For the record

Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:11:03 -0800 (PST)
From: "David Amos"
Subject:Fwd: Sgt Vaillancourt just talked byway of 506 452 3431 now I will take a guess at his email address
To:mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca, carleton@stu.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca

http://www.charlesinthehouse.com/

Everybody knows that Chucky Leblanc wasn't the only dude covertly banished from the Legislative Buildling. How come he get all the press I must ask? Perhaps you should ask his old pal and your cohort Kelly Lamrock what gives with this shit sometime N'est Pas?
Hell everyone in your University knows that I was illegally evicted from the polling station at the Student Union Building on January 23rd. Tell me what would Stevey Boy Harper do if that had happened to him? Sue? Am I any less of a man than the Prime Minister.or the French man you and your students support? Now Computer WCIE should search the Blogs Chucky. Live by the sword. Die by the sword so to speak EH? Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

http://www1.gnb.ca/legis/bios1/bio-e.asp?idNo=102&versionfiltered=e


David Amos wrote:

Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:23:59 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Sgt Vaillancourt just talked byway of 506 452 3431 now I will take a guess at his email address
To: write4u@consultant.com

David Amos wrote:

Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:57:07 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Sgt Vaillancourt just talked byway of 506 452 3431 now I will take a guess at his email address
To: Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, imc-maritimes@riseup.net, oldmaison@yahoo.com, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca, mary.schryer@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca, Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca, giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, belord@gnb.ca, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca, davies.carl@nbpub.com, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, claude.landry@gnb.ca, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca, MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca, Day.S@parl.gc.ca, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca, Allen.M@parl.gc.ca, Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca

I warned him that I was a very fierce political animal. I also made it clear to Sgt. Vaillancourt that I have many very justifiable reasons not to trust any cop anymore. I will do as I said and sue the Crown Corp known as the RCMP in the Court of the Queen's Bench in Fredericton unless somebody doesn't act with the scope of their employment ASAP. However I must do as I promised and file my first complaint against the Crown in Federal Court first. In the "mean" time perhaps some local cop in New Brunswick should simply do his job and investigate all the material I have given to them over the years. They really stop their bullshit about jusridiction and mandate in order to protect their personal interests. Do they not understand that I can sue them as individuals? There is nothing wrong with exposing the truth about my allegations of criminal conduct in support of public corruption for the benefit of all Canadians. Just act non paritsan and let the politcal card fall where they may. Lawyers and politicains are infinitely replacable and all falsly claim to be ethical as they pick our pockets. I would love to hear my name mentioned in a very public forum even if it was slandered. Before the Yankee elections on November 7th would be nice EH? Politicians cops and lawyers should look to their own personal interests and then uphold the law and the public trust placed in their positions. After all that is their job not mine N'est Pas?
I do not have to do anything any cop or lawyer may wish to suggest anymore. Not all Maritimers are dumb defeatists as Stevey Boy Harper has suggested in the past. At least I am one dumb pigheaded Maritimer who knows the differnce between my rights under the Charter and the government's wrongs practiced against them. I also know when somebody has falied their oath to uphold the law and protect the public interests and I certainly know how to hold them accountable in a legal and ethical fashion. To say you will sue someone is not a threat. It is merely a promise. Most lawyers employ such words everyday and they practice law for a fee.
I have taken no oath to obey other then one to my wife and an unspoken one to my seed.. Thus I obey only my own consience and I stress test my own integrity every day in the best interests of my Clan. It is them whom I serve and protect without a fee because it is my duty to do so just as cops and other public servants etc are gainfully employed to protect us all under oath and rule of law. My family has suffered enough over the past five years. Tis high time I sought monetary relief from our bad acting governemnts in order to bring them home to Canada to live in peace and escape further Yankee malice.
Anyone can check my work. Much of it still remains on file in the public record of many Yankee courts and one Canadian one. I am certain that anyone would agree that my Clan has had amazing patience thus far. I say nay never no more. I have been a student of enough Canadian law to get a good grip on the scene. It is time to put what I learned to good use for the benefit of my Clan. EH?
I am sending three emails to Sgt Vaillancourt and his bosses to protect my own dumb arse from more false allegations I will also use hard copy as evidence against the RCMP in court. Clearly I have introduced him to a few local witnesses EH? Sending these emails to most of them is truly redundant but it is to serve my own ends in the blogs. Charles Leblanc should know by now where to find this particular email posted within a blog. It is easy for anyone call me a liar or crazy as a loon or even to make the false claim that I am some kind of a criminal threat to them. But putting the claim in writing and signng one's name to the document is another kettle of fish. N'est Pas? Try it sometime soon. In fact I Double Dog Dare Ya to.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos


Stéphane Vaillancourt
506-452-3431
506-470-2300 (cell)
506- 558-1270 (pager)

I know for a fact it was my calls to Parliament etc in response to the following words that made the RCMP start to do their job and call me back.

OTTAWA - Wayne Easter, the former solicitor-general who presided during the Arar ordeal, appeared to contradict earlier testimony from RCMP head Giuliano Zacardelli today when he answered questions at a commons committee.
Responding to Justice Dennis O’Connor’s report on the Arar case at the public safety and national security committee, Easter said he was never told the RCMP had passed on false information to the United States and was never told the RCMP tried to correct it, as claimed by Zacardelli.
“I was not informed that the RCMP had provided inaccurate information to the U.S.,” Easter told the MPs.
When Zacardelli met with the committee in September he was asked when he informed his minister about the RCMP’s error, and he replied that he could not recall specifically but that “briefings and timelines started to be prepared for him as the matter came up, and we started providing that information.”
But Easter emphatically told the committee that that information never reached him. In preparation for today’s appearance Easter said he reviewed documents, briefing notes and material he had received during his tenure on the Arar case and met with his staff in order to have a clear timeline of what he knew and when.
In two briefing notes from October and November of 2002, Easter said, “There was no reference to errors in information, no reference to false information, nor was there any reference to any corrective efforts having been made by the RCMP with respect to any of the information which may have been shared.”
The same was true in briefings given in June and July of the following year, Easter testified.
Giving further evidence he was in the dark abut the erroneous information passed on to the U.S., Easter said the issue was never raised with him by his American counterpart Attorney General John Ashcroft. Presumably when American investigators learned they had false information on Arar, Ashcroft would have been briefed on that information, Easter said, and he believes Ashcroft would have shared that with him.
“Attorney General Ashcroft…would have undoubtedly raised that point with me,” Easter said.Asked whether he would have acted differently had he known earlier that Arar had no terrorist links, Easter said he didn’t want to answer hypothetical questions.
Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen, was arrested in the United States in 2002, and sent to his native Syria where he was imprisoned for a year and endured torture before being released without charge.
The committee is planning to recall Zacardelli to clarify his initial testimony and he will likely be asked about the contradictions provided today by his former political boss.
© CanWest News Service 2006

Here is a little proof of how much I study my political opponents. Cya'll in Court :(.

http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/CommitteePublication.aspx?SourceId=96766


David Amos wrote:

Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:12:58 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Say hey to Wayne Easter and the equally dumb Newfy lawyers Rob Moore and Andrew House for me will ya?
To: Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca

David Amos wrote:

Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:27:30 -0800 (PST)From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Maybe old Zack will explain to the kids the Federal Criminal Code I quoted within this email
To: mccmar@nbnet.nb.ca

David Amos wrote:

Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Maybe old Zack will explain to the kids the Federal Criminal Code I quoted within this email
To: handsofnothing@yahoo.ca, gcox@citizenspress.org, oldmaison@yahoo.com, ottawaresisters@yahoo.ca, giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

David Amos wrote:

Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Keep reading Ms. Roche
To: baldwij@psac.com

David Amos wrote:

Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Keep reading Ms. Roche
To: lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca, samperrier@hotmail.com, oldehippiebc@hotmail.com, Mayor@ci.milford.ct.us, stevengerickson@yahoo.com, CityClerk@ci.milford.ct.us, jim.amann@cga.ct.gov, judicialreform@cga.ct.gov, kevin.kane@po.state.ct.us, letters@courant.com, carmen.espinosa@jud.state.ct.us, john.driscoll@jud.state.ct.us, mlevenson@globe.com
CC: info@nedlamont.com, Kathleen Dickson , info@joe2006.com, Knibbs4senate@juno.com, haroldford@fordfortennessee.com, staff@destefanoforct.com, info@votethornton.com, ralphferrucci@sbcglobal.net, comments@joecourtney.com, campaign@murphyforcongress.org, greens@ctgreens.org, melinda@bobfarr.com

Just so the Newfys and the Yankees all know, it was Jim Case of the Newfoundland Constabulary (Rarespade) who told me that he saw Whitey Bulger hanging around his town of St. John's when I was preparing to come home to run for a seat in Parliament in 2004 and do a little bounty hunting on the side. No shit ask Byron Prior or Premier Danny Williams etc..

Sam Perrier wrote:
From: "Sam Perrier" samperrier@hotmail.com
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.comSubject:
RE: Fwd: What say you now Jacky Boy Layton? Cat still got your tongue? Shame onyou. You likely walked past Byron Prior again today
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:36:35 -0230

HOLY SHIT DAVID, THE SCUMBAGS MUST BE CHEWING ON THEIR BOOT STRAPS.
I SENT YOU ANOTHER FAX, ITS VERY INTERESTING, I KNOW YOU WILL GET A CHUCKEL OUT OF IT.
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, MAYBE SOMEDAY SOMEONE WITH A BIT OF DECENCY WILL INVESTIGATE BYRON'S SITUATION AND TAKE ACTION, ITWILL ONLY TAKE ONE RAT TO LEAVE THE BURNING BARN SQUEALING AND THE OTHERS WILL FOLLOW TO SAVE THEIR ASSES.
SAM.

