll down you will see that I have a huge bone to pick with you in the Court of the Queen's Bench further harrassment of me will not assist the lawyers that must defend your city from my justifiable lawsuit. After you became the latest Chief in Fred city I asked you last year to make your underlings uphold the Police Act as well as the other laws and the Charter. Didn't I? Don't
you think they should have quit harrassing me and just did their job as they said they would under oath?
Everybody knows who I am by now. A hairy dude who sometimes wears a Black Watch kilt driving a white Towncar or a black Panhead with Yankee plates is kinda hard to forget in the snotty town Fredericton. Stop it right now will ya? Do you have any doubts that I will sue the City because of the malice and incompetance of its cops, its Mayor and its City Solicitor? Why bury yourself if you manage to come up with some criminal charge to try to stick me with. trust that I with love explaining my matters to a jury on your dime and time.Well I just met two more of your cops (Durling and Arbour if that is how they spell it. They would not for me) last night that do not understand the term privacy. The yo yo named Durling decided to sneak up on me and read what I was typing in my laptop as I
sat off the street in a parked car. He demanded to know who I was but refused to take the same material that I had given to the cop name Carl who is running for York. I gave Durling a shocking surprise in that some men know how to defend their rights and ain't scared of corrupt cops not even a little bit. Tell me Chief Barry McKnight when do you think that you and Grant Garneau will ever get around to acting within the scope of you employment? Before I make you famous or right after I sue the City? Kinda late on both counts ain't it Chucky Leblanc?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: thee_sandman@hotmail.com ; mchayday@mta.ca ; lemisanthrope@hotmail.com ; desserud@unbsj.ca ; bernard.miller@mcinnescooper.com ; dmnorman@coxhanson.ca ; general@pub.nb.ca ; bryan.corbett@ualberta.ca ; mcfaul@hoover.stanford.edu ; mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ; patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov ; Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov ; stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com
; governorlynch@nh.gov
Cc: BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; bbixby@burnslev.com ; drosenblatt@burnslev.com ; thomas.gatzunis@state.ma.us ; wickedwanda3@adelphia.net ; Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us ; lcampenella@ledger.com ; Kandalaw@mindspring.com ; jmurray@ibc.ca ; tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com ; dwatch@web.net ; duffy@ctv.ca ; trvl@hotmail.com ; Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; fbinhct@leo.gov
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 9:07 PM
Subject: Fwd: Who thinks the dumb crooks in Saint John have one clue what I am up to?
Tommorrow is polling day up here and after it is primary day down in the Yankee neck
of the woods. Just for the record I should tell my former Yankee lawyer Barry Bachrach that I have a pretty good idea who murdered Anna Mae but the witness up here is too chicken to talk about it. Whereas our latest Attorney General Vic Teows has given John Graham the boot to Yankeedoddleland there ain't much I can do to help him now until I have my own malicious warrants for arrest removed EH? Furthermore why the Hell should I care anymore. As soon as i get back to the USA I am going to sue your law firm and Brian Bixby's for your assistance to the Commonweath of Massachusetts in the screwing of my wife for the benefit of a bunch of bad acting bankers, Gays and Catholic priests etc.
As far as the shit going down up here, obviously Byron Prior is asking for my support once again and I obliged but I also know where the Agent Orange barrels are stashed in Gagetown (right by the Shirley dump which is near Fire Point # 4). Plus obviously I am the only person willing to say that the testing of Corridor Resources has caused the folks in the area to lose their water and for the mine to spring many leaks as well. Everybody but me is too afraid of being sued to state the simple truth about that simple fact. However Barry and a bunch of other Yankees know how I love to argue lawyers EH? Cya'll in Court or Hell. C'est la meme chose. N'est pas?
Barry, the fact that you deliberately intervened in order to help screw my wife and kids will make you very famous someday or my name ain't Dave. You are just another lawyer who loves to FAKE LEFT and all your friends know it. You were right when you told my wife I was going to be pissed off after you screwed her in court. Do you think your law firm will let you go before or after I sue it? Do you or Bixby think that your managing partner is any smarter that David Rosenblatt? Me neither.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Byron Prior alltrue@nl.rogers.com wrote:
David, again THANKS, this is wonderful and should be just what his lawyer needs, by the way is name is Kent Morris fax# 754-5715 or toll free tele # 1-866-754-4124 e-mail morrislaw@nf.aibn.com I know you won't bother to contact him. David be nice to him and ask why can't he represent me also? I can give him all my info, I know, you have all of it.
Thanks again
Byron
Ernie Reid EREID@smss.com wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 05:04:29 -0400
From: "Ernie Reid" EREID@smss.com
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
I am away from my office for a period of time. Please forward any inquiries to my assistant, Maureen King at mauking@smss.com or phone 709.722.4270
Thank you,
Ernest G. Reid, Q.C.
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com 01/28/05 05:32 >>>
David Amos wrote:Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:41:09 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
To: garyobrien@legalaid.nf.ca, darleneneville@legalaid.nf.ca,
snewell@odeaearle.nf.ca, francis.obrien@lawsociety.nf.ca,
fodea@odeaearle.nf.ca, toreilly@coxhanson.ca
CC: plumduff@mac-law.ca, dcmoores@parsons-law.com,
kmorgan@churchill-law.nf.net, smorris@buddenmorris.com,
morrow@nf.aibn.com, vmoulton@gov.nl, kmoyse@nfld.net,
cmullett@curtisdawe.nf.ca, anne.f.murphy@exxonmobil.com,
bmurphy@monmar.nf.net, gmurphy@pa-law.ca, smurphy@curtisdawe.nf.ca,
mmurray@mwhslaw.com, ismuzychka@curtisdawe.nf.ca,
owenmyers@owenmyers.com, jmyles@bensonmyles.com, wmyles@bensonmyles.com,
jneville@bensonmyles.com, jnewbury@mwhslaw.com,
tsnewhook@curtisdawe.nf.ca, dnewman@pub.nf.ca, pauln@gov.nl.ca,
jnoel@gov.nl.ca, gnoel@pattersonpalmer.ca, paulnol@gov.nl.ca,
ednoonan@nfld.net, snorman@smss.com, dale.noseworthy@irb.gc.ca,
joakley@nfld.net, derricko@gov.nl.ca, gobrien@obrienandassoc.ca,
kobrien@obrienandassoc.ca, lobrien@curtisdawe.nf.ca,
maryobrien@roadrunner.nf.net, john.odea@mcinnescooper.com,
rodea@curtisdawe.nf.ca, stacey.o'dea@mcinnescooper.com,
keir@goodlandoflaherty.com, peter@goodlandoflaherty.com,
w.okeefe@nf.aibn.com, kokeefe@gov.nl.ca, loleary@pattersonpalmer.ca,
koneill@coxhanson.ca, posborne@bensonmyles.com
David Amos wrote: Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:18:54 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
To: barbaramacadam@legalaid.nf.ca, dennismackay@legalaid.nf.ca,
paulmalone@legalaid.nf.ca, tommarshall@gov.nl.ca,
stan.mcdonald@justice.gc.ca, lauramennie@legalaid.nf.ca
CC: macbeathedwards@nf.aibn.com, amacdonald@pattersonpalmer.ca,
kmackay@pattersonpalmer.ca, gmacnab@mmvf.ca, mmadden@justice.gc.ca,
jamesmaher@gov.nl.ca, denis.mahoney@mcinnescooper.com,
kmahoney@collinsandassoc.nf.net, cmajid@pattersonpalmer.ca,
marym@gov.nl.ca, bmarks@mplaw.ca, susanm@gov.nl.ca,
lori.marshall@nf.sympatico.ca, ValerieMarshall@gov.nl.ca,
amartin@whscc.nf.ca, jmartin@wrmm.nf.net, jmate@pattersonpalmer.ca,
rmatthews@bensonmyles.com, rmccabe@fortisinc.com, amay@mhplawlawfirm.com,
john.mccarthy@pwgsc.gc.ca, johnmcdonald@gov.nl.ca,
pmcdonald@coxhanson.ca, smcdonal@cancom.net, tobymcd@avint.net,
rmcg@wob.nf.ca, dmckay@wrmm.nf.net, km@gillianbutler.com,
jmellor@mail.gov.nl.ca, kmercer@wrmm.nf.net, rmercer@mmvf.nf.ca,
jemerrigan@pa-law.ca, dmills@nfld.net, heatherjewermills@legalaid.nf.ca,
cmills@mhplawfirm.com, tmills@gov.nl.ca, donovanmolloy@gov.nl.ca,
emontague@nfld.net, rmontague@gov.nl.ca, lynnmoore@gov.nl.ca
David Amos wrote: Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 23:53:34 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
To: heatherj@gov.nl.ca
CC: njacobs@smss.com, jackie.jenkins@nf.aibn.com, kjerrett@mwhslaw.com,
tjohnson@odeaearle.nf.ca, davidj@gov.nl.ca, jlj@wob.nf.ca,
bkavanagh@bensonmyles.com, skavanagh@pattersonpalmer.ca,
garykearney@legalaid.nf.ca, peterkearsey@legalaid.nf.ca,
kkeeping@bensonmyles.com, ifkelly@curtisdawe.nf.ca, jgkelly@nfld.net,
thomas.kendell@mcinnescooper.com, jkennedy@sklaw.nf.net,
mgk@lawatlantic.com, wkennedy@kennedybelbin.ca, kenny.mf@forces.gc.ca,
chris.king@mcinnescooper.com, dking@king-senior.com, sclarke@wrmm.nf.net,
tannisking@gov.nl.ca, evan.kipnis@aliant.ca, gkirby@odeaearle.nf.ca,
nkleer@oktlaw.com, francesknickle@gov.nl.ca,
barry.lake@mcinnescooper.com, calvinl@gov.nl.ca, jlavers@wob.nf.ca,
gander.law@nf.sympatico.ca, flayte@nfld.net, ldc@nfld.net,
rlee@wob.nf.ca, phillefeuvre@gov.nl.ca, dlenehan@mwhslaw.com,
clewis@smss.com, pdl@lewisday.com, cbslegal@nfld.com, aglilly@smss.com,
marklinehan@gov.nl.ca, alocke@pattersonpalmer.ca, regl@gov.nl.ca,
mlockyer@chc.ca
David Amos wrote: Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 23:25:40 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
To: gander.law@nf.sympatico.ca
CC: nhodder@mwhslaw.com, lhoegg@chescrosbie.nf.net,
derekhogan@legalaid.nf.ca, khollett@mun.ca, ken.hollett@nf.sympatico.ca,
georgehoran@gov.nl.ca, khorwood@wrmmlaw.com, shounsell@avint.net,
douglashowell@gov.nl.ca, hughes.brannan@nfld.net,
keith.humphries@cfc.nf.net, rachelhuntsman@gov.nl.ca, dhurley@nfld.net,
khurley@churchill-law.nf.net, ahussey@mhplawfirm.com,
jhutchings@pa-law.ca, deborah.hutchings@mcinnescooper.com,
vhynes@wrmmlaw.com, inder.griffin@nf.sympatico.ca,
elizabethivany@gov.nl.ca
David Amos wrote: Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 23:14:20 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
To: donaldjgallant@nf.aibn.com, williamgallant@legalaid.nf.ca,
dougaldgillis@legalaid.nf.ca, shickman@pattersonpalmer.ca
CC: gander.law@nf.sympatico.ca, vgauthier@whscc.nf.ca, cgill@nf.aibn.com,
kgillam@collinsandassoc.nf.net, mgillies@smss.com,
egittens@gittenslaw.com, duffy.law@nf.sympatico.ca,
sandra.gogal@mcinnescooper.com, david@goodlandoflaherty.com,
jgoodland@nf.aibn.com, wgoodridge@smss.com, fgosse@coxhanson.ca,
jgoudie@nf.aibn.com, pamelagoulding@gov.nl.ca, aubreygover@gov.nl.ca,
bgrant@smss.com, john.green@mcinnescooper.com, mgreene@nlh.nf.ca,
sgreene@nape.nf.ca, gggriffin@nfld.net, inder.griffin@nf.sympatico.ca,
mjgriffin@griffinlaw.nf.net, bgrimes@pattersonpalmer.ca,
jhale@chescrosbie.nf.net, mharrington@smss.com, jharris@thezone.net,
phyllisharris@gov.nl.ca, pendergastharterylaw@nl.rogers.combharvey@pattersonpalmer.ca, khatfield@wob.nf.ca, maryhatherly@gov.nl.ca,
kimhawley@gov.nl.ca, ghayes@newfoundlandpower.com,
veryanhaysom@eastlink.ca, chealy@smss.com, khealey@gov.nl.ca,
miller&hearn@crrstv.net, alanhenry@legalaid.nf.ca,
bheywood@pattersonpalmer.ca, rjh@wob.nf.ca, phickman@nlh.nf.ca
David Amos wrote: Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:56:06 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
To: smithcoffey@nfld.net, brianf@gov.nl.ca
CC: ldc@nfld.net, briandunphy@legalaid.nl.ca, cdwyer@ruttertech.com,
rearle@odeaearle.nf.ca, gander.law@nf.sympatico.ca,
David.Eaton@mcinnescooper.com, jedwards@bensonmyles.com,
herbedwards@gov.nl.ca, info@parsons-law.com, marcusevans@legalaid.nf.ca,
janineevans@gov.nl.ca, afagan@mmvf.nf.ca, cfagan@coxhanson.ca,
stacy.l.feltham@exonmobil.com, susanfisher@roadrunner.nf.net,
afitzgerald@nfld.net, sfitzgerald@churchill-law.nf.net,
fitzgeraldp@gov.nl.ca, janefitzpatrick@legalaid.nf.ca,
paul.fitzpatrick@aliant.ca, barryfleming@gov.nl.ca, gfleming@smss.com,
gforsyth@labour-law.com, ffowler@bensonmyles.com,
robinfowler@mail.gov.nl.ca, tfraize@fraizelawoffices.nf.net,
christopher@goodlandoflaherty.com, tfreeman@gov.nl.ca,
gfrench@curtisdawe.nf.ca, jvfrench@nf.aibn.com, jbfrench@nf.aibn.com,
furlotte@superweb.ca
David Amos wrote: Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:43:08 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
To: pauldavis@legalaid.nf.cam, rdawson@legalaid.nf.ca,
johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca
CC: gdavis-abraham@mwhslaw.com, jvdawe@daweandburke.nf.ca,
joandawson@legalaid.nf.ca, dawsonlaw@nf.aibn.com, stevedawson@gov.nl.ca,
admin@lewisday.com, susan.day@mcinnescooper.com, gdickie@wob.nf.ca,
pdicks@bensonmyles.com, vdillon@triton.nf.ca, mdodd@mdoddlaw.com,
downeylaw@yahoo.com, dpdrover@curtisdawe.nf.ca,
mdrover@michaeldrover.com, tdrover@wrmm.nf.net, wadedrover@nf.aibn.com,
mduffy@duffylawyers.com
David Amos wrote: Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:33:01 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
To: lclarke@cupe.ca
CC: jclarke@nfld.com, mcoady@odeaearle.nf.ca, smithcoffey@nfld.net,
colbourne.5@nf.sympatico.ca, bcole@bensonmyles.com, ron@colelaw.ca,
jennifercolford@gov.nl.ca, fcollins@obrienandassoc.ca,
collins@mac-law.ca, gconnors@pattersonpalmer.ca,
fconstantine@pattersonpalmer.ca, amconway@curtisddawe.nf.ca,
jcook@smss.com, morgan.cooper@mcinnescooper.com, mcooze@mdoddlaw.com,
pcoxworthy@smss.com, ccritch@wrmmlaw.com, acrosbie@curtis.nf.ca,
ccrosbie@chescrosbie.nf.net, michael.crosbie@mcinnescooper.com,jcummings@gov.nl.ca, chrisc@gov.nl.ca
David Amos wrote: Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:21:22 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
To: kdburridge@nf.sympatico.ca
CC: bbursey@stjohns.ca, dbussey@nfld.net, jbussey@smss.com,
info@gillianbutler.com, tbutton@wob.nf.ca, jbyrne@pennecon.com,
lbyrne@nfld.net, billcadigan@mail.gov.nl.ca, patriciacarpenter@gov.nl.ca,
tanyacarter@gov.nl.ca, christinecasey@legalaid.nf.ca,
lchafe@obrienandassoc.ca, james.chalker@mcinnescooper.com,
wchamberlain@nlh.nf.ca, schaytor@coxhanson.ca,
bruce.chislett@nfldlawyer.com, dennis.clarke@mcinnescooper.com
David Amos wrote: Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:11:02 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
To: pnbrowne@curtisdawe.nf.ca
CC: rbrown@coxhanson.ca, dbrowne@churchill-law.nf.net,
abruce@bensonmyles.com, bruceco@nf.sympatico.ca, rbruce@smss.com,
sbryant@nflawyer.nf.net, rhonabuchan@legalaid.nf.ca,
philip@goodlandoflaherty.com, bob@buckinghamlaw.ca,
dbuffett@bensonmyles.com, wayneburden@legalaid.nf.ca, sburden@nfld.net,
pburgess@burgesslaw.ca, smburke@daweandburke.nf.ca,
tburke@odeaearle.nf.ca, donburrage@gov.nl.ca
David Amos wrote: Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:59:18 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
To: jbrazil@rose-brazil.nf.ca
CC: tbridger@wrmm.nf.net, ebreen@sklaw.nf.net, tbristow@nfld.net,
johnbrooks@justice.gc.ca, kbrothers@nfld.net, andbrown@justice.gc.ca,
gbrown@smss.com, johnbrown@legalaid.nf.ca
David Amos wrote: Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:52:10 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
To: lbishop@stjohns.ca
CC: bblackmore@bb.nf.net, ablagdon@pattersonpalmer.ca,
archbonnell@bonnellaw.ca, abonnell@curtisdawe.nf.ca, dboone@smss.com,
eboone@lawyer.com, maryboulos@legalaid.nf.ca, ldc@nfld.net,
brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca, wboyd@wob.nf.ca, jkbrace@roadrunner.nf.net,
hughes.brannan@nfld.net
----- Original Message ----- From: David Amos
To: averillbakerlaw@nl.rogers.com
Cc: jbaker@wob.nf.ca ; ebaker@buddenmorris.com ; kevin.baker@cna.nl.ca ; dballard@gov.nl.ca ; rory.barnable@mcinnescooper.com ; jbarrett@odeaearle.nf.ca ; denisbarry@nfld.net ; barbarabarrowman@gov.nl.ca ; scott.beazley@justice.gc.ca ; gbelbin@kennedybelbin.ca ; jbenson@bensonmyles.com ; gbest@wrmm.nf.net
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:43 PM
Subject: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
----- Original Message ----- From: David Amos
To: janthony@smss.com
Cc: nickavis@churchill-law.nf.net ; geoff.aylward@nfldlawyer.com ; aylwardslawoffice@nf.aibn.com ; raylward@mhplawfirm.com ; jbabb@nf.aibn.com ; kbaggs@odeaearle.nf.ca ; averillbakerlaw@nl.rogers.com ; jbaker@wob.nf.ca ; ebaker@buddenmorris.com ; kevin.baker@cna.nl.ca ; dballard@gov.nl.ca ; rory.barnable@mcinnescooper.com ; dbaird@davidbaird.nf.net ; maeve.baird@justice.gc.ca
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:37 PM
Subject: Fw: Byron still needs a lawyer
----- Original Message ----- From: David Amos
To: ccabbott@iworks.net ; motomaniac_02186@yahoo.cmo
Cc: Dogan.Akman@justice.gc.ca ; palteen@newfoundlandpower.com ; palthouse@pa-law.ca ; andrews@mac-law.ca ; jhenleyandrews@smss.com ; jandrews@cnopb.nf.ca ; landrews@smss.com ; rba@wob.nf.ca ; law@rbansteylaw.ca ; danthony@wrmm.nf.net ; ganthony@pattersonpalmer.ca ; Paul.Adams@justice.gc.ca ; radams@pa-law.ca
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:27 PM
Subject: Byron still needs a lawyer
No lawyer that ever receives this cannot say that they did not know why. Rest assured that I keep good records. Far better than any lawyer's conscience allows their memory to function. I can't believe how many time I have heard a lawyer claim to have no recollection. So leave it to me to remind them.
----- Original Message ----- From: David Amos
To: me friends
Cc: scotta@parl.gc.ca ; andrew.holland@nb.aibn.com
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:18 AM
Subject: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments
Hey Fellas
Yesterday in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland my friend, Bryon Prior gave his word to a court he knows to be very corrupt not to publish or cause to have published some of the following documents in order for Judge J. Dereck Green not to throw him in jail. I have no doubt he will keep his word. Byron should not be punished for my actions in the necessary defence of my freedom in another country. Byron also also informed the court that there is no way for him to put a muzzle on me.
I am sending this email out to men that I trust that have my Durable Power of Attorney. Whether the bastards like it or not you are me in word and deed as long as I keep breathing. All of you and the court know I must make these matters widely known in order not to be put back in jail. As you all know I gave my fair warning to all of publishing the words within this email before Byron was compelled to make his promise. The Rules of Newfoundland Supreme Court do not hold nor do they mean a Tinker's damn to me until I am named and properly invited to the circus. I would gladly stand as a defendant beside Byron after the Court publishes that fact so it becomes widely known the reasons for my coming home. However it is painfully obvious that the Newfoundland Supreme Court and Byron Prior must wait until my present pending criminal trial in the USA is over before I can become joined in a civil matter up home. Never forget my native land denied me any assistance in trying to stop my
being persecuted down here and sent straight to jail without due process of law. At least in compensation Canada is sending down Franky MaKenna to speak for me as I sue his law firm. Won't that be interesting?
The sexual abuse of Byron 's family long ago and wrongful actions within the Offshore Oil Industry in Newfoundland are far more important to everyone in Newfoundland and the rest of the Maritimes than my arguments about Securities Fraud, Tax Fraud and dead ex Fbi agents etc. with Yankees. That said, my must protect my freedom and my own family's interests first before I can help anyone else. I am certain my friends agree and I thank you for your help. Whereas no lawyer would come to Byron's assistance, I did as best I could do from afar to study the rules and write what I could for Byron to use in his defence and counterclaim to expose the truth and to use in my own defence in the USA. The serious mischief that is afoot is within the ex parte doings of the desperate law firm Patterson and Palmer and a very corrupt justice system to have Byron's document stricken after they had demanded them of him. John Crosbie's partner Stephen J. May speaking on behalf of his own law firm and
Billy Matthews a Member of Parliament was forced to agree with Byron's inablitity to put a muzzle on me. As anyone can see Stevey Boy May in his Affidavit has admitted to the knowledge of the reasons why I am very angry with his law firm's malice towards Byron and I.
The fact that May refused to file his Affidavit and the court refused to accept Byron's document requesting a postponement today should prove to all what Byron and I say is true. If anyone wishes to view exactly the same documents as were served upon Patterson Palmer and their cohorts up home or upon the Suffolk County District Attorney down here, all they have to do is ask. I will fill their email inbox with scans in a Tiff format. All the documents have been filed in the Public Record during the course of my criminal trial and there are many more to follow. Many Canadian Politicians have received exactly the same material from me and many have answered me. the most recent Respond came from Senator Joe Day yesterday after a five month delay. Any ethical lawyer could easily employ them in Byron's defence and to support his counterclaim. Judge Green has ordered him to find a lawyer to defend him "pro bono" by February 9th. Byron and I hold no illusions about the impossible
task. He has already emailed every lawyer within the Newfoundland Law Society asking for assistance and not one has responded before he stood in court yesterday. What is truly necessary is an ethical Royal Commission to investigate T. Alex Hickman and his friends in order for the truth to be revealed.
Since we all know that the Liberal Caucus is now in Fredeicton. I ask that my friends take many of their friends and go see the MP Andy Scott today and ask him why he did not respond to the material I delivered in hand to his office with Dave Mollins before I returned to the USA. The fact that I was falsely imprisoned makes me very angry with people such as Andy Scott and his cohorts who are employed to uphold the Public Trust. As a Member of Parliament he could have stopped this nonsense out of the gate. As the Minister of Indian Affairs he certianly should have contacted my friend the lawyer Barry Bachrach by now. I called his office today and told them to expect some sincere men to turn up with some simple but serious questions for him. I also forwarded him this email to share with the Liberal Caucus now in Fredericton.
Please find within this email three Motions and an Affidavit of mine in a Yankee Court and A court order in Newfoundland with the related Defence, Counterclaim and Request of byron Prior all of which I wrote. Most importantly is an Affidavit by the crooked lawyer Stevey Boy May.
Spotlight on N.B. culture for national Liberal caucus retreat
Maritime Kitchen Party welcomes Prime Minister, cabinet to Province
Fredericton (N.B.) – New Brunswickers are putting on a really big show for Prime Minister Paul Martin and his Liberal caucus when they come to Fredericton later this month.
The National Liberal Caucus Winter Retreat will bring the 135 Liberal Members of Parliament, including Mr. Martin’s entire cabinet, as well as the 61 Liberal Senators to the Capital City for three days of meetings. The retreat is co-hosted by Tobique-Mactaquac MP and Chairman of the National Liberal Caucus Andy Savoy and Hon. Andy Scott, Fredericton MP and Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs.
A Maritime Kitchen Party, Wednesday, January 26, will feature a full evening of New Brunswick-flavoured food, song and dance, from toe-tapping Acadian reels to high-stepping Scottish jigs.
The party headlines Fredericton’s own Downtown Blues Band, Bairdsville singer and songwriter Matt Andersen, the multi-talented La Famille Arsenault and fiddling sensation Dominque Dupuis of Dieppe with Moncton comedian Marshall Button, better known as Lucien, as emcee.
“This is a one-of-a-kind occasion to share our rich cultural heritage with the leaders of our nation,” Mr. Savoy said. “We are proud to be an example of cultural diversity and harmony to the rest of Canada.”
“We want to give our friends in Ottawa the kind of warm welcome that New Brunswickers are noted for,” Mr. Scott said. “This will be a showcase of our heritage and hospitality.”
The Maritime Kitchen Party is open to the public and will begin at 8 p.m. at the Delta Fredericton ballroom. Tickets are now on sale at all MP constituency offices in New Brunswick, as well as the New Brunswick Liberal Association office in Fredericton. For further information, contact the NBLA 1-800-442-4902;
Office of Andy Savoy at 1-866-542-4400 or the Office of Andy Scott, (506) 452-4110.
Office of the Hon. Andy Scott
Towne Centre Building
412 Queen Street
Suite 100
Fredericton, N.B.
E3B 1B6
Phone: (506) 452-4110
Fax: (506) 452-4076
This is the fella I just called.
Andrew Holland
Excutive Assistant
Phone: (506) 452-3516
Read this fellas and then go cause the Liberals that are having to much fun at our expense to weep and worry about their own malevolent interests. Ask them if they still wish to support the Diddlers T. Alex Hickman and their buddy Billy Matthews. At the very least tell everybody to call Andy Savoy and Andy Scott and ask them the same question Lois Skanes asked of Stevey Boy May. Who the Hell is David Amos and what the Hell is he talking about?
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT DORCHESTER, SS. DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF )
MASSACHUSETTS ) CRIMINAL ACTION
) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
v. )
)
DAVID R. AMOS )
)
MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THE OFFICE OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ON THE BASIS THAT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST
EXISTS THAT WOULD RENDER IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE DEFENDANT,
DAVID R. AMOS TO RECEIVE A FAIR TRIALNow comes the defendant, David R. Amos a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and demands that the Office of the Suffolk County District Attorney be disqualified from prosecuting this matter. This motion is based on the affidavit previously filed with the clerk of this court and recorded in the public record, the court herein and such matters as may be presented at the hearing on this motion and points to his civil rights under the following authority: the Declaration of the Rights of the Inhabitants of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts PART THE FIRST Article XII which states as follows: "No subject shall be held to answer for any crimes or offence, until the same is fully and plainly, substantially and formally, described to him; or be compelled to accuse, or furnish evidence against himself. And every subject shall have a right to produce all proofs, that may be favorable to him; to
meet the witnesses against him face to face, and to be fully heard in his defense by himself, or his counsel, at his election. And no subject shall be arrested, imprisoned, despoiled, or deprived of his property, immunities, or privileges, put out of the protection of the law, exiled, or deprived of his life, liberty, or estate, but by the judgment of his peers, or the law of the land." The defendant legally acting ithin his rights was imprisoned.
In support of this motion, the defendant states that on October 1st, 2004 he returned from safe haven in Canada to stand once more before Judge Coffey of this court as ordered. The judge witnessed the signing the aforesaid affidavit. This was done prior to any hearing of this matter in a court not recognized by the defendant as having the proper jurisdiction and venue for a trial of a Canadian citizen involving serious criminal charges with an unsigned complaint. The defendant was well aware that if he were to be convicted of the false charges he would be subject to a prison term and the revocation of his status as a permanent resident of the USA and that his family would suffer greatly. The plaintiff went to great lengths to inform the correct Canadian authorities of his persecution in the USA. Judge Coffey witnessed the defendant serve the District Attorney and also provide the clerk of this court an exact copy of the aforesaid affidavit before he properly disqualified himself from
hearing this matter as soon as he was informed that he lives the defendant’s neighborhood. This was done before the defendant was ever served a complaint that he would be compelled to answer. Attached to the aforesaid affidavit are two large exhibits containing one or more affidavits and many other legal documents etc. that prove the malicious actions of the District Attorney supporting a criminal conspiracy against the freedom, civil rights, interests and property of the defendant.
In further support of this motion the defendant states that beginning in July of 2004, the defendant had fully disclosed to the District Attorney the circumstances of this matter before the Clerk Magistrate Owens went forward and filed his malicious complaint.
The defendant had every right to expect the District Attorney to uphold the law and properly warn the Clerk Magistrate not to attempt to make an illegal compliant. Instead the District Attorney attempted to explain the illegal action while claiming not to be involved. In response the defendant received a letter from the District Attorney dated July 29th, 2004. In it the DA claimed that he as not yet involved but attempted to explain the impending illegal action of the Clerk Magistrate on August 13th, 2004. A true copy of the aforesaid letters to and from the District Attorney in July of 2004 are hereto attached for the court to review.
On September 3rd the District Attorney proved his malice and even demanded imprisonment or bail to make certain that the defendant answer an unsigned complaint that had yet to be served. Judge Coffey properly denied the DA’s request, ordered the DA to serve the defendant copies of all that was in the docket of the matter and ordered a hearing of the matter on October 1st in order establish the legality of the complaint and the proper jurisdiction and venue. The judge suggested that the defendant file the documents he had shown to the court byway of a proper means on October 1st and then he would hear if the District Attorney wanted to continue to prosecute the matter.
To date the defendant has not heard from or received on slip of paper from the District Attorney other than the documents comprising of this complaint ordered by Judge Coffey on Sept 1st. If there was in fact a signed complaint against the defendant dated August 13th, 2004, it should have been served upon him at that time not by Judge Hanlon after he was compelled to waive his right to counsel in order to receive swift justice. The defendant does have three separate copies of an unsigned complaint. One is of the court’s record, one is of the prosecutor’s copy and the last is the defendant’s copy. The defendant strongly believes that the signed copy of the complaint was created October 1st, 2004 after the District Attorney had asked for a recess and studied the defendant’s affidavit. That fact should have been blatantly obvious to the court and Judge Coffey because the District Attorney’s Office had asked to confer with the defendant before he filed the affidavit but afterwards they
did not wish to continue with their own request.
It became blatantly obvious to the defendant and his witnesses that the court and the DA were cohorts in the conspiracy against him as they watched the clerk of this court give the District Attorney their copy of the affidavit that that had been filed in the Public Record before Judge Hanlon had the matter called before her on October 1st. On that day Judge Hanlon did inquire about the last statement in the defendant’s affidavit and of his concerns with the well being of his friend Byron Prior in Newfoundland and of the defendant’s own concerns with Canada. The defendant told the judge as much as she was willing to hear before she sent the defendant to jail based on the false allegations of an ADA claiming that Judge Coffey was threatened. The allegations were absurd. If Judge Coffey had in fact felt threatened then he would have dealt with the defendant immediately. After the defendant was put in jail many Canadian authorities act quickly to cover up their own conspiracy against the
defendant and Bryon Prior. At the time of the writing of this document a law firm of a well-known Canadian politician, John Crosbie has made a statement of claim against Byron Prior on behalf of the Member of Parliament Bill Matthews while ignoring the very same material that was served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney and this court on October 1st. That matter will be addressed in Canada. However on October 19th as the defendant stood before Judge Hanlon, she clearly affirmed the fact that Judge Coffey had not been threatened but did nothing to chastise the ADA for her false allegations and denied that the original wiretap tapes served upon the District Attorney on Sept 3rd were any sort of evidence in this matter even though the Clerk Magistrate had made note of their existence on August 13th. Thus there is a need to sue the District Attorney and the court.
Dated January 11th, 2005 David R. Amos, Pro Se
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 698-6549
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, David R. Amos of Milton, MA hereby certify that on January 12th, 2005, I with two friends accompanying me as witnesses served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney, Daniel F. Conley a true original copy of the attached Motion to his office within Dorchester District Court at the following address 510 Washington St. Dorchester, MA
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
DORCHESTER, SS. DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF )
MASSACHUSETTS ) CRIMINAL ACTION
) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
v. )
)
DAVID R. AMOS )
)
MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE SIDNEY HANLON ON THE BASIS THAT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST EXISTS THAT WOULD RENDER IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE DEFENDANT, DAVID R. AMOS TO RECEIVE A FAIR TRIAL
Now comes the David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts herein named as the defendant and demands that Judge Sidney Hanlon be disqualified from hearing all further proceedings in the above stated criminal prosecution because of her personal interest in the outcome. In support of this motion, the defendant has attached a true copy of a letter received by Cynthia A. Robinson, the legal counsel of Boston Municipal Court on January 4th,.2005 and a true copy of the docket sheet of this matter. Also attached to the aforesaid letter is a copy of an email that was served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney and a Judge of Dorchester District Count on November 19th, 2004. Within the email are the irrefutable facts that support the defendant’s statements within an Affidavit and its attached exhibits filed in the Public Record of this court on October 1st, 2004 and ordered removed by Judge Hanlon on
Oct 19th after she admitted that the defendant did not threaten Judge Coffey. The defendant freely admits that this is a very important trial about Criminal Harassment. However he has always maintained the Criminal Harassment has been practiced by the court against him. The defendant maintains his declaration of innocence and only demands his right to a swift trial in front of a jury of his peers in the proper jurisdiction and venue.
. As of this date the defendant has not received a response from Ms. Robinson either in the spoken or written word to refute his allegations of criminal activity supported by many people employed to up hold the law and the public trust in their elected or politically appointed positions within the justice systems of Canada and the USA. Whereas this motion was the last day to file this motion according to law and ordered by this court in order for it to be heard on January 21st, 2005, the defendant must make it well known to the court that he is about to sue the court to regain lost assets and seek relief for personal injury. Whereas it was Judge Hanlon who willing supported with documents signed in her own hand the malicious actions of the Clerk Magistrate Mr. Owens and the false allegations of the District Attorney, the defendant demands that she be disqualified. The fact that Judge Hanlon went even further and maliciously declared that she believed the defendant had a prior history
of mental illness and did not believe his actions within the Canadian justice system and the Parliamentary process was very offensive to the defendant. Please view attachments bearing her signature.
Dated January 11th, 2005 David R. Amos, Pro Se
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 698-6549
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, David R. Amos of Milton, MA hereby certify that on January 12th, 2005, I with two friends accompanying me as witnesses served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney, Daniel F. Conley a true original copy of the attached Motion to his office within Dorchester District Court at the following address 510 Washington St. Dorchester, MA
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
DORCHESTER, SS. DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF )
MASSACHUSETTS ) CRIMINAL ACTION
) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
v. )
)
DAVID R. AMOS )
)
MOTION OF THE DEFENDANT, DAVID R. AMOS TO DEMAND THAT THE MATTER BE SENT TO US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN ORDER THAT HE MAY RECEIVE A FAIR TRIAL BY A JURY OF HIS PEERS IN THE PROPER JURISDICTION AND VENUE.
Now comes the defendant, David R. Amos a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and demands his right to a swift trial before a jury of his peers in order to defend his freedom in the proper jurisdiction and venue of the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The defendant has already spent time in a malicious Sheriff’s jail in a clear and irrefutable violation to his Eighth Amendment rights. He asserts his rights as follows and prays that the Dorchester District Court to make note that there are two other directly related motions filed along with this motion and that they should be heard first. The aforesaid motions demand that the entire office of the Suffolk County District Attorney and Judge Hanlon be disqualified because of their interest in the outcome of this matter. This motion is based the affidavit previously filed with the clerk of this court and recorded in the public record, the court herein and
such matters as may be presented at the hearing on this motion.
In support of this motion the defendant states that he is being prosecuted for criminal harassment byway of emails on behalf of the lawyer, Angela Troccoli whom he has been litigating against in the USA for years. One of the emails that she claims as harassment contain pictures of police surveillance tapes that contain recordings of the private conversations of several people that reside outside of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Boston Municipal Court does not have jurisdiction to even begin prosecution particularly in light of the fact that the Minister of Justice who is also the Attorney General of Canada received the email that the court finds so offensive before the lawyer Troccoli received her forwarded copy and made her false allegations. If the emails were in fact criminally offensive then David Lutz QC, a lawyer who litigates on behalf of the Attorney General of Canada in the Province of New Brunswick should have filed a complaint against the defendant while he was on
Canadian soil. The defendant was running against the candidate Mr. Lutz was supporting for the same seat in Canada’s Parliament. On July 29th, 2004, the very same day that the Suffolk County District Attorney was composing his malicious letter, the defendant was confronting David Lutz in front of many witnesses including the RCMP in Sussex Provincial Court in the Province of New Brunswick. David R, Amos who was yet to be charged with anything was demanding an answer for the many documents served upon David Lutz in his capacity as a prosecutor for the Queen in June of 2004. Mr. Lutz’s only answer was that he had given the material to law enforcement. It appeared to the defendant that a solicitor appointed to speak on behalf of the Queen was content in allowing a Clerk Magistrate of a Boston Municipal Court to attempt to prosecute the defendant in order to assist in the cover up his own wrongs. The defendant’s suspicions have since been affirmed many times over in many ways.
In further support of this motion the defendant states that he must call many witnesses to testify in his defense in federal court. Many of these people act under the federal code of law enforcement. If they had acted within the scope of their employment years ago then it would not have been necessary for the defendant to run for Parliament in Canada let alone stand trail as an innocent man being criminally prosecuted in order to protect the political interests of so many others. Indeed the defendant will joyfully argue a criminal matter in defense of his freedom in order to expose the rampant public corruption the people of the two countries that he is a person of know to exist.
In further support of this motion, the defendant states that on October 1st, 2004, Judge Coffey of this court witnessed the signing the aforesaid affidavit which has since been removed from the public record under Judge Hanlon’s orders. This was done prior to any hearing of this matter in a court not recognized by the defendant as having the proper jurisdiction and venue for a trail of a Canadian citizen involving serious criminal charges in an unsigned complaint. The defendant was well aware that if he were to be convicted of the false charges he would be subject to a prison term of up two and one half years and the revocation of his status as a permanent resident of the USA and that his family would suffer greatly. Attached to the aforesaid affidavit are two large exhibits containing one or more affidavits and many other legal documents etc. that prove the malicious actions of the District Attorney and this court supporting a criminal conspiracy against the freedom, civil rights,
interests and property of the defendant. The defendant will have the aforesaid affidavit and many other documents and wiretap tapes to support this motion with him in court on January 21st, 2005. The defendant would refuse to give this material to the Federal Bureau of Investigation or any other law enforcement authority because he now needs it as evidence to be used against them in a civil lawsuit. The material proves that he has been pleading for years fo law enforcement authorities to act within the scope of their employment. Perhaps the District Attorney Daniel Conley upon reading this motion should reconsider and ignore Judge Hanlon’s opinions of the wiretap tapes that he has in his possession then give tapes to the FBI as soon as possible. He has ten days to review all that the defendant has provided him appear as an ethical officer of the court. A true copy of the aforementioned affidavit is hereto attached for the court to review.
Dated January 11th, 2005 David R. Amos, Pro Se
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 698-6549
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, David R. Amos of Milton, MA hereby certify that on January 12th, 2005, I with two friends accompanying me as witnesses served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney, Daniel F. Conley a true original copy of the attached Motion to his office within Dorchester District Court at the following address 510 Washington St. Dorchester, MA
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
DORCHESTER, SS. DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF )
MASSACHUSETTS ) CRIMINAL ACTION
) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
v. )
DAVID R. AMOS )
)
AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID R. AMOS
Now comes, David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA and asserts his Constitutional Rights pursuant to Title 42 Sections 1981, 1982, 1985 and 1986 of the Federal Code and freely swears under the penalties of perjury that the following statements are true and to the best of his knowledge.
On September 3rd, 2004 I returned to the USA and stood before the Dorchester District Court in response to a summons served upon my home in Milton MA dated August 13th, 2004.
On September 3rd, 2004 I reported to the probation officer as ordered after he joked and made fun of me he directed me to serve upon the District Attorney the many original wiretap tapes that I had promised I would bring to court and ask if they wished to continue. The District Attorney Office wished to prosecute me so I returned to the probation office and the required documentation was filled out. I did not discuss the matter with anyone working for the Commonwealth on September 3rd or since that time other than register my indignation about the lack of diligence, professional behavior and malicious acts practiced against me in an effort to impeach my character.
On September 3rd, 2004, before any hearing of the matter began I protested the fact that the Clerk Buckley had claimed that I was pleading not guilty. I had made no plea whatsoever. I refused to waive any of my Rights and I demanded that the court prove its jurisdiction to hear the matter.
For over a period of almost three months I had tried to resolve the issues of this matter with the Clerk’s Office of this court, the Boston Police Dept., the Police Commissioner, the City’s Legal Dept. the Mayor’s office, the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office, The Governor’s Office, the US Ambassador to Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. CSIS and the Canadian Consulate in Boston. I was refused the right to know what the allegations against me were and no one would discuss my concerns about the possibility of foul play. I knew I had done nothing wrong and I had fully disclosed the circumstances to the Suffolk County District Attorney as Chief Justice Robert A. Mulligan had suggested. I had received an answer from the DA weeks before he was willing to prosecute me on false charges. I had no understanding of the matter. I had not been given information to work with and no one would speak to me. If the District Attorney Daniel F. Conley had acted ethically and
diligently the lawyer, Angel Troccoli and her cohorts within the law firm of Dane M. Shulman should have been the ones charged with criminal actions against me.
On September 3rd after the hearing and another hearing was marked for today October 1st, Judge Coffey ordered ADA attempting to prosecute me to give me a copy of the documents that I was entitled to view. In return I gave her my Canadian contact number so that we may confer about this matter. I then returned to Canada to defend my rights and freedom. The ADA never called. I was not surprised because upon viewing the material provided I discovered that there is in fact no complaint against me.