From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
To: Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca, Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca, kquigg@nb.aibn.com, rjbasque@forbesrothbasque.nb.ca, dlw@barryspalding.com, cbanb@cbanb.com, albertmf@umoncton.ca, dean@law.ualberta.ca, bobinski@law.ubc.ca, lawdean@ucalgary.ca, comments@michaelignatieff.ca, info@bobrae.ca, lawdean@osgoode.yorku.ca, lawdean@dal.ca, daniel.gervais@uottawa.ca
CC: pswan@ccs.carleton.ca, andre.lareau@fd.ulaval.ca, harvey_secter@umanitoba.ca, dean.law@mcgill.ca, anne-marie.boisvert@umontreal.ca, mockle.daniel@uqam.ca, w.flanagan@queensu.ca, brent.cotter@usask.ca, daniel.b.proulx@usherbrooke.ca, mayo.moran@utoronto.ca, dean@law.uvic.ca, cbrown3@uwo.ca, belman@uwindsor.ca
Subject: Fwd: What say you now Jacky Boy Layton? Cat still got your tongue? Shame on you. You likely walked past Byron Prior again today
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:41:18 -0700 (PDT)

David Amos wrote:

Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: What say you now Jacky Boy Layton? Cat still got your tongue? Shame on you. You likely walked past Byron Prior again today
To: greg@currentmag.ca, locke@straylight.ca, ed_hollett@hotmail.com, mgeist@uottawa.ca, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca, tommarshall@gov.nl.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Simms.S@parl.gc.ca, Russell.T@parl.gc.ca, Manning.F@parl.gc.ca, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca
CC: oldmaison@yahoo.com, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, Deb_Nobes@cbc.ca, spinks08@hotmail.com, Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca, mackay01@canada.com, PoliticsNB@hotmail.com, oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com, advocacycollective@yahoo.com, dchafe@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca, news@kingscorecord.com, news@dailygleaner.com, kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, davies.carl@nbpub.com, urquhart.mia@telegraphjournal.com

Hey Greg
As you scroll down to the both of the email you see that Stevey Boy Harper byway of the Privy Council’s reply to me can never deny that he don’t know all about Byron Prior and I now. As if he ever could EH? As I told you on the phone this morning, methinks if anyone truly wishes to know the truth of all that you ask you should Google the name of Byron Prior and that of mine as well it is as I said David Raymond Amos. Better yet pick up the phone and call my cell # anytime after 8 pm in the Maritimes and I will take you down the path through the Garden of Good and Evil that will leave you staggering under the weight of the awful truth. As you could tell I am not a shy man. What you may not know is that I am never reckless with the awful truth. My number is 506 434 1379.
I must say I found it rather hard to believe that a journalist in St John’s Newfoundland has not heard of the name Byron Prior by now. I will allow you the license to claim that you have never heard of me and that federal politics is not your forte. However no Newfy who claims to be a journalist is that dumb or out of touch of the local political scene to not know of the lawsuit between the MP Billy Matthews and Byron Prior on file in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland. You write books. Perhaps you should find Martha Jette’s book about Byron and write one of your own. Rest assured I will mention both of you in mine. I ain’t shy about naming names and calling a spade a spade pursuant to the following federal code. One sort of spade I will name is Constable Jim Case of the Newfy Constabulary. He used the name rarespade for his email address as he tortured Byron Prior for years. Hell he even told me saw Whitey Bulger in downtown St. John’s back in 2004. You should know how to read as well as write
EH? Check the law. Byron and his friend Paul Perrier have done nothing wrong. But the people acting against them certainly have. EH?

Criminal Code PART VIII: OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION Defamatory Libel
315. No person shall be deemed to publish a defamatory libel by reason only that he publishes defamatory matter in good faith for the purpose of seeking remedy or redress for a private or public wrong or grievance from a person who has, or who on reasonable grounds he believes has, the right or is under an obligation to remedy or redress the wrong or grievance, if
(a) he believes that the defamatory matter is true;
(b) the defamatory matter is relevant to the remedy or redress that is sought; and
(c) the defamatory matter does not in any respect exceed what is reasonably sufficient in the circumstances.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 279.

You should also know as well as I that people often fail ethical stress tests when it concerns their own interests. It seemed to strange me that you claim on your own website that you know and write of many things but on the phone to you try hard to play dumb. As you could no doubt tell, I gave up on you rather promptly. I see no need to argue on my dime. I am accustomed to that kind of double talk from lawyers and journalists alike when they do not want to know anymore. Obviously the lawyer Michael Geist is both because of the fact he loves to blog about all that he knows. His silence speaks volumes to me.. I contacted him and the Newfy Constabulary etc as soon as I read his post and the words of Paul Perrier recorded by CBC.. So much or for the ethics of professors who expound of the law EH? Clearly the cat or Stevey Boy Harper has got that Upper Canadian lawyer’s tongue. If Geist is so adept with the internet, he should know everything there is to know about Byron Prior and I by now. Clearly I have been studying
him. Methinks the Dean of his Law School will have a shit fit in short order after I approach the kids they teach about ethical conduct etc. I think Byron Prior who is in Ottawa once again should go ask that lawyer/professor of Canada’s so called University some questions about publishing the truth on the internet face to face in front of his students. What say you?

. http://www.michaelgeist.ca/component/option,com_tags/task,view/tag,email+spoof/

Geist says this of himself. And I inserted both of your Bios in this email in order to stress test your ethics as well
I am a law professor at the University of Ottawa where I hold the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law. My current contact information is included below:

University of Ottawa
Faculty of LawCommon Law Section
57 Louis Pasteur
Box 450, Stn. A
Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5
Canada
(613) 562-5800 extension 3319
mgeist@uottawa.ca

It appears by way of CBC reporting of Paul Perrier and the following comment by the Current and others has caused Byron Prior to finally break the ice of his matters in the corporate controlled media. Hooray for Paul Perrier. He did what needed to be done. I wish I had thought of it first. As you shall see he clearly told the truth of what he was doing and why. The fact that I understood his game and supported his efforts out of the gate must have Danny williams panties in quite a knot EH?. Ask yourself why nobody mentions me. Paul Perrier is one man with sand and lots of integrity whom I will stand behind until hell freezes over. Look for these words in my own blog Greg.
I hope that Paul Perrier does not trust lawyers and the corrupt the Justice System in Newfoundland to protect his rights and interests. Clearly Danny Williams and his cohorts ignore the law all day long. Here is a couple Danny Boy should review before he supports the false imprisonment of another man from the Maritimes. I am going to sue Danny Boy anyway ask his attorney General Tommy Boy Marshall why if you don’t already know.

Criminal Code PART IV: OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND JUSTICE Corruption and Disobedience
126. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by wilfully omitting to do anything that it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.
2) Any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to contravene an Act mentioned in subsection (1), other than this Act, may be instituted at the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted by or on behalf of that Government.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F).
Criminal Code PART VIII: OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION Duties Tending to Preservation of Life
217.1 Every one who undertakes, or has the authority, to direct how another person does work or performs a task is under a legal duty to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to that person, or any other person, arising from that work or task.
2003, c. 21, s. 3

Methinks it is the spoken word of honest common men not VOCM in Newfoundland as they gossip about Danny Williams and his cohorts that will save Paul Perrier from malicious prosecution. I say that Paul Perrier did the right thing and that his only offence is to be a minor nuisance to some very major crooks. Canada needs more men like the man the Current has labeled a hero.
Greg this comment on your post within the Current is emailed to you not posted because I am not a member of your blog nor do I wish to be, You have explained to me that the posting was written by someone else but you are the only contact person.. I find that the post is an interesting stress test of the Ethics of the CBC and the Justice System in Newfoundland as a whole by what appears to be an Independent News organization.. I truly did think by your outfit’s name that your were associated with CBC. Please feel free to post my comment to your post and ask me anything you wish in the hope that I can force CBC to obey its mandate. but computers never do. It seems that only machines are capable of acting within the scope of their employment eh? I will forward the two emails that were spoofed about Danny Williams and the NTV as well. Obviously I forwarded this email and the two offending emails to Byron Prior Danny Boy and the NTV and that have made you a witness not only to malicious prosecution but to my own pending complaints as well. It is who that is in the Bcc box
and those I forward this email to afterwards that only the Feds and me will know that should cause you the most concern as I stress test your ethics to the max.. Trust that some will respond to this email and bounce it back to me for my records because I am up to something most folks will not believe. Truth is stranger than fiction and I am about to prove it once more.

Many people consider me crazy or worse yet a criminal. However they can never deny that I ran for a Seat in Parliament twice and in two provincial elections thus far. The false allegations and the simple facts do not fit together very well. I must have been slandered EH? Many people know the reason that a man who has never voted in his life decided to become a very fierce political animal but nobody will say my name not even Byron Prior because it seems my affairs are very scary indeed. To date not one person other than my brother in law, Norfolk County Deputy Sheriff Robert F. O’Meara has been willing to call me a liar and put it in writing. Many people joke and liken me to the Mel Gibson or some other character in a Hollywood movie and suggest I write a book. Well my life ain’t no movie and methinks I should continue living in order to finish the god damned book. Methinks a lot of lawyers and cops will regret that they did not pay better attention to the laws they swore to uphold once the truth of my matters become public knowledge. EH? Everybody knows that there is no honour amongst thieves. Soon or later I will break the ice as well Won’t I Mr. Geist?

Criminal Code PART XIII: ATTEMPTS — CONSPIRACIES — ACCESSORIES
465. (1) Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions apply in respect of conspiracy:
(a) every one who conspires with any one to commit murder or to cause another person to be murdered, whether in Canada or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a maximum term of imprisonment for life;
(b) every one who conspires with any one to prosecute a person for an alleged offence, knowing that he did not commit that offence, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable
(i) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life or for a term not exceeding fourteen years, or
(ii) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to imprisonment for less than fourteen years;
(c) every one who conspires with any one to commit an indictable offence not provided for in paragraph (a) or (b) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to the same punishment as that to which an accused who is guilty of that offence would, on conviction, be liable; and
(d) every one who conspires with any one to commit an offence punishable on summary conviction is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
(2) [Repealed, 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 61]
(3) Every one who, while in Canada, conspires with any one to do anything referred to in subsection (1) in a place outside Canada that is an offence under the laws of that place shall be deemed to have conspired to do that thing in Canada.
(4) Every one who, while in a place outside Canada, conspires with any one to do anything referred to in subsection (1) in Canada shall be deemed to have conspired in Canada to do that thing.
(5) Where a person is alleged to have conspired to do anything that is an offence by virtue of subsection (3) or (4), proceedings in respect of that offence may, whether or not that person is in Canada, be commenced in any territorial division in Canada, and the accused may be tried and punished in respect of that offence in the same manner as if the offence had been committed in that territorial division.

(6) For greater certainty, the provisions of this Act relating to
(a) requirements that an accused appear at and be present during proceedings, and
(b) the exceptions to those requirements,
apply to proceedings commenced in any territorial division pursuant to subsection (5).
(7) Where a person is alleged to have conspired to do anything that is an offence by virtue of subsection (3) or (4) and that person has been tried and dealt with outside Canada in respect of the offence in such a manner that, if the person had been tried and dealt with in Canada, he would be able to plead autrefois acquit, autrefois convict or pardon, the person shall be deemed to have been so tried and dealt with in Canada.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 465; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 61; 1998, c. 35, s. 121.

Criminal Code PART XIII: ATTEMPTS — CONSPIRACIES — ACCESSORIES

463. Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions apply in respect of persons who attempt to commit or are accessories after the fact to the commission of offences:
(a) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an accused is liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years;
(b) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an accused is liable to imprisonment for fourteen years or less is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term that is one-half of the longest term to which a person who is guilty of that offence is liable;
(c) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an offence punishable on summary conviction is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction; and

(d) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an offence for which the offender may be prosecuted by indictment or for which he is punishable on summary conviction
(i) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding a term that is one-half of the longest term to which a person who is guilty of that offence is liable, or
(ii) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 463; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 59; 1998, c. 35, s. 120.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

P.S. If the people at the Current were truly wise they would investigate a really big scoop that no other media has reported on. That said it would not behoove the Current to delete their comment within their own Blog. I already saved a digital copy of the webpage in my reliable little old computer. If they do so it is just another piece of evidence I will employ against the Crown and use to question the Current about why they questioned something one day then ignored the obvious answer a few days later.

Greg says this of himself

Greg has more than twenty years experience as a professional photographer, journalist and editor. His work has appeared in publications and news agencies such as Macleans, Equinox, Canadian Geographic, Reuters, The Globe & Mail, Forbes, Time, Businessweek, Readers Digest, Toronto Star, Canadian Busness, Utne Reader, Men's Health and der Spiegel as well as commercial work for corporate clients including Mobil Oil, Chevron, Texas Instuments, Bank of Montreal, Canadian Bar Association, Petro Canada, Medecins sans Frontieres, Canadian International Development Agency, Newfoundland Hydro, Parks Canada, Kodak Europe and McClelland & Stewart, Canada.

His assignments have taken him from the ice floes and offshore oil fields of the North Atlantic to the civil wars of The Balkans and the conflicts in Central Africa. Locke is equally comfortable working in the corporate boardroom as he is remote field locations.

Dr. Michael Geist does brag a great deal more EH?

Dr. Geist has written numerous academic articles and government reports on the Internet and law and is a columnist on technology law issues that regularly appears in media outlets on five continents including North America (the Toronto Star and Ottawa Citizen), South America (Santiago Times), Europe (BBC), Asia (South China Morning Post), and Africa (Kenya's Daily Nation). He is the creator and consulting editor of BNA's Internet Law News, a daily Internet law news service, editor of the monthly newsletters, Internet and E-commerce Law in Canada and the Canadian Privacy Law Review (Butterworths), the founder of the Ontario Research Network for E-commerce, on the advisory boards of several leading Internet law publications including Electronic Commerce & Law Report (BNA), the Journal of Internet Law (Aspen) and Internet Law and Business (Computer Law Reporter). He is the author of the textbook Internet Law in Canada (Captus Press) which is now in its third edition, and the editor of In the Public Interest: The Future of Canadian Copyright Law, published in 2005 by Irwin Law.

Dr. Geist's work has been recognized with several important awards and grants including the 2002 Canadian Association of Law Teachers Scholarly Paper Award and a major research grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for work on Internet jurisdiction and copyright law. In 2003, Dr. Geist became the first law professor to receive the Ontario Premier Research Excellence Award, obtained a significant grant from Amazon.com to establish Canada first technology law public interest litigation clinic at the University of Ottawa, was named one of Canada Top 40 Under 40, and received the Public Leadership Award from Canarie for his contribution to the Internet in Canada.

Dr. Geist serves on the director and advisory boards of several Internet and IT law organizations including the Canadian Internet Registration Authority , the dot-ca administrative agency, and the Public Interest Registry , which manages the dot-org domain. He was a member of Canada’s National Task Force on Spam and is the former chair of a global Internet jurisdiction project for the American Bar Association and International Chamber of Commerce. He is regularly quoted in the national and international media on Internet law issues and has appeared before government committees on e-commerce policy.

Lots of people were talking then they all seemed to shut up EH?

Lets see it I can get the gossips going once again EH?

Greg’s crowd said this in my humble opinion it is the best piece of gossip yet.

The Great Danny Williams E-mail Caper.
by Greg Locke on Sun 17 Sep 2006 08:21 PM NDT

"It is dead easy to originate email that appears to be from anyone you choose" by Sylvia Chafe

CURRENTMAYBE IT’S JUST ME, but I’ve been surprised at the lack of discussion about the reported spoofing of Premier Danny Williams’ email address. I think there are some things that should be discussed.As reported in the media, here’s how the events unfolded, with a little editorializing from myself. In the early hours of August 1, email messages purportedly from Premier Danny Williams began arriving in email inboxes in the provincial government. The messages contained derogatory statements pertaining to the premier himself. Panicked and evidently clueless on how to read a simple email header, someone thought Danny’s government email account had been hacked and decided that the provincial government’s email system had to be shut down. Shut down it was, and for several hours email addressed to the government bounced or sat in queues for later delivery. The RNC was brought in to track down the culprit. Within a couple of days charges were laid against a St. John’s man, who later publicly claimed responsibility. To judge from the interview CBC Radio’s morning show did with him, the fact that he pulled this off is a testament to how easy it is to spoof email addresses.Shutting down a government’s email system because of a spoofed email that almost anyone who has ever looked at an email header would identify as having originated outside government’s network strikes me as quite an over-reaction. Only two possible explanations come to mind, and I don’t like either of them. One is that there was a lot more to this than we have been told about. The other, more likely, explanation is that there was a complete disconnect between the people making the decisions and the people (most of whom are quite competent) who actually run the systems. One might also wonder why messages pretending to be from addresses inside the government’s network would be accepted from the outside, since they would be obvious forgeries.
Presumably lessons have been learned and changes made.What bothers me most about this, however, is that there seems to be one law that applies when the Premier is victimized and another for everyone else. It is dead easy to originate email that appears to be from anyone you choose. Danny, for example. Just get an email address and fill in the blanks. Even better, if you put their email address in the "Reply To" field, responses to the messages you send as them go to their email address. This was evidently what our hero in this story intended: to flood the Premier’s inbox with reply messages. Ironically, it is unlikely that Danny himself would have seen any of the replies, until one was brought to him as a sample (it also wouldn’t surprise me if Danny was not aware of the decision to shut down the government’s email system or call the cops).
Most likely our hero used the address published on the Internet for the Premier (Premier@gov.nl.ca) as opposed to the address he actually uses. No doubt some unfortunate assistant to an Executive Assistant has the privilege of sifting through the tsunami of spam that washes in there.Your email address has almost certainly been spoofed by spammers and/or as a result of a virus activity on a computer where your address was stored. What do you think would be the reaction if you called Fort Townsend to file a complaint? Right! You would hear them laughing in Harbour Grace.So why is it that when Danny’s email address is spoofed it warrants chewing up scarce police resources, including the RNC Economic Crime Unit and the RCMP Integrated Technical Crime Unit? Not to mention time of the courts. No sane person who read that spoofed email message could possibly have believed it was sent by Premier Williams. (I’ll bet you have received spam from Brad Pitt – do you think he actually
sent it?) Yes it was offensive,and quite possibly libellous. But Danny should have access to the same remedies as you and me: a private investigation and a civil suit. And the cops should be spending their valuable time chasing real criminals.

Greg Locke
4 Meighen Street,
St. John's, Newfoundland.
Canada. A1A2M4
Tel: +1.709.738.4237
Mobile: +1.709.685..4710
E-mail: locke@straylight.ca

There is an interesting comment within this blog though before the news got worse.

Worth the cash: Paul Wells on the Premier's meeting
It's been a while since Paul Wells' columns at Macleans gained a link from here.Long overdue sez many and I'd agree.So here's a link to his most recent online column (at macleans.ca) in which Paul points out that the Premiers' recent meeting in St. John's was a dismal failure.

Oh no. I fear I have fallen into the mocking tone that sometimes provokes a letter of rebuke from Benoit Pelletier, the Quebec intergovernmental-affairs minister, who plays the same role in the Council of the Federation that the former Cardinal Ratzinger once played in the Vatican: stern-eyed guardian of doctrine and lecturer of apostates. How could you take glee from the provinces' hardship? How does Canada benefit when the provinces lose? Doo-dah, doo-dah. But in fact, the provinces, understood as places where Canadians live and consent to be governed, are fine. Eight of them are in budget surplus. All enjoy near-record low interest rates and unemployment. It's the "provinces" -- understood as jumped-up satrapies whose potentates get to tell the governments of Brazil and China how to trade, as a break from telling the government of Canada how to
budget -- that had a bad couple of days in St. John's.
Good thing Paul didn't say something about Danny. Then it wouldn't be an ersatz Ratzinger sending e-mails.Nope.The Premier's personal publicist might pick up the phone or, if the slight was grievous enough, the thin-skinned Prem himself would give you a ring. It's another thing Danny picked up from Brian one day when they were playing golf together.There'd be no chance of spoofing one of those calls.Nosirreee.BTW, speaking of spoofing e-mails: if any one of the eighty people or so who got e-mails purportedly from the Premier's e-mail address actually thought that an address saying "premier@gov.nl.ca" was the real thing, then none of those 80 people ever got an e-mail from the real account. Apparently, they also completely missed that the content defamed the Premier hisself.lookit, people. A spoof has to mimic not merely the address of the sender but the content typically sent from that address. A real spoof is one of those supposedly from your bank or eBay asking for your account number and password. People get fooled because they look real.If people actually though this fake e-mail came from The Danny, then they likely had never seen a real one.If the computer nerds shut down the e-mail system on the off-chance these were real, then those guys need to re-evaluate the security system of the government computers.Seriously.The shareware obviously ain't cutting it.But I digress.As for Paul Wells, when all is done, head over to Inkless Wells, Paul's blog. It is - as usual - an eclectic mix of comments on everything from failing printers to Iggy the erstwhile Liberal leader to a devastating - but brief - review of the Miami Vice movie.Biting. Funny. Worldly. Thoughtful.Paul Wells.What every blogger
wants to be when they grow up.

posted by Ed Hollett at 8/03/2006 09:00:00 AM

What words of Paul Perrier that managed to be repeated are the best read of all.
.Again I say Hooray for Paul and shame on Danny Boy Williams. His law firm once represented Byron Prior before he became the Premier of Newfoundland

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2006/08/10/spoof-emails.html

Man claims he spoofed premier's e-mail address

Last Updated: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:50 AM NT

CBC News
The Royal Newfoundland Constabulary has charged a 38-year-old St. John's man for mimicking the e-mail address of Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams.