The complaint in this matter is not signed or witnessed by anyone. Apparently the DA did not expect me to make it to court on September 3rd and certainly did not wish to discuss it with Canadian authorities. I now consider the DA Conley to be just another corrupt politician just like Tom Finneran and further proof of why it was so necessary for me to go to Canada and run for Parliament in order to speak in a public forum of my knowledge of public corruption. I gave all the crooks to the last possible minute for one to act ethically and uphold the Public Trust. All I got in return was continued harassment with the little perk of Colonel Foley quitting his job before I left and Tom Finneran quitting his as soon as I got back. It appears that I must complain of the Queen and President Bush if no one in public service is willing to uphold the law and act within the scope of their employment.
For the record I must state the reason I was alarmed by this malicious action against me. The fact is it was the Trail Court of Massachusetts on April 1st, 2003 that had made false allegations against me to agents of the DHS claiming that I had threatened the life of George W. Bush. Now the same court was demanding that I return to the USA to stand in court and answer charges it knew to be false the morning after the President’s big Political Speech in New York. I had no doubt whatsoever that the DHS would pounce on me at the border and use a policy of rather than safe than sorry upon me and take me away for the benefit of many a low man in high places. The RCMP would do nothing to protect me and in fact attempted to run me out of Canada on Sept 2nd That was the very day of the Republican National Convention was much in the news about protests and presidential propaganda. In order to be of no possible threat to the President I was compelled to come to the USA after the President
left New York and drive all night in order to appear in court on the morning of the 3rd.
The most alarming fact of all is that everybody knows that I am bounty hunting for Whitey Bulger. The order to come to his old stomping grounds and amongst his friends by the same corrupt justice system that allowed him to practice his criminal behavior for so long and then allow him to escape justice is indeed a very malicious summons.
April 1st, 2003 was also the only day that I ever met with the lawyer, Angela Troccoli before Sept 3rd. I argued her before Judge Livingstone in Plymouth Probate Court. I have argued her again in Norfolk Probate Court on Sept. 21st, 2004. That court found it necessary for no stated reason to place six court guards around me. I am far more than a mere acquaintance to her but obviously a rather formidable litigant against her criminal actions. I did send her emails asking her to ask her clients to stop harassing me with attached photos of the proof. The emails were necessary because she would not return my phone calls and sent my correspondence to her partner Dane M. Shulman to Barry Bachrach claiming that I was his client. I am not and never was. Mr. Bachrach had informed Troccoli many times that he only represented my wife, Jean F. O’Meara because the court had Stricken my right to do so pursuant to M.G.L 201B.
Barry Bachrach has now withdrawn from all of my wife’s matters with my assent because of a conflict of interests over one of his partners and myself about a fraudulent Title V inspection. However he is an important witness to be called because he has complete knowledge of all my contact with Troccoli during the time frame that I have been accused.
Barry Bachrach also has several original wiretap tapes in his possession in case the ones given to the District Attorney have disappeared like so much of my other material has.
On April 1st, 2003 I became aware that Troccoli and the Massachusetts Trial Court had practiced fraud against me and had created a Notice of Appearance in my name with a false document in order to strike me and cover up their own wrongs.
On April 1st, 2003 I had also spoken to a Judge in Quincy District Court in my best effort to have the court place a restraining order against my brother in laws William, Robert and Brian O’Meara in my name because after I had tried to do so a few days before in my wife’s name under her Durable Power of Attorney the court laughed at me and denied it. Within a day of my first appearance in Quincy District Court William O’Meara called my wife at her work and implied that the homes would burn down and he was willing to pay the insurance premiums. Those same insurance premiums were continued to be paid by us and one policy was canceled over one month after the property in Plymouth was destroyed by Troccoli clients. The Plymouth Probate Court called a Trial quickly with no notification to the litigants after Sept 3rd and on September 9th it authorized a very fraudulent real estate sale about a property that had been illegally destroyed for five months.
The lawyer Troccoli and the Massachusetts Trial Court have been assisting the criminal actions of my brother in laws and many others in order to protect the interests of many lawyers and politicians from my actions in other courts.
My wife’s family have forged her signature on a Purchase and Sale Agreement, created fraudulent Title V inspection, broke into our home, assisted in the theft of her rightful inheritance, stolen personal property and food, made false allegations against me in other states, threatened to burn down the homes and harassed us on sometimes a daily basis with the knowledge and assistance of several Police Departments. It is time we sought relief.
Whereas two of my most recent documents have disappeared from the Public Record in two countries I have attached them to this affidavit for the court and the public to view. Exhibit A is a Motion to Dismiss Troccoli’s latest malicious action. It was filed on September 13th, 2004 and stricken from the Public Record by Judge Langlois on September 21st. Exhibit B is a copy of two letters with the same enclosures that were sent to the RCMP in Newfoundland byway of the Canada Post and one was sent to the Canadian Consulate by US Mail. Both mailings were tracked and not received. They are obviously now in the possession of some sort of secret authority. As the court views these documents it can easily see what I say is true and my material is of no concern for the public safety. They are filed in the public record for the benefit of all in my best effort to see that the Public Trust is upheld. I have also brought to court a case of documents requested by Utica Mutual Insurance Company
of New York to investigate the actions of their client Jan Whiting. However once they knew the truth they refused to accept or pay for what they had requested. If the court deems it necessary I shall file it into evidence to refute the false allegations made against me.
Since I have last appeared in this court a great deal has transpired that cannot be told of within this affidavit but it concerns the pursuit of justice for many people in two counties. Much has been done by many to stop my friends and I in revealing the truth of our concerns. Thus far we have been able to thwart our adverasies actions. The court should pray that it does not get our blood on its hands. The proof of some of what I state can be found in Exhibit B.
Signed before the court and
under the Pains and
Penalties of Perjury by
Dated October 1st , 2004 David R.Amos, Pro Se
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 698-6549
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEI,
David R. Amos hereby certify that on October 1st, 2004, I served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney Daniel F. Conley a true copy of this document with all its attachments.
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRAIL DIVISION
BETWEEN: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
AND: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
ORDER
Before the Honourable Chief Justice Green.
Filed January 21, 2005
UPON HEARING Stephen J. May, of Counsel for the Plaintiff, AND UPON READING the Application and Affidavit filed herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, until further order of the court, Byron Prior is prohibited from publishing, causing to have published, distributing or causing to have distributed the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim pending the determination of the Applicant’s Application to strike the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim in its entirety, and that the Court’s file in this proceeding is not to be made available for review by anyone other than the parties or their legal counsel pending the determination of the Applicant’s Application to strike the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim in its entirety, and that the requirements relating to the obligations of the Defendants to the Counterclaim to file Defences are be waived pending the determination of the Applicant’s Application to strike the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim in its entirety. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
THAT the content of the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim shall not be published or broadcast in any manner whatsoever until further order of the court.
AND IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Application to strike the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim is scheduled to be heard on January 26, 2005.
AND IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that costs of this Application be in the cause.
DATED at St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador this 21st day of January, 2005.
Signed by J. Derek Green, Chief Justice
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRAIL DIVISION
BETWEEN
WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
and:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT
DEFENCE
The Defendant, Byron Prior, admits to the statements of the plaintiff, William Matthews in the paragraphs numbered one (1), two (2) and seven (7) of his claim.
Defendant, Byron David Prior (Prior) and his friend David Raymond Amos (Amos) With respect to this claim for damages by a Member of Parliament, have no understanding how the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador can legally proceed with this civil matter until the Attorney General Thomas Marshall (Marshall) and the Premier Danny Williams (Williams) answer the Defendant’s and Amos’ criminal allegations proven to them in September of 2004. The Defendant has the right to know the results of any of the Attorney General’s investigations of his concerns about Public Corruption before any proceedings in this matter. Furthermore Amos’ as a candidate for a seat in Parliament in the last election certainly deserves an answer from the Arar Commission. That Commission has ignored him and allowed him to be illegally imprisoned in the United States of America (USA) long after it was made irrefutably aware of his supporting evidence to Mr. Arar’s matters. Every Member of the 37th and the
38th Parliament has been made well aware of the facts of this matter by the Defendant and Amos for over one year byway of email if not hard copy in the mail or personal service. The Defendant and Amos are just members of the Public but they demand that those in Public Service uphold the Public Trust and expose Public Corruption.
The Defendant further states that hard copy of much evidence of many crimes practiced against the Defendant and Amos were given to Williams by the Defendant on September 9th, 2004 and to Marshall by the Lieutenant Governor Edward Moxon Roberts (Roberts) on September 10th. On September 11th, the Governor General of Canada Adrienne Clarkson (Clarkson) affirmed to Amos that he had taken the appropriate steps and properly contacted all authorities having jurisdiction over his and the Defendant’s concerns about criminal actions. In support thereof Defendant states the Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan (McLellan) of the 37th Parliament had directed Amos to do so in December of 2003 and the Defendant was directed to do so by the Minister of Justice Irwin Cotler of the 38th Parliament in July of 2004. Both aforesaid persons are members of the same Liberal caucus as the Plaintiff now seated on a backbench in Parliament.
The Defendant further states that former law firm of Williams had successfully defended him in a criminal trial against other false allegations and charges of criminal acts in 1998. At that time law firm Williams was completely informed by the Defendant of the sexual abuse of his family. The Defendant has no doubt Williams used that knowledge to become the powerful person of his political party he is today rather than assisting his client, the Defendant in attempting to up hold the law and see that criminals with other politically powerful positions be properly prosecuted.
The Defendant further states that whereas this claim of much embarrassment of the Plaintiff as a Member of Parliament, he feels no pity towards a man that had practiced sexual abuse against his family and was never punished.
The Defendant clearly states in his web site (Site) and now in this document signed in his own hand that every word he has published is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help him his God.
The Defendant further states that whereas this claim by the Plaintiff against him comes about byway the words he legally published in his web site ("Site") published in the USA under the First Amendment its Constitutional pursuant to the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press, the onus is upon the Plaintiff to prove without any reasonable doubt that the Defendant’s allegations are false. The defendant is well prepared to argue that every word he has ever said or written about the Plaintiff is true and he is willing to call many witnesses to support the true facts of this matter.
The Defendant further states as he does within his Site that the quickest way for the Plaintiff to prove one of the allegations false without burdening the court would be a few blood tests to prove he is not the father of the person named Aaron whom he chooses to mention within paragraph three (3) his own statement of claim. That is a very small task for a Member of Parliament to do in order to help protect his reputation and save himself from a lot of further embarrassment.
The Defendant further states that he does in fact welcome this claim against him. Plaintiff has finally given the Defendant an opportunity to see justice served upon the plaintiff and his cohorts after over forty years of seeking it for over fifty years of much abuse. Hopefully this will be done byway of this answer and a very justifiable counterclaim that should not be easily dismissed. It is quite honestly the only way a man on welfare can make a legitimate complaint against some of wealthiest and most corrupt persons in Canada.
The Defendant further states whereas the Plaintiff complains that the published words of the Defendant can be found on the Internet, other web sites and within many emails etc, the Plaintiff should complain all the other persons that support the Defendant allegations as well. Otherwise this malicious claim is fruitless to stop the justifiable embarrassment of the Plaintiff and his lawyers.
The Defendant further states if the claim against a layman on welfare were to be won by the legal trickery of a malevolent wealthy law firm it would merely support all what the Defendant has published is true. If the Plaintiff truly wishes to protect his reputation in a legal fashion he must prove with witnesses and evidence in front of a jury that all the allegations of the Defendant are false. The Plaintiff merely claiming falsehoods does not prove the allegations untrue.
The Defendant further states that the Plaintiff makes mention of many emails in his statement of claim paragraphs numbered five (5) and six (6) containing the Defendant’s published work. The Defendant states that one of the persons to send thousands of emails in support of the Defendant and his allegations is his friend Amos. The defendant points out the fact that Amos had sent emails containing the entire text of the Defendant’s Site to every Member of the 37th Parliament before he came to Canada to run for a Seat in the June Election of the 38th Parliament. One of the persons to respond to Amos’ emails was an assistant of McLellan as the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness on March 16th 2004. That person sent back the entire text of the Site the Plaintiff finds so offensive. The Plaintiff should name McLellan as a defendant.
The Defendant further states that Amos would welcome the opportunity to be joined into this matter as a defendant and argue the lawyers he has already crossed paths with his own matters and the Defendant’s during the time he was in Canada running for a seat in Parliament. If any Member of Parliament including the Plaintiff had acted ethically one year ago. Amos would not have been imprisoned to sleep on a cement slab in the Physc Ward of a Downtown Boston Jail while being illegally held against his will under the false charges of "other" until the Yankees could think of something to charge him with. Furthermore the statement of claim of the Plaintiff would not exist and the Defendant would not be still suffering today from more abuse by the Judicial System.
The Defendant further states that this answer and many other documents etc. involving the governments of Canada and several Provinces including Newfoundland will be used in defence of Amos’ freedom during the course of his pending Criminal Trial before a jury of his peers in the USA. However this answer in this civil matter is no less important for the Defendant because the justice system of his own province has failed to uphold the law with regards to the crimes practiced against him for over forty years.
The Defendant states in defence of Plaintiff’s claim in paragraph numbered three (3) that the lawyer Stephen J. May ("May") of the law firm of Patterson Palmer acting for the Plaintiff, the benefit of his own law firm and many others maliciously edited many words from the very first statement in the Defendant’s Site This is a very fraudulent attempt by a lawyer to exclude the names of many other parties who should be plaintiffs as well if in fact the Plaintiff’s claims were valid. For the sake of brevity demanded by the rules of this court the defendant offers only the first statement in the Site because that is where his edited words were gleaned from in the plaintiff’s third statement of his claim. The first words of the Site in their entirety are as follows:
Canadian Corruption Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.
RCMP Incompetence & Cover up. Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada
How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and convict itself? If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL SYSTEMS CONTROL, at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates your younger sister Susan, at 12 years old, what would you do? Liberal MP Bill Matthews & his friends, raped the same child repeatedly, for more than 3 Yrs. At 14 ,she had a second baby, Aaron, she said she was 80% sure he is Matthews son. A third baby, Harriett, at 18 & 3 miscarriages also, by this time, what abuse of a child. Matthews & his lawyer, Ed Roberts, pressured me to sign papers, saying Matthews had nothing to do with my family & I imagined it all. NOT SO. I have copies of their letters. 2 weeks after I signed these papers, MR ED, THE HORSE'S ASS, ROBERTS was made LT. Governor of NFLD. & LAB. by MR JEAN, THE JACK ASS, CHRETIEN, soon to be known as Canada's
most CORRUPT Prime Minister After the Justice Minister, Rapes & Impregnates a 12 Yr. old child, in a small town & everyone knows, who will stop or charge anyone else, for Raping & abusing that same child?? PAUL MARTIN, IS THIS FEDERAL ENOUGH FOR YOU OR MUST I NAME MORE LAWYERS & JUDGES?? DO SOMETHING NOW or I will be forced to name many more, RESPECTABLE NEWFOUNDLANDERS, many names you won't like to read yourself. I am willing to take any tests and answer all questions regarding my entire life. All they have to do is take one blood test. It's time for them to stop manipulating our legal system and face the truth, which I have be telling anyone else who would listen, all of my life.I didn't just awake one morning and decide to accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no education, no family, no hometown, no self- esteem or self-respect and no past, present or future as a contributing person. By the time I was 14 years old I
was responsible for 9 younger children, all of us abused and molested while our hometown either joined in, bothered us about our situation, or looked the other way and said we were all trouble………
The Defendant altered the above statement published within the Site in October of 2004 upon taking the advice of Amos after he had been released for jail on bail. Amos advised the Defendant take back his promise to the Plaintiff’s lawyer Roberts years ago and tell all that he knew to be true about all things as soon as possible for their own protection and the benefit of all Canadians.
The Defendant further states that one of the aforesaid named parties in his published Site Roberts is a former partner of the law firm Patterson Palmer. In 2002 acting on behalf of the Plaintiff with the assistance of the law firm of Patterson Palmer. Roberts, the well-known and powerful political lawyer had maliciously threatened to sue the unemployed Defendant and his family if his client’s name was ever mentioned in the Defendant’s Site as it existed at that time.
The Defendant further states that it was not the Defendant’s fault that the Plaintiff’s guilty conscience about his own sexual abuse of children had compelled him to hire lawyers to cover up his crimes. However the defendant buckled under Roberts’ pressure and signed a document promising never to mention the Plaintiff within the Site;
The Defendant further states that at that time in of his encounter with Roberts in 2002 and until October of 2004 the Defendant was seeking justice for the sexual abuse of his family by T. Alex Hickman (Hickman), the former Minister of Justice and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. That fact was plainly stated for the world to view from the very beginning of the Defendant’s first published web site. Not once over the years did Hickman openly refute the Plaintiff allegations but he did indeed send many of his cohorts employed within law enforcement and others to harass the Defendant.
The Defendant further states that within mere months of the Defendant’s signature on the documents demanded by Roberts he was appointed the 11th Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland and Labrador. The defendant has no doubt whatsoever it was a political reward to Roberts for protecting the false integrity of a Member of Parliament with a very guilty conscience within Jean Chr*tien’s scandalous government. The fact that May employs the phrase "inter alia" which means "among other things" does not indeed negate the fact that he is a deliberate conspirator in a scheme to cover up Public Corruption assisted and practiced by members of his own law firm of Patterson and Palmer.. The Defendant demands to argue all of his published words not just the words a malicious lawyer has chosen to take out of context to suit his own ends. Justice would not be served again.
The Defendant further states that the following words found within his published Site were also edited by May within the Plaintiff’s fourth (4) paragraph of his claim for the same aforesaid reasons stated in paragraph number two (2) of this defence. The complete context of the Defendant’s words are as follows:
To Whom It May Concern:
July 24, 2001
My name is Byron Prior. I'm the oldest living of these 12 children. I not only had to livethrough my abuse but, watch as the rest of my sisters and brother were abused and raped. Three of my sisters raped, 1 by a grandfather at the age of 4, a second raped by T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, at age 12 & Bill Matthews & friends from 13 on. A third sister raped by a young man in our home town. The legal system are onlyconcerned with keeping all this under cover and protect themselves. Please people, if you have a heart, walk one day in my shoes and tell me you would just forget because these bureaucrats say so. I have copies of my full statement on all the details of what happened, which I gave the R.C.M.P. on March 9, 1998, 52.5 hours at their office. I will send it to anyone who will send me an E-mail address. I will never forget the abuse, shame, and persecution to this day, from the animals who did this to my family.
Sincerely,
Byron Prior
The Plaintiff should have joined as plaintiffs T. Alex Hickman, Edward M. Roberts, Jean Chretien and Paul Martin the persons first mentioned in the Site and numerous others including many members of the RCMP and the justice system named throughout the remainder of the Site pursuant to Rule 7.02 (2) which states as follows: Subject to the provisions of any statute and unless the Court otherwise orders, a plaintiff, who claims any relief that any other person is entitled to jointly with the plaintiff, shall join all persons so entitled as parties to the proceeding, and any of them who do not consent to be joined as a plaintiff shall be made a defendant. The fact that the lawyer May carefully edited the defendant’s published work in the plaintiff’s statement of claim does not negate the fact that many parties are named within the Defendant’s Site.
The Defendant further states in answer to the Plaintiff’s statement of claim paragraph six (6) that denies his allegations of the criminal actions made on his published Site against the Plaintiff and many others are false. The defendant clearly states that all of his allegations made against all parties mentioned within the Site are absolutely true and he has sworn to the truth of some of the stated allegations the Courts of Newfoundland in the past. The text of one of his statements to the RCMP can be found on the published Site. The Plaintiff desires the Freedom of Speech and the Freedom of the Press in another country to be ignored in order to save himself from embarrassment from his own wrongful acts for which he has never been prosecuted and punished because of his association with T. Alex Hickman, the former Minister of Justice an Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador.
The Defendant clearly states that the Plaintiff, Bill Matthews and his cohorts living in Grand Bank many years ago used against the Minister of Justice at the time, their knowledge of the sexual abuse of the minor children of the Prior family by T. Alex Hickman’s in order not to be prosecuted for their own many crimes including their own sexual abuse of the same family. The Plaintiff has continued to prosper ever since that time because of crime not integrity. The Defendant will not take back one word of his truthful publications in the USA. The defendant prays to the court for his right to a jury trial in his own native land in accordance with all the rules of the Supreme Court in order to call many witnesses in support of his defence to insure that the truth about many criminal acts become widely known in order that all the perpetrators including the Plaintiff, William Matthews and the Former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, T.Alex Hickman may be
finally prosecuted for the sexual abuse of his family and himself. The Defendant prays that the crimes against his family will never be forgotten, never repeated upon anyone and never covered up by any Judicial System ever again.
In closing the Defendant, Byron Prior sincerely believes that the conspiracy by so many highly placed public officials over the past forty years to cover-up the crimes of others warrants an investigation by a Royal Commission immediately. .
DATED at Conception Bay South Newfoundland and Labrador this 21st day of January, 2005.
Byron Prior
Reader’s Crescent,
Conception Bay, NL A1W 5B4
The Defendant
TO: Stephen J. May
PATTERSON PALMER
Suite 1000, Scotia Centre
235 Water Street
P.O. Box 610
St. John’s, NL. A1C 5L3
Solicitors for the plaintiff
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRAIL DIVISION
BETWEEN WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
and
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN BYRON PRIOR PLAINTIFF
and
WILLIAM MATTHEWS
T. ALEX HICKMAN
THOMAS MARSHALL
DANNY WILLIAMS
EDWARD M. ROBERTS
JOHN CROSBIE
PATTERSON PALMER DEFENDANTS
COUNTERCLAIM
The Plaintiff, Byron Prior was born and raised Grand Bank Newfoundland. He is an out of work former employee of the offshore oil exploration industry who is now on social assistance. He has been unable to find employment in the area of his expertise because his outspokenness in the 1980’s about oil industry matters that caused Crosbie Offshore Services to be investigated for its wrongful acts. The aforesaid company was then controlled by Andrew Crosbie, brother to John Crosbie a former Minister of Justice of Canada
The Defendant, John Crosbie, is now a partner in the law firm of Patterson Palmer. He was served much evidence of many crimes including the crimes practiced against the Plaintiff byway of his partner, Gregory Byrne a former Minister of Justice of New Brunswick in Fredericton N.B. on August 24th, 2004. This was done by personal service by David Raymond Amos (Amos) a friend of the Plaintiff.
The Defendant, Edward M. Roberts was once a member the law firm of Patterson Palmer who acted against the Plaintiff years ago on behalf of the Defendant William Matthews. He knew the truth of the plaintiffs allegations and did nothing to up hold the law in the pursuit of his own gain. On September 8th, 2004, the Plaintiff made personal service upon Edward Roberts as the Leutenant Governor of Newfoundland Hard irrefutable evidence proving the crimes that concern his friend David Amos on the same day that Amos was having a lawyer file the same documents attached to his affidavit in defence of a friend unjustly charged with criminal behavior in a New Brunswick Provincial Court in Sussex NB. Roberts continued to stay the course of his deceit and merely passed the evidence on the Defendant, Thomas Marshall the Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador who has done nothing whatsoever to uphold the law. Marshall has refused to answer or return one phone call or email in order answer
or ask one question about the allegations of crime by the plaintiff and his friend Amos.
The Plaintiff further states the Defendant, William Matthews was born and raised Grand Bank Newfoundland. on July 22, 1947. He attended Memorial University and in 1969 he earned a B.P.E., B.Ed. He was first elected to the Newfoundland and Labrador Legislature in 1982 as the MHA for the Grand Bank District. He was re-elected in 1985 and was appointed Minister of Culture, Recreation and Youth. In 1988, Mr. Matthews was appointed Minister of Career Development & Advanced Studies. In 1989, Mr. Matthews was re-elected to the Newfoundland and Labrador Legislature and was appointed Finance Critic. From 1990 to 1995, he served as Fisheries Critic, and in 1991 was appointed as Opposition House Leader. In 1993, Mr. Matthews was again elected to the Legislature and was re-appointed House Leader and Fisheries Critic. On June 2, 1997, he was elected as the Member of Parliament for Burin-St.George’s. the Defendant did serve as Vice-Chair of the Standing Committees on Fisheries & Oceans. On Sept
1st, 2000, he was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs. The defendant was re-elected November 27, 2000 as the Member of Parliament for Burin-St. George’s and re-appointed September 1, 2001 as the Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs. The Defendant was reelected on June 28th, 2005 but is now a backbencher in the Liberal caucus of 38th Parliament of Canada still representing the constituency of Random-Burin-St. George’s having apparently fallen out of favor with Paul Martin’s minority government.
The Plaintiff further states he has no doubt that his actions are part of the reason for the Defendant’s loss of Stature within the Liberal Caucus and the cause of his stated embarrassment in paragraph number six (6) of his statement of claim.
The Plaintiff further states the Defendant, T. Alex Hickman was born and raised Grand Bank Newfoundland. The Plaintiff whose mother was a whore with Hickman as a client has known him since childhood. The Plaintiff witnessed the fact that Hickman sexual abused his younger sibling at 12 years old on the night of his first political win in 1966. Hickman and his associate John Crosbie rose to positions of great power and wealth beginning under the corrupt leadership of Joey Smallwood before turning coat on the Liberal party and climbing even higher on the political totem pole of Public Corruption. Hickman finally retired as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and was later awarded the Order of Canada with the courthouse in Grand Bank now bearing his wicked name.
The Plaintiff has never made any secret of the fact that he hated and despised the Defendants Matthews and Hickman ever since he was a child chucking rocks in the street at Matthews’ big green fifties Chrysler as he sped away to sexually abuse another one of the Plaintiff’s underage siblings. Both the Plaintiff and Matthews knew that that he would never be punished because of what everybody in Grand Bank never of the sexual misdeeds of Hickman. The Plaintiff is grateful for the invention of the World Wide Web in his lifetime in order that he may tell all who wish to read of it what he knows to be true in Newfoundland. Now the Plaintiff can hurl simple truths far and wide at the defendants done the Internet highway. He will not stop telling the world the truth because the defendant, William Matthews feels embarrassed and justifiably hated and despised by many others. The Plaintiff is proud of his work legally published in another country so that the crooks in his home Province of
Newfoundland can no longer keep their dirty secrets to themselves.
Plaintiff was denied legal aid in this matter by the government lawyer, John Duggan for no stated reason that the Plaintiff can find within the Legal Aid Act. However the Plaintiff is well aware that he will never receive any assistance from law enforcement or the judicial system because of the cover up the sexual abuse of his family when he was a child by T. Alex Hickman, the former Minister of Justice and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador.
The Plaintiff further states that when his friend Amos heard that the Province was unwilling to offer legal to him or even look at the supporting evidence from Amos they knew for certain all government employees in Newfoundland were acting against the Plaintiff under orders from the Premier Danny Williams. Amos did the best he could to help compose the Plaintiff’s answer and countercomplaint within the time allowed by the rules of this court.
The Plaintiff further states that Amos also went one step further to make certain their suspicion of the malice of Danny Williams was true. On January 20th, 2005, Amos called Danny Williams’ office personally and asked why he had not responded to the identical letter and materials Roberts, Crosbie and the Newfoundland Law Society had received. The Plaintiff had served it upon his office on September 9th and the receipt is signed by one of his assistants. The aforesaid material also included a copy of a police surveillance tape numbered 139 recorded in the USA of the mob. It letter certainly warranted a valid answer for someone in law enforcement. However later in the day another one of Danny Williams’ assistants called Amos back and denied any knowledge of anything. That man’s words affirmed what the plaintiff and his friend already knew and that is almost everyone employed within the justice system is willing to be a liar and support Public Corruption for their own personal gain.
People employed in the Public Service of law enforcement only act ethically and do their job if it politically correct to do so in order to keep their job. It truly is just that simple and everybody knows it. The plaintiff and his friend merely went to great lengths to prove it after the Justice Systems of two countries had practiced many crimes against each of them.
The true facts of this matter are stated as best the Plaintiff could in his answer to William Matthews now a defendant in this Counterclaim. For the sake of brevity for the court, the benefit of the Plaintiff and the Public Trust, the Plaintiff, Byron prays the court to review his answer filed at the same time as this counterclaim in a timely fashion as per the rules of this court.
The Plaintiff is now prepared to reveal all that he knows to be true about wrongful actions within the offshore oil exploration industry and to be a supporting witness to the allegations of much Public Corruption within Canada and the United States of America (USA) recently exposed by Amos. The Plaintiff truly believes that is the reason he was served the malicious claim against him by William Matthews at this time and compelled to answer it on by January 21st, 2005 is because of the actions of actions of Amos in the USA and his court ordered appearance in Dorchester District Court in Boston Massachusetts on the very same day. All of the above named defendants are involved in a cross border conspiracy to cover-up many crimes.
The Plaintiff further states that he and his friend are well aware that their knowledge and evidence of many crimes are a very serious and legitimate threat to the false integrity of many persons employed to protect the Public Interests of the people around the world. They have no doubt whatsoever that their lives are in great danger. History has proven many decent men acting as they have died for much less. However history has also proven that if good men do nothing evil will prevail. The Plaintiff and his friend have no choice but to proceed in their efforts to expose Public Corruption because it is not in their nature to quit. They also recognize the fact that as fathers they owe to their children what their forefathers fought so hard in so many wars to secure for them, Freedom within a Just Democracy.
The Plaintiff further states that the sincere actions of he and his friend to make what they know of many crimes become common knowledge has the entire corrupt Justice Systems of Canada and the USA greatly concerned. If the two friends do prevail in revealing the truth to all it will be to the detriment of many malevolent Global Corporations, Bankers, Politicians, lawyers and the most importantly the Catholic Church. There has been much ado in recent times about the affiliations within such societies as Skull and Bones and the involvement Presidents and Senators who attempt to appear to be on the opposite side of the political fence. Politicians come and every four years or so. However it is the puppet master that pulls the strings who always remains behind the scene that is the one who is truly obscene. The Plaintiff, Byron David Prior and his friend David Raymond Amos want the world to know they truly believe their most evil foe is none other than Count Peter-Hans
Kolvenbach the Superior General of the Jesuits.
15. The Plaintiff therefore claims:
a. general damages to be assessed;
b. aggravated, exemplary and/or punitive damages;
c. pre-judgment and post-judgment interest pursuant to the provisions of
the Judgment Interest Act, R.S.N. 1990, c. J-2;
d. cost on a solicitor if one is found and own client basis;
e. such further relief deems to be equitable and just in the circumstances.
DATED at Conception Bay South Newfoundland and Labrador this 21st day of January, 2005.
Byron Prior
Reader’s Crescent,
Conception Bay, NL A1W 5B4
The Plaintiff
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRIAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
AND: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFFBY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT
RE: An Amended Interlocutory Application of the Plaintiff to maintain an Order of the Court restricting publication; to strike portions of the Statement of Defence pursuant to Rule 14.24; and strike the Counterclaim in it’s entirety pursuant to Rules 11.02 and 14.24 and ss. 93 and 94 of the Judicature Act, RSN 1990, c. J-4 as amended.
(Inter Partes)
The Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim in this proceeding requests a postponement before attempting to argue the above stated Application served upon him on January 25, 2005. In support thereof he states as follows:
The Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim is a resident of Conception Bay South who is a layman on welfare with a Grade Eleven GED who has yet to secure legal assistance in his defence and counterclaim in this matter and is ordered by the court to argue a very long and very complicated memorandum of law within one day of being served.
The Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim and Applicant is a resident of Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador, and a Member of the 38th Parliament of Canada who is represented in this action by the wealthy and influential law firm of Patterson Palmer, which is also the Seventh Defendant by Counterclaim.
The Defendant by Counterclaim, Patterson and Palmer had acted hastily and maliciously in an "ex parte" fashion in order to protect its own interests in this matter and later was compelled to amend the first Interlocutory Application it had composed in order to correct errors and cover up the justifiable existence of the other Defendant by Counterclaim.
The past managing partner of the Seventh Defendant by counterclaim, Stephen J. May (May) had caused the above stated documents to be served upon the Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim in an admitted untimely fashion. May promised not to oppose this request for postponement within a cover letter signed in his own hand one day before the scheduled hearing, The text of May’s letter states as follows:
Please find enclosed our further materials that now seek to strike only portions of your Statement of Defence but still seeks to strike the entire Counterclaim. Our Application also now seeks to refer this proceeding to case management in order to address the service and scheduling of any future Applications that may be brought in advance of a Trial. As I advised previously, the Application is scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Court at the Court House off Duckworth Street on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 at 10:00 a.m. The enclosed Affidavit has not been filed with the Court but I will seek leave to do so on Wednesday. As weather prevented these documents from being served yesterday, we will not oppose a request for a postponement to allow you further time to prepare your position.
Signed by S, J. May
May declares to have served upon the Defendant/Plaintiff by counterclaim his own sworn Affidavit in which he has admitted to the prior contact between himself, his law firm and other named Defendants by the counterclaim with the Defendant/Plaintiff by counterclaim and David R. Amos a willing Joiner in this matter pursuant to Rule 7 02.
Whereas it appears that May does not wish to file his Affidavit in this matter until the counterclaim has been stricken from the Public Record, the Defendant/Plaintiff by counterclaim prays that the court allows May to file his documents immediately and that his Affidavit and related Exhibits be studied closely by the court before considering the Defendant’s latest untimely Application.
DATED at Conception Bay South Newfoundland and Labrador this 25st day of January, 2005.
Byron Prior
Reader’s Hill Crescent,
Conception Bay South, NL A1W 5B4
The Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim
TO: Stephen J. May
PATTERSON PALMER
Suite 1000, Scotia Centre
235 Water Street
P.O. Box 610
St. John’s, NL. A1C 5L3
Seventh Defendant by Counterclaim and
Solicitors for the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRIAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
AND: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFFBY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENT Court File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010Date of Filing of Document:25 January 2005Name of Filing Party or Person:Stephen J. MayApplication to which Document being filed relates:Amended Application of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim to maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it’s entirety, and to refer this proceeding to case management.Statement of purpose in filing:To maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in its entirety and refer this proceeding to case management.
A F F I D A V I T
I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John’s, in the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say as follows:
THAT I am a Partner in the St. John’s office of PATTERSON PALMER solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for Random-Burin-St. George’s in the Parliament of Canada.
THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a publication called "My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town with a Secret". In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr. Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior’s sister.
THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr. Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "1" to my Affidavit.
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts’ letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached as Exhibit "2".
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit "3" to my Affidavit. Following Mr. Roberts’ receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our firm closed our file.
THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author of the material on the site.
THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews’ intentions to commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "4" to this Affidavit.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004 voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend of Mr. Prior.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr. Amos.
THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews’ claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews’ solicitor. I attach as Exhibit "7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach as Exhibit "8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr. Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts’ letter also covered his reply to Mr. Amos.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on Sunday, 23 January 2005.
THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike Mr. Prior’s counterclaim.
SWORN to before me at
St. John’s, Province of Newfoundland and Labrador this 24th day of January, 2005.
Signed by Della Hart STEPHEN J. MAY Signature
STAMP
DELLA HART
A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
My commission expires on December 31, 2009.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
***********************************
This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential,
for the sole use of the intended recipient and may be
privileged. Any unauthorized distribution, copying or
disclosure is prohibited. Neither communication over
the Internet nor disclosure to anyone other than the
intended recipient constitutes waiver of privilege.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
us and delete it from your computer system and records.
Internet communications are subject to data corruption
and other errors. Unless we expressly agree, our
messages will not be encrypted or otherwise protected.
By submitting any individual's personal information to us,
you agree to our collection, use and disclosure of such
personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.
Our policy, along with other information about
Stewart McKelvey Stirling Scales, can be found at www.smss.com .
-----------------------------------
Ce courriel (ainsi que toute pièce ci-jointe) est
confidentiel et destiné exclusivement au(x) destinataire(s)
mentionné(s) et peut contenir de l'information privilégiée.
Toute distribution, reproduction ou divulgation non
autorisée est strictement interdite. Le fait de communiquer
le contenu de ce courriel en utilisant l' Internet et/ou
de le divulguer à toute personne autre que le(s)
destinataire(s) mentionné(s) ne constitue pas une
renonciation au privilège ou à la confidentialité. Si vous
avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez nous en aviser
et le supprimer de votre système informatique et de vos
dossiers. Les communications par Internet sont exposées
à l' altération des données et à d'autres erreurs. Sauf
avec notre consentement explicite, nos messages ne
seront pas encryptés ni protégés d'une quelconque façon.
En nous soumettant tout renseignement personnel concernant
une personne, vous nous permettez de recueillir, d' utiliser
et de divulguer lesdits renseignements, conformément à
notre politique de confidentialité. Vous trouverez cette
politique, de même que d' autres renseignements portant sur
Stewart McKelvey Stirling Scales, à l' adresse www.smss.com .
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 09:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Attn Kent Morris and Ernie Reid does any Newfy lawyer wish to call me a liar BEFORE we meet in Court?
To: kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, mikemurphymla@hotmail.com, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca, michael.malley@gnb.ca, leroy.armstrong@gnb.ca, brad.green@gnb.ca, frank.branch@gnb.ca, fdykeman@mta.ca, Elvy.ROBICHAUD@gnb.ca, scotta@parl.gc.ca, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
CC: Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca, Brison.S@parl.gc.ca, davidorchard@sasktel.net, rosent@math.toronto.edu, Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca, McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Valeri.T@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca
Hey Ken Dryden
Too bad you did not call me back while you were in Newfoundland and Nova Scotia EH? Well at least you can say hey to Byron Prior for me. He is the Newfy standing in front of the old house on the hill in Upper Canada whom you and your friends have been ignoring all year. I know what I sent you in emails and I have a record of my calls to your office which were witnessed as well. Why not do the right thing Ken for the benefit of all Canadains that you claim to love?
I know I have been forced to put you over a barrell so to speak. Hell you ignored my concerns for two god damned years. Please prove to me the lawyer within you understands the meaning of the words honourable and integrity. There is still time for you to pull off a win in the liberal leadership race your god knows your party needs a leader with ethics. i have already proven that Bob Rae and his old college buddy Ignatieff are not the dudes to act in such a fashion. All you have to do Ken, is mention my name on the record in Parlaiment before you receive hard copy of what the crooks Andy Scott, Dion, Bob Rae and Ignatieff got. Just ask the aptly named Newfy lawyer Rob Moore who the hell David Raymond Amos is and let the cards fall where they may. I will handle the argument against all the lawyers under Vic Teows' direction. You deal with the politicians. What say you Mr. Dryden?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 08:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Attn Kent Morris and Ernie Reid does any Newfy lawyer wish to call me a liar BEFORE we meet in Court?
To: aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com, advocacycollective@yahoo.com,
frederictonartsalliance@yahoo.ca, wassef@nb.sympatico.ca, Premier@gnb.ca,
bev.harrison@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca, Shawn.GRAHAM@gnb.ca,
brian.kenny@gnb.ca, roy.boudreau@gnb.ca, hedard.albert@gnb.ca
CC: Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, rosemay.poirier@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca,
David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, tony.huntjens@gnb.ca, milt.sherwood@gnb.ca,
Eric.ALLABY@gnb.ca, Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, dale.graham@gnb.ca,
wally.stiles@gnb.ca, roly.macintyre@gnb.ca, socialsciences@mta.ca
The biggest MLA stooges to be left out of the circus in the legislature after tomorrow just have to be Tanker, Brad, Elvy, Peter, Franky and Leroy to name but a few EH? What say you oh ye snotty dudes at Mount A? The crooks cannot employ the Justice Department lawyers to defend their actions against me after the 3rd.
Methinks I must have crossed paths with every lawyer in the Maritimes including your University's by now. I doubt that many lawyers will want to enter the circus with the clowns Chucky Leblanc and Tom Young and argue the court jester in me on the public record in front of a jury of my peers EH?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: Ivan.court@saintjohn.ca ; norm.mcfarlane@saintjohn.ca ; pat.bonner@saintjohn.ca ; thomas.gatzunis@state.ma.us ; cnichols@norwellpolice.com ; info@pco-bcp.gc.ca ; Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us ; BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; kmearn@mpdmilton.org ; swanson@storm.ca ; robmoirndp@gmail.com ; ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca ; elizabeth.weir@gnb.ca ; flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca ; Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca ; Brison.S@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ; Cuzner.R@parl.gc.ca ; david.allgood@rbc.com ; mackay.p@parl.gc.ca ; stronach.b@parl.gc.ca ; moore.r@parl.gc.ca ; thompson.g@parl.gc.ca ; rep@karenyarbrough.com ; gearpigs@hotmail.com ; alltrue@nl.rogers.com ; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; mlevine@goodmans.ca ; brae@goodmans.ca ; EGreenspan@144king.com ; josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca ; Zed.P@parl.gc.ca ; Eyking.M@parl.gc.ca ; Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca ; Regan.G@parl.gc.ca ; Savage.M@parl.gc.ca ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca ; Graham.B@parl.gc.ca ; solberg.m@parl.gc.ca ; toews.v@parl.gc.ca ; ruby@ruby-edwardh.com ; patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov ; stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com ; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com ; broy@ogilvyrenault.com
Cc: info@woodstockpolice.ca ; stevemci@nbnet.nb.ca ; bnpp@nb.aibn.com ; ottawairc@state.gov ; eamacleod@cbrmps.cape-breton.ns.ca ; dcole@amherstdaily.com ; Carrie.C@parl.gc.ca ; blaikb@parl.gc.ca ; Charlc@parl.gc.ca ; trinityspadina@ndp.ca ; comarj@parl.gc.ca ; atamaa@parl.gc.ca ; chrisd@parl.gc.ca ; crowdj@parl.gc.ca ; cullen@parl.gc.ca ; daviel@parl.gc.ca ; laytoj@parl.gc.ca ; stronach.b@parl.gc.ca ; day.s@parl.gc.ca ; iwhitehall@heenan.ca ; jchretien@heenan.ca ; rheenan@heenan.ca ; duffy@ctv.ca ; tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.comSent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 4:35 PM
Subject: As the Ides of March appoach Methinks Harper should watch his back and the little big man Jacky Boy Layton?
Hey
Everybody must remember what Jacky Boy did to Humpty Dumpty in November of 2005? History often repeats itself. N'est Pas? However what do I know? I am just another dumb defeatist Maritimer as Stevey Boy Harper loved to say about us. EH? But at least I ain't short and bald and I definitely don't lick western crooks' arses like the lawyer, Rob Moore, Greggy Thompson and Mikey Allen do. Furthermore the liberals can never deny that the only provincial liberal mandate in the Maritimes is getting a little nervous about my ethical actions and they have yet to even sit in the house. In my humble opinion little lord Bernie Baby was wise to duck out the back door before the shit hit the fan. I think Mulroney advised him to do so so that he can save the remants of theNeo conservative party once Harper and MacKay go down in flames this year. What say you all ye not so honourable souls? Do ya dare to call me a liar and put it in writing?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
For the record you will find the email posted here.
http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2005/03/ides-of-march.html
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com ; nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com ; newsroom@nbpub.com ; carl.davies@gnb.ca ; janet.trail@gnb.ca ; Akoschany@ctv.ca ; jtravers@thestar.ca ; warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com ; Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; spinks08@hotmail.com ; seanoshaughnessy@rogers.com ; jonesr@cbc.ca ; mleger@stu.ca ; jwalker@stu.ca ; plee@stu.ca ; dwatch@web.net ; Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca ; oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com ; btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca ; trenchcoatblog@yahoo.ca
Cc: Jack.Keir2@gnb.ca ; advocacycollective@yahoo.com ; MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca ; collins.moncton-east@hotmail.com ; wally.stiles@gnb.ca ; bruce.northrup@gnb.ca ; kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca ; greg.byrne@gnb.ca ; Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca ; Bernard.Richard@gnb.ca ; abel.leblanc@gnb.ca ; eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca ; John.Foran@gnb.ca ; premier@gnb.ca ; Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca ; dan.bussieres@gnb.ca ; Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; chris.goodwin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; info@cisnb-srcnb.ca ; bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 2:53 PM
Subject: If this ain't news the day after Bernie Lord quit. I will eat your hat Chucky Leblanc
Tell me Chucky if you dare to take a guess on the record. Who do you think is the Speaker of the Old Maison? I just called Danny Boy your buddy the ex cop who guards the Old Maison you used to be allowed to haunt and he said he would love to talk to me but he was too busy to even disclose what I believe must be true and that is the Speaker is still the ghost of ol Tanker. You write LOL but I would rather LMAO in this instance.
Love and Kisses
Dave
P.S. How's that for nice Frenchy?
"Murphy, Michael B. (DH/MS)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca wrote:
Without Prejustice???
And my arse is skinny too EH Mikey Baby? You forwarded just one email after I had a little pow wow with Norman Plourde of NSIS? Methinks the sneaky lawyer in you was just making a faint hearted effort to cover your skinny butt after deliberately ignoring my concerns about crime for three long years. I do remember our converstiononthe phone in the fall of 2006. Don't you? To give a little devil his due you were far nicer than Chucky's kinsman Abey Baby Leblanc was justbeforehe was compelled to kiss Tanker's fat nasty arse.
What about the Hard Copy of my material I addressed to you and the McGinley character that I delivered in hand to your office at 710 Queen St despite the fact Bussieres wanted to have me arrested for his own malicious reasons? Why didn't you give that stuff to the RCMP immediately? Remember it was just before polling day on January 23rd? I stuck my hand out to all the local liberals then. Did I not?
Never forget I take pictures just like Chucky Leblanc does. Only I don't spread them around tis all. I strongly doubt Eldon Hunter and his lawyer pal McGinley will ever forget our little spit and chew at the cornboil on Grand Lake while we were both running in the last election. I took pictures that day too in case the next Speaker of the House has a poor memory. His buddy Hunter has a copy of my letter to you in his hand that sad day in August of 2006 after my kids kissed their Proud Papa goodbye for another long lonely winter.
Collins and all your other pal's in Moncton know I plan to run against him. Furthermore I let Plourde and NSIS know I knew the score. N'est Pas? The only question now is when will the writ be dropped and whetheror not Collins will debate mein public. If Shawn Graham had two clues between his ears he would be talking to the Lt. Gov right now. EH? It is well past chinese dentist time and theCBC News has said nothing about any byelection yet. Hmmm maybe Shawn Graham is truly that dumb.
EH Trenchcoat?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Subject:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
January 30, 2007
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Mr. David Amos
Dear Mr. Amos:
This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29, 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
Sincerely,
Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health
CM/cb
Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
Dear Mr. Amos,
Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear that
Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and the
US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing in
Petitcodiac, NB.
It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
I wonder if Bush's Robot, Stevey Boy Harper ever talks to the crooked bureaucrats in the Privy Council Office or their computer?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Info, Info" info@pco-bcp.gc.ca
To: "Info, Info" info@pco-bcp.gc.ca; "David Raymond Amos" davidramos@xplornet.com
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: As the Ides of March appoach Methinks Harper should watch his back and the little big man Jacky Boy Layton?
Thank you for your message to the Privy Council Office. We will reply to you as soon as possible.
Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le Bureau du Conseil privé. Nous vous répondrons aussitôt que possible.
POGO blog - blogging on corruption, blogging for solutions.
« More Los Alamos Whistleblowers | Main | Troops in Iraq Question Private Military Contractors »
Former DHS Inspector General Clark Kent Ervin on Homeland Security
Former Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General (IG) Clark Kent Ervin spoke to POGO fellow Lauren Robinson last month from his new position at the Aspen Institute to discuss his two years at DHS.
POGO: You’ve been lauded for your frank and honest appraisals of DHS. Do you believe your not being invited back is a sort of punishment?
ERVIN: Well, not really. Clearly, I made myself unpopular in certain quarters of the department. [But] the news articles I’ve seen haven’t done a good job of explaining what happened. Really, the issue is that the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee never scheduled a vote on my confirmation, so I never got on to the Floor of the Senate. At the end of 2003, the President gave me a recess appointment, which is a very extraordinary thing. I would be IG now if at any time during 2003 or 2004, Senator Collins had scheduled a confirmation for me.
What are some examples of waste and inefficiency you’ve found at DHS?
There are so many. We did this undercover work where we found that it was still easier than it should have been after 9/11 to sneak guns and knives and bombs onto airplanes. We were able to confirm that ABC News was able to smuggle depleted – not weapons-grade – uranium into the United States. Even though Customs and border protection had inspected those containers, the Department missed it on two occasions. In terms of border security, they’re not catching as many people as they might if their systems were interoperable with the FBI’s. It’s entirely a DHS decision not to, the reason being the FBI takes ten fingerprints while DHS only takes two. When asked why, [DHS Under Secretary] Asa Hutchinson said it would be too time consuming. I don’t know why. It’s not five times more time consuming, you just put down all ten fingers instead of two!
What is your main concern for Homeland Security right now?
My main concern is that there has been a mindset at the senior level that has ignored problems or excused them. For example, [when ABC News smuggled uranium into the US] and the Department gives you the response, “well, we targeted the container and inspected it,” as opposed to admitting that they just didn’t find the uranium, that suggests a ‘see no evil, hear no evil’ mentality. There are a lot of problems, and you’ve got to acknowledge them before you can begin to solve them.
Are we more our less vulnerable to a terrorist attack now?
We are safer than we were on 9/11. A number of things have been done since 9/11 that will help in the fight against terrorism, but we’re not as safe as we need to be, we’re not as safe as we can be, and we’re not as safe as we think we are.
Are you concerned for other public servants who may be discouraged from speaking forthrightly about inefficiencies and problems?
The Inspector General Act gives us a lot of power to do what I did, but there needs to be an amendment [to IG language] for Homeland Security, Justice, Treasury, and CIA. Those IGs can be prevented from inspecting, auditing, or investigating matters if, in the judgment of the Cabinet Secretary, the IG’s doing so might compromise national security. That provision, to Secretary Tom Ridge’s great credit, was never invoked by him against me, but it could have been. And so we need to remove the temptation for Secretaries to use it. Such provisions are inconsistent with the notion of an independent Inspector General.
Any advice for your fellow public servants?
Well, just do your job and let the political chips fall where they may. Unless you’re willing to do that, it seems to me you shouldn’t take the job in the first place.
March 22, 2005 in Homeland Security | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2112154
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Former DHS Inspector General Clark Kent Ervin on Homeland Security:
Comments
David R. Amos wrote:
RE: Please remove my email address from your e-mails - they are filling up my inbox.
Hey Braaton you can’t fool me I am too stupid You have gmail. We should all be so lucky. Ya think David Drummond would invite me to have one after I saved his and Google’s butt from the SEC right after I got out of Deputy Dog’s buddy’s jail EH? Furthermore I must tell you again I saved your entire webpage before you deleted Deputy Dog’s and my minor little spit and chew. Don’t you think you readers will start wondering about your integrity? I have inserted a little proof to prove what I say is true. Read it and weep Beancounter and look for your handiwork elsewhere,
Methinks I will send you only one more email but trust that it is a dilly. Opps I spoke to slow I am too late it is already gone. If you delete this post before it can be read it is ok by me look for it in POGO YoYo
Friday, 01.06.2006 at 6:20 pm
Posted by: David R. Amos | Jan 6, 2006 8:39:26 PM
David R. Amos wrote:
That ain’t nothing. I am running for Parliament again because of what I know about securities fraud etc. caused me to be falsely imprisoned last year in the USA. Paul Martin and his cohorts are trying hard to shut me up. rest assured all party leaders no the same stuff. they are all crooks. get it? If you wish to see what I just sent to the CBC etc. that i know they will ignore Send me an email and I will forward my email to you. It has a tiff files attached. Yahoo swears there will be no virus in it. here is my email address. motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com i ain’t hiding from anyone. I am the Darkhorse running against Andy Scott. If you read the text of the emial you should notice how and when i addressed Income trusts with CARP.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Tuesday, 12.13.2005 at 12:19 am
Posted by: David R. Amos | Jan 6, 2006 8:36:30 PM
I see that Braaton is still supporting you and not me. I will blog this answer in Pogo if he blocks it. You have no idea as to why Braaton is nervous do ya Deputy Dog. I will be damned if I will tell you in this blog but look for the same email Braaton does not want to get. Because I am about to give this Right Wing beancounting Bastard a heart attack and it involves your evil old Uncle Willy J. Kickham the ex FBI Agent. Perhaps you should read the entire Blog for the light to dawn on your Marblehead about how dumb you truly are. It is your Securities Fraud I sent Braaton a lady he loves to hate, Landslide Annie and I are spitting and chewing about far more serious matters involving Uncle Willy's buddies. You really should read before you write but trust that i don't mind. To prove that i do I will say this. As far as your words go, you are correct in that it is not slander as long as what is said or writin is true. I am more that willing to argue every word of mine. How about you starting with your forgery of my wife's signature. Please introduce me to anyone who witnessed her sign anything in matters of litigation since I had her power of attorney unless she did so under my direction. Whereas you are so concerned about money and like counting yours and bragging that I none don't you put your money where your mouth is and sue me? What say you Deputy Dog? Remember you must serve me in Canada. whilst i can reach out and touch you byway of my wife, your sister.
Posted by: David R. Amos | Jan 6, 2006 6:08:48 PM
CBC is a Crown Corp Their mandate dictates that they give all political opponents and equal playing field. they fail miserably in that regard last year and did not report my standing until after the election was over for the benefit of the powers that be. I agree with what Duchastel
writes but he runs under the banner of Mr. Harris. Duchastel's many words would ring more true if he ran as an Independent such as I. Duchastel will have a hard time debating me when I agree with him but doubt his sincerity.
Here is a couple of Blogs that are assisting me in keeping CBC honest this year. tha Media is only interested in protecting corporate interests Blogging is the only way to keep them a little bit honest. Ask Dan Rather or his boss Sumner Redstone why.
This blog posts my stuff and then edits what suits their purposes later.
http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2005/03/former_dhs_insp.html#comment-12623162
This Neo Conservative has no idea what he should do now that he opened the can of worms. the problem both blogs have is the geek in me saves everything in order to use it later in court.
http://www.mkbraaten.com/2005/12/10/martin-linked-medisys-income-trust-stock-volume-increased-3400-the-day-before-goodale-trust-announcement/
Posted by: David R. Amos | Jan 6, 2006 12:44:47 PM
http://forums.cbc.ca/ridings/2005/11/025.html#comments
Paranoid is exactly the right word Steve Oakley. But the last thing you should call is a fraidy cat. that label better suit my opponents. Try having the DHS coming to to your door inthe Middle of the night with cops and guns and attempt to take you away to Cuba in front of your minor children just because of your knowledge of securities fraud and murder. Then while running for Parliament have the FBI follow you home and for your efforts be falsely imprisoned in the USA under the Charges of "Other" without being arrested or read your rights. If you doubt me Oakley please introduce me to your lawyer and I will allow him to listen to some wiretap tapes before I sue the Crown. Rest assured George W. Bush will not want him to hear them and we shall see who become paranoid then. EH?
Posted by: David R. Amos | Jan 6, 2006 12:23:15 PM
http://forums.cbc.ca/ridings/2005/11/025.html#comments
I see that Andy Baby's buddies finally allowed the CBC to make note that I am in Fredericton to debate him while I prepare to argue the Crown in Federal Court. Trust that I did not mind being the Darkhorse. I truth i prefer it. Everybody loves a mystery EH? Humpty Dumpty(Paul Martin) claims it is his job to uphold the Charter. I can easily prove that he and his cohorts have failed miserably in that regard on my behalf at least. Perhaps that is why I am excluded from so many debates in Fredericton. I must thak the folks that have invited me and take on the lawyers of those who have not. Everybody knows (particularly lawyers)that Andy Baby is as dumb as a post. He also suffers greatly from foot in mouth disease. The Green Party man considers my running for a seat to be personal and I wholeheartly agree. Why he wishes to be counted out is beyond my understanding but I will count him out because there is no middle ground between me and rampant public corruption. I have no time to spend with fainthearted politicians who will never get elected and too chicken to argue simple truths. Lets just say I am not surprised that the NDP and the Neo Conservatives are trying hard to play dumb. Methinks it comes naturally to them. One thing I know for certain is that Maritimers enjoy a good scrap. Maybe some will find some joy in watching me raise some Hell. I am one fierce but ethical pigheaded Maritime Political Animal. Ask the suitably named lawyer/politcian Rob Moore. I am very curious to see if CBC posts this they should know that I saved it anyway. If they don't I will blog it elsewhere.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Posted by: David R. Amos | Jan 6, 2006 7:51:43 AM
Gotcha POGO I saved the proof of my postings. T fact that you left one of Depoty Dog's postings and yet removed many others before and afterwards makes your malice towards me and the simple truth of our matter undeniable. Your peoplr have proven to me that your organization is fake and no better than any other corporate controled Blog such as Laughing at Liberals and Free Republic etc etc. Sooner or later I will hope to sue your organization in the same complaint with Superman and Deputy Dog. i will be calling your offices tomorrow to prove my sincerity to you. Once i have identified a lawyer in your midst. i will send them hard copy of Deputy Dog and Superman's malice to stress test his ethics to the mmax. Thanks at least for proving for me that even the World Wide web is corporate controled. Freedom even in cyberspace must be defended proptly or all is lost in the real world. I find it interesting that you let my Blogs last so long and yet erased them on the very day the Homeland Security Act was blessed once more by a very corrupt Congress.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos.
Posted by: David R. Amos | Dec 8, 2005 10:59:16 PM
Deputy Dog perhaps you should explain your words to Jeannah's lawyer Barry Bachrach or the dickhead Greg Chandler's lawyer the LaPointe character who made all the false allegations against me on the public record on Oct 26th. Sometime before Jan 25th would be wise. Barry speaks for Jeannah and I speak for me and the kids. As you know I cannot speak to you directly because you are represented by Troccoli. There is a definite trial pending about your actions and you and I are both named litgants. Anyone can check the public record of the matter and see what i say is true. the docket number is is a follows. May I suggest that you have your lawyer read my pretrial Memoradum real slow that bitch is a dumb as a post. Merry Xmass I am am running for Parliament again. After that i will be back to make the Suffolk County District attorney's office account for the bail bond money they stole.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
TRIAL COURT
PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT DEPARTMENT
NORFOLK DIVISION DOCKET NO. 04E0017PP1
ROBERT F. O’MEARA, )
WILLIAM J. O’MEARA, )
BRIAN L. O’MEARA )
Petitioners )
GREGG A. CHANDLER )
DIANNE SACCO
Intervenors
versus
JEAN F. O’MEARA,
DAVID R. AMOS
MAX X. AMOS,
GRACE E. AMOS
Respondents.
PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM
A. MEETING BETWEEN PARTIES: The parties did not meet in person. The attorney for Jean F. O’Meara spoke on the phone with the attorney for Mr. Chandler to discuss the matter set forth in the Pre-Trial Notice and Order.
B. WRITTEN STIPULATIONS OF FACT:
1. The parties have not discussed stipulation of fact. Counsel for Respondent, Jean F. O’Meara received intervenor’s pre-trial memorandum at the end of the day on October 24, 2005. Upon reviewing it, Respondent’s. counsel believes that the parties can work toward a stipulation of certain facts and would agree to try to do so with intervenor’s counsel before trial. However all counsel has also been made well aware that the respondent David R. Amos does not agree with that opinion and retains his right to speak Pro Se in this matter on behalf of his own interests and that of his two minor children. The Respondent will never understand why her own Counsel did not name her husband David R. Amos as a witness.
C. CONTESTED ISSUES OF FACT AND LAW:
The parties have not discussed stipulation of fact.
1. Whether the sale of the property was conducted in an illegal fashion by the Commissioner in violation of court orders and statutes, and hence whether Ms. O’Meara should be required to bear costs sought by Mr. Chandler.
2. Whether the intervenors admit it or not, the Norfolk Probate and Family Court has yet to close the estate of Francis X. O’Meara by and until June 21st, 2004 the deed of the Milton property was still in Francis X. O’Meara’s name.
3. Whether the intervenors admit it or not, Citizens Bank which held an interest in the property dating back to 1959 and duly registered in the Norfolk County Registry of Deeds was never served notice of the Petition to Partition of this matter and neither were any of the Respondents.
4. Whether the intervenors admit it or not, the Norfolk Probate and Family court and Norfolk County Register of Deeds were made completely aware of the Respondents concerns and allegations in this matter on Sept 21st, 2004. This was a full ten days before David R. Amos, a Canadian citizen was falsely imprisoned without being arrested or even read his rights because of false allegations made against him by the lawyer Angela Troccoli and the Suffolk County District Attorney in order to cover up their own wrongs.
5. Whether the intervenors admit it or not, the respondent has no understanding why the Norfolk County Register of Deeds allowed the discharge of the mortgage Francis X. O’Meara and his wife Jane E. O’Meara to be recorded in weeks after the deed was illegally transferred and the lawyers Cronin and Kerstein fraudulently signed HUD forms completely ignoring the penalties under Title 18 Sec.1001 of the US Federal Code.
6. Whether the intervenors Sacco and Chandler admit it or not, they deliberately chose to involve themselves in this matter and act so maliciously against the respondents for their own gain and at the expense of the Respondents home and property.
7. Whether the intervenors Sacco and Chandler admit it or not, they and their various lawyers have been made well aware that the Milton property was homesteaded and duly recorded with the Norfolk County Register of Deeds on May 16th, 2002. This was done long before the Respondents ever heard the name of the lawyer Angela K. Troccoli who was admitted to the bar on Jan 25th, 2002 a day or so David R. Amos meeting with Special Agents of the IRS for the first time and exposing the fraudulent actions of the Kickham Law Offices and Officers of Norfolk Probate and Family Court who had closed the estate of Jane E. O’Meara and many others that the respondents have an interests in.
8. Whether the intervenors admit it or not, Chandler heard every word the Respondent David R. Amos said on May 12th. 2005 before he signed an agreement with Kerstein in front of many witnesses. Sacco met Jean F. O’Meara on June 1st, 2005 and actually thanked her for the material served up her after Sacco husband invaded the Respondents home with police without warrants or due process of law. The lawyer Kerstein has admitted within his own filings in this court that he discussed in his office on June 2nd. what was served upon Chandler and Sacco the day before. Furthermore the notice of the potential of many lawsuits un federal court was filed by Kerstein in this court in February of this year and Judge Boorstein answered with a court order based on no recorded hearing whatsoever.
9. Whether the intervenors admit it or not, the Respondent, Jean F. O’Meara has know understanding why the court and his lawyers accepts Chandler’s standing to act as his wife’s attorney in fact and yet ignores the rights of David R. Amos to act as her attorney in fact under the Respondent’s Durable Power of Attorney pursuant to M.G.L. Chapter 201b. Counsel of record for Jean F. O’Meara in this matter has recognized those rights and was in fact enlisted under the authority of the aforesaid document.
10. Whether the intervenors admit it or not, the attorney, Angela Troccoli acting on behalf of the petitioners has only served two documents upon the respondent Jean F. O’Meara, one was a change of address dated Sept 9th, 2004 after she had assent to the withdrawal of counsel on Aug 20th, 2004 and another letter dated Nov 5th, 2004.
11. Whether the intervenors admit it or not, excepting his wife’s counsel and the petitioner Robert F. O’Meara, no other litigant or their attorney involved in this matter have conferred with the respondent, David R. Amos since the appearance in this matter of Dianne Sacco and Gregg Chandler as intervenors.
12. Whether the intervenors admit it or not, the Respondent, David R. Amos on his family’s behalf has diligently attempted to make all parties involved in this matter aware of the irrefutable facts well before April 1st, 2004 and he became aware of the fact Troccoli committed the crime of perjury in this matter. All parties have ignored his pleadings. Before the purported sale of his family’s home on May 12th, 2005, the Norfolk Probate and Family Court struck the Motion to Dismiss of David R. Amos and refused to record three pre trail memorandums properly filed in this matter thus far. The Respondents were served nothing by Troccoli afterwards even though she states under penalties of perjury otherwise.
13. Whether the intervenors admit it or not the Respondent David R. Amos, husband of Jean F. O’Meara and their two minor children Max X. Amos and Grace E. Amos are named respondents in this matter and they are entitled to be heard. However, their friends David Mullins and David Woodman were not named as respondents by Chandler’s attorney Lapointe. On August 17th, 2005 they were staying with the respondent Jean f. o’Meara and were also threatened to be arrested and evicted by Gregg Chandler’s associates within the Milton Police Dept and Constables Michael Moore, Gerold and Adam Loomis. Their property was also illegally taken by Triple M. Movers as well as that of many other friends of the family.
14. Whether Mr. Chandler failed to mitigate his alleged damages by incurring unnecessary costs in the manner in which Ms. O’Meara and her family were evicted.
15. Whether Ms. O’Meara should be responsible for the mortgage and tax payments incurred by Mr. Chandler, where, as here, she was lawfully challenging the sale, she was not a tenant of Mr. Chandler, and, even though she was not a tenant, Mr. Chandler claimed in Land Court that she should be evicted for failure to pay rent.
16. Whether Ms. O’Meara should be responsible for any attorney’s fees incurred by Mr. Chandler.
17. Whether Mr. Chandler is entitled to recover the expenses he seeks to recover as intervenor from the interests of Ms. O’Meara.
D. DISCOVERY: Discovery has not been completed. There are many pictures, tape recordings, videotapes and many directly related documents relating to Securities Fraud Issues etc. within the estate of Jane E. O’Meara and her husband Francis X. O’Meara’s estate that the Respondents have yet to provide a copy of to the opposing counsel.
E. CHILD CUSTODY: No issues.
F. RESPONDENT’S PARTIAL WITNESS LIST: Linda Abboud, Jean F. O’Meara, David R. Amos, David Mullins, David Woodman, William O’Meara, Paula O’Meara, Robert O’Meara, Wanda Willard, Brian O’Meara, Tara O’Meara, Gregg Chandler, Diane Sacco, Brendon O’Conner, Everett Murray, Constable Gerold Loomis, Constable Adam Loomis, Constable Michael Moore, Margaret Cronin Esquire, Marjorie Adams Esquire, Suffolk County Assistant District Attorney Alicia S. McDonnell, Stoughton Police Officer, Lt. Blount, Milton Police officers, Chief Kevin Mearn, Lt. William Bryan Lt. Wanda White. Sgt. Foley, Officer Mark Alba, Officer Louis Bullard, Officer Villard Officer Daniel Neil M. Kerstein, Esquire and Angela K. Troccoli, Esquire.
Respondent reserves the right to call additional witnesses.
G. LIST OF EXHIBITS: The court records in this matter are intended to be introduced as exhibits.
H. TRIAL: The trial should be completed within 5 days.
David R. Amos Pro Se
_________________________________
David R. Amos
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB E5P 3G2
October 25, 2005
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Jean F. O’Meara of Milton, MA, on this 26th day of October, 2005 hereby certify that I have served in hand a copy of my husband’s foregoing document upon the following lawyers
Neil M. Kerstein,
Kerstein & Associates, P.C.
1212 Hancock Street, Suite 120
Quincy, MA 02169-4300
Jeffrey C. LaPointe,
c/o Law Office of George C. Burke
339 Hancock Street
Quincy, MA 02171
Angela K. Troccoli
P.O. Box 166
Foster RI 02825
If the lawyer Angela K. Troccoli is not present today I will serve her by mailing the same, postage prepaid this very day. An identical copy has been faxed to my attorney, Barry Bachrach.
Barry A. Bachrach
Bowditch & Dewey LLP
311 Main Street
P. O. Box 15156
Worcester, MA 01615-0156
(508) 926-3403
_______________________________
Jean F. O’Meara
Posted by: David R. Amos | Dec 6, 2005 4:20:58 PM
In regards to Dave Amos,,,,,,,,blah, blah, blah, blah,blah...You are quite a story teller. Most of your remarks aren't worth the time to comment on. Again, get spell check for your comp. or whoevers comp. you're using. Tools ??? I took back my tools, the ones you "borrowed" years ago. You're like the neighbor who borrows the lawnmower and forgets to return it. Man,,,,,call everyone else a thief. Kinda like the pot calling the kettle black. what say you now,,,,pot.No one cares whose names were on vehicle registrations. You refuse to move them of someone elses property,,,,,they are moved for you. At your expense(or Jeans).Her rightful inheritance. Don't you mean yours ? Or what you were trying to weasel for yourself. Maybe you should have read all of the wills, you are babbling about, a little more closely. We did. You two got what you deserved. Actually, you got more than you deserved. You should have received nothing. I better get on the phone and warn all of the lawyers that you are after them.Ooooooooooo. Burning down two houses,,,,,,,,,,you are a real,,,,,,,,,,,,dave. Look it up,,,,,,,,,,,,,dave ; a brainless buffoon, usually found hiding in Canada, blaming everyone else for his screw ups.
Posted by: Bob O'Meara | Dec 3, 2005 4:14:02 PM
Dave Amos, yes you and your pal are probably keeping warm up in old Canada. Of course at someone elses expense, as usual. Dave Amos,,,,, a man who has abandoned his family so he can hide out in Canada.I wonder if you can run for public office in your homeland with a warrant out for your arrest in the good ole U.S. of A.I guess you still forget that all these court sessions have nothing to do with you. Thank goodness for the government or Jean would not be in her apartment. If she was relying on you, she would be in a cardboard box, under a bridge somewhere. I guess thats not top priority with someone like you, to support your own family. You've done nothing since you met Jean to help her out. No,,,,,,,,,, I'm wrong,,,,,,,you did do something. You took off on her, so now she doesn't have to listen to your bullshit 24/7. Poor Woody has to.I guess he is a true friend. Did you think about anything I said to you last time ?? No,,,I guess not. I forgot how smart you are. Glad you are around to remind the world. I love reading your crap about how everyone is so afraid of you and wondering what you are going to do next. Ever hear the line from Clint Eastwood,,,,,,,,," a legend in your own mind". What a complete buffoon.Have you paid back your $5,000.00 bail to who ever posted it for you ? Have you told them yet that it now belongs to Suffolk County Courts. They will have a fine X-mas party with that.I may have to stop in for a little egg nog,,,,,,,,,,,,on Dave. Please keep us all posted on your lawsuit againest the Queen. I'm sure she is shitting bricks too, like all of us are. Hope Santa brings you a new kilt for X-mas. One thats lined. Getting a little cold up there. Well, I'm going to go and do something important,,,,,,like watch the leaves fall. Talk to you soon, I hope......
Posted by: Bob O'Meara | Dec 3, 2005 3:17:52 PM
----- Original Message -----
From: "McKnight, Gisele"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
Subject: David Amos
Hello Lisa,
David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our federal election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency of Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on the candidates' debate held June 18.
As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election. The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358. I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the photo that ran, but this one is very similar.
Gisele McKnight editor
Kings County Record
Sussex, New Brunswick
Canada
506-433-1070
Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
By Erin Hatfield
"If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if unofficial, theme song for the debate.
The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn. Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty, mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices. Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each other on their answers and criticizing eachothers’ party leaders. Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to register sex offenders rather than register the property of law abiding citizens."
The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You’re out of touch," Armstrong yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time, anyplace," Armstrong responded.
As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate, candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making process for the June 28 vote.
Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his favourite possessions—motorcycles.
McKnight/KCR
The Unconventional Candidate
David Amos Isn’t Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
By Gisele McKnight
FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from running for office in Canada.
One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail to meet Elections Canada requirements.
When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his favourite place to do so—Fundy.
Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his dissatisfaction with politicians.
"I’ve become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he needed to change his life.
"I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that sometimes in midlife."
So Amos, who’d lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952 Panhead motorcycle.
"Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact) experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask for anything, but you take what they offer."
For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs and conversation all over North America.
Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls himself.
He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
"But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said. "It’s alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
"I didn’t appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can call me. I’m not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
"I won’t take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It’s not about money. It goes against what I’m fighting about."
What he’s fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood, the exploitation of the Maritimes’ gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to name a few.
"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing, farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I’m death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it (NAFTA) out the window.
NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
"There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me, especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right. Don’t necessarily vote for me, but vote."
Although…if you’re going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have your X by his name.
"I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and say, ‘what the hell.’"
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
DORCHESTER, SS. DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF )
MASSACHUSETTS ) CRIMINAL ACTION
) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
v. )
)
DAVID R. AMOS )
AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID R. AMOS
Now comes, David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA and asserts his Constitutional Rights pursuant to Title 42 Sections 1981, 1982, 1985 and 1986 of the Federal Code and freely swears under the penalties of perjury that the following statements are true and to the best of his knowledge.
On September 3rd, 2004 I returned to the USA and stood before the Dorchester District Court in response to a summons served upon my home in Milton MA dated August 13th, 2004.
On September 3rd, 2004 I reported to the probation officer as ordered after he joked and made fun of me he directed me to serve upon the District Attorney the many original wiretap tapes that I had promised I would bring to court and ask if they wished to continue. The District Attorney Office wished to prosecute me so I returned to the probation office and the required documentation was filled out. I did not discuss the matter with anyone working for the Commonwealth on Septmber 3rd or since that time other than register my indignation about the lack of diligence, professional behavior and malicious acts practiced against me in an effort to impeach my character.
On September 3rd, 2004, before any hearing of the matter began I protested the fact that the Clerk Buckley had claimed that I was pleading not guilty. I had made no plea whatsoever. I refused to waive any of my Rights and I demanded that the court prove its jurisdiction to hear the matter.
For over a period of almost three months I had tried to resolve the issues of this matter with the Clerk’s Office of this court, the Boston Police Dept., the Police Commissioner, the City’s Legal Dept. the Mayor’s office, the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office, The Governor’s Office, the US Ambassador to Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. CSIS and the Canadian Consulate in Boston. I was refused the right to know what the allegations against me were and no one would discuss my concerns about the possibility of foul play. I knew I had done nothing wrong and I had fully disclosed the circumstances to the Suffolk County District Attorney as Chief Justice Robert A. Mulligan had suggested. I had received an answer from the DA weeks before he was willing to prosecute me on false charges. I had no understanding of the matter. I had not been given information to work with and no one would speak to me. If the District Attorney Daniel F. Conley had acted ethically and diligently the lawyer, Angel Troccoli and her cohorts within the law firm of Dane M. Shulman should have been the ones charged with criminal actions against me.
On September 3rd after the hearing and another hearing was marked for today October 1st, Judge Coffey ordered ADA attempting to prosecute me to give me a copy of the documents that I was entitled to view. In return I gave her my Canadian contact number so that we may confer about this matter. I then returned to Canada to defend my rights and freedom. The ADA never called. I was not surprised because upon viewing the material provided I discovered that there is in fact no complaint against me.
The complaint in this matter is not signed or witnessed by anyone. Apparently the DA did not expect me to make it to court on September 3rd and certainly did not wish to discuss it with Canadian authorities. I now consider the DA Conley to be just another corrupt politician just like Tom Finneran and further proof of why it was so necessary for me to go to Canada and run for Parliament in order to speak in a public forum of my knowledge of public corruption. I gave all the crooks to the last possible minute for one to act ethically and uphold the Public Trust. All I got in return was continued harassment with the little perk of Colonel Foley quitting his job before I left and Tom Finneran quitting his as soon as I got back. It appears that I must complain of the Queen and President Bush if no one in public service is willing to uphold the law and act within the scope of their employment.
For the record I must state the reason I was alarmed by this malicious action against me. The fact is it was the Trail Court of Massachusetts on April 1st, 2003 that had made false allegations against me to agents of the DHS claiming that I had threatened the life of George W. Bush. Now the same court was demanding that I return to the USA to stand in court and answer charges it knew to be false the morning after the President’s big Political Speech in New York. I had no doubt whatsoever that the DHS would pounce on me at the border and use a policy of rather than safe than sorry upon me and take me away for the benefit of many a low man in high places. The RCMP would do nothing to protect me and in fact attempted to run me out of Canada on Sept 2nd That was the very day of the Republican National Convention was much in the news about protests and presidential propaganda. In order to be of no possible threat to the President I was compelled to come to the USA after the President left New York and drive all night in order to appear in court on the morning of the 3rd.
The most alarming fact of all is that everybody knows that I am bounty hunting for Whitey Bulger. The order to come to his old stomping grounds and amongst his friends by the same corrupt justice system that allowed him to practice his criminal behavior for so long and then allow him to escape justice is indeed a very malicious summons.
April 1st, 2003 was also the only day that I ever met with the lawyer, Angela Troccoli before Sept 3rd. I argued her before Judge Livingstone in Plymouth Probate Court. I have argued her again in Norfolk Probate Court on Sept. 21st, 2004. That court found it necessary for no stated reason to place six court guards around me. I am far more than a mere acquaintance to her but obviously a rather formidable litigant against her criminal actions. I did send her emails asking her to ask her clients to stop harassing me with attached photos of the proof. The emails were necessary because she would not return my phone calls and sent my correspondence to her partner Dane M. Shulman to Barry Bachrach claiming that I was his client. I am not and never was. Mr. Bachrach had informed Troccoli many times that he only represented my wife, Jean F. O’Meara because the court had Stricken my right to do so pursuant to M.G.L 201B.
Barry Bachrach has now withdrawn from all of my wife’s matters with my assent because of a conflict of interests over one of his partners and myself about a fraudulent Title V inspection. However he is an important witness to be called because he has complete knowledge of all my contact with Troccoli during the time frame that I have been accused.
Barry Bachrach also has several original wiretap tapes in his possession in case the ones given to the District Attorney have disappeared like so much of my other material has.
On April 1st, 2003 I became aware that Troccoli and the Massachusetts Trial Court had practiced fraud against me and had created a Notice of Appearance in my name with a false document in order to strike me and cover up their own wrongs.
On April 1st, 2003 I had also spoken to a Judge in Quincy District Court in my best effort to have the court place a restraining order against my brother in laws William, Robert and Brian O’Meara in my name because after I had tried to do so a few days before in my wife’s name under her Durable Power of Attorney the court laughed at me and denied it. Within a day of my first appearance in Quincy District Court William O’Meara called my wife at her work and implied that the homes would burn down and he was willing to pay the insurance premiums. Those same insurance premiums were continued to be paid by us and one policy was canceled over one month after the property in Plymouth was destroyed by Troccoli clients. The Plymouth Probate Court called a Trial quickly with no notification to the litigants after Sept 3rd and on September 9th it authorized a very fraudulent real estate sale about a property that had been illegally destroyed for five months.
The lawyer Troccoli and the Massachusetts Trial Court have been assisting the criminal actions of my brother in laws and many others in order to protect the interests of many lawyers and politicians from my actions in other courts.
My wife’s family have forged her signature on a Purchase and Sale Agreement, created fraudulent Title V inspection, broke into our home, assited in the theft of her rightful inheritance, stolen personal property and food, made false allegations against me in other states, threatened to burn down the homes and harassed us on sometimes a daily basis with the knowledge and assistance of several Police Departments. It is time we sought relief.
Whereas two of my most recent documents have disappeared from the Public Record in two countries I have attached them to this affidavit for the court and the public to view. Exhibit A is a Motion to Dismiss Troccoli’s latest malicious action. It was filed on September 13th, 2004 and stricken from the Public Record by Judge Langlois on September 21st. Exhibit B is a copy of two letters with the same enclosures that were sent to the RCMP in Newfoundland byway of the Canada Post and one was sent to the Canadian Consulate by US Mail. Both mailings were tracked and not received. They are obviously now in the possession of some sort of secret authority. As the court views these documents it can easily see what I say is true and my material is of no concern for the public safety. They are filed in the public record for the benefit of all in my best effort to see that the Public Trust is upheld. I have also brought to court a case of documents requested by Utica Mutual Insurance Company of New York to investigate the actions of their client Jan Whiting. However once they knew the truth they refused to accept or pay for what they had requested. If the court deems it necessary I shall file it into evidence to refute the false allegations made against me.
Since I have last appeared in this court a great deal has transpired that cannot be told of within this affidavit but it concerns the pursuit of justice for many people in two counties. Much has been done by many to stop my friends and I in revealing the truth of our concerns. Thus far we have been able to thwart our adverasies actions. The court should pray that it does not get our blood on its hands. The proof of some of what I state can be found in Exhibit B.
Signed before the court and
under the Pains and
Penalties of Perjury by
Dated October 1st , 2004 David R.Amos, Pro Se
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 698-6549
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:31:06 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: I am on the phone to you two right now may I suggest that you not ignore me anymore
To: jlaskin@torys.com, jterry@torys.com.
CC: atinfo@torys.com, ggartner@torys.com, jscheine@torys.com
416.865.7380 John A. Terry
416.865.7317John B. Laskin
Law firm set to pay $30M settlement to Hollinger
CTV.ca News Staff
One of Canada's most prominent law firms has tentatively agreed to pay at least $30 million US in a settlement to Hollinger International Inc. for its role in deals that saw Conrad Black and some of his deputies pocket millions of dollars.
The Globe and Mail reports that Tory's LLP could be about to make one of the largest payments ever made by a law firm to settle allegations that it failed to act in a client's best interests.
Sources told The Globe that the two sides are working on drafting documents for the agreement and that Hollinger International could announce the lucrative settlement as early as next week.
A spokesman for Chicago-based Hollinger International declined to comment and a spokesman for Torys did not return phone calls, The Globe reports.
Torys has 330 lawyers in Toronto and New York. It's unclear whether the firm's partners will have to personally contribute to the payout.
Torys is a member of a private insurance exchange that is funded by a number of other major Canadian law firms and reinsured by a variety of insurance companies.
It is believed that the exchange, called the Canadian Lawyers Liability Assurance Society, has enough funds and insurance coverage to absorb most of the settlement costs.
The payout will be a huge public relations blow for Torys, but rival law firms said the firm's strong reputation and blue-chip corporate clients, including Brookfield Asset Management Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Thomson Corp., should help it pull through.
"This settlement allows the firm to put all the controversy behind it so that it can carry on," a senior official with a rival law firm told The Globe.
It's believed that Hollinger International notified Torys in writing of its intention to launch a suit against the firm on the grounds that it failed to act in the company's best interests during transactions that enriched Black.
Torys was Hollinger International's chief law firm from 1999 until Black resigned from the company in 2003, when the company parted ways with the law firm.
The allegations centre on the multiple roles Torys played as an adviser to Hollinger International and two of Black's holding companies when Hollinger International sold $2.1 billion US of assets to CanWest Global Communications Corp. in 2000.
It's very unusual for law firms to simultaneously advise separate parties during a transaction, without client consent, because of the perceived difficulties in demonstrating undivided loyalty to more than one client.
Sources told The Globe that Torys allegedly failed to inform Hollinger International that it was also advising Black's companies, Ravelston Corp. and Hollinger Inc., during the CanWest transaction.
Hollinger International has criticized Torys for not alerting them that $51.8-million of proceeds from the CanWest sale was transferred to Black, his private holding company and three of his deputies.
The personal payments are the subject of criminal charges levelled against Black and some of his former colleagues by the U.S. Department of Justice earlier this month.
It is also understood that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is reviewing Torys' role in the CanWest transaction as part of a broader examination of Hollinger International's disclosure practices.
Large personal payments are usually required to be disclosed to shareholders on a timely basis.
But the $51.8 million US of transfers to Black and his executives were only publicly revealed when a U.S. law firm spotted the unusual transfers in 2002 -- six months after the CanWest deal was completed.
In a report last year, a special committee of Hollinger International directors criticized Torys and the company's auditor KPMG for failing to alert the board about a number of questionable transactions involving Black.
Torys has also been named in a Canadian class-action suit that alleges Torys, Black, KPMG and others failed in their duty to protect the interests of Hollinger International shareholders.
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:41:39 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: So it is Xmas EH? Say hey to the Maritimer Landslide Annie for me. Will ya?
To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Thompson.M@parl.gc.ca, Sorenson.K@parl.gc.ca,
Richardson.L@parl.gc.ca, Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca, Penson.C@parl.gc.ca,
Obhrai.D@parl.gc.ca, Mills.B@parl.gc.ca, Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca,
Merrifield.R@parl.gc.ca, Menzies.T@parl.gc.ca, Johnston.D@parl.gc.ca,
Jean.B@parl.gc.ca, Hanger.A@parl.gc.ca, Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca,
Chatters.D@parl.gc.ca, Casson.R@parl.gc.ca, Benoit.L@parl.gc.ca,
Anders.R@parl.gc.ca, Ablonczy.D@parl.gc.ca, INFO7@elections.ca
CC: Fletcher.S@parl.gc.ca, Bezan.J@parl.gc.ca, Mark.I@parl.gc.ca,
Pallister.B@parl.gc.ca, Smith.J@parl.gc.ca, Toews.V@parl.gc.ca,
Tweed.M@parl.gc.ca, davidamos@bsn1.net, webb@caut.ca, pilon@caut.ca,
morgan@caut.ca, National@cbc.ca, lcampenella@ledger.com,
McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.com, ombudsman@cbc.ca, duffy@ctv.ca,
martine.turcotte@bell.ca, news@ctv.ca, am@ctv.ca, diane.bourque@flsc.ca,
jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca, Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us, Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca
Hey
So it is Xmas EH? Say hey to the Maritimer Landslide Annie for me. Will ya?
As your Boss and his Deputy Dog brag and Landslide Annie squeaks and bitches on Cpac right now. I press send and prepare to run again. Methinks Landslide Annie will never get elected again. Do you. I know for a fact that I am the one that has got her so upset. It is all over but the crying now. Read on then press print on the attached Tiff file and the light may dawn on your Marbleheads out west. She talks of a Global connected world and asks us to choose between to crooks. The money grubbing lawyer Paul Martin or your evil Bush supporting right wing boss Harper. I sincerely hope that not one of you gets to take a seat in the New Year in the 39th Parliament.
In my humble opinion you lapdogs for Bush all have failed the Canadian people in your obligation to uphold the public trust and protect our common interests. Harper proved to all he was willing to make backroom deals with Humpty Dumpty as soon as he had Clarkson, the Queen’s malevolent spendthrift alter her speech from the throne in order to have Martin agree to the Yankee missile defence scheme.
The 38th Parliament should never have taken its seat if any Member of Parliament had used the evidence of crime I provided them. You Conservative MPs who demand integrity of liberals should have helped me to impeach George Bush and Paul Martin out of the gate last year. Stevey Boy Harper should not have been surprised when the old lawyer Martin went back on his word after he got his way and was allowed to buy as many favours as possible with the hard earned taxpayer dime. Even the nasty Connie Rice got huffy about that. Petey Baby MacKay proved to all the PC’s and the Westerner David Orchard years ago that a lawyer’s words ain’t worth a damn even when he puts them in writing. Didn’t he? Not all Maritimers are honourable. However not all Maritimers are defeatists either as your Boss Harper likes to suggest. Many Maritimers know better than to trust lawyers especially ones such as Petey Baby MacKay and Johnny Crosbie particularly when they seek the counsel of the crook, Brian Mulroney.