The province shut down its e-mail system for several hours last week when it discovered that someone had been sending e-mails from what appeared to be the premier's account.
However, a short time after pulling the plug on the government's e-mail system, the messages were discovered to be a ruse. Officials said the person who sent the messages was unable to read the premier's e-mails or access sensitive information.
Police said Wednesday that a man was formally charged last week with one count of mischief in relation to the incident.
While police have not named the individual, Paul Perrier said this week that he is the man responsible.
"Last week I was the man, basically, who made the front page of the Evening [sic] Telegram," said Perrier.
Man plans to plead not guilty

Perrier claimed he sent an e-mail containing nasty and wild accusations about Premier Danny Williams last week and he said he made it look like it came from the premier's account. He added it was a ploy to draw attention to children's issues.
"I want to rattle this guy's chain, that's why I sent out this spoof e-mail," said Perrier.
"I never cracked into no system or anything like that. It was just a little basic program I used to make it look like it came from the premier's e-mail."
The provincial government said about 80 employees and an unknown number of outside accounts actually received the message.
Perrier, however, claimed the actual number is a lot higher. He said he went to random websites and picked thousands of addresses.
"Well, I had a list of about 44- or 45,000 e-mails, I suppose," said Perrier.
"I got about 50- to 55,000 out of it, I suppose."
While Perrier claimed he sent the e-mails, he said he is going to plead not guilty to mischief at his court appearance in September.
The police said an investigation is still underway by the RNC's economic crime unit and the RCMP's integrated technical crime unit.
A spokesperson for the RNC said police are not ruling out further charges.

Perhaps everybody should read on and give their Member of Parliament in Ottawa a call before the Newfys prosecute the wrong man again. Ask the Parliamentarians to look out the window and inquire about the Newfy Byron Prior who has been protesting against them on the lawn since the 39th Parliament first sat.
What do you think Sam is this worth passing on?

David Amos wrote:

Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: What say you now Jacky Boy Layton? Cat still got your tongue? Shame on you. You likely walked past Byron Prior again today
To: "Ciavarra, Louis M." , racing.commission@state.ma.us, dwatch@web.net, general.info@thomson.com, tracy.parsons@pcparty.org, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Martin.P@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca, graham@grahamsteele.ca, michael.baker@ns.sympatico.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, justice@gov.nl.ca, info@apex.gc.ca
CC: Kandalaw@mindspring.com, fbinhct@leo.gov, josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca, lgold.blcanada@b-l.com, Rep.LindaDorcenaForry@Hou.State.MA.US, Rep.MichaelMoran@Hou.State.MA.US, canada@canadianembassy.org, brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca,
Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca, Byron


Subject: RE: Byron
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:50:33 -0400
From: "Info, Info"
To: "Info, Info" , "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Thank you for your message to the Privy Council Office. We will reply to you as soon as possible.Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le Bureau du Conseil privé. Nous vous répondrons aussitôt que
possible.

David Amos wrote:

Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Patience Depupty Robert F. O'Meara don't get your panties in a knot check your email
To: Bob , thee_sandman@hotmail.com, mchayday@mta.ca, lemisanthrope@hotmail.com, desserud@unbsj.ca, bernard.miller@mcinnescooper.com, dmnorman@coxhanson.ca, general@pub.nb.ca, bryan.corbett@ualberta.ca, mcfaul@hoover.stanford.edu, mayor@ci.boston.ma.us, patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov, Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov, stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com, governorlynch@nh.gov
CC: BBACHRACH@bowditch.com, bbixby@burnslev.com, drosenblatt@burnslev.com, thomas.gatzunis@state.ma.us, Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us, lcampenella@ledger.com, Kandalaw@mindspring.com, jmurray@ibc.ca, tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com, dwatch@web.net, duffy@ctv.ca, trvl@hotmail.com, Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us, fbinhct@leo.gov

How is your cyber game going Sandman? The fatlady sings tonight EH?

Bob wrote:

Here we go again, with the frauds and the forgeries. Didn't work then, won't work now. Here's Dave before the judge,,,,,,But your honor since when do I have to own something to claim it for myself. Fuck you, Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Bob ; thee_sandman@hotmail.com ; mchayday@mta.ca ; lemisanthrope@hotmail.com ; desserud@unbsj.ca ; bernard.miller@mcinnescooper.com ; dmnorman@coxhanson.ca ; general@pub.nb.ca ; bryan.corbett@ualberta.ca ; mcfaul@hoover.stanford.edu ; mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ; patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov ; Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov ; stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com ; governorlynch@nh.gov
Cc: BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; bbixby@burnslev.com ; drosenblatt@burnslev.com ; thomas.gatzunis@state.ma.us ; Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us ; lcampenella@ledger.com ; Kandalaw@mindspring.com ; jmurray@ibc.ca ; tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com ; dwatch@web.net ; duffy@ctv.ca ; trvl@hotmail.com ; Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; fbinhct@leo.gov
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 12:26 PM
Subject: I sense another challenge from Norfolk County Deputy Sheriff Robert F. O'Meara

I will forward just one email between Barry Bachrach a long long time ago that I am certian he and my G.A.L. Brian Bixby will never wish to explain in a Yankee Fedeal Court way down in Dixieland or the Court of the Queen's Bench in Canada. The attachment in the following email is merely two slips of paper. Clearly I did not file two notices of appearance in the same yankee court two days in a row, The second document bears my signature but it is obviously a fraudulent document created by Depupty Dog's lawyer Angela K. Troccoli and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
Prime minister Harper and all his underlings are going to have a hard time explaining why they supported the malicious actions of Yankees as he tries to ram his Accountability Act through Parliament.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

Bob <wickedwanda3@adelphia.net> wrote:

I could care less about any town in your country. Hi Sam,,,Hi George,,,,,,,,,you know Dave"I'm gonna sue ya" Amos ? Biggest arsehole in two countries. Hey,,,,,I hear that your family is tired of you. Hmmmm, what a shame. Again, fuck you, Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: wickedwanda3@adelphia.net ; george.chiasson@nb.ca ; samperrier@hotmail.com
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: Sam and george meet Norfolk County Deputy sheriff Robert F. O'Meara

That dumb crooked Yankee is my brother in in law. Obviously he does not even know the difference between one town in Newfoundland and another in New Brunswick. Trust that he has no idea what I am up to but methinks his lawyers wish that he would shut up EH?

Bob <wickedwanda3@adelphia.net> wrote:

From: "Bob" <wickedwanda3@adelphia.net>
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Who thinks the dumb crooks in Saint John have one clue what I am up to?
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:58:43 -0400

Why should the dumb crooks in St. John have a clue as to what you are up to. You don't have a clue to what you are up to. For that matter, no one cares what you are up to. Fuck You, Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: thee_sandman@hotmail.com ; mchayday@mta.ca ; lemisanthrope@hotmail.com ; desserud@unbsj.ca ; bernard.miller@mcinnescooper.com ; dmnorman@coxhanson.ca ; general@pub.nb.ca ; bryan.corbett@ualberta.ca ; mcfaul@hoover.stanford.edu ; mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ; patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov ; Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov ; stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com ; governorlynch@nh.gov
Cc: BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; bbixby@burnslev.com ; drosenblatt@burnslev.com ; thomas.gatzunis@state.ma.us ; wickedwanda3@adelphia.net ; Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us ; lcampenella@ledger.com ; Kandalaw@mindspring.com ; jmurray@ibc.ca ; tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com ; dwatch@web.net ; duffy@ctv.ca ; trvl@hotmail.com ; Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; fbinhct@leo.gov
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 9:07 PM
Subject: Fwd: Who thinks the dumb crooks in Saint John have one clue what I am up to?

Tommorrow is polling day up here and after it is primary day down in the Yankee neck of the woods. Just for the record I should tell my former Yankee lawyer Barry Bachrach that I have a pretty good idea who murdered Anna Mae but the witness up here is too chicken to talk about it. Whereas our latest Attorney General Vic Teows has given John Graham the boot to Yankeedoddleland there ain't much I can do to help him now until I have my own malicious warrants for arrest removed EH? Furthermore why the Hell should I care anymore. As soon as i get back to the USA I am going to sue your law firm and Brian Bixby's for your assistance to the Commonweath of Massachusetts in the screwing of my wife for the benefit of a bunch of bad acting bankers, Gays and Catholic priests etc.

As far as the shit going down up here, obviously Byron Prior is asking for my support once again and I obliged but I also know where the Agent Orange barrels are stashed in Gagetown (right by the Shirley dump which is near Fire Point # 4). Plus obviously I am the only person willing to say that the testing of Corridor Resources has caused the folks in the area to lose their water and for the mine to spring many leaks as well. Everybody but me is too afraid of being sued to state the simple truth about that simple fact. However Barry and a bunch of other Yankees know how I love to argue lawyers EH? Cya'll in Court or Hell. C'est la meme chose. N'est pas?

Barry, the fact that you deliberately intervened in order to help screw my wife and kids will make you very famous someday or my name ain't Dave. You are just another lawyer who loves to FAKE LEFT and all your friends know it. You were right when you told my wife I was going to be pissed off after you screwed her in court. Do you think your law firm will let you go before or after I sue it? Do you or Bixby think that your managing partner is any smarter that David Rosenblatt? Me neither.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:

Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Who thinks the dumb crooks in Saint John have one clue what I am up to?
To: carl4york@hotmail.com, lord2006@rogers.com, leroy4mla@nb.aibn.com, tanker.malley@pcnb.org, pcmonctonnorth@nb.aibn.com, ashfieldpchq@nb.aibn.com, fitch@nb.aibn.com, kirk.macdonald@warpnet.ca, mike.tantramar@nb.aibn.com, leodoiron@nb.aibn.com, cfmh@unbsj.ca,
chsr@unb.ca, chsrpd@unb.ca, nmiller@corridor.ns.ca
CC: paulbarry@nb.aibn.com, secretary@monctoncrescent.com, info@gregdavis06.ca, clesper@nbnet.nb.ca, lpmcgraw@nb.sympatico.ca, Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca, Stephen.Downes@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, AtlanticBlogger@gmail.com, sjhliberals@nb.aibn.com, mikeparker@coalfish.ca, rchedore@mosherchedore.ca

David Amos wrote:

Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 06:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Attn Chief Barry McKnight of Fred City
To: brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, police@fredericton.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, Deb_Nobes@cbc.ca, spinks08@hotmail.com, Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca, btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca, mackay01@canada.com, PoliticsNB@hotmail.com,
norm.mcfarlane@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.court@saintjohn.ca, oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com, pat.bonner@saintjohn.ca, advocacycollective@yahoo.com
CC: dchafe@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca, kingseastPC@nb.aibn.com, news@kingscorecord.com, news@dailygleaner.com, kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, davies.carl@nbpub.com, dannyrobichaud@nb.aibn.com, vote4idee@hotmail.com, urquhart.mia@telegraphjournal.com, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, William.Gould@gnb.ca

Hey Barry
If you or you underlings bother to scroll down you will see that I have a huge bone to pick with you in the Court of the Queen's Bench further harrassment of me will not assist the lawyers that must defend your city from my justifiable lawsuit. After you became the latest Chief in Fred city I asked you last year to make your underlings uphold the Police Act as well as the other laws and the Charter. Didn't I? Don't you think they should have quit harrassing me and just did their job as they said they would under oath?