All that said I must thank you for the opportunity to run for Parliament again and speak about your malice whilst I sue the Crown. You fine and fancy folks are one year too later but better late than never EH?
Should I say Merry Xmass to all and to all a Good Night? Naw. Bah humbug works better for me I sincerely hope to Cya’ll in Court real soon. In a court of law each and everyone of you can be held accountable. The Canadian government certainly needs to be changed but none of you have earned the right to bring it about. None of you should feel blessed to follow a leader such as Harper. I hope it is a wash and many other people will fill your seats. Many amongst them there will be an ethical few. Here’s hoping I am allowed to prove in court in the New Year what I know to be true about all of you.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Posted by: David R. Amos | Dec 1, 2005 2:21:27 PM
It has been a long hard six months waiting for Humpty Dumpty's government to fall in Canada. Now I finally have my chance to raise some serious political Hell in the Maritimes before I return to the USA and sue you Deputy Dog, your wench Wicked Wanda and all your nasty little friends and relatives.
There is a Pre Trial Hearing in Norfolk Probate and Family Court in Dedham Massachusetts slated to be heard on or about January 26th I believe. I am inviting the world to attend the circus but I may not come at all. Everybody loves a mystery EH? After that hearing I will be filing a lawsuit against Angela Troccoli, the Dude named after Superman whom inspired this particular Blog, Attorney General Elliot Spitzer and many others in the Second Circuit of US District Court before I head on down to Dixieland to take on young J. Strom Thurmon Jr. in federal court. I did promise to argue him first. Unlike you Deputy Dog, I am a man of my word.
It is getting cold up here in my native land but the politics are heating up. Me and Woody and my little Dog too are still nice and cozy and warm but we do miss Jeannah and the kids. Have you ever heard of the term personal injury? That mean old Yankee lawyer named LaPointe who said many lies about me on Oct 26th during the course of a Pre Trial hearing almost had a stroke when the matter went forward. He knew things just went badly for him. His Bullshit was for the benefit of his client Greg Chandler and his many cohorts such as Triple M Movers and Constables Michael Moore, Gerry and Adam Loomis. He has no idea who he has pissed off and how I will make him eat every word and then piss on his grave once he finally does go to hell.
Yankees may be amazed at how dear I hold my old Harleybit you should not Deputy Dog. Your bragging of being allowed into our home in order to steal my tools did you no good as well. Even you must realize I had a reason to leave my favorite bike behind. Did you really think I would not come back to the Usa to regain all that was stolen from us? You said a couple of major freudian slips when you mentioned your relatives were tired of you and about locking the door after the horse was stolen. Spoken like the true theif your are EH? Did any of the crooks you know so well bother to notice Annie the Pannie is still licensed in Nova Scotia? What of Ronnie's Kawasaki from New Brunswick or Woody’s Mustang from New Hampshire or Rays car down in Plymouth etc etc. Many people will be suing you and your BUDDYS, Deputy Dog. I am a just breaking ice. Thats all. That said what the Hell did you do with Wiretap Tape # 138 that Lt. Blount of Stoughton gave to you in front of everyone on May 12th? Should “Al” and his friends sue you too or should I just call them and tell them where to find the tape to use as evidence against the Feds? I asked Lt. Blount to give it to the FBI in front of everyone on May 12th. Instead he gives it to you and then calls his boss in Stoughton to let him know that he just screwed up?Your lawyers should never forget it. I have a picture of you holding the tape etc in your hand as you stood between Kerstein and Troccoli and watched the dumb as a post Greggy Chandler make his malicious deal with the devils you brought to our home.
Pay back is gonna be a bitch that even Wicked Wanda could not hold a candle to. However I will lay odds the I will have a merrier Xmass than you once she gets word of this Blog. Never forget Uncle Franky is still dead and the world is looking at the irrefutable evidence of your Securities Fraud. Even Canadians rely on the ethics of the Yankee SEC and FTC. Anti Trust laws cross international borders for a joke Deputy Dog. Watch me reach out and fry your nasty arse from afar.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.S. Deputy Dog you must remember this letter it was in the envelope with Wiretap tape # 138 that Lt. Blount gave to you. Insert it here for many Feds in Canada and the USA to review before I sue the Crown. Obviously I posted it six month ago and it that bitch Belinda Stronach had not crossed the floor in Parliament you would likely be in jail by now.
http://politblogo.typepad.com/politblogo/2005/04/warren_kinsella.html
Comments
May 11th, 2005
Ambassador: H.E. Mr. Allan Rock
One Dag Hammarskjold Plaza
885 Second Avenue , 14th Floor
New York , NY 10017
Ambassador Franky McKenna
Canadian Embassy
501 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20001
Assistant Director Louis M. Reigel III
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
Special Agent David Price
FBI Minneapolis
Suite 1100
111 Washington Avenue, South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-2176
RE: Rampant Public Corruption in Canada and the USA
Hey,
Now that Paul Martin has finally set the date for his confidence vote, methinks its time to pack my bags and head for home. I must raise some serious political hell in the Maritimes before the Commonwealth of Massachusetts does its worst to bankrupt my wife and put my kids on the street before I can expose the rampant public corruption. This is also a very good day to prove within the USA that we are well aware of each other and of my concerns and allegations in order to stress test the integrity of the US Mail. It and the Canada Post have failed me big time in recent years particularly just before the Yankees falsely imprisoned me last year for the benefit of George W. Bush, John Kerry and Paul Martin to name a few. I have no doubt whatsoever each of you dudes know more about me than I do about you. However that does not mean that I have not studied each of you a lot more than the ordinary layman. Just so we are clear, I have no respect for any of you. I know that all of you are as crooked as Chief Mearn, his cops and the lawyers who are coming into our home tomorrow without a warrant. This mail should prove your malice and willingness to support crime and public corruption.
Pursuant to my many emails, phone calls and faxes etc., you will find enclosed as promised exactly the same material I served upon the Solicitor Generals Teddy Olson and landslide Annie McLellan last year before I ran for Parliament last year. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as officers of the court and FBI Agents in order that it may be properly investigated. Franky got this stuff and more last year. The FBI got even more the year before. Perhaps they should go find the original tapes that the Suffolk County District Attorney and Special Agent in Charge Ken Kaiser have been playing dumb about for far too long. This material was good enough to impeach George W. Bush last year and cause many people to quit or lose their jobs. It is every bit as valuable today and you all know it. Ask the many people whose names can be found within these documents or Franky Boy or Claude Richer, Allan Rock’s lawyer buddy in the RCMP about this stuff before you call me a liar. As you all know I am out of jail on bail pending my upcoming criminal trial in front of a jury of my peers. I have the right to remain silent in the USA. I will employ different rights in Canada and say a lot.
What I choose to say while stumping for a seat in Parliament in Canada is of my concern not yours. If you dudes do your jobs here and I act ethically and legally up home with luck the world will be far better off in short order. I have already checked the rules with the people working for Elections Canada. We agree it is perfectly legal for an innocent man to run for Parliament while being prosecuted with false charges in the wrong jurisdiction and venue in the USA. Everybody knows I can secure my personal freedom quicker in a political forum in Canada rather than argue crooked judges in the USA. They have already imprisoned me on bullshit charges without even reading me my rights or telling me why I was in jail. The crooks are not going to have a sudden fit of ethical behavior now without it becoming a matter of political will. We all know it is high time for a change, the sooner the better for the Maritimes as well as the rest of the world. What better politician to argue with than a right wing lawyer named Rob Moore?
As you all no doubt know I have been talking to many people within the UN and have sent many much of my stuff. You all must have laughed as hard as I did when the Cubans were afraid to talk about my stuff. I must agree with George Bush about one thing. The UN is certainly in need of an overhaul. Yet we all know that nasty dudes like Maurice Strong’s buddy, Paul A. Volcker, the Former North American Chairman of the Trilateral Commission and Karl Rove’s puppet, John Bolton are just going to make matters worse. The same holds true with the turncoat Robert C. Pozen. He now offers advice to Bush on how to fix Social Security simply because I sent him running for cover with my Putnam Investment concerns and the malevolent media control of Global Corporations. Feel free to argue me or act ethically. You choose. I don’t care. Franky Boy knows he is way past too late. I am just rubbing his nose it before I talk a lot about him and his failure to uphold the public trust in our old stomping grounds up home. I can’t help but wonder how he explained his “Harper is a lapdog for Bush” dogma to Karl Rove and his nasty cohorts. I suspect it was an allowed comment from an insider of the Carlyle Group. Don’t you? We all know Stephen Harper would never fit in that group. He is as dumb as a post. All of his successes playing at politicking have just been a matter of luck and playing on the PC and Liberal scandals. Harper is kinda scary to me. He has a truly awful agenda in store for all Canadians like evil old T. Alex Hickman and Johnny Crosbie did for our Newfys.
Sometimes less is more. So in conclusion I will just quote former Inspector General of the DHS Clark Kent Irwin and simply say it would have benefited all if he had taken his own advice way back in November of 2003 when he had an important job.
POGO: “Any advice for your fellow public servants?”
Irwin: “Well, just do your job and let the political chips fall where they may. Unless you’re willing to do that, it seems to me you shouldn’t take the job in the first place.”
What say you?
Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
They got their mail now. Check for yourself
USPS Track & Confirm
Current Status
You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6592
We attempted to deliver your item at 6:58 am on May 14, 2005 in MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.
Here is what happened earlier:
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:30 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
Current Status
You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6608
We attempted to deliver your item at 8:04 am on May 14, 2005 in NEW YORK, NY 10017 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.
Here is what happened earlier:
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:32 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
Current Status
You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6615
We attempted to deliver your item at 4:03 am on May 14, 2005 in WASHINGTON, DC 20535 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.
Here is what happened earlier:
ARRIVAL AT UNIT, May 14, 2005, 4:01 am, WASHINGTON, DC 20022
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:31 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
Current Status
You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6707
Your item was accepted at 9:32 am on May 12, 2005 in QUINCY, MA 02169. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later
Posted by: David R. Amos | May 18, 2005 05:48 PM
Posted by: David R. Amos | Nov 25, 2005 10:03:01 PM
All you had to do to prevent your family from being "thrown" out on the street, was to buy everyone elses share. Didn't that ever occur to you? It is what most normal people would do who only own 25% of something. Buy the other 75%. You two think you can just claim both houses as your own. Thats right, Jean "homesteaded" Milton. Try looking up what the homestead act is. When you thought I was breaking into my own house in Mano, did you ever look at the back door? Always unlocked. I wish it was me destroying the beach house, but I'm sorry to say it was the new owners. All that equipment you saw belonged to them. All the property that was left in the house or on the property was moved or disposed of by the new owner. Thats what happens when you refuse to move yor crap. It is moved for you and at your expense, not ours.Try looking at your own wifes signatures. Which one does she claim is forged now. Seems she can't make up her mind. Oh thats right, she was suffering a nervous breakdown. How long did this breakdown last for? Seems to me she was still working during most of it. First it was over 911, then over the Kickhams, then it was the three of us. You guys should pick one story and stick to it. I think it was over you and the countless times you left to go on another scumbag tour. We all remember them. One of your best was summer of 1990. Remember Jeans delicate condition. You were gone for four and a half to five months while she sat around pissing and moaning about you. Why, I don't know since she does fine without you. Getting back to her signatures, I have about twenty copies of her signature dating as far back as 1980. They all look the same. Maybe thats why no one pays any attention to your bs about forgeries. You have accused a few people of this forgery. Have you made up your mind who you are going to "sue" for that. You must be up in the thousands of people who you are going to sue. I guess that's your full time job. There must be some correct paperwork on file in all these courts. It looks like both houses sold, while you kept yelling that we can't do it. You never did tell anyone why we could not, other than you saying we couldn't. You see where that went. I remember you saying in one of your many documents that you two were willing to match the first offer on the house. What ever happened to that? You and I both know. On Ole Tom, it's a kilt,,,,,,,on you,it's one of your wifes old skirts. You seem to dump on P-town. Seems to me that many of your friends,or former friends, and family go to P-town.Coming from a man in a skirt, I would not put too much credibility in what you say. You keep shitting on Yankees,,,,,,,,, both your children and your wife are Yankees. Thank God you will never be one. In case you are wondering, we are each enjoying our share of the sales, as we should be and so could you. Hopefully those storage fees are not getting too high. Maybe Triple M has alreadt auctioned of your junk. I was able to get my tools back before everything was packed up. You do remember the things you borrowed many years ago and failed to return them. I know that was just an oversight, being the honest man that you are. You should also look into how a deed works. We did not need a deed in our name to sell either property. I'm sure you being such a smart fellow, you looked into that and found a "Dave" loophole. Again,,,,nice try. You're suing the Queen? I didn't think the Queen had anything to do with Canada anymore. But I could be wrong. Don't really care. More useless info. I'm sure she responds to all your correspondence. She better if she knows what is good for her. Don't want her on the Dave list. Weren't you still married when you were messing around with jean and her friend. I really need a smart lawyer to argue with you. You still haven't seen through Barry yet. First he represents you, or Jean, or whoever. Then he Quits because you two don't pay him. Then he represents you because why, you're a political prisoner. That's cute. How much did you have to give him up front? I'm sure a nice chunk. The Mano money came in handy. Now he represents Jean. Thats good too. Same as with Mano, hire a lawyer after everything is done. Kind of like locking the barndoor after the horse is stolen. But this is how you two work, againest everyone and you achieve nothing. This pre-trial has nothing to do withus. It's Greg Chandler verses Jean O'Meara, no one else. Not you either. You need your own country, Daveland, where you can make up all the rules and laws. You don't seem to like any in the States or in Canada anymore. What's up with that. King Dave,,,,,,has a nice ring to it, don't you think. Lets go vacation in Daveland,,, there are no laws there. None that anyone has to obey, anyway. Does your new friend and lawyer know how you feel about lawyers? Or is he the second one that you like? This must all be good for you,,,,your latest excuse to stay away from your family and play with your friends. Thats what a husband and proud papa does. Do you have that in your book? I haven't seen in the stores. What ever happened to the millions you were getting from it? What ever happened to the millions you were awarded in court? Maybe that was another day the US Postal Service was screwing with your mail. With all this money you should be sitting pretty fat about now. Oh well, wish I was as well off as you.
Posted by: Bob "Deputy Dog" O'Meara | Oct 7, 2005 2:23:31 PM
Pogo really should start reading their own Blog. Sometimes less is more so this is my last Blog directed to you. I played you like a fiddle. Your Big Bad Brother Billy can explain it to you. He understands it all. Honestly I think he kinda gets a kick out of what I am doing. I got the poison out off my system with you. It helped me do what is very important defending Jeannah and the kids. You and Chandler were being very weird stalking her in August. I am glad some of it was recorded it on video tape after I had left the scene. If you wish to bitch take it up with Wicked Wanda or Superman your former Inspector General of the DHS. He got fired after Bush got reelected because he answered me right after I explained to the SEC some of your Securities Fraud. My god damned Queen knew all about it but it seems that the Crown forgot that Canadians rely on the ethics of the SEC too. Either that or she forgot how pigheaded and mean Maritimers are. A lot of them helped to save her Crown in the World Wars long before the Yankees ever got involved. I am about to sue the bitch in order to have the malicious warrant for my arrest revoked and then I will maintain my promise and come back to the USA to bankrupt you, your whole god damned family and their silly little lawyers too. The Crown allowed you Yankees to persecute and imprison me and that was ok by me. I used the malice as evidence to help me to impeach your President. It is a dirty job but somebody has to do it or we are all truly screwed. When you Yankees threw your sister and our kids into the street that really pissed me off. Enough is enough you can do no worse to me now. Your vain attempt to rub salt into the wound was in fact great fun for me. I will use it against you very soon. The Crown had admitted that it knew truth about you and your lawyer's malevolent actions and told me to give the evidence to the Suffolk County District Attorney. I did and he answered me last July while all the Democrats were in Beantown. A very great many of those bastards knew that they could help me to impeach your Master of War George W. Bush and did nothing at all about it. This is a very important anniversary Deputy Dog. One year ago today I came screaming out of your buddy Sheriff Cabral's jail where I had been falsely imprisoned and held under the charges of "other" without even being arrested and read my rights. Sheriff Cabral obviously forgot that she supported the US Attorney's perjury in federal court years ago or she would have had me snuffed in jail I suspect.I only let go of my pride and allowed my friends to bail me out after the Canadian Consulate came to visit me in jail and supported the false allegations that I had threatened our neighbor Judge Coffey. He had properly recused himself.If I had threatened him, he would have taken care of me himself. He did not need the sneaky ADA Alicia McDonnell to bitch about something that never happened. After I was on the loose and raising Holy Hell your nasty little lawyer Troccoli filed for an interlocatory decree without giving Jean any notice whatsoever because we were still awaiting a Trial after embarassing her at two pre trial conferences. However Troccoli still failed to file the Petition to Partion with the Register of Deeds pursuant to M.G.L. 241 Sec 7 that she had falsely claimed she had done under penalties of perjury on March 8th, 2004. You would think the bitch would have gotten clued in on March 1st at the so called Beach House closing when they forced her to do so then. At about the same point in time that spring you stole our property and destroyed the Beach House while we were awaiting trial in that matter as well. You (actually I think it was Chrissy and Paula but you found out later and support it because you know neither Jean and I are liars) forged Jean's signature years ago and your lawyer filed a fraudulent Notice of Appearance bearing my signature. The court did not allow the sale and with no notice to us about the Trial until after the state covered up your ex cop buddy's fraudulent Title V inspection. You are so dumb you spilled the beans yourself when you thought it was over. There is a Trial coming in Norfolk Probate Court asshole. There is a pretrial hearing slated for Oct 26th. Barry will call you to testify, However I may be suing you, Troccoli and Eliot Spiter in the 2nd Circuit before that. I loved it when I got Troccoli fired from the third law firm (Sims, Shulman and Ellis) and she ran and hid in Rhode Island. The Second Circuit is perfect. Your Big Brother Billy will explain why. Didn't you see us talking on May 12th? He said it was our and I explained that it was just beginning and I was goona sue him and Chrissy in New Hamshire. The wheels of justice grind slowly. Everybody knows that Deputy Dog. Better hire a smarter lawyers. You need them bad. The first thing they should tell you to do is shut up. you are way out of your league Deputy Dog if you think you can argue law with me particularly on the internet where many ordinary folks like me can check to see if I am a liar. Don't you know everybody hates lawyers.Your bragging of using them did you no service whatsoever. Say hey to Billy for me. When he reads this he will just shake his head. He is ten times smarter that you ever were. However even though your Uncle Willy paid Billy off Uncle Franky is still dead. Get it? Billy does. Has his friend Mike Willard filed divorce papers on Wicked Wanda yet? He should.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Posted by: David R. Amos | Oct 6, 2005 9:14:15 PM
Yes, you were a hero to some,you gave them just what they were looking for. Seems your only recource is to throw out simple minded insults, which all seem to fall on deaf ears. Thank you for the "Dave Amos" history lesson.More useless information.
Posted by: Bob O'Meara | Oct 5, 2005 8:25:57 AM
I got along with my fellow Prisoners just fine just as soon as they discovered I didn't take shit from anyone. In fact I was a bit of a hero to some of them because of the way I gave the Jailors a hard time. When i showed some of them they Affadavit that caused me to be falsely imprisoned I won a lot of instant respect. Everybody hates Feds crooks and honest folk alike. As you well know Mr. Queer Jailer Deputy Dog O'Meara what makes even better sport is when a crooked jailer is thrown behind the same bars as the people he teased and tortured in the past. Ask your three fellow jailers whom came to see me in the middle of the night if they ain't scared little puppies right now. Better yet ask your Sheriffs Dept lawyer Mr. Walsh why he is to chicken to answer my letter to him. Several of the jailors in Suffolk County I have deliberately forgotten their names because they were ok dudes to me but two I will sue along with their Boss Sheriff Cabral. One smartass in a white shirt is L Lynch. He should remember the Herringchoker that took no shit from anyone.It seems he took a special trip down to meet me. Then there is the dumb as a post J. Ellis who did me the favor of putting me away alone because he pissed me off as much as I did he. His attitude towards others is very much like yours Yankee. You dudes talk tough but have no idea what tough is. The skirt you refer to I wear proudly. I dare you to call it that to my face. You well know it is one of my best friends personal Kilts. It is Black Watch all the way Baby Deputy. Ol Tom whom you have met at Laconia years ago is one of the last of the 48th Highlanders. You do know the Ladies from Hell never took prisoners so there was no need for queer jailors like you. That said my Mother is a decent woman who gave her son the name of her favorite Brother Raymond. He was killed on June the 7th, 1944 during the landings in Normandy by Nazi's who acted a lot like your Yankee cops do now. He and many others including your own father fought so that men in Black could not come to an honest man's home in the middle of the night and in front of his minor children try to take him away just because he caught some crooked lawyer, bankers and Feds with their pants down. I scared off the Secret Service and the Milton cops that night didn't I Deputy Dog? Ask the long fired Clark Kent Ervin why. His name appears right above this post. That chickenshit never had the balls to answer my letter other than the usual legal double talk from his help.I am torturing his replacement Richard L. Skinner about that fact right now. Even the entire Yankee DHS don't scare me Deputy Dog. Why do you think you do? In closing on June 24th, 1944 my Mother's birthday in fact my Father's friend and Captain was killed as well. he was awarded Victoria Cross for his bravery while killing Nazi's but far more importantly for giving up his life for his friends. His name was David and I am very proud my father named me after him. My old Friend Ol Tom ordered me to never allow his colors to be treated with disrespec. Try putting that kilt down in person Deputy Dog and on behalf of manyy ghosts beside the still kicking Ol Tom I will rip you a brandnew arsehole. Perhaps your fellow Yankee jailors can find new joy sticking their little dicks into it your new hole. My big dumb ass feels just fine but may I suggest you have Wicked Wanda start reaming out and lubing yours bigtime. There is no doubt a lot of fellas you have offended as a jailor that would love cram a lot of things up it. I hope they start with your head. I suspect you will become a favorite cellmate for many. While you are out work faking your injuries again and milking workman's comp for all that its worth, perhaps you should consider getting brest implants.In my opinion you need some tits because you have no balls at all. I will wager you can dream up a reason for the Commonwealth to pay for them. Try explaining that you need them to cushion your fall the next time you slip on the floor of a jail. The tits may also help to remind you of Wicked Wanda as you do time away from her but never forget how quickly she will forget you. Your former Yankee Attorney General the weirdo Johnny Ashcroft was offended by the tits on the Statue of Justice. I laugh to think what he may think of tits on the likes of you. Have you ever even been in a fight in your entire life? Well you are in a for a Hell of a battle now. I am playing you like the pawn you are in a serious war against dudes who scare the shit out of you. You have no idea what a man is but a lot of Feds certainly do and they are being very careful in how they deal with me. You are just a snake to me. Watch me teach you to eat your own ass. Stay tuned.
Posted by: David R. Amos | Oct 5, 2005 12:52:45 AM
A message for Dave Amos,,,what makes good sport in jail is a "man" being booked into a jail while wearing someone elses skirt. How does your ass feel, Dave? Also,,,,,,,,,,you can have your mother call me anytime. I will tell her what her son is really like. She is a good and decent person. What happened to you.
Posted by: Bob O'Meara | Oct 4, 2005 6:58:16 PM
The is one of many posts in Blogs that I am curious will stand the test of time. Thus far it is one of only a very few that have not been erased from the web. That in and of itself says something of POGO's integrity I am very curious why POGO has never called me back or written me to stress test my ethics in return? i have emailed you directly and called and talked to your people in the past? Could it be that i am merely fortunate that you do not read your own web pages? Becare if you delete this page now. I have save it in my files and have refered many people to come and see it for themselves. Men like Clark Kent Ervin deserve to be out of work in any sort of position the involves the public trust. I am making it a point to prove it to all that care to investigate my doings for themselves. However is that not what POGO maintains that it does anyway? You dudes are paid not me. I am merely imprisoned for simply speaking out about the same things that POGO maintains that they care about greatly? I must ask POGO why it does not seem to care?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bsharpe@nl.rogers.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net ; duffy@ctv.ca ; martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; news@ctv.ca ; am@ctv.ca ; diane.bourque@flsc.ca ; jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca ; gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca ; corp.website@sunlife.com ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; shickman@pattersonpalmer.ca ; lrikleen@Bowditch.com ; John.Conyers@mail.house.gov ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca ; carterweb@emory.edu ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; parkhill@stu.ca ; plee@stu.ca ; billestabrooks@navnet.net ; kentlib@nbnet.nb.ca ; police@fredericton.ca ; wickedwanda3@adelphia.net ; marno3@shaw.ca ; cmgstjohns@nf.aibn.net
Cc: guild@interlog.com ; ombudsman@cbc.ca ; lise@cmg.ca ; pacificpalate@telus.net ; ajehman@hotmail.com ; maureen_matthews@cbc.ca ; gerry@cmg.ca ; bvessey@pei.eastlink.ca ; sallypitt@hotmail.com ; garyparsons@nfld.net ; neilmac@vzw.blackberry.net ; deesdee@yahoo.com ; shawk_1999@yahoo.com ; cari_blanchard@yahoo.com ; cturner@nbnet.nb.ca ; briann@accesswave.ca ; mplaurin@sympatico.ca ; lebelb@nbnet.nb.ca ; slmsmbouchard@hotmail.com ; maurice10@rogers.com ; m.meldrum@ns.sympatico.ca ; twomech@nb.sympatico.ca ; dugasp28@hotmail.com ; embateman@hotmail.com ; sawebb@hotmail.com ; pgcastle@hotmail.com ; newschick@hotmail.com
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 2:02 PM
Subject: Fwd: I am on the phone to your office right now Ms. Frulla
David Amos wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: I am on the phone to your office right now Ms. Frulla
To: liza_frulla@pch.gc.ca, Frulla.L@parl.gc.ca, davidamos@bsn1.net
Before you doubt my sincerity perhaps you should call my attorney Barry Bachrach his phone number is 1 508 926 3403
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: garey.shea@gnb.ca ; frank.crilley@gnb.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; Graham.B@parl.gc.ca ; Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca ; maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca ; josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; info@pco-bcp.gc.ca ; belanger.jean-daniel@psio-bifp.gc.ca ; Gary.Toft@gnb.ca ; liaison@justice.gc.ca ; lcampenella@ledger.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Cc: Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us ; Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us ; Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us ; Linda.Dorcenaforry@state.ma.us ; Rep.JamesEldridge@hou.state.ma.us ; carl.sciortino@state.ma.us ; letters@baywindows.com ; Info@MassEquality.org ; warren.tolman@hklaw.com ; registerodonnell@norfolkdeeds.org ; info@mwpc.org ; Lliss@rubinrudman.com ; regbert@egbertlaw.com ; has@harveysilverglate.com
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:18 PM
Subject: Feel free to correct me if I am wrong Deputy Sheriff Shea
Hey
I tried to call you today to see if you had made a report about what had transpired between you and I on August 30th of this year. However I could not get past the double talk of your boss, Frank Crilley so I suggested that he talk to his lawyer and boss Brad Green. If you have in fact made a report, I will demand a copy of it soon.
Mr. Shea I truly believe you are the man who used his authority to throw me out of the courtroom on August 30th for the benefit of the crooked lawyer, David Lutz. You said it was because I told you that I would be suing him in front of him. You know as well as I I said that so you would repeat it to the judge. How was that against the law and whom did I offend? The man I will be suing? I definitely did not disturb the court. The judge was in her chambers and Richardson was conferring with her client in private. Only you, the other Deputy Sheriffs, David Lutz and a couple of ordinary folks like me as witnesses were present.
You and I and everyone else heard the judge say during the hearing that day that the judge did not want to read anyone's affidavit. I believe that the judge was very afraid that I would be called as witness to testify about what I knew to be true about David Lutz's malicious actions in the matter being heard that day. Who heard the judge call the matter a hearing of a motion of Richardson's and then turn around and say it was not and allowed Lutz to call his witness first. I saw the kangraoo court's plan out of the gate. It was to coverup the Crown's support of David Lutz and his wrongful actions against Richardson's client. I have no doubt that the affidavit I heard the judge refer to was mine. One thing the court does know is that the last thing I am is shy and I am quick to tell the truth loud and clear particularly when it is recorded in the public record..Mr Shea, you heard for yourself that there was obviously quite a spit and chew between the lawyers, Richardson and Lutz within the Law Society and the judge definitely did not want to know the reasons behind it all. She kept referring the arguements within the matter back to the law society to solve behind closed doors in confidence. In confidence is not the way to go in order to see that justice is served. Not on my watch anyway particularly when an affidavit of mine is in the public record of the matter.
I know for a fact that you work under the authority of Attorney General Brad Green who acts on behalf of the Crown. As an Officer of the Court you really should have accepted the documents I tried to give you to give to the Crown before you threw me out. I will now send them to the Federal Justice Dept lawyer Ted Tax in Halifax to see if he is interested in upholding the law before I file the complaint.
Your boss Brad Green knows why it was necessary for me to do this. He answered me last year before I was falsly imprisoned in the USA and he did nothing to see that justice was served on my part. The documents I tried to give you were in order to support the reasons why I find it necessary to sue the Crown as well. It is because nobody is willing to act within the scope of their employment including you or you would have accepted my service of documents on behalf of Brad Green and the Crown. Like you the judge wanted nothing to do with justice being served upon David Lutz that day so you threw me out likely for the judge's benefit as well as David Lutz. Thjerefore I must take it upon myself to sue him just as I told you I would do.
As I also told you when I left in front of several witnesses including David Lutz that at the very least you are a witness for me during the course of a trial of a lawsuit that I do intend to file against the Crown. I sure hope you know how to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth or I will sue you too. The following text of this email will support what I say is true. May I suggest that you read it real slow. If you disagree with me wait until Ted Tax receives the documents you refused before you opt to argue me in court.
In the "mean" time say hey to Jeff Mockler and David Lutz for me and I will say hey to a bunch of bad acting Yankees for you. They behave just like the Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz. Many Maritime familys have suffered greatly because of that lawyer's greedy self interest. On August 30th whether you understand it or not Deputy Shea you watched an ordinary man do a very noble thing on behalf of his ex wife because Lutz was about to hang his own client in order to protect his own nasty arse from litigation. That is the reason I spoke up after it was all over. Call me a liar, I double dog dare ya.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
"The mandate of the Department of Justice is to promote the impartial administration of justice and to ensure protection of the public interest through the dual offices of the Attorney General and Minister of Justice."
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; trenhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca ; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca ; Poirier-Rivard.D@parl.gc.ca ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Lavallee.C@parl.gc.ca ; Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Faille.M@parl.gc.ca ; Deschamps.J@parl.gc.ca ; Demers.N@parl.gc.ca ; Brunelle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bonsant.F@parl.gc.ca ; oec-bce@parl.gc.ca
Cc: buckley@pol.state.ma.us ; steve@djflynn.com ; ombud@globe.com ; paul@djflynn.com ; dan@djflynn.com ; letter@globe.com ; publicrelations@cubanmission.com ; rusun@un.int ; france-presse@un.int ; uk@un.int ; contact@germany-un.org ; c103@c103.com ; general.info@thomson.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:11 PM
Subject: Ms. Sgro do you supose Mr. Shapiro will do his job now?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: scottmk@gov.ns.ca ; bev.harrison@gnb.ca ; ted.tax@justice.gc.ca
Cc: davidamos@bsn1.net ; BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; adams_sammon@msn.com ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca ; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:37 AM
Subject: You Dudes are too late to call me now
Hey Mr. Scott and Mr. Tax
It is interesting that both of you decide to return my calls this morning after avoiding me for quite a while. Could it be because I had just announced that I would be suing the Crown? You Mr Scott are the Speaker of the House. It was not wise of you to play dumb with me. You should know who your own Attorney General is. The text of this letter should refresh his memory of me though. Baker got the same material Wally Opal got.
As for you Mr. Tax prepare to argue every god damned word of the email following this one. Whereas you just affirmed to me that you know David Lutz. there is no need to send you hard copy of what David Lutz got last year. He claimed he gave it to law enforcement authorities in front of many witnesses before I was falsely imprisoned in the very country he dodged prosecution from years ago. Perhaps you should ask David Lutz to forward you all the email I have sent him since then I got out of a Yankee jail. If David Lutz had went to jail years ago and experienced the Justice System from the other side of the bars, I doubt many Canadians would curse his name now because of the sort of lawyer he has become up here.
Mr. Speaker perhaps you should speak with Bev Harrison another speaker you no doubt know. I suspect he knows David Lutz quite well. I will wager Harrison was advised by Lutz and Brad Green to play dumb as well. Better yet go ask your own Attorney General Baker why I must sue the Crown before we meet in court.
That said I will make certain both of you get exactly the same material the sneaky Shirley Heafey and Michael Baker did receive early in august of this year. I hate it when people who should know better play dumb with me. Ask the Yankee carpetbagger in cowboy boots and a bowtie why.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
July 31st, 2005
Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and for Public Complaints against the RCMP
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay P.O. Box 3423 Station "D" Canadian Judicial Council Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
RE: Rampant Public Corruption
Hey,
Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; trenhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca ; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca ; Poirier-Rivard.D@parl.gc.ca ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Lavallee.C@parl.gc.ca ; Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Faille.M@parl.gc.ca ; Deschamps.J@parl.gc.ca ; Demers.N@parl.gc.ca ; Brunelle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bonsant.F@parl.gc.ca ; oec-bce@parl.gc.ca
Cc: buckley@pol.state.ma.us ; steve@djflynn.com ; ombud@globe.com ; paul@djflynn.com ; dan@djflynn.com ; letter@globe.com ; publicrelations@cubanmission.com ; rusun@un.int ; france-presse@un.int ; uk@un.int ; contact@germany-un.org ; c103@c103.com ; general.info@thomson.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:16 PM
Subject: I bet a man named Mr. Tax who works for the Justice Dept doubts that he will
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: scottmk@gov.ns.ca ; bev.harrison@gnb.ca ; ted.tax@justice.gc.ca ; graham@grahamsteele.ca ; hepstein@supercity.ns.ca ; deveaux.mla@ns.sympatico.ca ; ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca
Cc: davidamos@bsn1.net ; BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; adams_sammon@msn.com ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca ; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:08 AM
Subject: Hey Ted Tax as soon as I saw that the Lt. Gov had honoured you
I figured you would do nothing to rock the Queen's boat for reasons of job security. However even you and your pension funds rely on the ethics of the Yankees employed by the SEC in the USA. Perhaps you should side with me ASAP. My kids need a roof over their heads. I am not above suing anyone to get one including the Queen and the Holy See. However it is your job to prosecute criminals not mine. Correct?
"Ted Tax and the Department's Atlantic Regional Office (ARO) were honoured at a Nova Scotia Lieutenant Governor's Awards Ceremony. Tax was presented with a Certificate of Recognition for "contribution to the Reserve Force by taking positive action to assist its employees who are reservists in maintaining their commitments to the Canadian Forces." Following September 11, 2001, there was an increase in the demand for military legal officers on operational deployments. Major John Smithers, a lawyer with the Tax Law Services Section of the ARO, was granted military leave to serve on an overseas mission."
For the record this is the text of the cover letter sent to Baker etc. Lets see what Mr. Speaker has to say now. I believe he is an ex cop ain't he? Lets see if he remembers how to uphold the law. If not don't you think it is high time that the lawyers in the NDP give the crooked Conservative Goverment the Boot? Everybody knows they are lapdogs for George W. Bush. Why else did he make it a point to fly down and see them last year and snub Paul Martin and his cohorts in Ottawa?
July 31st, 2005
Lt. Gov. J. Léonce Bernard Lt. Gov. Myra A. Freeman
Premier Pat G. Binns Premier John F. Hamm
c/o Att. Gen. Mildred A. Dover c/o Att. Gen. Michael Baker
Fourth Floor, Shaw Building, North Department of Justice 4th Floor
105 Rochford Street Room 5151 Terminal Road
P.O. Box 2000 P.O. Box 7
Charlottetown, PEI C1A 7N8 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2L6
Lt. Gov. Norman L. Kwong Lt. Gov. Iona V. Campagnolo
Premier Ralph Klein Premier Gordon Campbell
c/o Att. Gen. Ron Stevens c/o Att. Gen. Wally Oppal
208 Legislature Building Stn Prov Govt PO Box 9044
9E210800 - 97 Avenue Parliament Buildings East Annex
Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2B6 Victoria, BC V8V 1X4
RE: Public Corruption
Hey,
Apparently everybody wanted to play dumb about my concerns and allegations so that Humpty Dumpty Martin’s minority government would not fall and they could party hardy while the Queen was in Canada. As you all know months ago, I began faxing, emailing and calling the eight other Lt. Governors I had yet to cross paths with. I fully informed them of my indignation towards the Governor General Clarkson and two of her other Maritime Lieutenants Roberts and Chaisson before the latest wave of bad acting Yankees invaded my home in the USA without warrants or due process if law.
I made certain all of the provincial Attorney Generals and Premiers can never deny the fact that I tried to make them well aware of my concerns and allegations in order to make everybody should sit up and pay attention. Not one person from any of your offices ever responded in any fashion at all. You can be certain that I expected the deliberate ignorance. It is one of the oldest tricks in the book that lawyers employ in order to play their wicked game of see no evil, hear no evil speak no evil. I knew it would happen particularly after Nova Scotia’s Conflict of Interest Commissioner Merlin Nunn had blocked my emails before I had contacted you. I have no doubt it helped to relieve him of his ethical dilemma before the NS NDP decided what to do about their chance to unseat the Conservatives. I have no doubt whatsoever many lawyers in Canada were praying that the Suffolk County District Attorney would have me back in the loony bin by April 28th and that all your troubles would go away. I opted to let you all have your way and did not bother you anymore until the Queen had left our shores and Parliament quit for the summer. Now it is my turn to have some fun and raise a little Political Hell.
While the Queen, Clarkson and Martin where all having a grand old time on the Canadian dime my little Clan went through living hell down here. Trust me, lawyers need to learn some new tricks. Ignorance is no excuse to the law or me. Making some Canadian Attorney Generals and their political buddies show me their arses is child’s play to me after all that I have experienced in the last few years. If you doubt me ask Michael J. Bryant and Yvon Marcoux why I am so pissed at their bosses and the DHS. Then check my work for yourself. If the tag team of John Ashcroft and Tom Ridge could not intimidate me, believe me you people don’t have a prayer. Both of those dudes have quit their jobs but I am still standing and squaring off against their replacements now. If it were not for all the decent folks I know, the snotty ones like you would make me feel ashamed to be a Canadian. There is no shortage of lawyers. It is just that ethical ones that are rare birds, that’s all. You must know how easily the Canadian people can replace you with other lawyers if it becomes widely known how willing you are to ignore crime if it means some fancy dude may be compelled to suffer for his own wrongs.
The justice system is supposed to be self-policing. It should clean up its own act rather than trying to maintain a false mask of integrity for lawyers that are obviously criminals. It is way beyond my understanding why you people would choose to support the likes of Paul Martin, Adrienne Clarkson, T. Alex Hickman and Billy Matthews if you are not all as crooked as hell as well. The deliberate ignorance and double-talk employed by the wealthy few to dodge simple truths is absolutely offensive to ordinary people blessed with the rare attribute called common sense. Not all folks are like sheep.
Paul Martin’s latest tricks make for a very fine example of truly how bad things are. Even amidst wholesale scandals breaking out hell, west and crooked everywhere lawyers and politicians just close ranks and stand together as thick as the thieves they are. I stress tested the ethics of the ladies of the Bloc Quebecois and the Gomery Inquiry immediately after Martin’s carefully orchestrated little circus in Parliament on May 19th was a matter of history. Lets just say I was not surprised to not hear one peep in response from anyone other than to get a call from an unidentified and very nervous but cocky Yankee lawyer claiming that Tony Blair was mad at me.
Pursuant to my phone calls, emails and faxes please find enclosed as promised exactly the same hard copy of what I sent to the Canadian Ambassadors Allan Rock and Franky Boy McKenna and a couple of nasty FBI agents on May 12th just before an interesting event in front of our home in Milton. I have also included a copy of four letters I have received in response since then that you may find interesting to say the least. I also sent you a copy of a letter sent to a lady Ms. Condolezza Rice whom our former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney considers to be the most powerful woman in the world. The CD of the copy of police surveillance tape # 139 is served upon all the above named Attorney Generals as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also included a few recent items to spice things up for you. I am tired of trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186
The enclosed letter from The Public Service Integrity Office, whose boss recently testified before the Gomery Inquiry and following quotes prove why I must speak out.
"Well what do you expect?" said Le Hir in reaction. "Anybody who had been involved in that kind of thing isn't going to admit readily, or willfully, to having participated." Asked why he's waited 10 years to come out with his allegations, Le Hir said he was "sworn to secrecy." "I'm breaking that oath, and the only way I could have been relieved by that oath was by a judge in a court saying, 'Mr. Lehir, I understand that you have made an oath of secrecy; and you're hereby relieved of that oath."
"Mr. Wallace added that police and the courts, not internal rules, are best-equipped to deal with bureaucrats who cross the line and break the law. But Judge Gomery did not appear satisfied. "It takes a major scandal to get the police involved," he said. "It is not in the nature of the public service to call in the police."
Everybody knows that in order to protect the rights and interests of my Clan and to sooth my own soul, I have proven many times over that all lawyers, law enforcement authorities, and politicians in Canada and the USA are not worthy of the public trust. I maintain that their first order of business is to protect the evil longstanding system they have created for their own benefit rather than the people they claim to serve. Call me a liar and put it in writing. I Double Dog Dare ya.
Baker got my material. So did everyone else. Only the Attorney General in Quecbec refused it. I bet our newest Governor General knows why. It is likely for the same reason she will not accept my emails. It should be obvious to anyone why I must sue the Crown.
USPS Track and Confirm
Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 440U S
Detailed Results:
Delivered Abroad, August 05, 2005, 9:23 am, CANADA
At Foreign Delivery Unit, August 05, 2005, 8:10 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 2:52 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 2:22 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 2:22 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 10:28 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 9:08 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:32 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; trenhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca ; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca ; Poirier-Rivard.D@parl.gc.ca ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Lavallee.C@parl.gc.ca ; Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Faille.M@parl.gc.ca ; Deschamps.J@parl.gc.ca ; Demers.N@parl.gc.ca ; Brunelle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bonsant.F@parl.gc.ca ; oec-bce@parl.gc.ca
Cc: steve@djflynn.com ; ombud@globe.com ; paul@djflynn.com ; dan@djflynn.com ; letter@globe.com ; publicrelations@cubanmission.com ; rusun@un.int ; france-presse@un.int ; uk@un.int ; contact@germany-un.org ; c103@c103.com ; general.info@thomson.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:41 PM
Subject: Here is a couple of Yankee lawyers to call if any of you studied the last email
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Here is a couple of Yankees to call after you study this email.