Everybody knows who I am by now. A hairy dude who sometimes wears a Black Watch kilt driving a white Towncar or a black Panhead with Yankee plates is kinda hard to forget in the snotty town Fredericton. Stop it right now will ya? Do you have any doubts that I will sue the City because of the malice and incompetance of its cops, its Mayor and its City Solicitor? Why bury yourself if you manage to come up with some criminal charge to try to stick me with. trust that I with love explaining my matters to a jury on your dime and time.Well I just met two more of your cops (Durling and Arbour if that is how they spell it. They would not for me) last night that do not understand the term privacy. The yo yo named Durling decided to sneak up on me and read what I was typing in my laptop as I sat off the street in a parked car. He demanded to know who I was but refused to take the same material that I had given to the cop name Carl who is running for York. I gave Durling a shocking surprise in that some men know how to defend their rights and ain't scared of corrupt cops not even a little bit. Tell me Chief Barry McKnight when do you think that you and Grant Garneau will ever get around to acting within the scope of you employment? Before I make you famous or right after I sue the City? Kinda late on both counts ain't it Chucky Leblanc?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

David Amos wrote:

Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Hey Brucster see if Leroy can explain this email to you I know Idee and Dr. ED won't
To: kingseastPC@nb.aibn.com, leroy4mla@nb.aibn.comCC: lord2006@rogers.com, tanker.malley@pcnb.org, pcmonctonnorth@nb.aibn.com, ashfieldpchq@nb.aibn.com,
fitch@nb.aibn.com, kirk.macdonald@warpnet.ca, carl4york@hotmail.com, mike.tantramar@nb.aibn.com, leodoiron@nb.aibn.com, vote4idee@hotmail.com, sjhliberals@nb.aibn.com

David Amos wrote:

Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: If Brad Green can't explain this email to Rick, McGraw should be able to explain everything to all
To: paulbarry@nb.aibn.com, secretary@monctoncrescent.com, info@gregdavis06.ca, clesper@nbnet.nb.ca, lpmcgraw@nb.sympatico.ca, Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca, Stephen.Downes@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, AtlanticBlogger@gmail.com.

A lawyer by training, Louis-Philippe was an MLA from 1999 to 2003. He is currently Director of Regional Affairs for the federal Minister Greg Thompson. Originally from Sainte-Rose, he has a bachelor in business administration (B.A.A.), a law degree (LL.B.) and a master in business administration (M.B.A.). Louis-Philippe is also actively training in endurance sports and taking care of his blueberry fields.


Say hey to that nasty bastard Greg Thompson for me will ya McGraw?.Better yet I just did. N'est Pas? So should I say hello to Charles LeBlanc for you?

I hope some liberal wannabe MLA displace just enough conservatives like they did you last time around to make just a very slim majority like Bernie Lord had last time around. I would dearly love to see a few NDP get in and rule the roost like Tanker Malley did this spring. Now that would be a truly entertaining circus to watch..

Guess who is in town Chucky. Let just say any fool can sing the Blues lets see if you can live them.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

David Amos wrote:

Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: See if Brad Green can explain this email to you Rick
To: standup@electrickmiles.ca, brad.green@gnb.ca
CC: lewisgoa@nbnet.nb.ca, gregbyrne@nb.aibn.com, broy@pattersonpalmer.ca, nbyla_hillary@hotmail.com

David Amos wrote:

Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: This email is the proof I forwarded the text of your webpage the all the MPs
To: carswell.customerrelations@thomson.com,
jayne.jackson@thomson.com

David Amos wrote:

Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: This email is the proof I forwarded the text of your webpage the all the MPs
To: Byron Prior , morrislaw@nf.aibn.com
CC: editor@notacolony.ca, stephen@downes.ca, info@ottawapolice.ca, radar_cdn@yahoo.com, prevention@psepc.gc.ca, swanson@storm.ca, Day.S@parl.gc.ca, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca, OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, smay@pattersonpalmer.ca, jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca, Deb_Nobes@cbc.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, ombudsman@cbc.ca, bsharpe@nl.rogers.com, rgfaloon@pattersonpalmer.ca, news@dailygleaner.com, kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, davies.carl@nbpub.com, tony.whalen@fredericton.ca,
david.kelly@fredericton.ca, brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, police@fredericton.ca, cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, scotta@parl.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, advocacycollective@yahoo.com, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, cityadmin@fredericton.ca, Wiesen@mintz.com, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, rchedore@mosherchedore.ca, Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us, Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us, spinks08@hotmail.com, Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca, btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca, mackay01@canada.com, PoliticsNB@hotmail.com, oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com, pat.bonner@saintjohn.ca

Byron
I just called the Morris law office but after we talked a few minutes it appears he hung up suddenly. However the same thing happened yesterday when I was talking to a politcal priest in New Brunswick who is running for the NDP up on the Mirimichi. I suspect the Feds are playing games with me as usual. That said I did manage to tell Mr Morris I will send him a few emails to aid in his defence of his clieit. If he wishes he can call my number (506 434 1379) and deal with my voicemail, then let me know when is a good time to call him back. At the very least he can never say he does not know of my support of you way back in 2004 before I ran for a seat in Parliament the first time anound. Since then I ran in the 2006 federal election, the election in June in Nova Scotia and I am now running in the present election in New Brunswick. I plan to file the first of many lawsuits against the Crown this week.

To aid in your friend's defence I will forward to his lawyer and obviously many others my answers to his spoof emails. At the very least I am a witness against the Newfy Justice system's actions against him. He needs to be very careful because I suspect they are employing criminal chages that could involve imprisonment. You must remember what the Yankees did to me in order to coverup their wrongs against my Clan. Don't think the same cannot happen to the young fella supporting you.

I recognized his game as soon as I read what he sent to me and many others. In fact he explained what he was up to within the spoof emails. This young fella has big balls. I liked his open and honest stlye of taking on the smiling bastards.I supported him immediately by answering the emails and adding some stuff gleaned from the web about you. I also sent him an email with some of my stuff attached to help him out as soon as I read the following CBC news report and his name was mentioned. however methinks that the cops quite likely had his computer by then and kept that email to themselves because I was complaining of them at the same time for their cover up of my concerns and allegations.

This is the best I can do for now from afar. After this particular election is over I just may catch a boat to the Rock and idle around St John's Newfoundland a while on my old Harley in order to jerk some chains myself. I really should sue some lawyers would failed to uphold the Law Society Act. That Rhodes Scholar named Danny Williams is at the top of my list of lawyers I hope to sue someday after i take on the Crown. His Attorney General Tommy Boy Marshall and all the corrupt cops who support them do not scare me one little bit. If they get for some trumped up charge they will have a hell of an argument coming from a Pro se defendent just like Michael bray laments of over here after the CBA meeting over on the Rock. If I some how quit breathing my ghost will get even with all the smiling bastards for me. Trust that simple fact. You know I keep good records and they are far more complete and accurate than any crooked clerk's of any court..

Veritas Vincit.
Dave

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2006/08/10/spoof-emails.html

Man claims he spoofed premier's e-mail address
Last Updated: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:50 AM NT
CBC News
The Royal Newfoundland Constabulary has charged a 38-year-old St. John's man for mimicking the e-mail address of Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams.
The province shut down its e-mail system for several hours last week when it discovered that someone had been sending e-mails from what appeared to be the premier's account.
However, a short time after pulling the plug on the government's e-mail system, the messages were discovered to be a ruse. Officials said the person who sent the messages was unable to read the premier's e-mails or access sensitive information.


Police said Wednesday that a man was formally charged last week with one count of mischief in relation to the incident.
While police have not named the individual, Paul Perrier said this week that he is the man responsible.
"Last week I was the man, basically, who made the front page of the Evening [sic] Telegram," said Perrier.
Man plans to plead not guilty
Perrier claimed he sent an e-mail containing nasty and wild accusations about Premier Danny Williams last week and he said he made it look like it came from the premier's account. He added it was a ploy to draw attention to children's issues.
"I want to rattle this guy's chain, that's why I sent out this spoof e-mail," said Perrier.
"I never cracked into no system or anything like that. It was just a little basic program I used to make it look like it came from the premier's e-mail."

The provincial government said about 80 employees and an unknown number of outside accounts actually received the message.
Perrier, however, claimed the actual number is a lot higher. He said he went to random websites and picked thousands of addresses.
"Well, I had a list of about 44- or 45,000 e-mails, I suppose," said Perrier.
"I got about 50- to 55,000 out of it, I suppose."
While Perrier claimed he sent the e-mails, he said he is going to plead not guilty to mischief at his court appearance in September.
The police said an investigation is still underway by the RNC's economic crime unit and the RCMP's integrated technical crime unit.
A spokesperson for the RNC said police are not ruling out further charges.

Byron Prior wrote:

David, again THANKS, this is wonderful and should be just what his lawyer needs, by the way is name is Kent Morris fax# 754-5715 or toll free tele # 1-866-754-4124 e-mail morrislaw@nf.aibn.com I know you won't bother to contact him. David be nice to him and ask why can't he represent me also? I can give him all my info, I know, you have all of it.
Thanks again
Byron

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Byron
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 2:01 AM
Subject: within this email is the proof I forwarded the text of you webpage the all the MPs

moto maniac <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:

Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 00:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: moto maniac <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: Jeff it is David Amos
To: alltrue@nl.rogers.com
Note: forwarded message attached.


Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.

Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: moto maniac motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Jeff it is David AmosTo: jeff.mockler@gnb.ca
CC: diane.bourque@flsc.ca, brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, police@fredericton.ca

sans ms" Hey
I just called and introduced myself. I knew all along that the prosecutor was McAvity himself and the legal aid lady was Gallagher. I just wished for him to be honest about it all. Thank you for being honest enough to admit that you at least still had the copy of wiretap tape numbered 139. I also called Sgt. Copp of the Fredericton PD in answer to his letter yesterday as soon as could after getting out of jail. He never returned my call and I am not surprised. Corporal Ross had everything he said needed since June 24th.
There is now a rather large personal injury lawsuit heading up-home in the near future. I seen no need to explain it to you at this time as I am certain that your already know the reason it is necessary. As i said I will look forward to arguing you in court.
The timing of your letter to me was really quite offensive to me. It appears that you sent it to me once you knew I was heading to jail and that they were trying to put me away as a nut. As soon as I appeared in Dorchester District Court on on Oct 1st it was obvious that they had a malevolent plan against me particularly in light of the fact that I had filed original wiretap tapes over a month before in two courts one in each country. The same holds true for Sgt. Copp. Not one word has ever been mentioned about them except by the DA Tim Cruz and the US Attorney Don Feith over a year and a half ago when they falsely claimed that they were evidence in my wife's Probate Matters after the DHS tried to take me away. May i suggest that you sit back and listen to the CD if you already haven't and prepare your defense of your own interests. I my opinion you have failed the Public Trust. The fact that you agree with Brad Green merely serves to prove my point. Even the Governor General admitted that he was the right dude to give my stuff to. Wayne Steeves, as you certainly failed to act within the scope of his employment.
In return for you mocking candor I will forward you some emails that are being read around the world. They come through in Yahoo as attachments but I assure you that they are free from viruses. If they weren't, I would have heard about it yesterday from Anne McLellan or Eva Plunkett or Margaret Bloodworth.