To: scottmk@gov.ns.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca,
adams_sammon@msn.com, fbinhct@leo.gov
In July my attorney, Barry Bachrach served this lawyer Ms Adams in hand many documents etc. This was almost one month before she had my wife and kids thrown into the street. I had made certain that she knew the truth about many things long before the corrupt Constables she had hired in an ex parte fashion broke into our home because the Milton cops and the Norfolk County Sheriffs were too chicken to argue with me and my wife anymore. Adams practiced her wrongs agianst us and the court with many fraudulent documents created by Angela Toccoli and Neil M. Kerstein to support her malicous actions. Adams is so afraid to litgate against us that her last action on August 12th was done ex parte and supported an unsigned warrant before she bailed out on her very nasty clients Gregg Chandler and his wife. She has left the new crook LaPointe to pick up where she left off. It seems that Adams forgot that my children are Canadians too and I answered on their behalf while Barry answered on mine. the court may say that Barry and my wife were in default for their own malicious reasons but they failed to notify my children and I of their malicious decision before our property was stolen by Triple M Movers. We will sue Adams and her law firm in a US District Court just like I promised I would.
The moving company Triple M. Movers that Adams' and her clients had hired are in possession of a great deal of evidence that I plan to use against Adams and the Crown etc. Perhaps someone should call the FBI and see that they go check it out and make certain that nothing is lost. The FBI has ignored me too long just like you.
Marjorie A. Adams
Adams & Sammon
800 Hingham Street
Suite 200N
Rockland MA 02370
617-773-7891
Jeffrey C Lapointe
Law Offices of George E Burke
339 Hancock Street
Quincy MA 02171
617-328-1300
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; trenhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca ; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca ; Poirier-Rivard.D@parl.gc.ca ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Lavallee.C@parl.gc.ca ; Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Faille.M@parl.gc.ca ; Deschamps.J@parl.gc.ca ; Demers.N@parl.gc.ca ; Brunelle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bonsant.F@parl.gc.ca ; oec-bce@parl.gc.ca
Cc: buckley@pol.state.ma.us ; steve@djflynn.com ; ombud@globe.com ; paul@djflynn.com ; dan@djflynn.com ; letter@globe.com ; publicrelations@cubanmission.com ; rusun@un.int ; france-presse@un.int ; uk@un.int ; contact@germany-un.org ; c103@c103.com ; general.info@thomson.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:21 PM
Subject: If someone does do their job the taxmen in the USA will have hell to pay in short order EH?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: davidamos@bsn1.net ; BBACHRACH@bowditch.com
Cc: fbinhct@leo.gov ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca ; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 3:00 PM
Subject: The Feds are at it again
Hey Barry
Look at the bottom of this email. Remember when we told each other to be careful last year on this very day? Well it is even more true today. I will wager many crooks are very nervous that I am still free and raising hell. Just like last year I have a very bad feeling that the bastards are going to try something again. Desperate people do do desperate things. I am being as careful as possible please be careful too. I know you are on vacation and I have not heard from you lately. So I do not know whether or not the ADA Alicia S. McDonnell has provided you with any proof of the malicious warrant she swore out for my arrest but at least the FBI has affirmed to me that it exists.
Here is one of those emails that I warned you would be politicaly vicious. I am a politicall animal but never forget the Suffolk County District Attorney is a politician. He answered me before the politically appointed Clerk Magistrate Anthony Owens made his ridiculous criminal complaint against me last year. They have already proven to me are far more vicious than I.
For my own benefit I am will print this email after I send it to myself and you. I obviously also sent to the two women one Canadian, one Yankee, the FBI dudes in CT that claim to be so concerned about public corruption and last but far from least the Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz. All of whom have refused to act within the scope of their employment for a very long time. I don't care if they answer this email or not but I certainly hope you do. As you know not only are you my attorney right now you are also very important witness for me as well.
I must leave my friend's house soon and hit the road in order to serve a bunch a lawyers in hand and mail a pile of other stuff to many bad acting lawyers and politicians etc. Then I will file a Statement of Claim in Canadian Federal Court against the Crown. I suspect that the bastards will try hard to stop me before I can file that complaint. After I got off the phone today with the clerk of the Federal Trial Court in Fredericton, I began composing this email. I am covering my bases as best I can. If you have not heard from me for a few weeks or if you wish to check to see if I filed the complaint, here is the clerk's number (506 452-3016) I made the clerk office well aware of what I will be filing and why. I will publish that statement of claim on the web before I file it so that it cannot dissapear so easily from the public record like so much of my other work often does. The clerk did me the courtesy of faxing me a copy of another complaint by fishermen against the Crown last year so that I can use it as sort of a template to make my filing acceptable to the court. I love the fact that it appears that even the Federal Court thinks my work is a typical pigheaded Maritimer's action after all.
If need be, I will present this email to any cop who decides to hassle me for the benefit of the rampant public corruption he wishes to support. I will also give them the same material I sent Shirley Heafey, the Commissioner of Public Complaints Against the RCMP. I will let them all wonder who else I sent this email to. Rest assured, it will be many.
It is necessary that I do this in this fashion because I got word that the local RCMP have been sniffing around and talking to my friends about me. There is no denying I am spooked. Alicia S. McDonell has taught me to be wary of false allegations. The cops are claiming that they got a call from Ottawa from people stating that I was a possible physical threat to someone. The RCMP in Sussex are well aware that I seldom leave the house these days except to get more cigarettes and coffee. In an effort to be left alone, I told many people that I intended go many places when in fact I went almost nowhere at all. My friends have said that if the cops have questions they should go talk to me because everybody knows that I am not in hiding but the cops should recognize my right to go anywhere I wish as a free man in a free country that he is a citizen of. The Yankee Feds must know I haven't gone anywhere too because my constant emailings and phone calls leave no time to do anything else and I should be very easy to locate by the telephone id alone. I am freely telling anyone anything they wish to know about everything I know to be true before the Feds try to shut me up. Everybody knows the Yankee Feds watch the internet etc like a hawk. They are likely reading this email as I type it into the web. That is one of the reasons I sent my material the General Counsel of Yahoo. I wanted to make certain that the Yankees do not kill this email address just like they did all the rest.
I see no need to talk to any RCMP officers anymore. Three and a half years is long enough to wait for them to do the right thing. I sent their lawyer, Ms. Longo hard copy of my material last year before I was falsely imprisoned in the USA and Shirley Heafey knows it. I am entitled to an answer from the General Counsel of a Crown Corp. and the Commissioner appointed to check their work on my behalf before I am compelled to deal with the help anymore. If nothing else I am a member of the puiblic you has human rights as well. A few of the questions that I ask my friends after they tell me about the cops asking questions are "Who was the cop, what did he say and what did he want to know?" One of cops named to me was the RCMP officer Derek Daniels. Of all of the cops in Sussex that should have an understanding and investigated the truth of my matters by now it should have been that RCMP officer in particular.
After what I did in court up here last year and all the answers I got from the various authorities way up the food chain from him, Derek Daniels has no excuse whatsoever. He was the first one in Sussex I crossed paths with three years ago. I had a long talk with the cop Derek Daniels in front of three witnesses on the last day of hunting season in November of 2002 after he had taken it upon himself to stop some of my friends and I on the road for no stated reason whatsoever. One thing I recall about our converstion was that as he was looking at the list of Yankee lawyers I was dealing with at the time, he remarked that a lot of them seemed to be of the same bunch that were up here investigating the tragic bus accident that had occurred the year before in Sussex. It seems that Canadian taxpayers were forced to go to great expense to make a big change in the highway because no doubt some clever Yankee lawyers convinced our dumb government lawyers that since one Yankee did not know how to drive safely and obey the law the Canadian people may be somehow responsible for the accident. It seems to me that Daniels has sided with clever crooked Yankee lawyers and against me because he thinks me dumb too. Well if that is the case, he should also know that he cannot fool me because I am too stupid. Daniels has known the truth of my matters for three years and has done nothing about it at all. Some cop EH?
Attached to this email is the obvious perjury of Troccoli that she filed herself in Norfolk Probate Court. I will print it and attach it to the hard copy of this email. I will ask the cops that may choose to hassle me why she filed her documents with the Norfolk County Register of Deeds only after I came screaming out of jail and tried to remove the matter to US District Court. I will love to hear their answer because it is her false allegations that also caused my imprisonment. In my humble opinion this attachment is the first document you should present to the Judge in Norfolk Probate Court on October 26th on Jean's behalf. The entire action against our home began with perjury and the Norfolk Probate Court knows it. Everything that has been done against us should be undone ASAP. The Norfolk County Register of Deeds is well aware of that fact plus the fact that Jean had homesteaded the property long before we had ever heard of Angela Troccoli. He has a lot to answer for. I defy anyone to call me a liar especially the crooked Assistant District Attorney of Suffolk County Alicia S. McDonell. The simple truth is she swore out the warrant for my arrest in an effort to stop me from suing her and Judge Hanlon before the crooks could steal our home and our belongings. It was a very malicous effor to bankrupt us and break our hearts. However my wife and kids can still sue them no matter what they may do to me and our home..
Barry, you know as well as I that for Jean and the kids benefit I must not go to jail or they will be truly screwed. The last people I can afford to trust are the RCMP. Everybody knows I have been like a ghost since I have returned home this time around the cops have no right to hassle me at all. Ghosts are as harmless as hell and they usually only haunt one spot. The RCMP have been making false allegations against me for years long before I ever even knew the names of many Yankee lawyers such as Charles J. Kickham Jr. or Angela K. Tocccoli. Ever since I testified against the RCMP's actions in the far from accidental death of a man on a motorcycle, I have not been on the list to join them in the Lions Den. I must say I am greatful not to be considered one of their ilk and that anything the cops in Sussex may say about me now should be doubted. I have few stories to tell about them that are not so hard to beleive.
Lately I have been very careful of what I say on the phone and put in emails so that my ethical actions cannot be misunderstood. Since I have been home I have very purposely stayed away from almost everyone including most of my friends. Most of what I say, I put in writing and I do not speak long on the phone to people I do not trust. Just ask the lawyer Joyce Richardson about that fact. While the bigtime canadian crooks such as Johnny Crosbie, Justice Gomery, Jack Layton, Stevey Harper and Paul Martin were yucking it up in the Maritimes during the past month, I usually stayed inside the house so no one could accuse me of doing anything malicious at all. I know that they expected me to turn up everywhere but in truth I only went out in public once and that was in a court in Saint John on August 30th. Ask the Yankee lawyer, David Lutz or the Deputy Sheriff Shay who threw me out of court on his behalf what I said and why. Better yet ask his plain clothes RCMP buddies Johnny Dewinter of Jimmy Gas why I am so pissed off. They heard everything Judge Henrick Tonning and I said in court last year. It makes no difference that the transcript was edited and the tape is no longer available. Many other people heard what was said too.
Lately I have been getting many strange calls again on the cell phone from some interesting Yankee Feds including the FBI and the DHS. They are just like the ones I got from Chief Kevin Mearn in November of 2002 after his political friends Senators Joyce and Kerry received my mail in October of 2002 just before they were reelected. I got another strange call yesterday from the DHS. That is what prompted this email. I crossed paths with them bigtime to make certain that Max got safely back to the USA to comfort his mother. They were a little late getting back to me now. The phone id comes up blank and there is no record of the call and the people will not properly identify themselves so what am I to think of that? If they cannot act openly then obviously they are up to no good. I called some of their offices quite awhile ago but they are just getting back to me now? I must ask why to all. The RCMP, FBI and the DHS appear to be fishing around for info from me or anyone in an effort to find something to hang me with. The Feds refuse to speak to you even though I demand that they do. They seem to be avoiding you like the plague just like Alicia S. McDonnell and Angie Troccoli did. It seems they don't appreciate ethical lawyers for some reason. Eh? Hell the Feds will not even take your phone number So I will give to them in this fashion. Here it is 1 508 926 3403 Correct?
I do have the right to remain silent. You know as well as I was forced to enlist your help once again in order to meet the terms of the ADA Alicia S. McDonnell's malicious motion on April 28th. She should uphold the law and deal with you as my attorney about the simple truth of my matters. The same holds true for the Yankee Feds if they have questions of me now they should talk to my attorney. Correct?
I will deal with the Canadian Feds and the people employed to insure that they act ethically byway of a very justifiable lawsuit against the Crown. I have no understanding as to why the Yankee and Canadian Feds did not make certain that Angela Troccoli and her buddy Neil M. Kerstein were not in jail before they threw my wife and kids out of their home and into the street. They have raised the stakes not me. It seems to me that they forgot that my kids are Canadian citizens too. Quincy district court claimed that you and Jean were in default but they sent no notice to me. Remember I filed an answer to Chandler on my kids behalf and you served his lawyer for me and watched me file it with the clerk. I know for certain my kids were definitely not in default and Chandler's lawyer never argued me about their interests. It would have been in the Feds' best interest to act within the scope of their employment and at least come to our home on August 17th to stop Triple M. Movers, Constable Moore and his buddies the Milton Police from taking my kids beds out of their mother's home. Troccoli's and Kerstein's Fraud is Fraud and their Perjury is Perjury etc etc. Someone must be held accountable for the crimes. The crimes are undeniable and recorded in the public record. The fraudulent documents are filed by the very lawyers who practiced the crimes. What more should I have to do other than just point to the public record? What planet do Yankee lawyers and cops come from? The same one RCMP officers come from no doubt.
I am trying hard to prove to my fellow Maritimers once and for all that justice is a myth. To that end, I will try to take this matter up today with one Shirley Heafey's assistants once again and the Justice Dept lawyer named Ted Tax. Here are their numbers too. Ted Tax (902) 426-7592 and Steven McDonell (sound familiar?) (613) 952-1302. Clearly this is an ethical effort to offset the RCMP considering to pounce on me in an attempt to lock me up for the benefit of crooked Yankees like Angie Troccoli, Judge Hanlon and ADA Alicia S. McDonnell. That said, I have no faith in the integrity of Heafey's Commission or Ted Tax either or they would have called me back by now. I just want proof of contact one last time. This email is just one of the ways I will do it. I will use the phone next. After all Shirley Heafey should have read my US Mail by now. Her silence is deafening. Ted Tax will receive the same material soon.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.S. As I was typing this by some strange coincidence the Minister of Indian Affairs the yo yo Andy Scott whom I mentioned you in the letter to him last year is on Cpac talking to the Standing Committee on Human Rights about what a great job he did as Solicitor General for Canada in getting sweat lodges allowed in prison. I just have to send this email to him too now. Perhaps you and he should talk ASAP I am considering running against him for a seat in Parliament next time around. Here is his phone number. (613) 992-1067. I will insert the text of the letter to him last year at the bottom of this email so that he cannot play dumb anymore.
P.P.S The funniest and saddest thing of all just came into my email inbox. It appears that within one day of our newest Governor General taking office , she wants to play as dumb as Andy Scott. Now that she won't take my emails I will send her byway of Queen's Privy Council Hard Copy. As you know the former Governor General Adrienne Clarkson answered me last year before I was falsely imprisoned. Enough is enough but at least Michaëlle Jean proved to me that she is a crook out of the gate. The most truly strange coincidence of all is that at the very same point in time the Cpac channel was playing the tape of Michaëlle Jean swearing into her office yesterday. I just listened to her swear to uphold the laws of the land and see that justice is served and then I get her email rejection. Have a look for yourself. This is a tragic comedy that Shakespeare would have loved to write about. This is far more than a mere farce Barry. It is truly very sad as well.
All I can say about this right now is WOW and Yea right tell me another one Mr. Ibbitson
Date: 28 Sep 2005 14:02:05 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message
to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry
it didn't work out.
:
198.103.213.5 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 552 Error: content rejected
The remarkable new Governor-General personifies the free and open country Canada wants to be
By JOHN IBBITSON
Wednesday, September 28, 2005, Page A1
OTTAWA -- Her promise is the promise of what we almost are, of what we want to be. She is the becoming Canada.
There is a reason for the extraordinary attention paid yesterday to the investiture of Michaëlle Jean as Governor-General, and for the extraordinary controversy -- from accusations of separatist sympathies to the indiscretions of a dress designer -- that preceded it.
For the record my Jean did hear Judge Hanlon read the following email into the public record and sorta argue it with herself. What I would like to know is what the hell happened to the Appeal I filed in May to oppose her decision not to recuse herself? Judge Hanlon had no right to speak to you at all on July 28th and August 2nd until that appeal had been dealt with by the Supreme Court. There was no need for me to appear before Judge Hanlon until that appeal had been heard. Her order for me to appear on August 2nd was very malicious indeed.
----- Original Message -----
From: David R. Amos
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Cc: ken.ross@gnb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 8:51 AM
Subject: Attn Barry Bachrach and Assistant DA McDonnell
On April 28th, 2005 I made Judge Hanlon well aware of the facts of the matter and that I would not allow myself to have my head examined by any Yankee whatsoever. A friend of mine Robert Cochrane on his own accord and without my prior knowledge called another friend of mine, Ken Ross the Assistant Deputy Minister of Health in New Brunswick on April 28th as soon as I made him aware that the ADA was trying to put me back in Sheriff Cabral's Psych Ward.
At that time Ken told Robert to keep him informed and that he would do what he could to see that justice was served on my part and have my head examined if necessary by Canadian civil servants. Since that time I have made Ken fully aware of my circumstances and although he finds them rather unbelievable I still trust him to do the right thing on my behalf. Nevertheless if Judge Hanlon forces the issue today for me to have my head examined, I will turn myself in to Canadian Law Enforcement Authorities and ask to meet with my old friend Ken Ross not long after my first grandchild is born in Nova Scotia. I have had enough of the Yankee malice for now. I see no need to go to jail again in the USA under illegal criminal charges.
As you can see my wife Jean forwarded this letter to my friend Ken this morning and she will serve you both a copy in hand before the Status hearing begins today. There is no need for the ADA to swear out a warrant for my arrest. Canadian Authorities have jurisdiction over me and have been made well aware of my concerns for years and everybody knows it.
I will gladly argue with the Queen on my home ground. Anyone has any questions take it up with my friends Barry Bachrach or Ken Ross. This is Ken's contact information and as you can see he received the same email.
Carleton Place
P. O. Box 5100
520 King Street
Fredericton, NB
E3B 5G8 Canada
----- Original Message -----
From: Bachrach, Barry A.
To: 'McDonnell, Alicia (SUF)'
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 7:24 PM
My ire is about up here. Trocoli may find herself the subject of bbo matters. She lied to the court about serving me docs while I was representing jean omeara which lead to the sale of a house. I was never served. One of the so called harrassing docs was a package of pleadings given to trocolli by jean omeara not david amos. It was then sent to me unopened. When the facts come out here, I believe the charges will be proven frivolous and ms. Trocolli may find herself in hot water. Barry.
----- Original Message -----
From: Bachrach, Barry A.
To: 'David R. Amos'
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 6:40 PM
Subject: FW:
pleasant.
-----Original Message-----
From: McDonnell, Alicia (SUF) [mailto:Alicia.Mcdonnell@state.ma.us]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 5:52 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: RE:
Attorney Bachrach- i understand kate mcintyre agreed to this continuance but she did so without my consent and i would have objected- i am not aware of the next date and will find out tomorrow but just so you know if it is not scheduled to be heard again in the next 30 days i will make a motion to the court to have it moved up within 30 days- there are outstanding issues that need immediate attention from the judge- first, the commonwealth's motion for a competency evaluation; second, the defendant's continuing contact of the complaining witness in violation of the court order; and three: the complaining witness, angela troccoli, has informed me that she does not want to be contacted by you or any other attorney representing Mr. Amos.
I will contact you to discuss another date if it is not within the next 30 days- thank you- Alicia McDonnell
-----Original Message-----
From: Bachrach, Barry A. [mailto:BBACHRACH@bowditch.com]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:56 PM
To: 'McDonnell, Alicia (SUF)'
Subject: RE:
so we're all set for tomorrow. thanks. i think the presence of an atty will help this case.
-----Original Message-----
From: McDonnell, Alicia (SUF) [mailto:Alicia.Mcdonnell@state.ma.us]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 8:42 AM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: RE:
Attorney Bachrach-
I am standing in for ADA McDonnell this week in her absence. I am reading her e-mails to assist her and saw this. If you advance and continuance the case, we would just ask that the time be excluded under R. 36.
Kate McIntyre
-----Original Message-----
From: Bachrach, Barry A. [mailto:BBACHRACH@bowditch.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 11:25 PM
To: 'Alicia McDonnell (alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us)'
Cc: 'David Amos'; 'David Amos'
Subject:
Alicia, since we have not been able to talk, I feel it important that Mr. Amos have representation in the criminal matter. Hence I will enter an appearance Monday.however, I need to reschedule the status hearing scheduled for 6/14 because I will be travelling to a major hearing I have in fargo, nd, for leonard peltier. Could you please give me the name of the da taking your place Tuesday so I can reschedule. Thanks, barry.
----- Original Message -----
From: David R. Amos
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Cc: moto maniac
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 6:55 AM
Subject: I have been saving this email for just the right time
Barry this is a draft of one of many emails going out very soon. It should prove you why Hanlon and McDonnell hate me.
The time is now. This email should prove to you all that at least I am an ethical political animal. I sent this email to the following people on November 19th. I argued in it court after I had served the ADA and the court hard copy in hand. The conversation was largely between the second Spanish speaking judge and I that my attorney, Barry Bachrach and my wife met again in Dorchester District Court last week after they crossed paths with Judge Coffey.
On Nov 19th the ADA Alicia S. McDonnell mostly just stood before the court beaming beet red and struck dumb as usual. The only day McDonnell ever had much to say was on Oct 1st, 2004. That was when she read to the court Troccoli's Bullshit statement that apparently had just been faxed to her. She then quite frankly astounded me by adding a great deal more of her own Bullshit by falsely accusing me of threatening Judge Coffey. Her charges were not only false but insanely ridiculous. She is the one who needs her head examined not I. I could not be stalking anyone in the USA while I was in Canada the whole summer long. Then there is the simple fact that if I had threatened a judge he would have taken care of me immediately. He would not wait for an ADA and another judge to decide to protect him from possible harm. That aside McDonnell was not even present during the hearings I had before Judge Coffey. She had witnessed nothing that had transpired between he and I. She and Judge Hanlon were content to let their underlings handle me until I had thoroughly embarrassed their help and the court with the overwhelming truth of the matter out of the gate. After that their mission has always been to label me as some sort of madman and file me away forever to protect a bunch of crooks from their necessary and proper prosecution.
Rather than act within the scope of their employment and uphold the law the Clerk Magistrate Owens, Judge Hanlon, the ADA McDonnell and all others involved in the Dorchester District Court matter willfully practiced crimes against me as early as September 3rd if not before. The clerk Magistrate Anthony Owens admitted within his own signed documents that he knew of the FBI tapes. How could he not have known I had given the Suffolk County District Attorney a copy of one tape the month before the Clerk Magistrate broke the law and filed an unsigned criminal complaint against a man not only not in jail but who was not even in the USA. The Suffolk County District Attorney had even answered my letter attempting to explain the clerk Magistrate's illegal actions. Honestly I think they were all shocked that I had made it across the border without the DHS taking me away. Dorchester District Court has never had jurisdiction over me but the Suffolk county District Attorney has always has jurisdiction over the wiretap tapes. The tapes were found in the trash less than a mile from his head office in the mid nineties. I tried to give them to the FBI on October 15th, 2002 but they they told me they did not care about my concerns because they were to busy preparing to go to war with Iraq. I swear upon my seed that is true. I made certain I recorded a statement of that fact in the public record of Norfolk Probate Court as soon as the Secret Service woke me up in April of 2003 investigating false allegations of a presdential threat made against me by the Quincy District Court. The very court that has just ordered my wife and children out of their home based on the fraudulent actions of Trocccoli and her cohorts. Yankees are crazy not me.
On November 19th I served an Assistant District Attorney, a fairly young dude who always wears glasses with copy of the following email in hand after the court has first sent me to see Judge Coffey just like they did with Barry and my wife last week. As soon as I was called I asked the Spanish judge why I was ordered to the court that day. He looked at the largely empty docket and said had he had no idea and that it was a good question. So he sent for Alicia S. McDonnell to see if she could tell us why I was ordered to stand before the court that day. After a while McDonnell appeared and read every single word of the following email. She said nothing to argue the fact that the charges were illegal and malicious. In fact McDonnell hardly said anything at all except to claim that the hearing that day was supposed to be a pre trial conference.
Months later on January 21st McDonnell gave me documents claiming that we had had a pre trial conference way back on October 19th, 2004 which was an outright lie as well. That was the day I raised only Hell in Dorchester District Court after I got out of jail and tried hard to remove the matter to federal court. At least my indignation last October finally caused the Probate Court to force Angela Troccoli to file her documents with the Register of Deeds that she had sworn under penalties of perjury that she had done way back in March of 2004. The perjury of Angela Troccoli within the Records of the Register of Deeds can never be erased by any clerk. The book has already been printed and her malice was recorded years after my wife homesteaded our home still deeded in her father's name until late June of this year. Her father's estate has yet to be closed and he has been dead since 1973. Troccoli's associate Neil M. Kerstein had no right to interfere in our privacy whatsoever. Small wonder to me that Hanlon, McDonnell and oh so many others want me in the nuthouse. It is for their benefit not justice.
From: David Amos
To: cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; alltrue@nl.rogers.com
Cc: diane.bourque@flsc.ca ; jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca ; gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca ; corp.website@sunlife.com ; martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; shickman@pattersonpalmer.ca ; lrikleen@Bowditch.com ; John.Conyers@mail.house.gov ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca ; carterweb@emory.edu ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; parkhill@stu.ca ; plee@stu.ca ; kentlib@nbnet.nb.ca ; police@fredericton.ca
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:32 AM
Subject: Hey
( I have corrected some spelling and added a few words. What the hell it is after all my email and I own the copyright. Nobody except a few good friends will even admit the email was sent last November)
Hey Ron, Byron, Kathyrn and Mr. Conley,
I figure that today may go three ways. The District Attorney will drop the charges now that the federal election is over or he will go forward and attempt to prosecute me or he and the court will come up with some new charges in an attempt to put me away again. This email should off set all three actions. Feel free to surprise me Mr. Conley with a sudden fit of ethical behavior. However I ain’t betting on it.
Whereas you, Mr. Conley have chosen to not only ignore my legitimate concerns for months but have maliciously prosecuted me and have even had me sent to jail over false allegations of threatening a judge, I look forward to arguing you about just one email with this email alone. However since you and the clerks office have a very bad habit of making documents disappear, I have decided to record this contact with you electronically but give it to your Assistant in hand. I ask my friends to send it around the world so that it is never lost. I have also sent the other emails mentioned by the Boston Police Dept. and your Assistants in their complaint against me. I will print hard copy and present this and the following emails Cynthia A. Robinson as the legal counsel to the Chief Justice of the Boston Municipal Court. She has some serious thinking to do after she had chosen to ignore my call about my concerns with the court that she speaks for. I knew she knew a lot the instant she called me David rather than Mr. Amos as most other lawyers do.
On November 19th I will demand that Judge Hanlon recuse herself and ask the First Justice Charles R. Johnson to review the matter. I sincerely hope that he practices brevity, common sense, practicality accepts the court's limitations as well as his own. I do not think it wise for him to support Judge Hanlon's actions against me She had no right whatsoever to declare that I very likely have a prior history of mental illness and deny the fact that I had ran for Parliament and have very valid concerns about the Public Trust being upheld.
I will file a personal injury lawsuit against Judge Hanlon and anyone who stands with her. I already have the documents proving her malice Why the wiretap tapes were denied as evidence by Judge Hanlon and your office without examination by any law enforcement authority will forever prove my point about corruption in Canada and the USA. Chief Justice Mulligan, the Attorney General of New Brunswick, the Solicitor General of Canada, Governor General of Canada and a great many others suggested that I give the god damned tapes to you and return I am called mental ill and dangerous? I am not the one that needs his head examined in fact you Mr. Conley are in great need of having your Professional Conduct examined. You are not crazy. You are corrupt.
I will be demanding that the matter be sent to Congress and Parliament in order to be properly investigated and that counter charges be laid against you and many other employees of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts the City of Boston, the federal government and other States that failed to uphold the law and act within the scope of their employment. The fact that I as a Canadian Citizen was summoned out of Canada by an unsigned complaint by a Clerk Magistrate who had no authority to do so anyway forever makes this a federal matter. That it was done under the warrant of the Boston Police Dept whose very own Police Commissioner Kathleen O'Toole had been made aware of many crimes before even the first email was ever sent to Angela Troccoli's boss, Mr. Schulman makes this matter particularly offensive. The fact that I was sent to jail on unnamed charges that were labeled "other" should cause me to seek a great amount of relief in punitive damages so this does not happen again to others. The fact that I was sent into the custody of the very Sheriff that had practiced Fraud and Perjury against me for the benefit of the US Attorney Michael Sullivan two years ago just served to further piss me off. Clearly Judge Hanlon has no understanding of the Eighth Amendment and the Clerk Owens has done his best to try to cover his malicious tracks and destroy the Public Record in a effort to stop me from properly removing the matter to federal court. I watch you malicious Assistant District Attorney laugh as she over heard me saying that I would be suing her six ways to Sunday. Not only does she not understand me she does not understand how to uphold the law. Now she should suffer the pains and penalties for her malice. Following are a few law and prior matters we will be arguing in the near future.
CHAPTER 265. CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON
Chapter 265: Section 43A Criminal harassment; punishment
Section 43A. (a) Whoever willfully and maliciously engages in a knowing pattern of conduct or series of acts over a period of time directed at a specific person, which seriously alarms that person and would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, shall be guilty of the crime of criminal harassment and shall be punished by imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than two and one-half years or by a fine of not more than $1,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Such conduct or acts described in this paragraph shall include, but not be limited to, conduct or acts conducted by mail or by use of a telephonic or telecommunication device including, but not limited to, electronic mail, internet communications or facsimile communications.
Commonwealth v. Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury Division of the District Court
439 Mass. 352(2003)
** Important case regarding clerk-magistrate hearings **
A clerk-magistrate has no authority to conduct a show cause hearing prior to acting on an application for the issuance of a felony complaint where the person charged is not under arrest.
The Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury District Court scheduled show cause hearings on two separate felony complaint applications. In both instances, the person charged had not been arrested for the alleged offenses. The Commonwealth filed a c. 211, § 3 petition, requesting that the single justice vacate the show cause hearing and issue an order directing the clerk-magistrate to halt such hearings in the future. The Commonwealth's petition was granted and the Clerk-Magistrate appealed.
In reviewing the opinion of the single justice, the SJC looked to the statutes that both define and limit the clerk-magistrate's authority - G.L. c.218, §§33 and 35A. The SJC found no authority for a clerk magistrate to hold a show cause hearing with respect to felony complaints - in fact, §35 specifically limits such hearings to misdemeanors for which there is no arrest. Additionally, §33 contains no provision for an adversary hearing with regard to the issuance of a felony complaint. Finding no statutory authority for such a hearing, the SJC affirmed the decision of the single justice, vacating the hearing and ordering all future hearings to cease. "To the extent that a clerk-magistrate declines to act on an application for the issuance of process on a felony complaint until a show cause hearing is held, the clerk-magistrate improperly interferes with the prosecutorial discretion of the executive branch."
Commonwealth v. Clemens
Appeals Court
September 2, 2004
In a rescript opinion, the Appeals Court addressed for the first time the criminal harassment statute (c. 265, § 43A) enacted in 2000. The Court suggested that, similar to the stalking statute, criminal harassment will require a showing of at least three separate incidents of willful and malicious conduct to support a conviction.
Jurisdiction:
Criminal jurisdiction of the Boston Municipal Court includes most criminal offenses which do not require the imposition of a state prison sentence. If a prison sentence is mandated, the Court may conduct probable cause hearings to determine whether offenses will be bound over to the Superior Court. The Court has original jurisdiction over a number of serious felonies, concurrent with the Superior Court. The Court's civil jurisdiction includes contract and tort actions; cases remanded from the Superior Court; small claims, small claims jury appeals; mental health commitments; summary process; supplementary proceedings; unemployment compensation appeals; paternity and support actions; and domestic abuse actions. The Court also has jurisdiction for review of findings of the State Police Trial Board and equitable jurisdiction in lead poisoning prevention; landlord interference with quiet enjoyment or failure to provide utilities; family abuse prevention; sanitary code; and residential nuisances.
Wagenmann v. Pozzi, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30752, District of Massachusetts, 1986 decision, upheld the potential liability of prosecutors who convey false information to the bail magistrate which resulted in the setting of excessively high bail which precluded the plaintiff from obtaining release from jail, and further that such prosecutorial statements to the judge significantly contributed to the judge's decision to commit the plaintiff to a mental hospital, citing the next case below
Bretz v. Kelman, 773 F.2d 1026, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23482 (9th Cir. 1985)(en banc), in which a unanimous 9th Circuit upheld a Section 1983 civil rights claim for similar prosecutorial misconduct (alleged perjury, threatening and coercing witnesses, concealing and falsifying evidence), citing Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 68 L. Ed. 420, 101 S. Ct. 1908 (1981)
Richards v. City of New York, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13675, Southern District of New York, Judge Michael B. Mukasey, opinion dated September 2, 1998, explaining how prosecuting attorneys can be liable (i.e., lose their full or partial immunity) when getting involved in the investigative area
Mr. Conley I am well aware that you have many political friends that you are protecting from my very valid allegations of crimes. After I had properly disclosed to you many crimes practiced against me, you attacked me with great malice, You should inform your fellow District Attorneys William Keating, Paul F. Walsh, Jr. Timothy J. Cruz, John J. Conte and many other elected officials that I am going to sue you all after I done arguing Alicia S. McDonnell in Dorchester District Court.
I am just a layman. It was not my job to inform the Clerk Magistrate, Mr. Owens of the law but I truly did try to byway of his clerks F. Dennis Sullivan and Robert Sullivan beginning in June while I was running for Parliament. I also fully disclosed everything to you in July in enough time to impeach George W. Bush while all the other Democrats were in Beantown. Hell you even answered me. In return you attack Me? Then when I prove your malice Owens and his assistants like Mr. Buckley and all the other clerks practice fraud etc. against me. I am also aware of the federal political connection of the Dorchester District Court byway of Judge Sidney Hanlon and the former Attorney General Janet Reno and federal funding sent to that court to support the torture of men in malicious actions such as this. I suspect it was to support the actions of the political far left in their endeavors to make inroads in the justice system to suit their own ends. Feel free to argue me.
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
December 30th 2004
Legal Advisor Mary Jo Harris Legal Counsel Cynthia A Robinson
Boston Police Department Boston Municipal Court
One Schroeder Plaza 90 Devonshire Street, 16th Floor
Boston MA 02120 Boston MA 02109
Phone 617 343-4550 Phone 617-788-8733
RE: My pending personal injury lawsuit in federal court related to a pending matter
in Dorchester District Court Docket # 0407CR004623
Hey ladies,
Beginning in June of this year as soon as I was made aware of the Boston PD investigation of the very fraudulent allegations of Angela Troccoli, I diligently to discuss this matter with everyone involved including you two ladies. I have waited six months for someone to act ethically and uphold the law. Now I quit talking and must sue everyone including you. I must do so promptly in order to regain the lost assets within the malicious bail ordered by the corrupt, Judge Hanlon and the lost assets stolen by Troccoli and her clients while I was in jail. I was never arrested, never read my rights and illegally held in the very crooked Sheriff Cabral’s jail under the charges of "other" in order to have my head examined because I exercised my right to refute the false statements made by the wicked Assistant District Attorney to support a malevolent Clerk Magistrate’s blatantly illegal complaint. What would you do if you were I?
Thus far this was all done with the support of three judges, Coffey, Hanlon and some Spanish speaking judge no one will give me the name of. On Nov 19th the latter unnamed judge had no idea what the matter was about because the clerk had destroyed most of the Public Record. At least he ordered that the matter proceed swiftly to trial as I demanded. I must sue him too because he refused to return or reduce the bail. He also refused to keep the attached email that I served upon him and the District Attorney during the course of the hearing. He did study it but he called me back after the hearing was over and ordered me to take the document because both he and the clerk did not want it in the public record. I took it after promising to give it to his lawyer, which is you, Ms. Robinson. As you can see you are mentioned within the email dated Nov 19th hereto attached. Clearly it was composed and sent weeks after you had refused to discuss this matter with me when I still had time to remove it to federal court. I did tell you that I would send hard copy. I will never understand why you put me on hold and then were to busy to talk to me yet never called me back. I thought you would surely call once I had served this email upon the court and the DA. This matter does involve my freedom. Two months is long enough for any man to wait in order to be assured that a lawyer is delaying him for lucre or malice. Ms. Harris, the same is true for you. I called you before I called the Mayor’s office in July. If you ladies have questions now, ask your cohorts in the Police Dept, the Mayor’s Office, the DA’s office, the Clerks office, the Sheriff’s Dept, or listen to me on Jan 21st in Dorchester District Court as I argue a couple of interesting motions with whatever judge I meet next.
Please find enclosed exactly the same material served upon the legal counsel for the House of Representatives two days ago. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. Whereas Judge Hanlon refused to order the District Attorney to notify the FBI of the existence of the nine original tapes served upon them on September 3rd, perhaps you ladies should consider calling the FBI yourselves. Next year I will quit trying to reason with unethical lawyers etc. From now on I argue with them on the public record.
I made my last calls today to some of my future adversaries. Ms. Harris the last call was to you while you were purportedly out to lunch. I was directed to your voicemail. I declined but it was one step further than the last time I called your office in July. Whoever answered then refused to speak to me because I was a so-called defendant. It did not matter her that I had yet to be charged or that I would be defending myself Pro Se if I were to be charged. After month or so I did manage to talk to Det. Wayne Williams but only briefly because he told me he had an ongoing investigation of me and refused to discuss anything with me. I told him that since he had already pressed false charges against me, I would be suing him. Maybe during the process of discovery of a civil lawsuit I will find out what other crime he is attempting to accuse me of.
If the cops had studied the emails Troccoli claimed were harassing, they would have seen the last one was sent to other Police Depts and to Canada’s Minister of Justice. It was mere days before I returned to Canada to run for Parliament. If the emails were in fact harassment, ask yourself why Irwin Cotler didn’t charge me while I was under the Crown’s jurisdiction. If you doubt me then ask the District Attorney to show you the emails within the huge exhibits that were attached to the Affidavit filed on Oct 1st. Those same exhibits and a great deal more will reappear in federal court next year.
I have no idea what is recorded on the wiretap tapes I gave the District Attorney on Sept 3rd in my criminal matter nor do I care. It is not my job to investigate crimes. I will be filing other wiretap tapes in federal court under seal in a civil complaint so that I cannot be accused of violating other people’s Fourth Amendment Rights. As you listen in confidence to the CD of tape # 139 please understand that either I or my estate will give the original tape only to the fella that calls himself "Al" so that he may sue the government himself if I fail to in my efforts to see justice served.
A Happy New-Year for me would bring shame on all lawyers. Please feel free to impress me with ethical behavior as per the Rules of Professional Conduct. If the USPS does what they are paid to do this time around, you should receive this material first thing in the morning of the last day of this year. Perhaps you should call the FBI ASAP. Say hey to Mr. Kaiser for me. Tell him I am taking a vacation before going back to court on the 21st. He can forget trying to talk to me off the record next year. If he wants to hassle me let him know I sent the text of this letter to Irwin Cotler and many others.
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
September 1st, 2004
Howard Rubin, Lyn Crompton Andy Scott
and Greg Delbigio Minister of Indian Affairs
c/o Terry LaLiberte, 61 Carleton Street
Barrister and Solicitor Fredericton, NB. E3B 3T2
1190-605 Robson Street
Vancouver, B.C. V6B 5J3
RE: Corruption
Hoka Hey,
Please find enclosed a copy of most of the material sent to two Lieutenant Governors and the Governor General. The copy of wiretap tape number 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court and a Minister in our government in order that it may be properly investigated. I have also enclosed a copy of a letter I composed months ago but never sent and some other information you may find interesting about the political scene in South Dakota.
Leonard has been a political prisoner for far too long with Canadian assistance let us not allow history to repeat itself with John Graham.
May I suggest that you all give my friend Barry Bachrach a call, drop my name and then look to the best interests of the people that you are employed to speak for. There is a strong possibility that my actions may embarrass you in the near future if you choose to ignore this letter. You are looking at just the tip of a very malevolent iceberg that we all know exists. No government is beyond reproach once the electorate has been properly informed. Conrad Black just proved to us all how bad things realy are if anyone was paying attention.
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, David R. Amos, of 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. on Sept 2nd, 2004, I delivered the enclosed material to the office of Andy Scott at 61 Carleton Street Fredericton, NB. E3B 3T2 and by mail to Terry LaLiberte.
David R, Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
----- Original Message -----
From: Bachrach, Barry A.
To: 'David Amos'
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:28 PM
Subject: RE: Has Noam Chomsky ever talked to you?
SURE MENTION ME. CHAOMSKY IS PART OF THE FAKE LEFT. THEY ARE LOSERS.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 3:33 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: Has Noam Chomsky ever talked to you?
This really pissed me off. I have long email exchanges with him and when he and Paul Saba spoke in Milton (I had served Saba the same stuff you got at the same time.) I gave the same stuff to Noam's help without a CD recording. The old bugger don't mind running off to Canada to rub elbows with other Canadians he finds newsworthy but won't even pick up the phone to call me. He sure can talk a good talk though. I even had a long talk with Graham's buddies. I guess it is time to write his lawyers a letter do you wish for me to mention you?
http://www.grahamdefense.org/20040320noam.htm
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:05 PM
Subject: Hey Mr . Irwin why not do the right thing and take your mail?
It seems that CSIS is messing with my mail
Sent by last Thursday by Canada Post to RCMP General Counsel Liliana Longo
c/o Ast. Commissioner Gerry Lynch in NFLD. I have now called NFLD and gave Gerry the tracking number and told him if he wants to read his mail he should send someoneto find it. afterall he is one of the second in Command of the RCMP and Longo is his lawyer.
Canada Post won't say dick to me about it.
To track and confirm delivery of your item, enter the Item number, Reference number, or Delivery Notification Card number in the corresponding field provided below, then click the Submit button.
No records found for specified search criteria: 46227406901
Sent US Mail Saturday in Beantown all it had to do was go about a half a mile to the Canadin Consulate.
Obviously I informed them but the thing is they don't know who else I told. Kinda of a double check one by phone
and one by email.
Track & Confirm
Shipment Details
You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 5717
Your item was forwarded to a different address at 2:22 pm on September 21, 2004 in BOSTON, MA 02108. This was because of forwarding instructions or because the address or ZIP Code on the label was incorrect. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.
Here is what happened earlier:
ACCEPTANCE, September 17, 2004, 10:30 pm, BOSTON, MA 02205
Anyway it ain't no matter to me now Their mail is filed in court for the public to view. If they want to piss and moan about it they can argue me later in court.
They are public servants they should read their god damned mail. The Postal Service has a little explaining to do anyway over the Attorney General Robb Quinan and his Mail fraud anyway. I will just and this shit to it. I knew old man Ronald Irwin would duck and run but arguing Longo should be fun,
What I did in Norfolk Probate Court today was way beyond fun it went way better than I dreamed it could. October 1st should prove to be quite a hoot after meeting Angie in court today. I wonder if Longo is a pretty as she is. She looks good in her picture anyway I am certain that she is a damn sight smarter than Angie. Angie is so stupid I almost feel ashamed for making her show me her ass. (Not really I am an ass man)
Now it appears all the Canadian Boobs have shown me their ass a well. Time to talk to the right Yankees just before the November Election and then head out as planned. i finally got the tape from the New Brunswick Police Commission and I will send a copy of it your way someday Byron. I made sure I mentioned you several times and showed them the documents but I didn't speak of what it was about but everybody will know they got something really kinda big. I did to protect ya buddy. I also mentioned Barry once. I hope Barry called you today. I know the FEDS are likely listening and reading our emails so I recorded it here to protect the both of you and Collen Rowley as well. I cannot afford the time
to wait for her to retire she is more valuable to me as an honest lawyer within the FBI before the Yankee federal election, not afterwards.
I also hear Jean and Joyse on the tape so it should protect their butts as well. I will order a copy of the Probate Court tape as soon as we can afford it. But it will likely be edited anyway
From: "Bachrach, Barry A."
To: 'moto maniac'
Subject: RE: Fw: Something weird going on...FR: Byron
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:49:51 -0400
you got to be careful. just found out someone went out to pine ridege. totally disrupted a group of people trying to fight the corruption. guess what. bingo, his wife is an fbi agent. i smelled something and told them to find out. in the interim, the work was disrupted as planned.
-----Original Message-----
From: moto maniac [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 12:47 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Something weird going on...FR: Byron
Be careful Byron and I both think this lady is a FED in BC. He just spilled some beans to her on purpose.So that they will make a play against me on Oct 1st. You know what they say about keeping your friends close and your enemies closer. There is nothing wrong with my emails she just said that so that others won't read them.
Note: forwarded message attached.
Posted by: David R. Amos | Oct 3, 2005 3:19:16 PM
Now Deputy Dog can go sniffing around Superman's arse and yipping to him for protection from his own wrongs. Remember Superman you merely advised people to do their jobs after you had lost yours. shouldn't someone check Deputy Dog's work?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bsharpe@nl.rogers.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net ; duffy@ctv.ca ; martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; news@ctv.ca ; am@ctv.ca ; diane.bourque@flsc.ca ; jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca ; gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca ; corp.website@sunlife.com ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; shickman@pattersonpalmer.ca ; lrikleen@Bowditch.com ; John.Conyers@mail.house.gov ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca ; carterweb@emory.edu ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; parkhill@stu.ca ; plee@stu.ca ; billestabrooks@navnet.net ; kentlib@nbnet.nb.ca ; police@fredericton.ca ; wickedwanda3@adelphia.net ; marno3@shaw.ca ; cmgstjohns@nf.aibn.net
Cc: guild@interlog.com ; ombudsman@cbc.ca ; lise@cmg.ca ; pacificpalate@telus.net ; ajehman@hotmail.com ; maureen_matthews@cbc.ca ; gerry@cmg.ca ; bvessey@pei.eastlink.ca ; sallypitt@hotmail.com ; garyparsons@nfld.net ; neilmac@vzw.blackberry.net ; deesdee@yahoo.com ; shawk_1999@yahoo.com ; cari_blanchard@yahoo.com ; cturner@nbnet.nb.ca ; briann@accesswave.ca ; mplaurin@sympatico.ca ; lebelb@nbnet.nb.ca ; slmsmbouchard@hotmail.com ; maurice10@rogers.com ; m.meldrum@ns.sympatico.ca ; twomech@nb.sympatico.ca ; dugasp28@hotmail.com ; embateman@hotmail.com ; sawebb@hotmail.com ; pgcastle@hotmail.com ; newschick@hotmail.com
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 2:00 PM
Subject: This is who I am Bobby Baby. Read it and weep.
Hey
To put it simply in answer to your dumb request Mr. Sharpe. My answer is HELL NO. That is a nice as I can put it. I just called Katie Nicholson and introduced myself. I will it leave you to wonder whom I will call next. Your clue is that you sent them greetings as a Locked-Out brother in sunny St. Johns.
To elaborate, I must say that I definitely will not go away. Look how you people act since you have been locked out of your jobs. You behave far worse tha I. In fact I may be coming to Newfoundland very soon to copy the material in the dockets of Newfoundland Supreme Court in the Billy Matthews versus Byron Prior matter as it pertains to me me. I need hard copy before I sue the CBC and the Crown. My question right now is hey Bobby Baby why don't I sue you too? Maybe I will come around and watch your people do their song and dance for their job. Perhaps you should try meeting me toe to toe and looking me in the eye if you want to meet a simple sincere and very serious man and then dare me to. I will be real easy to pick out. I am the hairy bastard in the Kilt once worn by a good friend of mine Ol Tom. He is one of the last of the Ladies from Hell. I wear it with his blessings. too many of his friends fought and died many years ago so that shit like this should not happen in our own nativeland. Even the Yankee bastard I call Deputy dog has met Ol Tom long before I dated the Yankee's sister. You bear the same first name as Deputy Dog Bobby Baby and you just forwarded all them your dumb little email that jerked this mangey old dog's chain bigtime. Need I say that my wife did not like receiving your response? She has warned me not to send out her email address anymore. Like her I do not listen real good sometimes but I did accomadate her on her birthday at least.
Bobby Baby if you want someone's shoulder to cry on give the lady Liza Frulla a call. She is a former sister of yours correct? I think she may have some job security issues when there is finally a federal election called. The sooner the better for me and the NDP. Frulla did not answer me so I must remain a man of my word and pass this email on as I promised her I would. Quite honestly I did not expect her to answer me. Everybody knows that she does whatever Paul Martin and the warroom dudes within PCO/PMO offices tell her to do. I needed the proof of contact thats all because I was banking on the fact the warroom will tell her to ignore me. I was just playing her like a fiddlewhile fishing for response from yo sos like you and hopefully an ehtical person or two. Paul Dugas who likes to play the fiddle in the town where I was born should certainly get my joke. On the one year anniversary of Ashcroft visiting Canada and Wayne Easter's office talking to me, he joined a forum to yap about violins. I found the coincidence strangely comical. If Paul Dugas or anyone within the CBC had elected to report my doings on that day instead of talking about fiddlin etc, we would all be better off right now. The CBC recived received my material July 16th 2002, the very same day Argeo P. Cellucci did. That was long before the War on Iraq had started. Have your conscience dwell on that sad fact for a minute or two before you answer a lot of ghosts in your Heaven or Hell someday. As you can see I study people a bit and I already have a pretty good idea who will be naughty and who may be nice. I learned long ago cops, lawyers, bankers, priests and newsmen never are. So I attack them out of the gate but only in an ethical fashion byway of the written word and carefully worded phone calls. Newsmen should know that the word is mightier than the sword. You make your living by it you should die by it as well. Please fall on it ASAP or use it to hang the rest of the corrupt bastards. How is that for a challenge?
Furthermore I like to do everything in threes just like they purportly do in Heaven and Hell. Now that Suzanne Gaudet, Paul Dugas from the town where I was born and you the Newfy Bobby Baby have responded to me you have sealed the fate of the Crown Corp of CBC for me. I need no more responses from the likes of you. Why spoil my own fun? I will likely not tell you anymore about what I am up to after I send the next email and print both of them as evidence to use in Federal Court. I will sue the Minister who oversees your conduct and none of you can ever say that you did not know the truth of my concerns before I did. The CRTC can go to Hell for all I care. Starting with their crooked little Minister many of the public servants under her supervision need to be replaced if the public trust in your profession is ever going to be upheld.
Even though the unethical people at CBC, CTV and all other media pretend to have no understanding of what I mean, a lot of Maritimers understand me quite well already. Blogging is truly the only way to go these days. Watch out. Ordinary folks will replace you in a New York minute. Why else has CBC locked you out I might ask? It appears to me that only the Frenchmen has job security EH? Why do you think that is? Better yet look how quick Bloggers embarrassed Dan Rather before you call me a dreamer. That said look to find the text of this email in many Blogs in the near future and you can study the work of a very fierce political animal. All you should have to do is Google your own name or email address. Turn about is fair play. EH? If you don't like please sue me just like Billy Matthews did with Byron Prior. Google that name some time then tell me all is well in Newfoundland.
It is my fellow Maritimers that I want pissed off at the CBC etc. and all the corrupt politicians they have chosen to support. I do not give two hoots about you as a man Bobby Baby. To me you are just a dumb little pawn in a big big game. I am taking on the Masters of War alone despite the laughter from the likes of you. IF you want some insight in to my character have Rudyard Kipling explain my nature to you within his wonderful poem called IF. I take his advice not your. thus you have the reason behind my simple answer of NO. What I would prefer though Newfy is for you to call me a liar in a public forum. I dare ya. You do not seem all that sharp to me so I will warn you I was raised to the F's of the Maritimes that your former Premier explained to the Yankees years ago. I found it funny the chickenshit named only three. So much for being politically correct EH? He came close but no cigar. Castro will get my joke someday soon. Here is me phone number 506 434-1379. Use it Newfy if you dare to use a phone with a caller ID. Otherwise do not bother at all. just find me in the Blogs.
On a personal note Bill, I liked your voicemail to me. You and I should have a long talk sometime. I think it would be best to do in public in front of many witnesses who have no idea what we are talking about. I am up against some pretty bad acting Feds right now. I am sorry to say that I cannot afford to trust anyone. A very busy Bar or Diner where ordinary folk like me hang out are my favorite haunts. I know of a few down your way. Maybe I will give ya call when I am heading to your town. Better yet for the benefit of your party why not come see me ASAP? I ain't hard to find ask the RCMP. They have been watching me like a hawk.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 06:00:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: ROBERT SHARPE
Subject: Re: Moma and Max and Happy Birthday Cards
To: David Amos , Jean.F.O'Meara@aexp.com,
davidamos@bsn1.net, duffy@ctv.ca, martine.turcotte@bell.ca, news@ctv.ca,
am@ctv.ca, diane.bourque@flsc.ca, jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca,
gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca, corp.website@sunlife.com,
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, shickman@pattersonpalmer.ca,
lrikleen@Bowditch.com, John.Conyers@mail.house.gov, smay@pattersonpalmer.ca,
bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, carterweb@emory.edu, Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us,
Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us, parkhill@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca,
kentlib@nbnet.nb.ca, police@fredericton.ca, wickedwanda3@adelphia.net
CC: guild@interlog.com, ombudsman@cbc.ca, lise@cmg.ca,
pacificpalate@telus.net, ajehman@hotmail.com, maureen_matthews@cbc.ca,
gerry@cmg.ca, bvessey@pei.eastlink.ca, sallypitt@hotmail.com,
garyparsons@nfld.net, neilmac@vzw.blackberry.net, deesdee@yahoo.com,
shawk_1999@yahoo.com, cari_blanchard@yahoo.com, cturner@nbnet.nb.ca,
briann@accesswave.ca, mplaurin@sympatico.ca, lebelb@nbnet.nb.ca,
slmsmbouchard@hotmail.com, maurice10@rogers.com, m.meldrum@ns.sympatico.ca,
twomech@nb.sympatico.ca, dugasp28@hotmail.com, embateman@hotmail.com,
sawebb@hotmail.com, pgcastle@hotmail.com, bsharpe@nl.rogers.com,
newschick@hotmail.com
Who are you to have me on your list? Go away.
--- David Amos wrote:
>
> Yo Mama
>
> In lieu of a Birthday card or gift this year
> I figured sending you our Joy Boy Max will have to
> do to cheer you up and then later this email may
> give you some more joy at the thought that it may
> give Deputy Dog a serious stroke or a minor hat
> attack at the very least. I have been waiting awhile
> to repond to the bastard's blog for your benefit as
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: RE Communications in the Public Interest
To: liza_frulla@pch.gc.ca, Frulla.L@parl.gc.ca
CC: betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca, ocrdct@hotmail.com, davidamos@bsn1.net
From: "Paul Dugas"
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Moma and Max and Happy Birthday Cards
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 12:36:14 -0300
Please remove me from your email list thank you
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: So much for ethical reporters the town I was born in EH?
To: dugasp28@hotmail.com, m.meldrum@ns.sympatico.ca, maurice10@rogers.com
Suzanne Gaudet is just like Bill Hamilton, She plays the see no evil, hear no evil speak no evil game. While Maurice Doiron, Murray Meldrum and Paul Duhas just opt to play dumb. What must Liza Frulla think of all this. From my point of view you do nothing so why not replace you with nothing at at. It is cheaper for the Taxpayer to keep piping in the BBC. Bullshit is Bullshit no matter what the accent.
twomech@nb.sympatico.ca wrote:
From:
To: David Amos
Subject: Re: Hey Duffy I know why Dr. Hamm quit and why dog MacKay don't hunt in Nova Scotia
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:00:42 -0400
Please remove me from your mailing list. Thank you.
>
> From: David Amos
> Date: 2005/09/30 Fri AM 08:40:44 EST
> To: duffy@ctv.ca, martine.turcotte@bell.ca, news@ctv.ca, am@ctv.ca,
> diane.bourque@flsc.ca, jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca,
> gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca, corp.website@sunlife.com,
> cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, shickman@pattersonpalmer.ca,
> lrikleen@Bowditch.com, John.Conyers@mail.house.gov, smay@pattersonpalmer.ca,
> bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, carterweb@emory.edu, Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us,
Hey Lady Liza Frulla
I got the following response from the email I just sent to one of your underlings Ms. Macphee so I called the number she suggested and got the usual governmental voicemail from her help so I left a message. I got a call back just now from her assistant at 819 997-0313. I told her that I would send this email to you and she affirmed my right to do so. However when she attempted to lay down the law to me, I told her I would see her in court. I prefer to argue their lawyers in court rather than spit and chew with civil servants on the phone on my dime. More importantly to me is that I responded to you her Minister byway of email because I require hard copy for evidence to use during the pending arguments of the complaint against the Crown that I do intend to file in Federal Court in Fredericton New Brunswick soon. I am sending you two more emails after this one because my lawyer advised awhile ago to try hard to make my matters well none to the media. From this point forward as the Minister who oversees the CRTC who can never saw that you did not know what many other have known for quite sometime. For what is worth in my humble opinion if you play your political cards right you could be our first Lady Prime Minister.
I will give you Ms. Frulla the weekend to respond to me before I send this particular email to many others but many others will be receiving what Ms. Macphee aready got. I do not care what her assistant Ms Gable may think. She can gab to somebody else about what she wishes to inform me of. I have done my homework and need no advice from the likes of her. What Ms. Gable may not understand about me is that unlike Paul Martin I am a man of my word. I am just like him in one regard. I am also a very fierce political animal who is is equal and opposite in all things that define men. Martin is evil. I am not. Martin is a very wealthy lawyer. I am a just poor layman. Martin is labeled as Honourable and I am called as crazy as a loon. However I am a man Martin is not. He is a snake. I am indeed a very Proud Canadian who is definitely not proud of the people who speak for me. Get it Ms. Frulla?
As Minister Responsible for Status of Women, you really should make certain that the integrity of all women in government does not come into question. From my point of view some women such as the Yankee Judges, Sidney Hanlon, Paula Carey and Cristina Harms for example do much harm to the reputation of your gender. What they have done to my little family in the USA in order to support the rampant public corruption in Canada and the USA should offend anyone with half a mind at all. My wife is a woman too after all. She has never done any wrong at all. Her only offence to the justice system was to stand against the politcally connected family members who had stolen her interests because no lawyer would dare speak for her. When she had her breakdown I took up the fight as any proud husband and father should. It is not only my right but my duty to protect my little Clan. The biggest difference in our genders is that men are not so quick to cry or back down from any bully. My wife is a very tender soul while I can be as mean as a the snake Paul Martin is.
The New World of the Internet has afforded me quite a weapon to do battle with against the likes of Paul Martin and all his crooked cohorts. There is still a place in this Old World for a fierce ethical warrior such as I. Otherwise crooked men and women who are merely low people in high places to me will walk all over us common ordinary folk. I am no physical threat to anyone. I do battle with the word not the sword. It is mightier. Anyone who once worked for CBC should understand that simple fact.
Furthermore this email is definitely not Spam. I am greatly offended when the powers that be label it as such and block it to protect their own greedy interests. Whether you or anyone else believe me or not, my communications are in the best interest of the public. I feel confident that it is much to the chagrin of the people who have failed the public trust in their elected and politically appointed positions. I suspect that is why Nancy Gabler sounded so pissed off just like the tone of Hélène Lapointe's email to me . Rest assured many Canadians will be reading this email after I sent it to you. It is me on the phone to your office right now after that I am putting a bunch of material in the mail and serving many lawyers in hand. My phone call is an ethical effort to introduce myself in order to prove to you that I am sincere.
I know what I have sent to many Members of Parliament during the course of the past two years and I keep very good record to prove simple truths. For certain you just made my list of people who may be naughty or nice. After Xmas Martin must see that Gomery tells his tale and the Canadian people will decide once again who they think is naughty and nice. As as the freedom loving individual that I am I will decide long before then in the hope that my opinions become well known before an election is called. Whereas the people cannot depend on the CBC etc. to report all things of public interest, I will rely on the Blog.
I have no doubt whatsoever that your buddies within the CBC reported heavily your run for a seat in Parliament last year. As one of our newest Ministers besides Belinda Stronach ask them for your own education why the CBC failed in their mandate to report my bid for a seat as well. Better yet if you want to have fun take it out with the nasty dudes inside the warroom of the PCO/PMO offices. I will wager my name is the biggest curse word in Parliament right now. I am certain that is why it is not said over the airwaves or put in print. From now on at least you can never say that you did not know my name too.
I am begging ya, please do not be like two other women who once worked for the CBC Adrienne Clarkson and Michaelle Jean. Nobody is that dumb. They must have deliberatly ignored my laments because Paul Martin directed them to. May I suggest that you read this entire email from the point of view of an ethical Minister in charge of the public interest of the Canadian people? Please do the right thing despite what the leader of your party may wish. If not as you talk the talk on TV etc in the coming months about the doings of CBC and Parliament etc I will walk the walk and complain of many politicans in court. History has proven that in the end the truth usually wins out even if it is ignored in court in the present tense.
By the way guess who is campaigning hard for a fall election? To have an election on Boxing Day is righteously fine by me. I ain't religious. Ask the Holy See or George W. Bush why. I dare ya.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Excerpt from CTV.ca, Canada on Sep 27, 2005 of news by the Canadian Press
"CBC employees in Quebec and Moncton, N.B., are not affected by the lockout.
Information pickets set up early in the day under pouring rain didn't try to stop Prime Minister Paul Martin or Adrienne Clarkson, the Governor General, as they headed in for a morning news conference on Parliament Hill.
Clarkson, who will be replaced Tuesday by Michaelle Jean, governor-general designate, leaned out of her car to speak with CBC pickets.
At the rally, locked-out workers presented petitions signed by thousands of CBC fans calling for an end to the labour dispute.
Heritage Minister Liza Frulla acknowledged the anger of the Canadian public, telling the rally that cabinet ministers have been hearing demands that something be done to get the network back in business.
"All summer, we had messages from the population out there, messages from all through Canada, saying how they miss you," she told the rally. "
I just had to insert the campaign manager for Oscar Doucet for Leader Hélène Lapointe's answer in comical font. It is too funny to do other wise. How is is that dor the local NDP trying hard to play dumb?
"Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:28:40 -0300
Subject: Re: Free Thinkers please feel free to blog this.
From: Hélène Lapointe
To: David Amos
I DON'T WANT TO RECEIVE YOUR E-MAIL ANYMORE. PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM YOUR
MAILING LIST!!!
Le vendredi, 30 sep 2005, à 10:30 Canada/Atlantic, David Amos a écrit :
> The CBC and all others in the media and governemnt will not relay
> this crap to the people. Perhaps we the people should all ask the
> politicians who were elected to speak for us why I have been compelled
> to sue the Queen and the Holy See along with the USA.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: duffy@ctv.ca ; martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; news@ctv.ca ; am@ctv.ca"
"Macphee, Betty" wrote:
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Free Thinkers please feel free to blog this.
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:30:51 -0400
From: "Macphee, Betty"
To: "David Amos"
I will be away from the office until Friday, September 30th. If you have any urgency, please send your email to Nancy Gabler or contact her at 997-4319.
Je serai absente du bureau justqu'au vendredi le 30 septembre. Si vous avez des urgences, svp envoyer votre courriel à Nancy Gabler où téléphoner à 997-4319.
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 06:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Free Thinkers please feel free to blog this.
To: sahara@free-thinkersclub.com, publiceye@cbs.com, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca,
Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca, dmitchell@irvingmitchell.com,
contact@citizenscentre.com, cbc@crimlaw.ca,
belanger.jean-daniel@psio-bifp.gc.ca, pgriffin@lsrsg.com,
jlaskin@torys.com, wbrock@dwpv.com, carley@lutz.nb.ca,
registerodonnell@norfolkdeeds.org, info@mwpc.org, Lliss@rubinrudman.com,
regbert@egbertlaw.com, has@harveysilverglate.com, lawald@web.apc.org,
ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, brad.green@gnb.ca,
gary.ostoich@mcmillanbinch.com, info.com@chrc-ccdp.ca,
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca, radionews@mpbc.org,
publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com, kbabin@globaltv.ca,
jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org, info@ccna.ca,
kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca,
sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca, events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org,
crgeditor@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca
CC: rmoir@unbsj.ca, suzanne.ball@nbsc-cvmnb.ca, manon.losier@nbsc-cvmnb.ca,
ottawacomments@state.gov, Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca, Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca,
elizabeth.weir@gnb.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca, mail@allisonbrewer.ca,
aj_titus2002@yahoo.ca, ken.ross@gnb.ca, nanluke@nb.sympatico.ca,
ericson@unb.ca, ocrdct@hotmail.com, helenel@nb.sympatico.ca,
coates2001ca@yahoo.ca, maryanne.bourque.pollack@gnb.ca,
harbourmla@nb.aibn.com, president@ndp.ca, info@gomery.ca,
lcampenella@ledger.com, AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca, betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca,
potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca, josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca,
renaudlp@oag-bvg.gc.ca, rdaoust@privcom.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
smorel@gg.ca, rraymond@lcc.gc.ca, execassistant@nafta-sec-alena.org,
caroline.whitby@transfair.ca, pbroder@imaginecanada.ca,
cforcese@uottawa.ca, David.Fewer@uOttawa.ca, Philippa.Lawson@uOttawa.ca,
Stephane.Emard-Chabot@uOttawa.ca, Chantale.Fore@uOttawa.ca,
exec@casis.ca, gkealey@unb.ca, dgollob@cna-acj.ca,
justicepourmohamedharkat@yahoo.ca, mail@ccla.org, info@amnesty.ca,
rocht@iclmg.ca, katiag@ccic.ca, admin@cbanb.com, info@cba.org
The CBC and all others in the media and governemnt will not relay this crap to the people. Perhaps we the people should all ask the politicians who were elected to speak for us why I have been compelled to sue the Queen and the Holy See along with the USA.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: duffy@ctv.ca ; martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; news@ctv.ca ; am@ctv.ca ; diane.bourque@flsc.ca ; jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca ; gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca ; corp.website@sunlife.com ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; shickman@pattersonpalmer.ca ; lrikleen@Bowditch.com ; John.Conyers@mail.house.gov ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca ; carterweb@emory.edu ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; parkhill@stu.ca ; plee@stu.ca ; kentlib@nbnet.nb.ca ; police@fredericton.ca ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Cc: guild@interlog.com ; ombudsman@cbc.ca ; lise@cmg.ca ; pacificpalate@telus.net ; ajehman@hotmail.com ; maureen_matthews@cbc.ca ; gerry@cmg.ca ; bvessey@pei.eastlink.ca ; sallypitt@hotmail.com ; garyparsons@nfld.net ; neilmac@vzw.blackberry.net ; deesdee@yahoo.com ; shawk_1999@yahoo.com ; cari_blanchard@yahoo.com ; cturner@nbnet.nb.ca ; briann@accesswave.ca ; mplaurin@sympatico.ca ; lebelb@nbnet.nb.ca ; slmsmbouchard@hotmail.com ; maurice10@rogers.com ; m.meldrum@ns.sympatico.ca ; twomech@nb.sympatico.ca ; dugasp28@hotmail.com ; embateman@hotmail.com ; sawebb@hotmail.com ; pgcastle@hotmail.com ; bsharpe@nl.rogers.com ; newschick@hotmail.com
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 8:40 AM
Subject: Hey Duffy I know why Dr. Hamm quit and why the little dog MacKay don't hunt in Nova Scotia(slightly edited DRA)
The sad part is so do you people. I am gonna tell everybody the truth about what CTV and CBC have refused to report for years for the benefit of the rampant public corruption you support for your own personal gain. Need I say that I am happy the crooked CBC dudes are locked out of work right now? It appears to me that blogging is the only way to go these days. What say you? Call me a liar after you hear me speak in Federal Court in Fredericton in the near future. I dare ya to have your lawyer Martine Turcotte explain why Robert C. Pozen has become George W. Bush's favorite Democrat. Better why not ask Sunlife's Yankee lawyer Jeffery Carp why a proud Maritimer smells a lot of rotten fish in Beantown.
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Dr. Hamm you picked an interesting day to Quit
To: premier@gov.ns.ca, jdewolfe@ns.sympatico.ca,
michael.baker@ns.sympatico.ca, morse.mla@ns.sympatico.ca,
parentma@gov.ns.ca, rodneym@ns.sympatico.ca, rrussellmla@ns.sympatico.ca,
barnetbe@gov.ns.ca, ronchisholmmla@auracom.com,
bill.dooks@ns.sympatico.ca, elf@ns.sympatico.ca,
bill.langille@ns.sympatico.ca, btaylormla@rushcomm.ca,
chatawaymla@hfxeastlink.ca, mlaclarke@ns.sympatico.ca,
Peter.Christie@ns.sympatico.ca, dentreca@gov.ns.ca,
a.macisaac@ns.sympatico.ca, rhurlburt@auracom.com, hinesgb@gov.ns.ca,
educmin@gov.ns.ca, codonnellmla@ns.sympatico.ca,
kgmorashmla@ns.aliantzinc.ca, Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca
CC: john.macdonell@ns.sympatico.ca, mmacdonald@navnet.net,
mhraymondmla@eastlink.ca, wilsond@gov.ns.ca,
marilynmoremla@ns.aliantzinc.ca, jpye@ns.sympatico.ca,
joanmasseymla@ns.aliantzinc.ca, gaudetw@gov.ns.ca, mackinrv@gov.ns.ca,
macdonman@gov.ns.ca, gordiegosse@ns.aliantzinc.ca,
corbettmlacentre@ns.sympatico.ca, stephenmcneil@ns.aliantzinc.ca,
boudrebv@gov.ns.ca, billestabrooks@navnet.net,
davidawilsonmla@eastlink.ca, samsonmp@gov.ns.ca,
charlieparkermla@ns.aliantzinc.ca, Regan.G@parl.gc.ca
Looks like I am about to rain on your party. Perhaps the sneaky political/lawyers Regan and MacKay will tell you why if your own lawyer Mikey Baker won't do so.
"As premier, I am proud of our record,'' Hamm said.
Unlike many of his predecessors, the family doctor is leaving office without a cloud of controversy hanging over his head.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; trenhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca ; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca ; Poirier-Rivard.D@parl.gc.ca ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Lavallee.C@parl.gc.ca ; Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Faille.M@parl.gc.ca ; Deschamps.J@parl.gc.ca ; Demers.N@parl.gc.ca ; Brunelle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bonsant.F@parl.gc.ca ; oec-bce@parl.gc.ca
Cc: buckley@pol.state.ma.us ; steve@djflynn.com ; ombud@globe.com ; paul@djflynn.com ; dan@djflynn.com ; letter@globe.com ; publicrelations@cubanmission.com ; rusun@un.int ; france-presse@un.int ; uk@un.int ; contact@germany-un.org ; c103@c103.com ; general.info@thomson.com ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:16 PM
Subject: I bet a man named Mr. Tax who works for the Justice Dept doubts that he will
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: scottmk@gov.ns.ca ; bev.harrison@gnb.ca ; ted.tax@justice.gc.ca ; graham@grahamsteele.ca ; hepstein@supercity.ns.ca ; deveaux.mla@ns.sympatico.ca ; ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca
Cc: davidamos@bsn1.net ; BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; adams_sammon@msn.com ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca ; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:08 AM
Subject: Hey Ted Tax as soon as I saw that the Lt. Gov had honoured you
I figured you would do nothing to rock the Queen's boat for reasons of job security. However even you and your pension funds rely on the ethics of the Yankees employed by the SEC in the USA. Perhaps you should side with me ASAP. My kids need a roof over their heads. I am not above suing anyone to get one including the Queen and the Holy See. However it is your job to prosecute criminals not mine. Correct?
"Ted Tax and the Department's Atlantic Regional Office (ARO) were honoured at a Nova Scotia Lieutenant Governor's Awards Ceremony. Tax was presented with a Certificate of Recognition for "contribution to the Reserve Force by taking positive action to assist its employees who are reservists in maintaining their commitments to the Canadian Forces." Following September 11, 2001, there was an increase in the demand for military legal officers on operational deployments. Major John Smithers, a lawyer with the Tax Law Services Section of the ARO, was granted military leave to serve on an overseas mission."
For the record this is the text of the cover letter sent to Baker etc. Lets see what Mr. Speaker has to say now. I believe he is an ex cop ain't he? Lets see if he remembers how to uphold the law. If not don't you think it is high time that the lawyers in the NDP give the crooked Conservative Goverment the Boot? Everybody knows they are lapdogs for George W. Bush. Why else did he make it a point to fly down and see them last year and snub Paul Martin and his cohorts in Ottawa?
July 31st, 2005
Lt. Gov. J. Léonce Bernard Lt. Gov. Myra A. Freeman
Premier Pat G. Binns Premier John F. Hamm
c/o Att. Gen. Mildred A. Dover c/o Att. Gen. Michael Baker
Fourth Floor, Shaw Building, North Department of Justice 4th Floor
105 Rochford Street Room 5151 Terminal Road
P.O. Box 2000 P.O. Box 7
Charlottetown, PEI C1A 7N8 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2L6
Lt. Gov. Norman L. Kwong Lt. Gov. Iona V. Campagnolo
Premier Ralph Klein Premier Gordon Campbell
c/o Att. Gen. Ron Stevens c/o Att. Gen. Wally Oppal
208 Legislature Building Stn Prov Govt PO Box 9044
9E210800 - 97 Avenue Parliament Buildings East Annex
Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2B6 Victoria, BC V8V 1X4
RE: Public Corruption
Hey,
Apparently everybody wanted to play dumb about my concerns and allegations so that Humpty Dumpty Martin’s minority government would not fall and they could party hardy while the Queen was in Canada. As you all know months ago, I began faxing, emailing and calling the eight other Lt. Governors I had yet to cross paths with. I fully informed them of my indignation towards the Governor General Clarkson and two of her other Maritime Lieutenants Roberts and Chaisson before the latest wave of bad acting Yankees invaded my home in the USA without warrants or due process if law.
I made certain all of the provincial Attorney Generals and Premiers can never deny the fact that I tried to make them well aware of my concerns and allegations in order to make everybody should sit up and pay attention. Not one person from any of your offices ever responded in any fashion at all. You can be certain that I expected the deliberate ignorance. It is one of the oldest tricks in the book that lawyers employ in order to play their wicked game of see no evil, hear no evil speak no evil. I knew it would happen particularly after Nova Scotia’s Conflict of Interest Commissioner Merlin Nunn had blocked my emails before I had contacted you. I have no doubt it helped to relieve him of his ethical dilemma before the NS NDP decided what to do about their chance to unseat the Conservatives. I have no doubt whatsoever many lawyers in Canada were praying that the Suffolk County District Attorney would have me back in the loony bin by April 28th and that all your troubles would go away. I opted to let you all have your way and did not bother you anymore until the Queen had left our shores and Parliament quit for the summer. Now it is my turn to have some fun and raise a little Political Hell.
While the Queen, Clarkson and Martin where all having a grand old time on the Canadian dime my little Clan went through living hell down here. Trust me, lawyers need to learn some new tricks. Ignorance is no excuse to the law or me. Making some Canadian Attorney Generals and their political buddies show me their arses is child’s play to me after all that I have experienced in the last few years. If you doubt me ask Michael J. Bryant and Yvon Marcoux why I am so pissed at their bosses and the DHS. Then check my work for yourself. If the tag team of John Ashcroft and Tom Ridge could not intimidate me, believe me you people don’t have a prayer. Both of those dudes have quit their jobs but I am still standing and squaring off against their replacements now. If it were not for all the decent folks I know, the snotty ones like you would make me feel ashamed to be a Canadian. There is no shortage of lawyers. It is just that ethical ones that are rare birds, that’s all. You must know how easily the Canadian people can replace you with other lawyers if it becomes widely known how willing you are to ignore crime if it means some fancy dude may be compelled to suffer for his own wrongs.
The justice system is supposed to be self-policing. It should clean up its own act rather than trying to maintain a false mask of integrity for lawyers that are obviously criminals. It is way beyond my understanding why you people would choose to support the likes of Paul Martin, Adrienne Clarkson, T. Alex Hickman and Billy Matthews if you are not all as crooked as hell as well. The deliberate ignorance and double-talk employed by the wealthy few to dodge simple truths is absolutely offensive to ordinary people blessed with the rare attribute called common sense. Not all folks are like sheep.
Paul Martin’s latest tricks make for a very fine example of truly how bad things are. Even amidst wholesale scandals breaking out hell, west and crooked everywhere lawyers and politicians just close ranks and stand together as thick as the thieves they are. I stress tested the ethics of the ladies of the Bloc Quebecois and the Gomery Inquiry immediately after Martin’s carefully orchestrated little circus in Parliament on May 19th was a matter of history. Lets just say I was not surprised to not hear one peep in response from anyone other than to get a call from an unidentified and very nervous but cocky Yankee lawyer claiming that Tony Blair was mad at me.
Pursuant to my phone calls, emails and faxes please find enclosed as promised exactly the same hard copy of what I sent to the Canadian Ambassadors Allan Rock and Franky Boy McKenna and a couple of nasty FBI agents on May 12th just before an interesting event in front of our home in Milton. I have also included a copy of four letters I have received in response since then that you may find interesting to say the least. I also sent you a copy of a letter sent to a lady Ms. Condolezza Rice whom our former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney considers to be the most powerful woman in the world. The CD of the copy of police surveillance tape # 139 is served upon all the above named Attorney Generals as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also included a few recent items to spice things up for you. I am tired of trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186
The enclosed letter from The Public Service Integrity Office, whose boss recently testified before the Gomery Inquiry and following quotes prove why I must speak out.
"Well what do you expect?" said Le Hir in reaction. "Anybody who had been involved in that kind of thing isn't going to admit readily, or willfully, to having participated." Asked why he's waited 10 years to come out with his allegations, Le Hir said he was "sworn to secrecy." "I'm breaking that oath, and the only way I could have been relieved by that oath was by a judge in a court saying, 'Mr. Lehir, I understand that you have made an oath of secrecy; and you're hereby relieved of that oath."
"Mr. Wallace added that police and the courts, not internal rules, are best-equipped to deal with bureaucrats who cross the line and break the law. But Judge Gomery did not appear satisfied. "It takes a major scandal to get the police involved," he said. "It is not in the nature of the public service to call in the police."
Everybody knows that in order to protect the rights and interests of my Clan and to sooth my own soul, I have proven many times over that all lawyers, law enforcement authorities, and politicians in Canada and the USA are not worthy of the public trust. I maintain that their first order of business is to protect the evil longstanding system they have created for their own benefit rather than the people they claim to serve. Call me a liar and put it in writing. I Double Dog Dare ya.
Baker got my material. So did everyone else. Only the Attorney General in Quecbec refused it. I bet our newest Governor General knows why. It is likely for the same reason she will not accept my emails. It should be obvious to anyone why I must sue the Crown.
USPS Track and Confirm
Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 440U S
Detailed Results:
Delivered Abroad, August 05, 2005, 9:23 am, CANADA
At Foreign Delivery Unit, August 05, 2005, 8:10 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 2:52 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 2:22 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 2:22 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 10:28 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 9:08 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:32 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
Posted by: David R. Amos | Oct 3, 2005 3:07:10 PM
On my wife's birthday I have elected to respond to the Yankee bastard Robert O'Meara whom I often refer to as Deputy Dog. I have disowned him as a brother in law a long long time ago. I hope that this posting will at least make my wife laugh. Her brothers are one of the big reasons I founded my own Clan. you can pick your friend but you cannot pick your family unless you found your own and begin again with those you choos to call kin. I was really low when that Yankee slammed my mother though and really funny when he said his family is tired of him and he was forced to cover up the simple truth of his own blog. I find it very comical the things that he attempts to accuse us of. He is the crook not us. I defy any lawyer, politician, banker or cop to call me a liar and argue me Pro Se in front of a jury of my peers. Deputy Dog has refused to do so and thus far none of his lawyers are willing to do so either. I will lay odds that his boss the the fat little politician Sheriff Michael G. Bellotti wishes that his crooked little deputy would shut up right about now. Particularly when there is a pretrial conference pending in Norfolk Probate Court on Oct 26th in which with any luck at all some Deputy Dog's criminal actions will begin to be revealed.
It took me almost two months to have the FBI confirm or deny that there was a warrant for my arrest now that I can prove it to Canadian authorities I will fix it from here. I am hiding from no one at all as I raise Hell in the Maritimes right now. Here is my number. 506 434 1379. Call me with your own phone number in open view on my phones ID if you have the balls. I will be happy to explain to you or your lawyer how much the public trust has been betrayed on behalf of Robert O'Meara and his kin.
This is who Deputy dog really is. The chickenshit employs his nasty girlfriend Wanda Willard's phone # and email address because he ain't much of a man after all.
Robert O'Meara
75 Kathleen Dr.
Plymouth Ma.
(508) 224-4831
Following this little rant is a list of some of the lawyers that are well aware of Deputy Dog's crimes such as criminal harassment, fraud, insurance fraud, tax fraud, forgery, larceny and perjury etc etc. They have opted to assist this bastard instead of upholding the law because the false face of integrity of their legal profession would be embarrassed. They allow this suckhole to milk workman's comp while being employed as a jailer instead of putting him behind bars. I done some time for no reason at all for except for his benefit and he brags of it in a Blog? Methinks it is his turn don't you? The bastards that call themselves barristers will not do a thing to see that justice is served. They just throw my wife and kids in the street before they even bother to close her father's estate and he has been dead since 1973 and the deed of the property she homesteaded years ago was still in her daddy's name and pray that it all stays covered up. Furthermore I did prove Securities fraud within her mother's estate years ago. The SEC will not allow their lawyers to testify in my defence at a criminal trial brought on by false allegations made against me by a corrupt justice system trying to save its own butt?
Watch out Yankees in the words of your crooked Governator "I'll be back" If the dude named after Superman who is now hiding in the closet of the Aspen Institute after he got fired from the DHS don't scare me, do you thing the following lawyers do? Give any one of them a call and tell them I said hey and that I and looking forward to suing them all someday. If you want to have some fun with dumb lawyers within the following list Angie Troccoli is the first bitch to start with. She runs hard with Deputy Dog but she ain't got a phone. I got her fired from three law firms already because of her willful perjury etc. in support of Deputy Dog Robert O'Meara. Call her former bosses Ellis, Shulman and Sims just to listen to them stutter. Better yet call the Yankee DA McDonnell or the dumb as post Neil M Kerstein or the equally dumb Jan Whiting. All have assisted Troccoli greatly in her malice towards my family. This is just a partial list of lawyers who stand with Robert O'Meara against me. I say the more the better. Everybody knows that lawyers are liars. Wait until they tell you how much they love Robert O'Meara and have yourself a good laugh. Need I say that I am very happy that Deputy dog and his lawyers hate me? I ain’t a bit like them and damned proud of it.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Angela K. Troccoli
Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 166
Foster RI 02825
Alicia S. McDonnell
Suffolk County District Attorney's Office
510 Washington Street
Dorchester MA 02124
617-287-1195
Neil M Kerstein
Kerstein & Associates, PC
1212 Hancock Street, Suite 120
Quincy MA 02169
617-773-1200
Francis X Bellotti
Mintz Levin, Et Al
One Financial Cnt.
Boston MA 02111
617-542-6000
James F Walsh
2300 Washington Street
Canton MA 02021-1151
617-265-1200
Michael John Pieroni
Law Office of Michael J. Pieroni
One Park Place
Plymouth MA 02360
508-746-3443
Valerie L. Giglio
Law Office of Valerie L. Giglio, Esq.
220 Beach Street
Revere MA 02151
781-289-6966
Richard Phillippe DeMont
77 North Mill Street
Hopkinton MA 01748
508 893-9988
Gregory R O'Meara
222 North Street
P.O. Box 470
Hingham MA 02043
781-749-1155
James M Kickham
Constance K Kickham
George A Kickham
Kickham Law Offices
1318 Beacon St
Brookline MA 02446
617-566-5990
William D Kickham
119 Fisher Street
Westwood MA 02090-3618
781-320-0062
Jeffrey C Lapointe
Law Offices of George E Burke
339 Hancock Street
Quincy MA 02171
617-328-1300
Adam Chu
1212 Hancock St.
Quincy MA 02169
617-770-2221
Margaret Mary Cronin
409 Pond Street, Unit 2
Braintree MA 02184
781-843-4004
Michael Patrick Cronin
Ernst and Young LLP
200 Clarendon Street
47th Floor
Boston MA 02116
617-867-2957
Daniel P Matthews
280 Hillside Avenue
Needham MA 02494
781-444-1067
William P O'Donnell
55 Albemarle Road
Norwood MA 02062
781-762-0988
Timothy N Cronin
NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation
800 Boylston Street
17th Floor
Boston MA 02199
617-424-2104
Joseph D Cronin
Suffolk University Law School
120 Tremont Street
Boston MA 02108-4977
617-573-8547
Michael Patrick Cronin
Ernst and Young LLP
200 Clarendon Street
47th Floor
Boston MA 02116
617-867-2957
Dane M Shulman
1596 Blue Hill Avenue
Mattapan MA 02126
617-442-6800
George Ellis Jr
Ellis Law Offices
33 Pleasant St., Ste. 2
Worcester MA 01608
508-757-7451
William H Sims
Sims & Sims, LLP
53 Arlington Street
P.O. Box 7367
Brockton MA 02303
508-588-6900
Marjorie A. Adams
Adams & Sammon
800 Hingham Street
Suite 200N
Rockland MA 02370
617-773-7891
Jan W Whiting
Law Office of Jan W. Whiting
86 Washington Street
Weymouth MA 02188-1704
781 337-1699
Read on Yankees and tell Robert O'Meara to ream out and grease his asshole. He gonna need the practice for what I hope other prisoners in a Yankee jail shove up it someday soon. I hear that crooked cops and sheriffs make for good sport in jail.