You might as well have a look at them because you letter to me was sent immediately to Parliament. Say hey to Bruce Noble for me will ya? Tell Shirley McLean she is now way past too late to act with integrity.
ms"> You might as well share what you know to be true with Diane Bourque. I called her office a long long time ago and spoke with her directly as I did you. She took notes. Perhaps she should review them. There is now no need to send her hard copy. Your are Associated with her as is Shirley McLean and Bruce Noble to name a few. I will call Ms. Bourque again (514) 875-6351 after sending this email in order to assure her of my sincerity. Byway of this email she now knows the truth for herself. If she wishes she can call my attorney Joyce Richardson at 506 432- 4888 and ask her any thing she wishes before I begin the litigation process. I will prosecute my matters with you Pro Se. Joyce is an important witness because she accompanied me to the meeting with the Police Commission and also attempted to be the Conservative MP for Fundy in stead of the malevolent Rob Moore.. Ask Mr. Keirstead under the Minister of Public Safety if you don't believe me.

At the very least I have proof that this email was sent to you and all the others mentioned in this email. Even if you deny receiving it or anyone fails to respond, it is still evidence with far more traceable information than the Canada Post you sent me. I have found this necessary to do because because it appears that CISIS now intercepts both my Canadian Mail and my US Mail so I am forced to resort to emails or delivering in hand with a witness. Mr. Mockley, your knowledge of wiretap matters will prove quite valuable to me in the near future.

Mayor Woodside it is time for you to sit up and pay attention. I you don't think a man can't sue City Hall you really should check my work. I did not pick this fight with Fredericton. Your Police Dept. threw me out of the legislature and assisted the Sergeant at Arms in banning me from the premises. I can easily prove prior contact with your City Solicitor, one of you Councilors and the Fredericton Police Dept. byway of emails phone calls and personal visits over the course of last summer. If you have any questions contact Bolduc Clement and maybe he will allow you to listen to the tape of our meeting in the office of the New Brunswick Police Commission on August 24th immediately afterwords I saw you City Solicitor Bruce Noble waddle by and we did make eye contact. I remember him and I have no doubt that he remembers me. Trust the fact that once you meet me, I am rather difficult to forget. Many lawyers and politicians will swear that to be a true statement.

Trust me, now that I have emerged from the downtown jail in Beantown. I am very very pissed off. I will seek relief from all who conspired to put me there based on false allegations made by a very crooked little lawyer. I have got Ms. Troccoli fired from two law firms in their malicious efforts to disassociate with her before the shit hits the fan. It is now October and the Corrupt Court will not admit that my wife's Uncle Franky has be dead since the time I ran for Parliament in June. Both he and his siblings are are buried right beside Rose Kennedy. Need I say more? Yea why not? the last surviving brother in Boston that stole all of my wife's inheritances is an ex FBI Agent who know knows far to much about public corruption to allow a simple Maritime man find justice for his Clan. Putting me in jail as some sort of nut was a very desperate act of a very corrupt justice system in order to cover up their own wrongs and protect the reputation of many a low man in high places.

My last question to all of you is do you not understand the meaning of your oaths? I will ask it again later in court.
ms"> Cya'll in Court :)
sans ms"> David Raymond AmosNote: forwarded message attached.


Do you Yahoo!?vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

From: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
To: info@gg.ca
CC:,,,Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca,
,,,cei@nbnet.nb.ca,
,,,Brison.S@parl.gc.ca,
,,,ethics@harvard.edu,
,,,Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca,
,"motomaniac",,Efford.J@parl.gc.ca,
,,,Dosanjh.U@parl.gc.ca,
kcarmichael@bloomberg.net
Subject: Your words and now mine
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 22:35:00 -0400

Hmmmm
As I watch you fellas play your wicked game, it seems that you forgot the the wild card that is in the game as well. The joker or the self proclaimed court jester that is me. Or didn't anyone tell you this morning that I got out of jail last night and escaped Ashcroft's clutches once again for a little while at least? I bet you do know now because Rob Moore must be screaming for help like a little stuck pig by now.
You Bloomberg dudes ain't fooling me because I am too stupid. Plus there fact that I sent Bloomberg the same letter I sent Mulroney a long long time ago and little while before that I had talked personally to his reporter in the White House. I am certain he knew of that conversation. I will wager I am having more fun than you guys are right now. I will leave you all to wonder who gets this email next. Tommorrow we shall see if he has enough sand to make history or if he made a deal with you devils.
Some honest folks are having a pretty good laugh right now at your expense. I certainly hope the rest of Canada joins in on the chuckle. APEX in Ottawa and Accenture/McGraw Hill in New York are about to make their big plans for our future while I ran around chucking wrenches in the works. Trust me this is fun.

Tomorrow is another day and I would not want to spoil the show. If the Yankee bastards come get me tonight, methinks they will be to late to stop the circus. Rest assured I will die smiling because I know what I did today and they don't. No matter what they choose to do to me I cannot undo what I have already done. What a difference a day makes eh?
Oct. 6 (Bloomberg) -- "Canada's biggest opposition party said it would support Prime Minister Paul Martin's legislative agenda as long as he adds five pledges, including a commitment to lower taxes on poor families and to hold a parliamentary vote on whether Canada joins the U.S. missile defense program.

Conservative Leader Stephen Harper, 45, made his demands in an amendment to yesterday's Throne Speech, which laid out the government's program. The speech is considered a ``confidence'' matter, meaning the government will fall should the majority of members of Parliament vote against it. Tony Valeri, the Liberal minister in charge of organizing the legislative schedule, said he needed more time to decide whether the government could agree to the changes. Any votes on amendments to the Throne Speech will be votes of confidence, Valeri said. One may take place tomorrow, he said.
`Big Problem'
``Anything that changes the intent of the government is obviously something that we have a big problem with,'' Valeri told reporters in Ottawa. ``There's a lot to look at, a lot to consider.''





Jack Layton, leader of the New Democrats, indicated that he would back the Liberals.
``We will not play chicken with an opportunity to make positive change,'' Layton said in the House of Commons. "

To contact the reporter on this story: Kevin Carmichael in
Ottawa

Hey Chantal
OTTAWA—With yesterday's Speech from the Throne, Prime Minister Paul Martin is daring the federalist opposition leaders — in particular Conservative Leader Stephen Harper — to align themselves with the sovereignist Bloc Québécois to defeat his minority government.


He may yet see that happen.

At best, the speech amounts to a high-risk attempt to tilt the balance in the House of Commons in favour of the Liberals by polarizing it along federalist/sovereignist lines.

At worst, it is the clumsy product of a governing party that is willing to break at the first opportunity rather than bend to the realities of minority rule.

What it is not is the work of a government that has broken a sweat searching for ways to make do in uncertain circumstances.

For the most striking feature of Martin's second Speech from the Throne is that it is so much like the first one.


Poring over its 15 pages, one is at a loss to find signs that its authors drafted it with a serious thought to its changed circumstances and the election-imposed necessity to reach out to the opposition to survive.
Yo, Adrienne
Yesterday while my wife and friends from Canada were busy with their last dimes bailing me out of a Boston jail that the fat dumb and happy old lawyer Ronald A. Irwin didn't care that I was in, you were busy making your big speech and bragging of preparing for another fancy world tour at Canadian expense. When I read your speech today, I saw red. I expected the political double talk kissing Martin's ass simply because he has covered your butt with respect to all the money you squandered. However stealing a little glory from the veterans of past wars was to much for me to stand. You really pissed me off and I must register my indignation now.

In your speech you paid homage to dead men from World War II that I was named after and talked of visiting Saint John NB amongst other places. Perhaps you should have stopped at the Veteran's hospital in Saint John and talked to one of the last surviving 48th Highlanders that went up through Africa and Italy. His name is ol Tom. He has been through hell and back many times and still retains a remarkable Joie de Vivre. He is one of my best friends in life and it was his kilt that I wore while campaigning for Parliament. I was also wearing it as I went off to jail as well back out again.
I am sure Tom would have loved meeting you and telling you a few horror stories about the war and about the great times that we have shared together as friends. He is thirty years my senior but he has long recognized the attibutes within me that would befit a proper lady from hell. Ask Mr. Irwin's help about a proud man they met yesterday within the living hell of a Beantown jail. Ol Tom, my father and many other good men taught me to never surrender, never take prisoners, maintain your pride and ethics and never stop enjoying whatever life may throw at you. Ol Tom, my father and all the others saw too many friends that never had a chance to enjoy the sort of life that I have lived. I thank Ol Tom for his friendship and support he is my only friend of the old school of decnt men that I have known who is still alive. It is now my turn to make their lessons and memory live on. Rest assured Tom will receive a copy of this letter.

(: I hope to see you once again real soon Corporal Hee Haw. You know I just gotta jerk your chain to hear the old dog growl. Me old Yamaha is waiting for you to ride. I will ride along with Superfarmer's old Kawi. To hell with the Harleys they are too expensive and slow for the pace. Our old bikes have been stress tested for over the 25 years why quit riding them now? Beside we are all as poor as church mice these days we might as well enjoy the day with what we already have. Say hey to Dave for me as he reads you this letter and give him a kiss for me until payday :) This note is no joke I have more respect for Ol Tom than a million politicians. If there is anyone that I wish to be remembered byway of this email, it is him. I simply don't give a damn if anyone else reads it but I know many will very very soon. You can take that to the World Trade Bank.

It was no accident that I put my name on the ballot in Fundy on June 7th. That was the day my mother's favorite brother died in Normandy. She honoured me with his name, Raymond. My father, who was the sole survivor of a plane crash during the war honoured me with the name of his friend. David who went on to be awarded the Victoria Cross for his bravery. Obviously I put my full name on the ballot not only to honour both my mother and my father but to most importantly of all to honour the men like ol Tom still living who sacrificed so much in order for me to be allowed to speak up and defend the rights that so many people like him have fought to defend.