May 11th, 2005
Ambassador: H.E. Mr. Allan Rock
One Dag Hammarskjold Plaza
885 Second Avenue , 14th Floor
New York , NY 10017
Ambassador Franky McKenna
Canadian Embassy
501 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20001
Assistant Director Louis M. Reigel III
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
Special Agent David Price
FBI Minneapolis
Suite 1100
111 Washington Avenue, South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-2176
RE: Rampant Public Corruption in Canada and the USA
Hey,
Now that Paul Martin has finally set the date for his confidence vote, methinks its time to pack my bags and head for home. I must raise some serious political hell in the Maritimes before the Commonwealth of Massachusetts does its worst to bankrupt my wife and put my kids on the street before I can expose the rampant public corruption. This is also a very good day to prove within the USA that we are well aware of each other and of my concerns and allegations in order to stress test the integrity of the US Mail. It and the Canada Post have failed me big time in recent years particularly just before the Yankees falsely imprisoned me last year for the benefit of George W. Bush, John Kerry and Paul Martin to name a few. I have no doubt whatsoever each of you dudes know more about me than I do about you. However that does not mean that I have not studied each of you a lot more than the ordinary layman. Just so we are clear, I have no respect for any of you. I know that all of you are as crooked as Chief Mearn, his cops and the lawyers who are coming into our home tomorrow without a warrant. This mail should prove your malice and willingness to support crime and public corruption.
Pursuant to my many emails, phone calls and faxes etc., you will find enclosed as promised exactly the same material I served upon the Solicitor Generals Teddy Olson and landslide Annie McLellan last year before I ran for Parliament last year. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as officers of the court and FBI Agents in order that it may be properly investigated. Franky got this stuff and more last year. The FBI got even more the year before. Perhaps they should go find the original tapes that the Suffolk County District Attorney and Special Agent in Charge Ken Kaiser have been playing dumb about for far too long. This material was good enough to impeach George W. Bush last year and cause many people to quit or lose their jobs. It is every bit as valuable today and you all know it. Ask the many people whose names can be found within these documents or Franky Boy or Claude Richer, Allan Rock’s lawyer buddy in the RCMP about this stuff before you call me a liar. As you all know I am out of jail on bail pending my upcoming criminal trial in front of a jury of my peers. I have the right to remain silent in the USA. I will employ different rights in Canada and say a lot.
What I choose to say while stumping for a seat in Parliament in Canada is of my concern not yours. If you dudes do your jobs here and I act ethically and legally up home with luck the world will be far better off in short order. I have already checked the rules with the people working for Elections Canada. We agree it is perfectly legal for an innocent man to run for Parliament while being prosecuted with false charges in the wrong jurisdiction and venue in the USA. Everybody knows I can secure my personal freedom quicker in a political forum in Canada rather than argue crooked judges in the USA. They have already imprisoned me on bull**** charges without even reading me my rights or telling me why I was in jail. The crooks are not going to have a sudden fit of ethical behavior now without it becoming a matter of political will. We all know it is high time for a change, the sooner the better for the Maritimes as well as the rest of the world. What better politician to argue with than a right wing lawyer named Rob Moore?
As you all no doubt know I have been talking to many people within the UN and have sent many much of my stuff. You all must have laughed as hard as I did when the Cubans were afraid to talk about my stuff. I must agree with George Bush about one thing. The UN is certainly in need of an overhaul. Yet we all know that nasty dudes like Maurice Strong’s buddy, Paul A. Volcker, the Former North American Chairman of the Trilateral Commission and Karl Rove’s puppet, John Bolton are just going to make matters worse. The same holds true with the turncoat Robert C. Pozen. He now offers advice to Bush on how to fix Social Security simply because I sent him running for cover with my Putnam Investment concerns and the malevolent media control of Global Corporations. Feel free to argue me or act ethically. You choose. I don’t care. Franky Boy knows he is way past too late. I am just rubbing his nose it before I talk a lot about him and his failure to uphold the public trust in our old stomping grounds up home. I can’t help but wonder how he explained his “Harper is a lapdog for Bush” dogma to Karl Rove and his nasty cohorts. I suspect it was an allowed comment from an insider of the Carlyle Group. Don’t you? We all know Stephen Harper would never fit in that group. He is as dumb as a post. All of his successes playing at politicking have just been a matter of luck and playing on the PC and Liberal scandals. Harper is kinda scary to me. He has a truly awful agenda in store for all Canadians like evil old T. Alex Hickman and Johnny Crosbie did for our Newfys.
Sometimes less is more. So in conclusion I will just quote former Inspector General of the DHS Clark Kent Irwin and simply say it would have benefited all if he had taken his own advice way back in November of 2003 when he had an important job.
POGO: “Any advice for your fellow public servants?”
Irwin: “Well, just do your job and let the political chips fall where they may. Unless you’re willing to do that, it seems to me you shouldn’t take the job in the first place.”
What say you?
Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
They got their mail now. Check for yourself
USPS Track & Confirm
Status: Delivered
You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6592
Your item was delivered at 6:54 am on May 16, 2005 in MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401.
We attempted to deliver your item at 6:58 am on May 14, 2005 in MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.
Here is what happened earlier:
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:30 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
Status: Delivered
You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6608
Your item was delivered at 12:03 pm on May 16, 2005 in NEW YORK, NY 10017.
We attempted to deliver your item at 8:04 am on May 14, 2005 in NEW YORK, NY 10017 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.
Here is what happened earlier:
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:32 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
Status: Delivered
You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6615
Your item was delivered at 7:43 am on May 14, 2005 in WASHINGTON, DC 20535.
We attempted to deliver your item at 4:03 am on May 14, 2005 in WASHINGTON, DC 20535 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.
Here is what happened earlier:
ARRIVAL AT UNIT, May 14, 2005, 4:01 am, WASHINGTON, DC 20022
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:31 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
Status: Delivered
You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6707
Your item was delivered at 1:03 pm on May 16, 2005 in WASHINGTON, DC 20001.
Your item was accepted at 9:32 am on May 12, 2005 in QUINCY, MA 02169.
August 14th, 2005
John Bishar Jr General Counsel
KeySpan Corp
One MetroTech Center
Brooklyn, NY, 11201
Michael Callahan, General Counsel
Yahoo! Inc.
701 First Avenue
Sunnyvale, California 94089
Peter Hugh Collins
Law Office Of Collins & Collins
1266 Furnace Brook Parkway
Quincy MA 02169
William P. Barr, General Counsel
Verizon Communications Inc.
1095 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Lucian E. Seagraves General Counsel
EarthLink Inc.
1375 Peachtree St.
Atlanta, GA 30309
Manuel L Casabielle
2420 Coral Way
Coral Gables, FL 33145
Re: Public Corruption, Constable Michael C. Moore and Triple M. Movers
Hey,
Recently my phone line in Milton was cut off again just before I was ordered to appear in Dorchester District Court for no discernable or ethical reason other than to allow the court to have an opportunity to me put back in jail without a trial once more. The interruption of my phone service happened once before just as I was emailing my attorney Barry Bachrach and he had just warned that the FBI were behaving very poorly to some of his other friends at the same time. This occurred immediately before I was falsely imprisoned on October 1st of last year and my wife couldn’t call anyone for assistance for several days. Recently not very long after I talked to Peter Collins in his capacity as Norfolk County Commissioner and Manuel Casabielle as the latest lawyer for Whitey Bulger’s buddy the retired FBI agent John J. Connolly Jr. my phone was cut off again. All my alarms and bells and whistles went off. I had accurately predicted the demise of H. Paul Rico in the very same Miami Jail to Michael Von Zamft the very same Miami-Dade Assistant State Attorney in November of 2003. This FBI agent is charged with leaking confidential information that prompted the gangsters to kill John B. Callahan a Winchester financier and onetime financial adviser to Bulger's gang. I have made certain that everybody knows that I am bounty hunting Whitey Bulger and I have no doubt the FBI is protecting him from me. The other Callahan I sent this letter to should find at least that to be interesting since he found nothing else I sent him warranted a response a long time ago. Now he and Mr. Seagraves have hard copy of exactly the same material I sent the FBI on May 12th 2005. After they read the letter I just sent to Chief Justice Connolly, they can ask their buddies in the White House what the hell has happened that has me so pissed off right now.
However I will tell all of you that my phone was quickly put back in service as soon as I promised to send William P. Barr hard copy of this material. After all he the former Attorney General under President Bush’s daddy who now works for a phone company. If anyone could understand the ramifications of a layman from Canada possessing police wiretap tapes it should be Mr. Barr. I have no doubt whatsoever his phone company has been assisting the Feds in tapping my own phone lines. When the spooks get spooked they cut it. It is just that simple. Feel free to call me a liar. Why not hire the former Attorney General Ashcroft, the former DHS Inspector General named after Superman or his boss Tom Ridge to sue me. They are all loyal republican government lawyers who are now out of a job and looking for work. Lawyers make me sick every time they make use of the word integrity. I want to argue some of the bastards in court very soon. Last Friday when my wife watched the KeySpan truck pull up in front of our home and then go talk to the crooked constable Michael C. Moore I figured that our utility company was in bed with the crooks as well. Why else would they go talk to the constable and not my wife who pays their bills? Therefore I have sent both companies that we pay our after tax dollars to for their services exactly the same material that Constable Moore was served on Friday August 12th plus a copy of my letter that I just faxed to the Chief Justice of the District Court who sent the bad acting Yankee bastards to our home.
I have sent my wife to deliver in had to the lawyer who practices law not to far from our home. Peter H. Collins was also elected to make certain that things run smoothl;y and ethically within our county. I know what I said to him and faxed to him too long ago for him to pretend to me that he is an honest man now. However methinks he had better get on his phone if his line has not been cut and call all the crooked lawyers in Norfolk county right now and figure out how to smooth things over ASAP. I am about to put our little town of Milton on the map. Many fancy Yankee lawyers are about to show their nasty arses all over the world. Peter Collins may find himself quite famous in short order. I sent him and Manuel Casabielle exactly the same material I sent the old bastard from Dedham. Everybody knows who he is. Hell he owns CBS.
The CD which is a copy of police surveillance tape # 139 is served upon all of you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. Should someone call the FBI ASAP to ask what the hell is going on in law enforcement? If all else fails and the Feds will not fill you dudes in, the lawyers for the internet companies can review some of my private emails that their companies blocked just before the federal election last year. Those emails should have caused them to act ethically a long time ago rather than blocking my correspondence to other lawyers or politicians who had claimed to have an interest in my concerns and allegations as they sought to be elected. Maybe after receiving hard copy of some of the documents that they can find within my emails the light will dawn on Marblehead and integrity will have a far more important meaning to lawyers after this. With luck it may become more than just another word.
In closing I must repeat it and spell it in capital letters for you INTEGRITY is very important for lawyers, politicians, bankers and priests to understand the meaning of. Without it there is no public trust of their chosen professions. That is why many jokes such as politicians are just lawyers who have gone really bad ring oh so true. Get it?
If I were you Mr. Peter H. Collins I would get on the phone right now to your very corrupt Yankee friends such as Chief Mearn of the Milton Police, the District Attorney Keating and the Register of Deeds little Willy O’Donnell. You should all make certain that the crooked little Constables with the big guns under Constable Michael C. Moore and their many friends from Triple M. movers in Brockton do not make a move against me today or ever for that matter. Here is their numbers just in case you want to calll themFrom this point on things are only going to get worse for you damned Yankees. I am emailing this letter and blogging it around the world. I will lay odds lawyers and cops hate being made famous in such a fashion. If you don’t like it, sue me. I double dog dare ya too. You damned Yankees are gonna get famous anyway as soon as the ex FBI agent John J. Connolly Jr. starts spilling the Beans about Beantown way down in Dixieland. If the Feds put an end to him in the Miami lock up and he joins H. Paul Rico in Hell too soon for the FBI’s benefit, I will make certain that everybody knows that you knew my of my concerns about his well being first and had a copy of police wiretap tape to prove to you all that I am no liar. Triple M. Movers may have many more in storage as early as today.
There is a very good reason that the Assistant District Attorney Alicia McDonnell and Judge Hanlon caused the many original wiretap tapes that I gave them to disappear. Perhaps you should call Beth D. McLaughlin of the Dept of Public Safety and make certain the wiretap tapes in my home are kept very securely if Triple M movers storm into my home and remove them. It would be for the benefit John J. Connolly Jr. and your own selves as well. I truly think he is the sneaky bastard that threw them in the dumpster in Beantown years ago. Instead of the Feds keeping the tapes in confidence or using them as evidence they try to be rid of them in such an off handed way? They must be valuable evidence if only to the people recorded upon them in order to seek releif from the wanton invasion of their privacy. Imagine if I were to send such a tape of your family to someone else? At least I am ethical enough only to send just one tape to cops or officers of the court in a sincere effort to see that it is properly investigated.
The Ex FBI dude’s lawyer Manuel Casabielle should ask him to listen to the CD real closely, just in case he recognizes anyone. Even if he does not it is still very powerful evidence against the Feds. If my suspicions are true the shit will hit the fan in Beantown very soon or both John J. Connolly Jr. and I will be dead. Do you fancy Yankee dudes want our blood to be found on your hands?
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
PO Box 73
Acworth, NH 03601
Here is the proof that no Canadian Politician, cop or lawyer will take me on. I offer it in good faith to show that Yankees do not hold the low ground when it comes to public corruption. Candains have much to be ashamed of as well.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Ruth.Ross@christianlegalfellowship.org
Cc: thannigan@ropesgray.com ; csu@jesuits.ca ; robmoore@atrueconservative.ca ; Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre ; plocatelli@scu.edu ; elliottx@nb.sympatico.ca ; bishop@dioceseofsaintjohn.org ; nenprvsj@bc.edu ; curia@sjcuria.org ; tsmolich@calprov.org ; noprovsj@norprov.org ; moprov@jesuits-mis.org ; nykprov@nysj.org ; oregonprov@nwjesuits.org ; wisprov@jesuitswisprov.org ; sjdet@aol.com ; chgprov@jesuits-chi.org ; joseph.herlihy.1@bc.edu
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 8:24 PM
Subject: one hell of an Email
"From a little spark may burst a mighty flame." Dante from The Divine Comedy
Heres hoping but I ain't praying I am doing something about it.
Sent after Midnight December 25th, 2004 in Rome
David McMath and Walter Kubitz
Ruth Ross Executive Director
Christian Legal Fellowship
790 Franklinway Crescent,
London, ON, Canada. N6G 5C8
RE: Corruption of the Church State and Justice System
Hey,
Pursuant to my calls to all three of your offices yesterday and also to the office of Msgr. George Martin, the Vicar General of the Diocese of Saint John. Please find enclosed the hard copy of the material I promised to send. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated by law enforcement. This material includes an exact copy of all material given to our present MP Rob Moore and a copy of a letter given to the Priest Bill Elliot the following week along with the same material and three original wiretap tapes. There is no need to give your copies of this material to the RCMP or CSIS or the Arar Commission because they already have had theirs for many months. This email was composed in a hurry and sent out just before leaving our home.
If Mr. Kubitz wishes he may contact me and if we agree he can use this material to aid him in entering into a personal injury complaint on my behalf. I have already contacted the lawyer Ann Wheeler of Fredicton and faxed her this letter and a copy of the Affidavit of mine that was filed in US District Court on Dec 12th, 2002 that no doubt caused Cardinal Law to quit his job and run off to Maryland and then Rome. To everyone’s chagrin the Pope forgot to take him off the Boston Arch Diocese payroll until I announced my run for Parliament and began attacking the partners of some of the lawyers that had settled with O’Malley’s new lawyer, Hannigan in 2003. I had been arguing the Cardinal Law’s other lawyers Todd and Rogers for over a year and was ignored but as soon as I introduced the other side of the fence in another dispute into my matters they quickly settled and tried hard to ignore me some more. Obviously their conspiracy worked against them and allowed me more time to rope many more corrupt lawyers etc. and drag them into my affairs. Consider it a simple Maritimer’s backward way of pursuing justice by intervening into many matters in a unusual and unpredictable fashion. Feel free to stress test my ethics in any matter but watch out I don’t drag you into them as well. Some of my concerns involve the crime of murder.
Stephen Harper should have made certain that his lawyer buddy Rob Moore had upheld the law as soon as he announced in June on CBC that he had information about the Arar matter. He made that announcement after stopping for ice cream in Sussex with Rob Moore and Elsie Wayne. I made certain the RCMP Officers guarding Harper and the others that day were made well aware that Rob Moore possessed evidence of criminal matters that should be investigated immediately. I had someone witness me telling them so and had photos taken to record the encounter. Call me a liar I dare ya.
When David McMath refused to come to the phone to speak to me, I knew for certain he knew the score. His secretary was confused as to why he would not pick up the phone but I was not. He did not want to speak to me because he knew that in a very few words I could force him to display the integrity that must befit one of his profession or compel him to prove to me that he is just another liar. So like most lawyers he tried to duck my concerns and me. I loved it and laughed at his faint-hearted and predictable antics. I called the Vicar General Martin and left the voice mail that McMath desired from me. Nobody has called back to disagree. Perhaps they should talk and call me back after they receive a copy of this letter by fax and email and have a long talk with the priest, Bill Elliot. I know for a fact I really pissed that old bastard off by merely shaking his hand and stating my name in front of over a hundred of his followers and almost every other Candidate from two ridings including the winners the liberal Paul Zed and the new conservative, Rob Moore. I consider both me to be just opposites of the same counterfeit coin that the people are supposed to trust as genuine. Causing that evil old priest to lose his temper is one of my fondest memories of my political campaign along with pissing off Leroy Armstrong in front of his friends during a debate of federal politicians that he had no business mouthing off in. Since Bill Elliot wanted people to vote with their conscience, perhaps he should ask the man they elected Paul Zed and his friends Joe Day, Henrick Tonning and David Lutz to act according to theirs if they have any.
Whereas as your organization claims that acting through its Executive Director, its Board of Directors, its member volunteers, its lawyers, law students, and friends, the CLF: promotes Alternative Dispute Resolution which is designed to help Christians solve their disputes outside of court amongst other things. Perhaps you should inspire the Catholic Church to settle with me before I sue its fat pious ass. Forgive me for speaking plain but if you folks do not uphold the law and the Public Trust, I will also sue you in the same complaint. There is no middle ground for any lawyer to stand on once I have made them well aware of the reasons behind this unholy war of words with priests, bankers, statesmen and lawyers. Whereas you folks brag of your interventions into other matters, why not invite you to my circus out of the gate?
If anyone cares to notice the Affidavit crucifying Cardinal Law is witnessed by my brother in law, the lawyer Reid Chedore. He is a religious man who failed to prove his ethics to me when he sided with my foes to protect his own pocket book. I am not religious and do not hold with all the opinions within your good book but agree with many of its words. In my book there are no degrees of honesty. Lawyers must maintain their oath under rule of law and answer to the public that trusts them to the same degree as I do to my own conscience. I answer only to my kin that I respect. Maybe you folks should talk to Reid and make him see the light, repent his evil ways and seek my forgiveness instead of talking to my friends and family about my so-called crazy ways. Yea I am crazy. Crazy like of fox. I never expected politicians, priests, bankers and lawyers to be honest, so I played them all like a fiddle in order to dance to my own jig.
I must clearly state that IF I have an unnatural or questionable demise then my blood will be found on the hands of many a low man in high places. The Puppet Master over all is none other than the evil Count Peter-Hans Kolvenbach the Superior General of the Society of Jesus. The fact that I have encountered so many corrupt Jesuit educated people should make this painfully obvious to all. It is the General that I am picking a fight with today because I have lost patience with the incompetence and stupidity of his foot soldiers. Tis time to take on the Boss. I became very angry by the fact that he came to speak in Omaha prior to the Federal Election while his BUDDYS (Bunch of Unethical Dandy Damned Yankee Solicitors) tried to keep me under lock and key like a caged crazy animal. Yea yea I studied all about lawyers and Masons and politicians and priests and bankers and their signs on the dollar etc. I do understand the wicked game and want no part of it. I view everyone as just people and have no respect for any authority given to anyone if I do not feel they deserve it.
If someone is sent to my door to attack my kin or me under the veil of some authority, I take it very personally with the person that approached me. If they admit their mistake and apologize, I accept it but I demand to know who sent them and why. If they are liars and will not tell the truth I find it out for myself. The most glaring example of minor but well connected crooks would be my wife’s uncle William J. Kickham a wealthy ex FBI agent and her cousins Charles J. Kickham Jr. and the secretary of Cardinal Law, then Bishop Lennon and now Bishop O’Malley, Robert T. Kickham. The latter is priest that shares the same name as the long dead Monsignor Robert T. Kickham. That bastard in a Black Robe died at a family reunion on Prince Edward Island. I would not be surprised if Bishop J. Faber MacDonald knows the Kickhams quite well. I have no doubt that my name has been cursed many times in conversations between priests and lawyers in Boston and Saint John in their efforts to impeach my character. I must ask them all why an honest man is so hard to believe? Let just say that I was not surprised by the fact that it was a Assistant District Attorney by the name of MacDonald that was so willing to make false allegations in order to have me sent to jail without bail to have my head examined.
It has always been hard times for an honest man in the Maritimes and everywhere else. However the most obvious example that I can present of how bad the corruption and conspiracy is within the Church, State and Justice System occurred on Sept 17/02. On the same day that Michael J. Sullivan the US Attorney filed his malicious EX PARTE Motion to Dismiss Charles J. Kickham Jr. signed a new will leaving one hundred and fifty grand to the Jesuits at Holy Cross no doubt as a form of modern day dispensation to pay for the incompetant actions of the Rogers Law firm in their defense of Cardinal Law in my complaint. Everybody must have had a heart attack when they filed answer to a complaint that the Cardinal had already been fraudulently removed from. It was a small wonder to me that O’Malley fired them as soon as he got his new job as Bishop. Only thing was he hired Mr. Hannigan of the Ropes and Gray Law Firm.
Mr. Caner of the same firm as Hannigan was involved in the SEC cover up of the Brookline Savings Bank and Putnam Investments Securities Fraud. O’Malley’s ex Banker turned priest secretary should have better informed him of my actions against his own relatives. This truly is a comic tragedy of huge proportions. Although murky and complicated, the conspiracy is also very easy for ordinary people to understand. That is why the courts have done their best to keep me away from a jury. As soon as I introduced the fact that I had many wiretap tapes about unrelated matters that irrefutably proves that Federal Law Enforcement is full of Rampant Corruption. The FEDS tried their worst and I was lucky enough to meet a few honest people within the system. Now the crooks do not know who to trust and have no idea what to do now except kill me. They know I won’t quit and cannot be bought off. They also know that if someone does kill me that I have taken the proper steps to make matters get worse not better. They cannot get us all. Now you folks know the truth too. It is high time that the truth is revealed for the benefit of all. Why not side with me after you check my work? You have nothing to lose and our children have the world to regain from the Masters of War.
You may rest assured that I cannot wait until the Pig Farming lawyer, Frank McKenna that grew up down the road from my Bike Shop makes his appearance in Washington. I have a few bones to pick with that sly dog. He is not a bit bigger or smarter than me. He does have many powerful and crooked acquaintances but there is no honour amongst thieves. Frankly likely has far fewer friends that I that he can really trust. Most of my true friends are as poor as church mice or are in debt to their eyeballs. They stand with me to protect our rights and personal freedom out of mutual love and respect for each other rather than pocket book defensive actions of the wealthy men that surround Frank Boy and his cohorts that promote his own propaganda. He ain’t fooling Maritimers. Why do you think the good folks of New Brunswick swept the liberals out of power right after Franky Boy quit? No doubt Bernard Lord is considering not running again right now after the results of his long delayed by election. The only crook that made out there was the turncoat, Bernard Richard. Ask John Herron what we think of turncoats. If he had been ethical he should have ran as an independent. At least he would have lost with his pride intact like I did. We all know what a scumbag Franky Boy really is. Paul Martin in order to suit his own crooked ends was not so wise to pick him to go to Washington. Although he will fit in well with the other snakes in Washington, he will eat his own tail if it furthers his own ends. Everybody thinks that he wants Martin’s job but in my opinion he is being groomed to replace the aging and very evil Maurice Strong. He is by far more well connected than Chucky Kickham once was and a thousand times more ruthless if that is possible. I will use Chucky’s bad acts to expose Franky’s failings because I consider him to be a very dangerous threat to the future of Canada. Check his work and watch him closely.
The Yankees are making noises about Drafting people again. As a man who is raising a fourteen year old son to hate war I will not hesitate to move him to save haven in my native land. Ask David Lutz the Yankee Carpetbagger and a friend of Franky’s why I think this way. One of Franky’s first jobs as Ambassador may be to insure my son’s birthright. That said I must do my best that Canada remains an independent sovereign nation worth living in and defending.
All that said Franky Boy and I will have lots to argue about on how the Canadian Consulate treated me and protected my freedom while I was in a Boston jail held under the charges of "other" by a Sheriff that had supported fraud and perjury against me in a federal court. First I must I ask him why he failed to answer the same letter I composed on Canada Day that Brad Green was so quick to answer. That one should bring a comical response to start things off in a proper manner. I choked laughing when I read how Franky courted the blessings of B'nai B'rith Boys and the Bell Canada doings after B'nai B'rith had condemned Martin’s last choice of for an ambassador and Bell Canada had shown me their ass. Hopefully Franky boy and I shall display to the world how pigheaded Maritmers truly are when we butt heads. We are both from the same point on the planet but are worlds apart as men. It should be quite a hoedown particularly after Premiers Williams and Hamm just displayed their Maritime willingness to fight.
Maybe the rest of the world will finally realize just how important the Maritimes truly is in world affairs EH? It constantly amazed me why no one wondered why nominds such a Bernard Lord and Frank McKenna were invited to Bilderberger’s meetings and why everybody wants to golf and fish with men I wouldn’t cross the street to talk to. To see evil men like T. Alex Hickman and Lord Beaverbrook honoured should raise the flag of contempt of any honest hard working Maritimer. It is them I am speaking for. Get it?
I consider myself to be a very powerful friend of honest people and a very formidable foe for any crook. IF a man is measured by the strength and number of his enemies then I can easily support that thinking and I agree with Kipling in his poem labeled IF and I strongly disagree with Dostoevsky’s attempt to defend the actions of the evil Grand Inquisitors of old. I would dearly love to debate Paul L. Locatelli, SJ about his teachings and opinions but would prefer to argue his legal counsel John Ottoboni or anyone else in front of a jury of my peers first. What do you think should I send these Italian dudes the same copy of the wiretap tape I just sent you? The Commissioner of the RCMP and his General Counsel should have listened to the tapes before he taught another Italian Catholic lawyer Argeo P. Cellucci how to ride a horse in Ottawa so he would not appear to be the horse’s ass that he is during the parade for the Calgary Stampede. Mr. Kubitz you may have attended the Parade what did you think of the Yankee US Ambassador Argeo’s performance on a horse? Was the picture the same whether he was coming or going. A horse’s ass by any other name still smells the same. I pity the poor bastard that has to come along and clean up after him.
What do ya think should I chuck Argeo in bed with Franky Boy as soon as Bush appoints a new Ambassador to Canada? A blind man can see that Argeo has worn out his welcome just current ambassador Michael Kergin the lame duck in Washington has. That bastard certainly wasn’t around when I needed him and Franky will do no better.
By the way before I go did everybody think I didn’t know that Chucky graduated from the same class at Harvard the Redstone did? I died laughing when Redstone endorsed Bush at Mulroney’s CEO party in China at the same time his man Dan Rather was being hung out to dry. The fact that Redstone hired one of the very people I sued along with Cardinal Law to check Viacom’s ethics is simply too funny for words right now. I will let you figure out who he is. Another thing thing that really pissed me off was the fact that a Canadian Company, McGraw Hill partied with Accenture in the Big Apple while I sat in jail in Beantown. Ask them or Brian Mulroney or William Cohen or Cendant Corp or Bill Gates why. I ain’t telling I will explain it in court but rest assured Sun Life and Bell Canada are very nervous campers about my actions in the USA. Ask Robert C. Pozen.
In conclusion I ask that you all review Mr. Kubitz’s words, check my work closely and realize you have just encountered a rather unusual political animal that has no fear of litigation. Whether you believe me or not it is no matter to me. As I said to Mr. Kubitz you now have my fair warning that I am about to raise some Hell. I have no doubt the Black Pope will be curing my name at the Black Mass tonight. He can pray to his god for help as he enters into a war of words with a man that stands alone. Wanna bet he will not argue me Pro Se? Would you like to take bets on my life expectancy? I feel lucky. Do you? Many times in my life I have bet my ass on my actions? Have you? I am a seasoned veteran in dicey situations. Are you? Why not just act honestly speak the truth and let the cards fall where they may? Otherwise we all lose and the bad bastards win again. I am sick of it. Aren’t you? I simply don’t care about anyone political standing on any matter as long as it is backed by ethical consideration. Democracy is the ethical argument. The majority rules after people worthy of the Public Trust properly speaking for the people they were elected to represent argue the merits of all sides. The interests of the wealthy should consist of less that five percent of any vote not all of every vote simply because they funded the representative’s rise to power. What reason did the Yankees give for rebelling from our Monarchy? No Taxation without proper representation? Well? Act like ethical Religious lawyers and speak up goddamnit!!!
Mr. Kubitz your words are as follows.
"A decade or so later, pre-election polls predicted the Conservative Party might win the June 28, 2004 Federal election. The Party came close. To the disappointment of many conservative Christians, the cost of this electoral popularity was a retreat from politically unpalatable beliefs regarding abortion and same-sex marriage. If some commentators are correct, it appears that the prevailing current social morality of Canadians is founded on individual self-fulfillment and tolerance. But the good news is that the widely-regarded myth of a "Christian North America" has been shattered. Christians now realize that we no longer live in a "Christian" society. The naive blinders are off. What is God's agenda for Christians in a political sense? My thesis is that God's agenda always has been, and continues to be, an agenda of being salt and light in every arena of endeavour (including politics, the judiciary, and even the organized church), the betterment of what can be bettered in society, and the attainment of eternal life for as many as are called and who accept His message."
I think your thesis sucks but I recognize your right to speak of it and I am jealous of your connections that allow your to spread your words. At least I did you the honour of recognizing your work and inserting it in mine. I dare you to do the same with me. In rebuttal to your theory on your god’s agenda I believe his agenda comes from the minds of men to suit their own ends. I say your lament should fall on deaf ears. Our Society clearly mandates that we keep the state, the courts and the church separate for the obvious reason that a religious political lawyer would want it changed. Why must our society abide by your Christian beliefs and standards as long as we all abide by the golden rule and our own conscience. You must agree that Shakespeare made a pretty good point about being true to yourself and then what surely follows. My question to any pious person that reads this can be found in Matthew 16:26. Methinks your god asked the question. My answer is simple. Nothing. However being the self confessed. Righteous feeling dude that I am, I must quote the Psalm 37:16 of another David because I agree with him not you. "a little that a righteous man hath is better than the riches of many wicked." Can you tell I am having fun with this shit? Do you think it will make the Black Pope who is having a party right now as pissed off as I am? If so, then I will have done some good. I don’t care if any lawyer admits it just as long as they argue me. I am so afraid that they will drop the charges against me and I will lose my long awaited jury of my peers, I must keep the bastards upset or die trying.
Whereas everything in the supposed Heaven and Hell is purportedly done in threes. I have faxed, emailed and sent this document by mail or courier to the Superior General and many of his cohorts the best way I know how. He can never say he has never heard of me and my beefs against him. If ever we meet the first question I will ask him is whether or not it is true what I heard about the other guy he hangs around with that is dressed in white and what he sold in World War II before he became a priest. Maybe I will get to ask the famous Canadian lawyers Doug Christie or Ian Hanomansing first. They implied that my friend Byron Prior is a liar. They are the ones in the wrong not him. the following is an email exchange between Rob Moore and I before I came home to run for Parliament. Look how many people in Parliament were well aware of some of the reasons the reasons for my homecomings.
Enough is enough Count Peter-Hans Kolvenbach quite messing around and sending your small fry after me and torturing my kin. It is high noon somewhere on this planet. Skitter scatter lets get at her. Do your worst or get honest. You chose. We both ain't getting any younger. It is high time we argue. I will wager that I will sue you first or die trying. What say you? Wanna bet?
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton MA. 02186
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: fundshow@robtv.com
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 10:50 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: frankmag@rogers.com
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 11:35 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: leaders@ceocouncil.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 6:46 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: george@nb.sympatico.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 3:22 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: RADIATOR@nb.sympatico.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: efh@unb.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 1:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: kentfox@nbnet.nb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 11:59 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: premier@gnb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:15 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Chisholm.Pothier@gnb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:08 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: submit@ftowncrier.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 1:22 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: editor@fredthepaper.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:53 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: digeo@nbnet.nb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:29 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 11:40 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Yelich.L@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:32 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
Roy.J@parl.gc.ca ; Saada.J@parl.gc.ca ; Sauvageau.B@parl.gc.ca ; Savoy.A@parl.gc.ca ; Scherrer.H@parl.gc.ca ; Schmidt.W@parl.gc.ca ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca ; Serre.B@parl.gc.ca ; Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ; Shepherd.A@parl.gc.ca ; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca ; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca ; Sorenson.K@parl.gc.ca ; Speller.B@parl.gc.ca ; Spencer.L@parl.gc.ca ; St-Julien.G@parl.gc.ca ; St-Jacques.D@parl.gc.ca ; St-Hilaire.C@parl.gc.ca ; St.Denis.B@parl.gc.ca ; Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Stewart.J@parl.gc.ca ; Stinson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca ; Szabo.P@parl.gc.ca ; Telegdi.A@parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca ; Thibeault.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca ; Thompson.M@parl.gc.ca ; Tirabassi.T@parl.gc.ca ; Tobin.B@parl.gc.ca ; Toews.V@parl.gc.ca ; Tonks.A@parl.gc.ca ; Torsney.P@parl.gc.ca ; Tremblay.S@parl.gc.ca ; Tremblay.St@parl.gc.ca ; Ur.R-M@parl.gc.ca ; Valeri.T@parl.gc.ca ; Vanclief.L@parl.gc.ca ; Vellacott.M@parl.gc.ca ; Venne.P@parl.gc.ca ; Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca ; Wappel.T@parl.gc.ca ; Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Wayne, Elsie - M.P. ; Whelan.S@parl.gc.ca ; White.R@parl.gc.ca ; White.T@parl.gc.ca ; Wilfert.B@parl.gc.ca ; Williams.J@parl.gc.ca ; Wood.B@parl.gc.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Rock.A@parl.gc.ca
Cc: McNally.G@parl.gc.ca ; McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca ; Menard.R@parl.gc.ca ; Meredith.V@parl.gc.ca ; Merrifield.R@parl.gc.ca ; Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca ; Mills.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mills.D@parl.gc.ca ; Minna.M@parl.gc.ca ; Mitchell.A@parl.gc.ca ; Moore.J@parl.gc.ca ; Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca ; Myers.L@parl.gc.ca ; Nault.R@parl.gc.ca ; Neville.A@parl.gc.ca ; Normand.G@parl.gc.ca ; Nystrom.L@parl.gc.ca ; Obhrai.D@parl.gc.ca ; OBrien.L@parl.gc.ca ; OBrien.P@parl.gc.ca ; OReilly.J@parl.gc.ca ; Owen.S@parl.gc.ca ; Pagtakhan.R@parl.gc.ca ; Pallister.B@parl.gc.ca ; Pankiw.J@parl.gc.ca ; Paquette.P@parl.gc.ca ; Paradis.D@parl.gc.ca ; Parrish.C@parl.gc.ca ; Patry.B@parl.gc.ca ; Penson.C@parl.gc.ca ; Peric.J@parl.gc.ca ; Perron.G-A@parl.gc.ca ; Peschisolido.J@parl.gc.ca ; Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca ; Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca ; Phinney.B@parl.gc.ca ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Pickard.J@parl.gc.ca ; Pillitteri.G@parl.gc.ca ; Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca ; Pratt.D@parl.gc.ca ; Price.D@parl.gc.ca ; Proctor.D@parl.gc.ca ; Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca ; Provenzano.C@parl.gc.ca ; Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca ; Redman.K@parl.gc.ca ; Reed.J@parl.gc.ca ; Regan.G@parl.gc.ca ; Reid.S@parl.gc.ca ; Reynolds.J@parl.gc.ca ; Richardson.J@parl.gc.ca ; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca ; Robillard.L@parl.gc.ca ; Robinson.S@parl.gc.ca ; Rocheleau.Y@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:29 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
Cc: Hill.G@parl.gc.ca ; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca ; Hilstrom.H@parl.gc.ca ; Hinton.B@parl.gc.ca ; Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca ; Ianno.T@parl.gc.ca ; Jackson.O@parl.gc.ca ; Jaffer.R@parl.gc.ca ; Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca ; Johnston.D@parl.gc.ca ; Jordan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca ; Karygiannis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca ; Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca ; Keyes.S@parl.gc.ca ; Kilger.B@parl.gc.ca ; Kilgour.D@parl.gc.ca ; Knutson.G@parl.gc.ca ; KraftSloan.K@parl.gc.ca ; Laframboise.M@parl.gc.ca ; Laliberte.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lalonde.F@parl.gc.ca ; Lanctot.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lastewka.W@parl.gc.ca ; Lavigne.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lebel.G@parl.gc.ca ; Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca ; Lee.D@parl.gc.ca ; Leung.S@parl.gc.ca ; Lill.W@parl.gc.ca ; Lincoln.C@parl.gc.ca ; Longfield.J@parl.gc.ca ; Loubier.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca ; Lunney.J@parl.gc.ca ; MacAuley.L@parl.gc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; Macklin.P@parl.gc.ca ; Malhi.G@parl.gc.ca ; Maloney.J@parl.gc.ca ; Mahoney.S@parl.gc.ca ; Manley.J@parl.gc.ca ; Manning.P@parl.gc.ca ; Marceau.R@parl.gc.ca ; Marcil.S@parl.gc.ca ; Mark.I@parl.gc.ca ; Marleau.D@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.K@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.Pd@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.P@parl.gc.ca ; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mayfield.P@parl.gc.ca ; McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca ; McCormick.L@parl.gc.ca ; McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca ; McKay.J@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:22 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Herron.J@parl.gc.ca
Cc: Duncan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Duplain.C@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; Eggleton.A@parl.gc.ca ; Elley.R@parl.gc.ca ; Epp.K@parl.gc.ca ; Eyking.M@parl.gc.ca ; Farrah.G@parl.gc.ca ; Finlay.J@parl.gc.ca ; Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca ; Folco.R@parl.gc.ca ; Fontana.J@parl.gc.ca ; Forseth.P@parl.gc.ca ; Fournier.G@parl.gc.ca ; Fry.H@parl.gc.ca ; Gagliano.A@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.M@parl.gc.ca ; Gallant.C@parl.gc.ca ; Gallaway.R@parl.gc.ca ; Gauthier.M@parl.gc.ca ; Girard-Bujold.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godfrey.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca ; Goodale.R@parl.gc.ca ; Gouk.J@parl.gc.ca ; Graham.B@parl.gc.ca ; Gray.H@parl.gc.ca ; Grewal.G@parl.gc.ca ; Grey.D@parl.gc.ca ; Grose.I@parl.gc.ca ; Guarnieri.A@parl.gc.ca ; Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca ; Hanger.A@parl.gc.ca ; Harb.M@parl.gc.ca ; Harris.R@parl.gc.ca ; Harvard.J@parl.gc.ca ; Harvey.A@parl.gc.ca ; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:17 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bihal_sm007@rogers.com
Cc: pm@pm.gc.ca ; pmo@pm.gc.ca ; Abbott.J@parl.gc.ca ; Ablonczy.D@parl.gc.ca ; Adams.P@parl.gc.ca ; Alcock.R@parl.gc.ca ; Allard.C@parl.gc.ca ; Anders.R@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ; Assad.M@parl.gc.ca ; Assadourian.S@parl.gc.ca ; Asselin.G@parl.gc.ca ; Augustine.J@parl.gc.ca ; Bachand.A@parl.gc.ca ; Bachand.C@parl.gc.ca ; Bagnell.L@parl.gc.ca ; Bailey.R@parl.gc.ca ; Baker.G@parl.gc.ca ; Bakopanos.E@parl.gc.ca ; Barnes.S@parl.gc.ca ; Beaumier.C@parl.gc.ca ; Belair.R@parl.gc.ca ; Belanger.M@parl.gc.ca ; Bellehumeur.M@parl.gc.ca ; Bellemare.E@parl.gc.ca ; Bennett.C@parl.gc.ca ; Benoit.L@parl.gc.ca ; Bergeron.S@parl.gc.ca ; Bertrand.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca ; Bigras.B@parl.gc.ca ; Binet.G@parl.gc.ca ; Blaikie.B@parl.gc.ca ; Blondin-Andrew.E@parl.gc.ca ; Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bonwick.P@parl.gc.ca ; Borotsik.R@parl.gc.ca ; Boudria.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bradshaw.C@parl.gc.ca ; Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca ; Brien.P@parl.gc.ca ; Brison.S@parl.gc.ca ; Brown.B@parl.gc.ca ; Bryden.J@parl.gc.ca ; Bulte.S@parl.gc.ca ; Burton.A@parl.gc.ca ; Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca ; Caccia.C@parl.gc.ca ; Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ; Calder.M@parl.gc.ca ; Cannis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Caplan.E@parl.gc.ca ; Cardin.S@parl.gc.ca ; Carignan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Carroll.A@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ; Casson.R@parl.gc.ca ; Castonguay.J@parl.gc.ca ; Catterall.M@parl.gc.ca ; Cauchon.M@parl.gc.ca ; Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca ; Charbonneau.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Chatters.D@parl.gc.ca ; clark.j@parl.gc.ca ; Coderre.D@parl.gc.ca ; Collenette.D@parl.gc.ca ; Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca ; Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca ; Copps.S@parl.gc.ca ; Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca ; Crete.P@parl.gc.ca ; Cullen.R@parl.gc.ca ; Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca ; Cuzner.R@parl.gc.ca ; Dalphond-Guiral.M@parl.gc.ca ; Davies.L@parl.gc.ca ; Day.S@parl.gc.ca ; Desjarlais.B@parl.gc.ca ; Desrochers.O@parl.gc.ca ; DeVillers.P@parl.gc.ca ; Dhaliwal.H@parl.gc.ca ; Dion.S@parl.gc.ca ; Discepola.N@parl.gc.ca ; Doyle.N@parl.gc.ca ; Dromisky.S@parl.gc.ca ; Drouin.C@parl.gc.ca ; Dube.A@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ; Duhamel.R@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:13 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Connie Fogal
Cc: adamsw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; andrer@sen.parl.gc.ca ; angusd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca ; austij@sen.parl.gc.ca ; baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bankst@sen.parl.gc.ca ; beaudg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bironm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; boldur@sen.parl.gc.ca ; brydej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; buchaj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; carnep@sen.parl.gc.ca ; carsts@sen.parl.gc.ca ; chalit@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca ; chrisi@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cohene@sen.parl.gc.ca ; comeag@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca ; corbie@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; days@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; doodyw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; eytonj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ferrem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; finess@sen.parl.gc.ca ; finnei@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fitzpd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; forrej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gauthj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca ; grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; grahab@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca ; haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca ; hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca ; jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kellej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kennyc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; keonw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kirbym@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kolbel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kroftr@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lapiel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lapoij@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lawsoe@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lynchj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; maheus@sen.parl.gc.ca ; mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; mahouf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; meighm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca ; moriny@sen.parl.gc.ca ; murral@sen.parl.gc.ca ; nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pearsl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pitfip@sen.parl.gc.ca ; poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca ; poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rivesj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roberf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roberb@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roched@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rossie@sen.parl.gc.ca ; setlar@sen.parl.gc.ca ; sparrh@sen.parl.gc.ca ; spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; sibben@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca ; taylon@sen.parl.gc.ca ; tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; tunnej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wiebej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wilsol@sen.parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:21 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: robanders@telus.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:44 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:41 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:39 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:36 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: agarden@nb.sympatico.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 10:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: leblad@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:03 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: scotta@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:01 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: castoj@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:59 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: hubbac@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bradsc@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: savoya@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:55 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: info@paulzed.com
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:34 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: megan@lutz.nb.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 4:05 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Brison.S@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Bachand.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:53 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jim.prentice@shaw.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:41 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rosent@math.toronto.edu
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:30 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: davidorchard@sasktel.net
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:15 PM
Subject: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
Just so ya know David I am forwarding these emails to other politicians as well. But I didn't bother to call them because they are lawyers as well. Therefore I see no need to explain my actions to them. Plus the smart one's have a bad habit of trying to ignore me anyway. I t appears that standard operating procedure for them is to ignore. delay, deny and then try to settle. They are confused by someone that wants to argue law rather than go away with the gold. What should be interesting to both of us is whether or not they have a sudden fit of ethical behavior after they discover that an honest western farmer and wild but ethical maritime biker have been talking about them. Please notice that I am more than willing to help such a man as Byron Prior anyway I can. I just wish there were more men like him on this planet. Trust me the US Attorney backtracking in the Martha Stewart matter and prosecuting a Secret Service Agent is too funny to relate in this email.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From:
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> David,
>
> Thanks for the e-mails. I will read them all and hear what you have to say.
>
> All the best.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 5:08 PM
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Elsie, I like you more and more. If anyone understands about
> > being forced to be away from his family its me. Give my mom a
> > call. Her laugh alone will make your day. To hell with the
> > smiling bastards in Ottawa their grins ain't genuine. Maritimers
> > can still find some fun in a long hard day Come to think of
> > it, maybe thats why the Upper Canadians think we are crazy. By
> > the way I have managed to get a rather famous lawyer to speak on
> > my wife's behalf down here while I run for Parliament uphome. But
> > before I go I have been invited to go fishing with Martha
> > Stewart's brother Frank in the Gulf of Mexico. My matters are
> > about to bust wide open down here. That is why I have chosen this
> > time to make appearance uphome. Once I make the news down here I
> > will step on the stump uphome.
> > Best
> > Regards
> > Dave
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > To: David Amos
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:42 PM
> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Dear Dave,
> >
> > I try to respond to as many people as I can. We do get a lot of email
> > around here.... I decided to retire because I truly miss my family.
> > It's hard being on the road back and forth by yourself. It gets very
> > lonely.
> >
> > God Bless,
> > Elsie
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
> > Sent: March 22, 2004 3:28 PM
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > No problem, Elsie. By the way my mom is a fan of yours. She told
> > me you were quitting. Too bad if it is true.You are the first
> > politician to respond to me. That fact alone wins my respect. Ask
> > around Saint John about me in certain circles I am fairly well
> > known. You may even know my sister, Nancy and her husband, Reid
> > Chedore. Perhaps you crossed paths with my dad C. Max Amos he was
> > a tax Supervisor for the Province years ago. And maybe even my
> > mom's second husband, Lloyd Nickerson, from Fredericton. He was
> > somewhat of a political person whereas my dad was not. (Lloyd was
> > chief electoral officer for about twelve years and did run as a
> > Conservative) If you wish to warm my mom's heart please give her
> > a call and simply say that you appreciate her good words about
> > you to her wild child Dalevid. She will get the joke. She is
> > always confusing me with another brother. Her name is Anna and
> > her number is 506 455 3600. Do with it what you will. Trust me I
> > would love to see another out spoken Maritimer step up to the
> > plate and speak of rights and wrongs. The sooner that I can go
> > back to being just Papa the happier my little Clan will be. I
> > would truly appreciate if someone would let my mom know that they
> > are at least aware of my concerns whether they agree with me or
> > not.
> > Best
> > Regards
> > Dave
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > To: David Amos
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Thank you for the notice.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
> > Sent: March 16, 2004 2:07 PM
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: ethics@harvard.edu
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:06 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:05 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: alltrue@roadrunner.nf.net
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:03 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:57 PM
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > I already received Anne's response. Can't you people read what
> > you wrote to me? Why else would I be so pissed off?
> > I am who I say I am and that is as follows:
> > David R. Amos
> > 153 Alvin Ave,
> > Milton, MA. 02186
> > Phone 617 240-6698
> >
> > Now just exactly who are you Mr. Correspondence Deputy Prime
> > Minister and are you a lawyer?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier
> > ministre" To:
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:34 PM
> > Subject: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > > If you wish to receive a response to your comments addressed
> > to the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and
> > Emergency Preparedness, please include your return mailing
> > address along with your original e-mail message. All official
> > responses will be sent by regular mail.
> > >
> > > If you wish to send correspondence addressed to the Minister
> > through the regular mail, please use the following mailing
> > address:
> > >
> > > The Honourable A. Anne McLellan
> > > Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety
> > > and Emergency Preparedness
> > > 340 Laurier Avenue West
> > > Ottawa, Ontario
> > > K1A 0P8
> > >
> > > From: David Amos
> > > To: dwatch@web.net
> > > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:32 PM
> > > Subject: Read real slow then forget what is politically
> > correct.
> > >
> > > Deal with your own conscience. After that try to think of
> > a good
> > > reason why I should not run for Parliament and at least speak
> > my mind about the sad state of our affairs. You know who I am.
> > If you don't, trust me, you are way behind the eight ball.
> > > Once I make my mark in the American Justice System and
> > political
> > > process, I am coming home to stress test the ethics of many a
> > lawyer/politician in my nativeland during the course of the
> > next federal election. My question to all of you will be why
> > did you wait for me to say something? Am I the only one paying
> > any attention. Even Jesus got mad a time or two and tore up a
> > temple when he saw all the money changing hands in a place
> > that should not be concerned about such things. But forget
> > about the money for a minute. What did he have to say about
> > anyone that harmed a child? Rest assured I will remind you.
> > Although I ain't religious, I must say that Jesus had more of
> > sand than most men and he made some very good points about
> > what is right and what is wrong. Can any of you even hold a
> > candle to Byron? He has at least one friend that will back him
> > up all the way down the line. I don't mind dying it is what I
> > didn't do while I was living that will haunt me in in my
> > grave. What is the golden rule these days? Is it truly a fact
> > that he with the gold makes the rules. Do you think voters
> > agree with that fact? What say you?
> > > Canadian Corruption
> > >
> > > Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.
> > >
> > > RCMP Incompetence & Cover up.
> > >
> > > Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada
> > >
> > > How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and
> > convict itself? After years of asking the Canadian Legal
> > System to do its job, it's long past time to inform the public
> > myself about this lack of action or justice.
> > > If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health
> > Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
> > of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL
> > SYSTEMS CONTROL,at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates your
> > younger sister Susan, at 12 years old, and in grade 8, what
> > would you do?At 12 years old she was the youngest child
> > ever,in Grand Bank,to have a baby. I am willing to take any
> > tests and answer all questions regarding my entire life. All
> > he has to do is take one blood test. It's time for him to stop
> > manipulating our legal system and face the truth which I have
> > been telling the legal System,and anyone else who would
> > listen, all of my life.I didn't just awake one morning and
> > decide to accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal
> > animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no
> > education, no family, no hometown, no self- esteem or
> > self-respect and no past, present or future as a contributing
> > person.
> > >
> > > By the time I was 14 years old I was responsible for 9 younger
> > children, all of us abused and molested while our hometown
> > either joined in, bothered us about our situation, or looked
> > the other way and said we were all trouble. Our mother has
> > always been a hypochondriac and married prostitute in a town
> > of 2500 people. She can go blind instantly, become a cripple
> > instantly, go insane instantly and even convinced the doctors
> > at our Health Science Center 4 years ago she was dying of
> > cancer. They called her family and said she had a maximum of
> > two weeks to live, but out of every situation she can
> > instantly become well. This person is a disgrace to the human
> > race and also so are all those who support her. I am Byron
> > Prior, the oldest of her 12 children.
> > > (A) I was sexually abused by my mother from age 4 to 14.
> > >
> > > (B) Physically beaten by my mother until I bleed because I
> > tried to stop her friends and family from molesting my younger
> > sisters.
> > >
> > > (C) Sent next door with my mother's gay boyfriend almost daily
> > for money from age 5 to 14.
> > >
> > > (D) Brought to her drunk girlfriend's summer cabin to be
> > sexually abused for money.
> > >
> > > (E) Had to clean the blood from my 4 year old sister after she
> > was sexually molested by our grandfather and left on the
> > kitchen floor in a pool of blood.
> > >
> > > (F) Had to watch while my oldest sister had three miscarriages
> > and two children by the age of 15. One child for a member of
> > the Newfoundland Government when she was 12, and a second
> > child when she was 15 for another Politician, a girl, Majorie
> > and a boy, Arron. In 1983 the girl, age 15, was given an
> > illegal abortion in Montreal with everything arranged and paid
> > for with spending money for her and my sister Joan, by a
> > friend of the family. This girl has worked for Hickman's
> > family business from high school to this day. Five of my
> > sisters and one brother suffered similar abuse as I did.
> > > Why is this situation allowed to continue for more than 40
> > years and ruin all my families lives? Is it because,
> > > (A) Our mothers past customers are politically connected and
> > run our legal system.
> > >
> > > (B) Our mothers past customers are Grand Bank business men
> > whose children are now politicians.
> > >
> > > (C) One of our mothers family is a big wheel with organized
> > crime all of his adult life and is a partner to politicians.
> > >
> > > (D) Is it because two of her past customers are Salvation Army
> > officers, who came by to help us but became customers as well.
> > (E) Is it because all of North America is corrupt and a family
> > of 12 really means nothing to anyone when business and
> > politics are concerned in an economy controlled by corruption.
> > (F) Is it to cover up Child rape and corruption by T. Alex
> > Hickman and a business family with influence and business
> > contacts all across Canada. The legal system now tells us
> > justice for my family and I are three charges against one
> > mentally delayed man with a judge and jury at the T. Alex
> > Hickman building in the same town where we spent our entire
> > lives with abuse and persecution. Two R.C.M.P. officers and
> > the Crown prosecutors office will make no effort to have the
> > location changed. Again there will be NO JUSTICE SERVED and as
> > much covered up as possible. This I'm told will begin in Sept.
> > 2001, at Grand Bank, NFLD I spoke with the Crown Prosecutor on
> > Sept,18/01. He said his office has been trying to get the
> > complete investigation reports from the RCMP for more than two
> > years now and to this date still hasn't received them. He said
> > this was in his experience, the first time he had ever seen
> > such an unexplained delay to get information. On Nov 29/01 I'm
> > told by Victim services, this has changed to Jan.11/02 for a
> > trial date to be set.
> > >
> > > To whom it may concern: 04/13/98 There are many horrors that I
> > can recall from childhood. Byron's too frequent trips to the
> > woodshed next door; his having to sleep in the same bed as our
> > Mother; his little hands, palms down, being held on the hot
> > coal stove burner; the never ending beatings with belt
> > buckles; braided nylon ropes; old- fashioned ironing cords;
> > hot tea thrown in our faces or the face of my Father; knives
> > and forks thrown at us; hot grease thrown at us or our Father;
> > continual molestation - sexual - to myself and other siblings;
> > continual verbal and emotional abuse; at eight years old I was
> > locked in the cupboard under the stairs for hours with rats
> > crawling around me because my little brother had misplaced his
> > baby bottle while I was in charge of him; continual
> > abandonment when Mother would take her vacation and leave us
> > at seven and eight years old to take care of ourselves and the
> > babies; being forced to quit school to go to work to provide
> > yet more money for our beloved Mother; my younger brother,
> > Allan, being thrown into jail for no legitimate reason, other
> > than she wanted him out of the house - by the way; if you
> > check, you will also find that there is no record of his
> > incarceration; the abuse that we suffered was, and remains,
> > never ending........ Our lives have been destroyed. We all
> > suffer from severe emotional problems. We have extreme
> > difficulty trusting others. We cannot form loving
> > relationships. It is very difficult for us to allow others to
> > get that close to us without pushing them away. All we ever
> > wanted was someone to love us for who we were; but, when we
> > get close to others, we tend to sabotage those relationships -
> > unconsciously. The cycle of abuse continued with my own
> > daughter. My younger brother, Randell, molested her from the
> > age of four years. This fact my daughter was afraid to confide
> > to me until a year and a half ago. May God have mercy on his
> > soul because "I Don't"!!!! Both Byron and myself have tried to
> > have those in authority - RCMP, Social Services, Clergy and
> > Teachers help us, but, our cries for help fell on deaf ears.
> > We were, to them, a disposible family of liars and children
> > with overactive imaginations. Nothing can make the nightmares
> > go away. Even the sleeping pills don't work anymore. It has to
> > end! There has to be justice and a sense of closure for all of
> > us. Please, if we stop this cycle of insanity from happening
> > to other innocent children, then maybe our lives would have
> > not totally been in vain. You are our hope. Please help us to
> > find justice.
> > > Sincerely Yours,
> > > Sharl (Donna) Prior
> > >
> > > April 14, 1998
> > > A letter of Shame;
> > > This letter concerns what happened to my family and myself.
> > The things that I remember are also the things I try to
> > forget. I'm not very good with words so I will only tell you a
> > few things of many which have happened within my family.
> > Leather belts, ironing cords, ropes were only some things I
> > was beaten with so many times I can't count. Verbal and mental
> > abuse, the same humilating things that were done to my sisters
> > and brothers. Girls having to pull down their pants and pea in
> > their underwear for our mothers long time friend, for money. I
> > remember our mother going into a bedroom with him and coming
> > out some time later. We have a brother and sister (who I love)
> > who look and act like this guy. I expect, without much doubt,
> > are his. I remember the abuse to my father, a man I loved with
> > all my heart. Attacks on him with anything our mother could
> > put her hands on, knives, hot water, chasing him out of the
> > house. This man was home maybe a day every ten, and she would
> > blame him for everything and when Dad wasn't around, we were
> > blamed for everything, which was anything. This is a woman who
> > every chance she had would call the police on me to try to
> > have me charged with something. This was when she couldn't
> > beat me anymore because I was a little older, but she still
> > had to have control over me. This was a small town in
> > Newfoundland with a population of 3500 people. So she would
> > have me taken away from my home by the police and I would have
> > nowhere else to go, this was control over me and she knew it.
> > I would have to kiss ass just to have a roof over my head. (Of
> > course this was after my father had passed away. He was afraid
> > of her but he would never have let her do this to me.) This is
> > a woman that had me put in jail during Christmas and New
> > Year's when I was very young. This was for trying to teach my
> > niece her homework, she said I had to ask her. Education was
> > not something she was concerned about for her kids. All she
> > wanted was when I had turned 15 was to get out of school and
> > go to work in the fish plant so I could pay my way every week.
> > She would loan me $20 and I would have to repay her $40 plus
> > rent. This woman has a lot of problems. I do not hate her
> > because she is my mother but I do not like her as a person.
> > > I finally got out and moved to Ontario, uneducated with no
> > direction, but out. I really haven't had any contact with her
> > since then and have not seen her since. I think because of all
> > these things and many more which as happened to me and things
> > I saw that had happened to other members of my family is the
> > reason I have a hard time to meet anyone, develop a
> > relationship, or hold down a job. I'm always lost, I don't
> > know if I should see a doctor or if it's just me, I'm lost.
> > The way I am now is the way the rest also is, it must be
> > because of her, take a look, it has to be. I'm writing this
> > letter now so that this woman and the others who knew what was
> > happening but did nothing face up and admit what happened. All
> > of my family have the same problems and the same memories
> > which affect our lives. This is something I have never spoken
> > about with anyone, but now maybe it's time. Hopefully, this
> > will help me start to became a real person a whole person.
> > Please do what you know is the right thing to do.
> > > Sincerely yours,
> > > Allan Prior
> > >
> > > To Whom It May Concern:
> > > July 24, 2001
> > > My name is Byron Prior. I'm the oldest living of these 12
> > children. I not only had to live through my abuse but, watch
> > as the rest of my sisters and brothers were abused and raped.
> Three of my sisters raped, 1 by
Posted by: David R. Amos | Oct 3, 2005 1:30:58 AM
Regarding Dave Amos comments I made on 8/16/05. The statement I made about relatives being sick of me,,,,,,,,,,I meant relatives that are sick of Dave. If anyone has had any dealings with him, you know exactly what I mean. OH CANADA,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,you deserve him.
Posted by: Bob O'Meara | Aug 17, 2005 2:57:41 PM
This is in regards to the jailbird (or soon to be) David R.(runaway) Amos,,,,,,,He and his wife have done nothing wrong,,,,,,only try to steal two homes from her brothers. These homes were left to four people equally, not to just his wife. But they seem to forget that. They both think that two countries owe them. WRONG. As they can see, we sold both houses and at a great expense to both of them, thanks to the wonderful David R Amos. Anyone having any future contact with him or his wife, Jean F. O'Meara, be very careful, they may try to sue you too. Jean did one smart thing, she did not take his name when they were "married". Dave also has no problem ripping his own Amos clan off. How much money do you owe your mother Dave ? Have you ever thought about maybe working at a job to help support your own family. Oh that's right, that's what welfare is for. Or relatives that aren't sick of me yet. They are wising up too. C'yall Davie
Posted by: Bob O'Meara | Aug 16, 2005 9:14:46 AM
A Freemason Speaks
Author Stephen Knight wrote one of the seminal books on freemasonry called 'The Brotherhood' in 1983. During the course of his research for this book he was introduced to a man known as 'Christopher', a mason of the highest 33rd degree ranking. In the Cafe Royal, London, Christopher showed him the papers demonstrating the authenticity of his masonic rank and told Knight that he was keen to "stop the rot" in freemasonry. Stephen Knight asked him what a person might have to fear from a group of influential freemasons if circumstances made him, for instance, a threat to them in the business world; or if he discovered they were using masonry for corrupt purposes; or had fallen a victim of their misuse of freemasonry and would not heed warnings not to oppose them.
'Christopher', 33rd degree mason: "It is not difficult to ruin a man and I will tell you how it is done time and again. There are more than half a million brethren under the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge. Standards have been falling for twenty or thirty years. It is too easy to enter the Craft, so many men of dubious morals have joined. The secrecy and power attract such people, and when they come the decent leave. The numbers of people who would never have been considered for membership in the fifties are getting larger all the time. If only five per cent of freemasons use - abuse - the Craft for selfish or corrupt ends it means there are 25,000 of them. The figure is much closer to twelve or thirteen per cent now."
Stephen Knight: "Christopher explained that masonry's nationwide organization of men from most walks of life provided one of the most efficient private intelligence networks imaginable. Private information on anybody in the country could normally be accessed very rapidly through endless permutations of masonic contacts - police, magistrates, solicitors, bank managers. Post Office staff, doctors, government employees. Bosses of firms. A dossier of personal data could be built up on anybody very quickly. When the major facts of an individual's life were known, areas of vulnerability would become apparent. Perhaps he is in financial difficulties; perhaps he has some social vice - if married he might 'retain a mistress' or have a proclivity for visiting prostitutes; perhaps there is something in his past he wishes keep buried, some guilty secret, a criminal offence (easily obtainable through freemason police of doubtful virtue), or other blemish on his character: all these and more could be discovered via the wide-ranging masonic network of 600,000 contacts, a great many of whom were indisposed to do favours for one another because that had been their prime motive for joining. Even decent masons could often be 'conned' into providing information on the basis that 'Brother Smith needs this to help the person involved'. The adversary would even sometimes be described as a fellow mason to the Brother from whom information was sought - perhaps someone with access to his bank manager. The 'good' mason would not go to the lengths of checking with Freemason's Hall whether or not this was so. If the 'target' was presented as a Brother in distress by a fellow mason, especially a fellow lodge member, that would be enough for any upright member of the craft. Sometimes this information gathering process - often involving a long chain of masonic contacts all over the country and possibly abroad - would be necessary. Enough would be known in advance about the adversary to initiate any desired action against him.
'Christopher', the 33rd degree mason: "Solicitors are very good at it. Get your man involved in something legal - it need not be serious - and you have him."
Stephen Knight: "Masons can bring about the situation where credit companies and banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and tradesmen, said my informant. Banks can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for their work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of local authorities can arrange for a person's drains to be inspected and extensive damage to be reported, thus burdening the person with huge repair bills; workmen carrying out the job can 'find' - in reality cause - further damage. Again with regard to legal matters, a fair hearing is hard to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties. If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled freemasons skilled in using the 'network' it will be impossible because masonic DHSS and Law Society officials can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly."
'Christopher', 33rd degree mason: "Employers, if they are freemasons or not, can be given private information about a man who has made himself an enemy of masonry. At worst he will be dismissed (if the information is true) or consistently passed over for promotion. Masonic doctors can also be used. But for some reason doctors seem to be the least corruptible men. There are only two occurrences of false medical certificates issued by company doctors to ruin the chances of an individual getting a particular job which I know about. It's not a problem that need greatly worry us like the rest.
"Only the fighters have any hope of beating the system once it's at work against them. Most people, fighters or not, are beaten in the end, though. It's.... you see, I... you finish up not knowing who you can trust. You can get no help because your story sounds so paranoid that you are thought a crank, one of those nuts who think the whole world is a conspiracy against them. It is a strange phenomenon. By setting up a situation that most people will think of as fantasy, these people can poison every part of person's life. If they give in they go under. If they don't give in it's only putting off the day because if they fight, so much unhappiness will be brought to the people around them that there will likely come a time when even their families turn against them out of desperation. When that happens and they are without friends wherever they look, they become easy meat. The newspapers will not touch them. "There is no defense against an evil which only the victims and perpetrators know exists."
Stalkers/terrorist break down:
Legends
Ordinary people have legitimate family, friends that can account for their existance.
Stalkers live on false legends, and have many other stalkers back up their claim to live an ordinary existence
Strength: is anyone can be decieved due to the fact that we tend to believe references.
weakness:Deeper investigation would show the phony legends and references these people depend on.
Conclusion: The stalkers would have to avoid deep investigations. Stalkers will leave a trail of victims as careers are seldom left to one target.
Targeting victims Jobs
Ordinary citizens are motivated to do the job in trade for money
Stalkers have to be able to do the job plus harm the target and seam motivated for the money. This is made easier under phony investigations. The stalkers can approach the target's work with an official police badge and ask the company for assistance. The company will decide to terminate the employee at the earliest convenience.
Strength: The stalkers can create competition against the target. Companies can be enticed to hire someone of more experience. Stalkers can inform companies of false investigations.
Weakness: Victims can inform the Companies of the truth and reveal the deception if the job is snafued anyway. If the Stalkers are exposed the trail will light up instantly as the events will probably be remembered by the employer. Especially if he sees the target on television telling the truth.
Conclusion: Eventually there should be an adequate pattern to follow that a deep investigation could uncover. Police involvement in the investigations could implicate the players involve working within the R.C.M.P.
Street Theatre
Ordinary Citizens behave in a manner they wish to be treated themselves
Stalkers do not care and have only one agenda, to disrupt the targets everyday schedual.
Strength: The stalkers can create a feelling of hopelessness, create hardships as more and more stalkers become involved. Create uncertainty that would make the victim disoriented and phocused on minor things.
weakness: Pictures and recordings can expose the harrassment and pave the way to a deeper investigation.
Conclusion : Exposure tell family and friends show the recordings, sell them the truth gently. Ask them to storm the police station and demand a deep investigation. upload to the net all evidense so if anything did happen it could not be covered up.
Noisy neighbours
Ordinary neighbours can be nasty depending on who lives beside you. Partiers can keep you up all night and that might be perfectly normal.
Stalkers often never get caught when you call the police. Stalkers know when to be noisy and when to deny you proof. When the ceiling seems like the person is going to stomp right through and you call the authorities. Just before police arrive the place goes silent this is a definate yes that they are Stalkers. When the stalkers surround a target they tend to take up space. Possibly many innocent neighbours are targeted so they can get close to you. Notify neighbours with a letter about multistalking and try not to reveal you are the source unless absolutely neccesary.
Strength: Sleep deprivation is a powerful tool. Stalkers can break the target much easier if the target is not coherent.
Weakness: The property can be linked to somebody that can be investigated. Deeper investigation would either reveal a false name or a stalker that has stalked before. Stalkers have to have an excuse why they are home all day, try to find out what the excuse is. If you know the name of the stalker do a internet background check. Look up case files and see if they show up stalking other Targets and were taken to court.
Conclusion: Always be able to tell the difference between noisy neighbours and stalkers. If you falsely accuse you help the stalkers prove you are incompetant.
Internet resources to search for:
http://www.abika.com/Reports/Satellitephotos.htm
http://www.backgroundcheckgateway.com/
http://www.canlii.org/
WHY?
Deep investigations would require the aquivalent of a murder investigation. Suicides are self explanatory and do not require scrutiny. This is why the stalkers stalk but have good restraint to avoid hurting the target To break the target, and even ask them to give up is just a tip of the iceburg of methods used.
You are the total sum thoughts you think everyday which means if everyday you live in fear of the stalkers you become the rabbit that they mock and chase easily. Reading can empower you and bring you to a level of understanding how the stalking works.
Excellent Books to read:
"BiBle" study it thourough and you will have faith and enlightenment in these troubled times.
"How to win friends and influence people" by andrew Carnagy this book will allow you to build a stronghold of friends and allow you more power to tell the difference between friend and foe.
"criminology" can be found in the library it is good to study how the laws are made and manipulated.
"university of success" by og mandino learn to become a salesman this will help you sell your story to the public and help look for work.
"road less traveled" by scott peck this book can reveal the real issues behind your reactions
"psycocybernetics" this books helps to discover how the self esteem works and can give you a shield against stalkers.
"thinking big" this book will train you to look at the big picture instead of swimming in the small details that can hold you down.
"48 laws of power" by Robert Greene This book will show you what true ruthlessness is and make you more aware of the stalkers way of thinking.
"Art of war" by suntzu Learn how to create decoys tell them one thing and do another. Know your enemy, research your objectives never reveal your true plans.
Sometimes stalkers can be spotted in several ways:
Familiar face in the crowd always there just as you head around the corner. In public places if someone goes to the bathrooms looks in and then walks in view to count heads then sits back in the shadows. These are trained watchers. They most likely will not interact but most likely the stalkers are nearby and ready for their performance.
After a street performance take pictures of every car in the lot even if you are in the biggest mall in your town. These pictures will allow an investigator to help find the perpetrators and maybe weed out some of the silent players that are more valuable to know about than the stalkers. The stalkers are most likely just individuals who are approached and want to work for cash or the fantasy of being james bond.
Handy tools for fighting back
computer note book
Digital recorder capable of recording up to seven hours
digital camera
upload everything to a stalker website set up by you, try not to jeapardize other sites when revealing names and places. My personal favorite is msn groups
There just might be an enemy of the stalkers out there and providing this information would help expose their network and make them very nervous. Applying the pressure back at them, creating the uncertainty that they desire you to have.
Yours Truly
Dean Ray
NO R.C.M.P will investigate my claims
Break in report updated...
Lois Sheplawy
-noticed a Icecream pail lid with a chain sitting on it in her room near the door . noon December 12 2004. picture has been taken with disposable camera.
(anything happens use event number 04300763. A file has been made when trying to find out what happened to the satelite Bell expressview.)
Dean Ray
- noticed two finishing nails in bedroom closest to kitchen. Nails located on Eastern wall towards elevator. A hook was screwed into the ceiling very close to Eastern wall and the wall which has the window. December 13 2004
Note that apartment was painted and it is impossible for the nails to be left behind. Landlord specifically noted we are only allowed to use one wall and Lois Sheplawy chose the living room eastern wall.
Dean Ray
-noticed more holes peppered throughout the apartment. Extreme amounts of nail damage in the bedroom nearest the kitchen. 2004 DEC 14
Lois Sheplawy
-noticed religious tapes erased, broken door on closet, roll of quarters stolen
2005 may 04
Lois Sheplawy
-noticed dish washing soap drained faster than usual 2005 may 4
Posted by: Dean R Ray | May 8, 2005 12:48:06 PM
There is some other stuff over here too. Snotty Oxford dudes are worse that bible pounding Yankees.
http://www.tomgpalmer.com/archives/019909.php
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 5:46:12 PM
Maj. Chief Counsel, Doug Nappi, November 19, 2003
Min. Sr. Counsel, Martin Gruenberg,
Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee
534 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-7391
Fax: (202) 224-5137
Re: Corruption
Sirs,
I called Mr. Nappi today before sending this letter. Please review Rule 9 in particular of the attached Code of Ethics. I informed whoever took his message that I knew that I was the man in Massachusetts not Mr. Galvin that was referred to during the hearing yesterday. I am the one calling everybody names. If you doubt me, check my work at (http://briefcase.yahoo.com/motomaniac_02186)
I heard the Senators lament about jurisdiction over certain matters and Mr Shelby mention that nothing more important than trust. After your review of my documents please try to explain to me real slow why I or any other member of the public should trust anyone employed by the government during the reign of Bush and his absolute power the 108th Congress.
No one is above the law nor has immunity from prosecution if they break it or do not act within the scope of their employment in the public service. Feel free to surprise me and be the first lawyers that I have contacted to conduct yourselves Professionally and Ethically. Trust me the Constitution has jurisdiction over all. The First, Fourth and Seventh Amendments Civil Rights Violations are now in plain view to you within the documents and the recording now served upon you. Best you review Rule 9 again and then advise the Senators that I am determined to make them uphold the Constitution. I look forward to listening to the hearing on Thursday. Friday will be too late for you to confer with me. I have done you the courtesy of faxing this document to you two before mailing it. Included with the fax is some of my most recent letters to the SEC etc. and a few Reponses from some pretty fancy Dudes that you may find interesting. You can tell the Senators for me that they can preview the mail coming to them at the same web address as soon as I get back from the Post Office. I know they know all about me. I am merely proving it and letting them know that I have studied them and the law a little. It should be obvious to all that I have no fear of litigating against lawyers. I have yet to file my first complaint in a federal court but its coming soon.
Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA just prior to the malicious side show held before Judge Borenstein in Norfolk Superior Court on September 29th. I suspect the recent developments about the SEC and the FBI in Beantown have caused him to delay his judgments of long delayed motions that he had no jurisdiction to hear. He need not be advised as to whether or not to dismiss Prima Facia complaints that belong in federal court. The irrefutable evidence supporting the allegations were filed and served with the complaints. He knew the truth when he read what remained of the dockets. The clerks’ actions in all courts were evil. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you Mr. Cox in confidence as officer of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. I have also included a recent letter to Arnie Baby. I will wager he won’t want to debate me. If he does and if I were you, I wouldn’t miss it.
The recent ruling of the Massachusetts Supreme Court in favor of the Gay and Lesbian community could not have come on a better day for me. Watch me turn the underlying political issues into a very comical sideshow for my three ring circus that is about to pitch its tent in a town near you. You will all be invited to perform and the public is admitted for free. Bad actors will be summoned to pay relief for pretending to be something they are not. As Mr. Fink clearly stated he wanted to be judged by his actions. He wish is my command. The people demand no less when judging those that held the Public Trust. No action or inaction by anyone is to be excused. Just so ya know, tomorrow is the last day for George W. Bush to answer me as a federal employee. After that he and I should go nose to nose as individuals in a Prima Facia Pro Se Action. You can stand with him or bear witness for me. You choose. If you are wise you would call me today to hear what comes off the top of my head in order to judge for yourself my skill at making a jury understand me. After today I will not return your call but just listen to the hearing. If you wish to join H. Marshall Jarrett and go against me, it is fine by me. The more lawyers against a court jester, the merrier he is.
Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 240 6698
P.S. I loved hearing the questions Mr. Shelby asked and watching the reactions to them. Mr. Fink’s facial expressions were hilarious and Mr. Lackritz hid none of the truth from me or anyone else. I loved Mr. Donaldson’s doubletalk about the quick settlement with Putnam. Mr, Nester, Mr. Koski and I know why. So does he.
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 11:36:42 AM
November 15, 2003
Governor Gray Davis Governor-elect Arnold Schwarzenegger
State Capitol Building 3110 Main Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814 Santa Monica, CA 90405
Phone: (916) 445-2841 Phone: (310) 664-9002
Fax: (916)445-4633 Fax: (310)664-9120
Representative Barney Frank Senator Orrin Hatch
2252 Rayburn House Office Building 104 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-2104 Washington, D.C. 20510-4402
Phone: (202) 225-5931 Phone: (202) 224-5251
Fax: (202) 225-0182 Fax: (202) 224-6331
Re: Me teasing Arnie while putting a couple of his friends over a barrel.
Sirs,
Governor Gray Davis there is no need to cry later. You know as well as I what is going on and why. You had your chance to cry to all about all that you know earlier. All of you may wish to claim that you have never heard of me until today. However, I would strongly doubt such a remark, merely because of all of the people I have encountered in the past two years have connections with each of you with less than six degrees of separation. I will try not to elaborate too much on my beefs with the system and the proposed New World Order. Oft times less is more. I will rest on the strength of my words on file in the public record of many courts.
I have chosen this date to become sort of a political person. For the past week or so I have been poking and prodding many politicians in many ways. Before I strike myself dumb, I want to jerk Arnie’s chain to see if that old dog has got any teeth. His face-lift does not conceal the fact that his ass is starting to sag. I have determined that vanity is his Achilles heel. I will make the best of that knowledge to embarrass him. I do this not for spite but as an act of vengeance on behalf of many an honourable dead man. I like to have fun and do things my way rather than follow standard operating procedure laid out by the old school. Whereas you are politicians and are well paid to talk on behalf of others, you should do so. You do hold the public trust. On the other hand I am playing dumb for awhile. I am just another jerk who takes pride in his work. I am not a citizen of this country. As a legal permanent resident I have the same rights as anyone else under Title 42. I will pick my time to speak my mind to the press under the First Amendment until then I will take the Fifth. I will let the wiretap tapes that I have in my possession protect the Fourth Amendment Rights of others while I await the Justice System to finally recognize our Seventh Amendments Rights.
In the “mean” time I am on the road and in hiding. I can’t afford to trust anyone. Many federal employees have ignored Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics and have no understanding of the rest. I ask all of you this question. Do you understand how our Seventh Amendment Rights were violated in the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts in a complaint pursuant to the First Amendment? Please view the enclosed documents.
All paid employees of the State do not have immunity from the laws of this land if you do not act within the scope of your employment, obey the Rules, uphold the laws and The Constitution. All the lawyers amongst you particularly those that hold public office, have even more rules to obey with regard to Professional Conduct. The lawyers that review the enclosed documents that were sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA should take careful note that matters were dismissed ex parte without any documents ever served upon the plaintiffs and then consider Canon 3(a) that federal Judges must obey. Here is a part of one of my next filings in a federal court. I copied it from an interesting docket. Please note that I did not send you a copy of wiretap tape numbered 139. Ask the U.S. Attorneys in your various Districts about it. I have received enough denials from many authorities that the tapes are valid to do with them what I wish. I will be giving the tape to the offended parties in order that they may defend their own rights. I have many tapes to give others. Trust me, someone will react to the civil rights offences practiced against them. If the offended parties complain of me and win, I will complain of the government and all others involved for three times the loss.
III. LEGAL STANDARDSA. Motion to Dismiss
A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is disfavored: "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief." See Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957); see also Gilligan v. Janow Dev. Corp., 106 F.3d 246, 249 (9th Cir.1997) (issue is not whether plaintiff will ultimately prevail, but whether claimant is entitled to offer evidence to support the claim). In deciding a motion to dismiss, the court accepts as true all material allegations in the complaint and construes them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See Oscar v. University Students Co-op Ass'n., 965 F.2d 783, 785 (9th Cir.1992); NL Industries v. Kaplan, 792 F.2d 896, 898 (9th Cir.1986).
The court need not accept as true allegations that contradict facts which may be judicially noticed. See Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Ct., 828 F.2d 1385, 1388 (9th Cir.1987). For example, matters of public record may be considered, including pleadings, orders, and other papers filed with the court or records of administrative bodies, see Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, 798 F.2d 1279, 1282 (9th Cir.1986), while conclusions of law, conclusory allegations, unreasonable inferences, or unwarranted deductions of fact need not be accepted. See Western Mining Council v. Watt, 643 F.2d 618, 624 (9th Cir.1981); see also Branch v. Tunnell, 14 F.3d 449, 453 (9th Cir.1994) ("[A] document is not 'outside' the complaint if the complaint specifically refers to the document and if its authenticity is not questioned."). Allegations in the complaint may be disregarded if contradicted by facts established by exhibits attached to the complaint. See Durning v. First Boston Corp., 815 F.2d 1265, 1267 (9th Cir.1987).
In layman’s terms it means that a complaint must not be dismissed if there is a remote possibility that it is legit. Canon 3(a) mandates that a judge cannot discuss a pending matter with anyone without all parties present.
Judge Stearns dismissed 48 million dollars worth of relief sought within a Prima Facia complaint without the plaintiffs being served anything. This was done without a hearing on the word of a liar who was incompetently 5 months in default in defense of his clients. Many State Laws, Local Rules of the US District Court and Federal laws were broken to protect the mask of virtue of the Department of Justice. The Fax information served upon me on top of my own complaint by the US Attorney told me long ago that Attorney General Ashcroft was a crook.
The fact that the government altered the summons to show that the Treasury Dept Agents were not served was amazing. The fact that the Suffolk County Sheriff was willing to go along with the perjury of the U.S. Attorney was beyond belief. When Deputy Sheriff Larry McGrath asked me to please sue him on October 15th, 2002 in front of a witness, he should have realized that he didn’t have to ask me twice. Suing lawyers is one of those things I do that nobody seems to appreciate. The fact that the Massachusetts Attorney General practiced Mail Fraud in order not to receive my documents and the postal service covered it up was bad enough. Today I discovered that Deputy Sheriff McGrath is now practicing Mail Fraud as well.
Trust me. If I have my way this political scandal is going to break all the records. What I did with the MBA over a month ago was wicked funny. I had to wait for the seminar about Probate Turf Wars and the election in California before proceeding with my plan. Dragon slaying can be fun if approached with the right attitude. Lawyers may call me crazy but I bet they don’t call me stupid anymore. The best part of the day at MBA was when one of the snobby Oliver Wendell Holmes Fellows snubbed me and refused my papers as he entered their guarded clubhouse and then came out later and asked me for one. I smiled and said he could have them all. He refused and slid away back into the den of thieves. Can you tell I hold them in contempt? I like the famous jurist’s father better anyway. Although he was a witty writer, it was the fact that he went to find his son on the battlefields in order to bring him home that causes me to admire him greatly. Whatever else that man had accomplished in life, comes in second to me in comparison to what he did as a father. For that alone my hat is off to him.
Representative Dennis Kucinich failed to understand my position in his recent letter to me. The fact is that whereas I cannot vote, then it follows that no one can speak for me. Bill Delahunt is not my Clan’s State Representative, Stephen Lynch is. That said trust me, Bill Delahunt knew all about me long ago as does Senators Kerry and Kennedy. Now Stephen Lynch can never deny it yet he ignores me as well.
Because Stephen Lynch is my Clan’s Representative I had been saving him as one of the last people to prove that I have informed before leaving my family. There are several reasons for doing so. Stephen Lynch recently donated a portion of his liver to his brother-in-law. He still lives in his family home as does my wife. This proves to me that he has a strong sense of home and family. I admire that in a man. He has not renewed his license to practice law. Maybe he is as sick of lawyers as I am. I was hoping that he would approach me first. He didn’t so I did and now I am gone.
The two opponents that he had in his bid for Congress are very crooked lawyers and State Senators who have been well aware of our matters for a very long time. They have chosen to stand with my wife’s criminal relatives rather than uphold the law. On the other hand he does live in the Bulger neighborhood and did warm the former President of the Senate’s seat for awhile and he also avoided the issues in the congressional investigation into the Whitey Bulger matter. Nobody should deny the fact that I had been doing my level best to present possible evidence in the matter to the proper authorities. In return all I received was harassment.
The faxes I sent out a while ago to the Democratic Candidates looking for fellow Democrats to bless their run for President should have caused Mr. Lynch to contact me. Maybe they were mushrooming him. From this point on, he can never say that I kept him in the dark or fed him bullshit. I was disappointed but not surprised when I did not hear from Mr. Lynch. At this point in time I would be truly shocked if anyone in public service actually did their job and did an honest day’s work in an ethical fashion.
Just for fun, I am sending Playboy, Easyrider, Larry Flynt and Mary Carey a copy of this letter. I contacted the first two awhile ago but they laughed at me and ignored me. One of the fellas whose lady friend was running for Governor in Massachusetts last year received everything from me in hand. He also claims to have written for Playboy. Now I will laugh and ignore them. Maybe in return they will bother you guys with a few questions. If they do, then we will talk.
I was not surprised when the Magazines ignored me. I bear them no malice. I have no doubt they encounter many fools with an unbelievable story and simply do not have time to investigate them all. However, I cannot say the same about many other members of the press. If National Enquirer finally does decide to print something, they had best honour the offer of twenty-five grand. My Clan needs the money. I did fax them about two hundred documents and can prove it. Just for good measure the Enquirer’s General Counsel, Michael B. Kahane, gets this letter not the reporters. They had their chance. Maybe Mr. Kahane will recognize the argument quoted earlier from some other litigation in the U.S. District Court in California.
The last two folks I mentioned had no idea about me until I called them last month. As I said, I contacted them just for fun. I judge Larry to be an ethical man and do not judge his chosen vocation. Just like Jimmy Carter, I freely admit that I look upon women lustfully. The fact that he had a friend in Jimmy’s sister proved to me that not only did Larry have an ethical set of Big Balls to go against the System and defend all of our rights but other ethical people saw it in him as well. I sense that Marey Carey is all about fun. I like that in a lady because that is the kind of guy I am. There is no reason for me to think anything ill of her. Given their chosen professions and outlook on life, I figured that both would appreciate a man with big balls. Excuse the pun.
The last person who should judge any of us for having fun is the Governor-elect of California. In the past he has been paid to show off his balls. Mary Carey’s assistant laughed and seemed interested enough to have a look at my briefcase in yahoo. Larry’s assistant seemed too busy to bother with the likes of me. I have met with similar responses too many times in the past to continue to waste anymore of each other’s precious time. I will do as I said and simply email Larry this letter. If he develops an interest he will have to figure it out for himself. His help will not be of much help. In fact,