After all the prior contact with you and your office, you chose to defend the likes of Paul Martin and his many cohorts and head out to party some more? Shame on you. The following are your words and the following emails are my words and proof that I am making my best effort to properly shame you in an ethical fashion. If for no other reason someone must bear witness for the living and the dead so that their sacrifices were not in vain.
It is now the end of the first day of Parliament and it appears that my former political opponent Rob Moore, who is appropriately named as well is apparently struck dumb by my contacts with him and I have not heard from anyone that was willing to act honourably and call for a confidence vote. Methinks I will chastise the NDP first because they are the biggest disappointment to me. As you can see I have already begun. I had high hopes for them because their party contained the least amount of lawyers.

Adrienne, why you would choose to continue to honour the likes of T. Alex Hickman is way beyond Byron Prior's understanding and mine as well. Rest assured that we are cut from the same cloth as our forefathers who fought to defend our Queen. We will speak for the rights they gave us. The same ones that you and all those in public service deliberately deny us. What say you now oh ye fine and fancy lady?
Adrienne's (Martin's) words
"I congratulate both the returning members of Parliament, as well as the more than one hundred who are newly elected, as you take up your duties in the House of Commons for this Thirty-Eighth Parliament of Canada.

This year, Canadians commemorated the 60th anniversary of D-Day and the landing of allied forces in Europe—an event that spelled the beginning of the end of the Second World War. Canadian soldiers, sailors and aircrews fought with dogged bravery and were ultimately victorious on Juno Beach that day.
Shortly, I will be going to Italy to commemorate the significant campaign in which six thousand Canadians sacrificed their lives. To me, personally, these commemorations are a symbol of our eternal gratitude and an affirmation that we have not forgotten.
On these occasions, we are reminded of the huge debt we owe to those in uniform who have served this country—then and today. Our veterans connect generations and Canadians. As a country and as individuals, we gain in pride and in purpose from their deeds and their service.

I recently concluded extended visits to six cities of varying size—Saint John, Quebec City, Toronto, Saskatoon, Calgary and Vancouver. In them, I found remarkable, innovative projects for social renewal and individual commitment. They express the confidence and love that we all hold for this country. This is the spirit of Canada I see as Governor General."

And now mine
----- Original Message -----


From: David Amos
To: Moore.R@parl.gc.ca
Cc: alltrue@nl.rogers.com ; moto maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 7:58 AM
Subject: Remember me Rob?

Methinks it is time to sue you too.What say you?
By the way do you know the name of the RCMP officer that I was talking to on June 19th about you and Mr. Harper as he guarded you folks while you and Elsie had some Ice Cream and Harper smoozed the crowd? I have enclosed a photo to refresh your memory.
On that day in front of many witnesses, I told you I would sue you if you did not uphold the Public Trust. You told me you were too busy playing politics but for me to keep up the good work.How am I doing?

It has been almost five months since you and I first talked. You have done nothing to uphold the law as a lawyer and an officer of the court. Lawyer prepare to defend thyself in civil lawsuits. Say hey to Arthur Hamiton for me will ya?
MS"> Cya'll in Court:)
MS"> David R. Amos

P.S. Byron Prior and I both think today is a Good Day to inspire a confidence vote in Parliament since the Governor General didn't bother to to do the right thing yesterday. She can never say she didn't know the truth. I have answers from her and two of her Lt. Govs.
Lets see if a few emails from Byron and I can shake some trees and cause the rotting liberal minority to fall.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bihal_sm007@rogers.com
Cc: pm@pm.gc.ca ; pmo@pm.gc.ca ; Abbott.J@parl.gc.ca ; Ablonczy.D@parl.gc.ca ; Adams.P@parl.gc.ca ; Alcock.R@parl.gc.ca ; Allard.C@parl.gc.ca ; Anders.R@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ; Assad.M@parl.gc.ca ; Assadourian.S@parl.gc.ca ; Asselin.G@parl.gc.ca ; Augustine.J@parl.gc.ca ; Bachand.A@parl.gc.ca ; Bachand.C@parl.gc.ca ; Bagnell.L@parl.gc.ca ; Bailey.R@parl.gc.ca ; Baker.G@parl.gc.ca ; Bakopanos.E@parl.gc.ca ; Barnes.S@parl.gc.ca ; Beaumier.C@parl.gc.ca ; Belair.R@parl.gc.ca ; Belanger.M@parl.gc.ca ; Bellehumeur.M@parl.gc.ca ; Bellemare.E@parl.gc.ca ; Bennett.C@parl.gc.ca ; Benoit.L@parl.gc.ca ; Bergeron.S@parl.gc.ca ; Bertrand.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca ; Bigras.B@parl.gc.ca ; Binet.G@parl.gc.ca ; Blaikie.B@parl.gc.ca ; Blondin-Andrew.E@parl.gc.ca ; Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bonwick.P@parl.gc.ca ; Borotsik.R@parl.gc.ca ; Boudria.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bradshaw.C@parl.gc.ca ; Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca ; Brien.P@parl.gc.ca ; Brison.S@parl.gc.ca ; Brown.B@parl.gc.ca ; Bryden.J@parl.gc.ca ; Bulte.S@parl.gc.ca ; Burton.A@parl.gc.ca ; Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca ; Caccia.C@parl.gc.ca ; Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ; Calder.M@parl.gc.ca ; Cannis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Caplan.E@parl.gc.ca ; Cardin.S@parl.gc.ca ; Carignan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Carroll.A@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ; Casson.R@parl.gc.ca ; Castonguay.J@parl.gc.ca ; Catterall.M@parl.gc.ca ; Cauchon.M@parl.gc.ca ; Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca ; Charbonneau.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Chatters.D@parl.gc.ca ; clark.j@parl.gc.ca ; Coderre.D@parl.gc.ca ; Collenette.D@parl.gc.ca ; Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca ; Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca ; Copps.S@parl.gc.ca ; Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca ; Crete.P@parl.gc.ca ; Cullen.R@parl.gc.ca ; Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca ; Cuzner.R@parl.gc.ca ; Dalphond-Guiral.M@parl.gc.ca ; Davies.L@parl.gc.ca ; Day.S@parl.gc.ca ; Desjarlais.B@parl.gc.ca ; Desrochers.O@parl.gc.ca ; DeVillers.P@parl.gc.ca ; Dhaliwal.H@parl.gc.ca ; Dion.S@parl.gc.ca ; Discepola.N@parl.gc.ca ; Doyle.N@parl.gc.ca ; Dromisky.S@parl.gc.ca ; Drouin.C@parl.gc.ca ; Dube.A@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ; Duhamel.R@parl.gc.ca ; Duncan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Duplain.C@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; Eggleton.A@parl.gc.ca ; Elley.R@parl.gc.ca ; Epp.K@parl.gc.ca ; Eyking.M@parl.gc.ca ; Farrah.G@parl.gc.ca ; Finlay.J@parl.gc.ca ; Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca ; Folco.R@parl.gc.ca ; Fontana.J@parl.gc.ca ; Forseth.P@parl.gc.ca ; Fournier.G@parl.gc.ca ; Fry.H@parl.gc.ca ; Gagliano.A@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.M@parl.gc.ca ; Gallant.C@parl.gc.ca ; Gallaway.R@parl.gc.ca ; Gauthier.M@parl.gc.ca ; Girard-Bujold.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godfrey.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca ; Goodale.R@parl.gc.ca ; Gouk.J@parl.gc.ca ; Graham.B@parl.gc.ca ; Gray.H@parl.gc.ca ; Grewal.G@parl.gc.ca ; Grey.D@parl.gc.ca ; Grose.I@parl.gc.ca ; Guarnieri.A@parl.gc.ca ; Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca ; Hanger.A@parl.gc.ca ; Harb.M@parl.gc.ca ; Harris.R@parl.gc.ca ; Harvard.J@parl.gc.ca ; Harvey.A@parl.gc.ca ; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca ; Herron.J@parl.gc.ca ; Hill.G@parl.gc.ca ; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca ; Hilstrom.H@parl.gc.ca ; Hinton.B@parl.gc.ca ; Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca ; Ianno.T@parl.gc.ca ; Jackson.O@parl.gc.ca ; Jaffer.R@parl.gc.ca ; Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca ; Johnston.D@parl.gc.ca ; Jordan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca ; Karygiannis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca ; Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca ; Keyes.S@parl.gc.ca ; Kilger.B@parl.gc.ca ; Kilgour.D@parl.gc.ca ; Knutson.G@parl.gc.ca ; KraftSloan.K@parl.gc.ca ; Laframboise.M@parl.gc.ca ; Laliberte.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lalonde.F@parl.gc.ca ; Lanctot.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lastewka.W@parl.gc.ca ; Lavigne.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lebel.G@parl.gc.ca ; Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca ; Lee.D@parl.gc.ca ; Leung.S@parl.gc.ca ; Lill.W@parl.gc.ca ; Lincoln.C@parl.gc.ca ; Longfield.J@parl.gc.ca ; Loubier.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca ; Lunney.J@parl.gc.ca ; MacAuley.L@parl.gc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; Macklin.P@parl.gc.ca ; Malhi.G@parl.gc.ca ; Maloney.J@parl.gc.ca ; Mahoney.S@parl.gc.ca ; Manley.J@parl.gc.ca ; Manning.P@parl.gc.ca ; Marceau.R@parl.gc.ca ; Marcil.S@parl.gc.ca ; Mark.I@parl.gc.ca ; Marleau.D@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.K@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.Pd@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.P@parl.gc.ca ; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mayfield.P@parl.gc.ca ; McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca ; McCormick.L@parl.gc.ca ; McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca ; McKay.J@parl.gc.ca ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; McNally.G@parl.gc.ca ; McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca ; Menard.R@parl.gc.ca ; Meredith.V@parl.gc.ca ; Merrifield.R@parl.gc.ca ; Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca ; Mills.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mills.D@parl.gc.ca ; Minna.M@parl.gc.ca ; Mitchell.A@parl.gc.ca ; Moore.J@parl.gc.ca ; Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca ; Myers.L@parl.gc.ca ; Nault.R@parl.gc.ca ; Neville.A@parl.gc.ca ; Normand.G@parl.gc.ca ; Nystrom.L@parl.gc.ca ; Obhrai.D@parl.gc.ca ; OBrien.L@parl.gc.ca ; OBrien.P@parl.gc.ca ; OReilly.J@parl.gc.ca ; Owen.S@parl.gc.ca ; Pagtakhan.R@parl.gc.ca ; Pallister.B@parl.gc.ca ; Pankiw.J@parl.gc.ca ; Paquette.P@parl.gc.ca ; Paradis.D@parl.gc.ca ; Parrish.C@parl.gc.ca ; Patry.B@parl.gc.ca ; Penson.C@parl.gc.ca ; Peric.J@parl.gc.ca ; Perron.G-A@parl.gc.ca ; Peschisolido.J@parl.gc.ca ; Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca ; Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca ; Phinney.B@parl.gc.ca ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Pickard.J@parl.gc.ca ; Pillitteri.G@parl.gc.ca ; Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca ; Pratt.D@parl.gc.ca ; Price.D@parl.gc.ca ; Proctor.D@parl.gc.ca ; Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca ; Provenzano.C@parl.gc.ca ; Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca ; Redman.K@parl.gc.ca ; Reed.J@parl.gc.ca ; Regan.G@parl.gc.ca ; Reid.S@parl.gc.ca ; Reynolds.J@parl.gc.ca ; Richardson.J@parl.gc.ca ; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca ; Robillard.L@parl.gc.ca ; Robinson.S@parl.gc.ca ; Rocheleau.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Rock.A@parl.gc.ca ; Roy.J@parl.gc.ca ; Saada.J@parl.gc.ca ; Sauvageau.B@parl.gc.ca ; Savoy.A@parl.gc.ca ; Scherrer.H@parl.gc.ca ; Schmidt.W@parl.gc.ca ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca ; Serre.B@parl.gc.ca ; Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ; Shepherd.A@parl.gc.ca ; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca ; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Sorenson.K@parl.gc.ca ; Speller.B@parl.gc.ca ; Spencer.L@parl.gc.ca ; St-Julien.G@parl.gc.ca ; St-Jacques.D@parl.gc.ca ; St-Hilaire.C@parl.gc.ca ; St.Denis.B@parl.gc.ca ; Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Stewart.J@parl.gc.ca ; Stinson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca ; Szabo.P@parl.gc.ca ; Telegdi.A@parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca ; Thibeault.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca ; Thompson.M@parl.gc.ca ; Tirabassi.T@parl.gc.ca ; Tobin.B@parl.gc.ca ; Toews.V@parl.gc.ca ; Tonks.A@parl.gc.ca ; Torsney.P@parl.gc.ca ; Tremblay.S@parl.gc.ca ; Tremblay.St@parl.gc.ca ; Ur.R-M@parl.gc.ca ; Valeri.T@parl.gc.ca ; Vanclief.L@parl.gc.ca ; Vellacott.M@parl.gc.ca ; Venne.P@parl.gc.ca ; Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca ; Wappel.T@parl.gc.ca ; Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Wayne, Elsie - M.P. ; Whelan.S@parl.gc.ca ; White.R@parl.gc.ca ; White.T@parl.gc.ca ; Wilfert.B@parl.gc.ca ; Williams.J@parl.gc.ca ; Wood.B@parl.gc.ca ; Yelich.L@parl.gc.ca

Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:41 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Connie Fogal
Cc: adamsw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; andrer@sen.parl.gc.ca ; angusd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca ; austij@sen.parl.gc.ca ; baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bankst@sen.parl.gc.ca ; beaudg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bironm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; boldur@sen.parl.gc.ca ; brydej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; buchaj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; carnep@sen.parl.gc.ca ; carsts@sen.parl.gc.ca ; chalit@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca ; chrisi@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cohene@sen.parl.gc.ca ; comeag@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca ; corbie@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; days@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; doodyw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; eytonj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ferrem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; finess@sen.parl.gc.ca ; finnei@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fitzpd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; forrej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gauthj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca ; grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; grahab@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca ; haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca ; hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca ; jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kellej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kennyc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; keonw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kirbym@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kolbel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kroftr@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lapiel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lapoij@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lawsoe@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lynchj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; maheus@sen.parl.gc.ca ; mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; mahouf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; meighm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca ; moriny@sen.parl.gc.ca ; murral@sen.parl.gc.ca ; nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pearsl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pitfip@sen.parl.gc.ca ; poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca ; poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca ; prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rivesj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roberf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roberb@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roched@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rossie@sen.parl.gc.ca ; setlar@sen.parl.gc.ca ; sparrh@sen.parl.gc.ca ; spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; sibben@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca ; taylon@sen.parl.gc.ca ; tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; tunnej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wiebej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wilsol@sen.parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:21 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: robanders@telus.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:44 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:41 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:39 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:36 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: agarden@nb.sympatico.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 10:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: leblad@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:03 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: scotta@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:01 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: castoj@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:59 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: hubbac@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bradsc@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: savoya@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:55 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: info@paulzed.com
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:34 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: megan@lutz.nb.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 4:05 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Brison.S@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Bachand.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:53 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jim.prentice@shaw.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:41 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rosent@math.toronto.edu
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:30 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: davidorchard@sasktel.net
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:15 PM
Subject: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home

Just so ya know David I am forwarding these emails to other politicians as well. But I didn't bother to call them because they are lawyers as well. Therefore I see no need to explain my actions to them. Plus the smart one's have a bad habit of trying to ignore me anyway. I t appears that standard operating procedure for them is to ignore. delay, deny and then try to settle. They are confused by someone that wants to argue law rather than go away with the gold. What should be interesting to both of us is whether or not they have a sudden fit of ethical behavior after they discover that an honest western farmer and wild but ethical maritime biker have been talking about them. Please notice that I am more than willing to help such a man as Byron Prior anyway I can. I just wish there were more men like him on this planet. Trust me the US Attorney backtracking in the Martha Stewart matter and prosecuting a Secret Service Agent is too funny to relate in this email.

Dave
Sans MS">
----- Original Message -----
From: <robmoore@atrueconservative.ca>
To: <davidamos@comcast.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Regarding your e-mail

> David,> > Thanks for the e-mails. I will read them all and hear what you have to say.> > All the best.> > Rob> > > > >> >

----- Original
Message -----> > From: David Amos> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.> > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 5:08 PM> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail> >> >> > Elsie, I like you more and more. If anyone understands about> > being forced to be away from his family its me. Give my mom a> > call. Her laugh alone will make your day. To hell with the> > smiling bastards in Ottawa their grins ain't genuine. Maritimers> > can still find some fun in a long hard day :) Come to think of> > it, maybe thats why the Upper Canadians think we are crazy. By> > the way I have managed to get a rather famous lawyer to speak on> > my wife's behalf down here while I run for Parliament uphome. But> > before I go I have been invited to go fishing with Martha> > Stewart's brother Frank in the Gulf of Mexico.
My matters are> > about to bust wide open down here. That is why I have chosen this> > time to make appearance uphome. Once I make the news down here I> > will step on the stump uphome.> > Best> > Regards>
> Dave> > ----- Original Message -----> > From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.> > To: David Amos> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:42 PM> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail> >> >> > Dear Dave,> >> > I try to respond to as many people as I can. We do get a lot of email> > around here.... I decided to retire because I truly miss my family.> > It's hard being on the road back and forth
by yourself. It gets very> > lonely.> >> > God Bless,> > Elsie> > -----Original Message-----> > From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]> > Sent: March 22, 2004 3:28 PM> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail> >> >> > No problem, Elsie. By the way my mom is a fan of yours. She told> > me you were quitting. Too bad if it is true.You are the first> > politician to respond to me. That fact alone wins my respect. Ask> > around Saint John about me in certain circles I am fairly well> > known. You may even know my sister, Nancy and her husband, Reid> >
Chedore. Perhaps you crossed paths with my dad C. Max Amos he was> > a tax Supervisor for the Province years ago. And maybe even my> > mom's second husband, Lloyd Nickerson, from Fredericton. He was> > somewhat of a political person whereas my dad was not. (Lloyd was> > chief electoral officer for about twelve years and did run as a> > Conservative) If you wish to warm my mom's heart please give her> > a call and simply say that you appreciate her good words about> > you to her wild child Dalevid. She will get the joke. She is> > always confusing me with another brother. Her name is Anna and> > her number is 506 455 3600. Do with it what you will. Trust me I> > would love to see another out spoken Maritimer step up to the> > plate and speak of rights and wrongs. The sooner that I can go> > back to being just Papa the happier my little Clan will be.
I> > would truly appreciate if someone would let my mom know that they> > are at least aware of my concerns whether they agree with me or> > not.> > Best> > Regards>
> Dave> > ----- Original Message -----> > From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.> > To: David Amos> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:15 PM> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail> >> >> > Thank you for the notice.>
>> > -----Original Message-----> > From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]> > Sent: March 16, 2004 2:07 PM> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail> >> >> >> > ----- Original Message -----> > From: David Amos> > To: ethics@harvard.edu> > Sent: Tuesday,
March 16, 2004 2:06 PM> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail> >> >> >> > ----- Original Message -----> > From: David Amos> > To: tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:05 PM> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail> >> >> >> > ----- Original Message -----> > From: David Amos>
> To: alltrue@roadrunner.nf.net> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:03 PM> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail> >> >> >> > ----- Original Message -----> > From: David Amos> > To: Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:57 PM> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail> >> >> > I already received Anne's response.
Can't you people read what> > you wrote to me? Why else would I be so pissed off?> > I am who I say I am and that is as follows:> > David R. Amos> > 153 Alvin Ave,> > Milton, MA. 02186> > Phone 617 240-6698> >> > Now just exactly who are you Mr. Correspondence Deputy Prime> > Minister and are you a lawyer?> >> >

----- Original Message -----> > From: "Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier> > ministre" <dpm@pm.gc.ca> To: <davidamos@comcast.net>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:34 PM> > Subject: Regarding your e-mail> >> >> > > If you wish to receive a response to your comments addressed> > to the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and> > Emergency Preparedness, please include your return mailing> > address along with your original e-mail message. All official> > responses will be sent by regular mail.> > >> > > If you wish to send
correspondence addressed to the Minister> > through the regular mail, please use the following mailing> > address:> > >> > > The Honourable A. Anne McLellan> > > Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety> > > and Emergency Preparedness> > > 340 Laurier Avenue West> > > Ottawa, Ontario> > > K1A 0P8> > >> > >

From: David Amos <mailto:davidamos@comcast.net>> > >
To: dwatch@web.net> > >
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:32 PM> > >
Subject: Read real slow then forget what is politically> > correct.> > >> > >

Deal with your own conscience. After that try to think of> > a good> > > reason why I should not run for Parliament and at least speak> > my mind about the sad state of our affairs. You know who I am.> > If you don't, trust me,
you are way behind the eight ball.> > > Once I make my mark in the American Justice System and> > political> > > process, I am coming home to stress test the ethics of many a> > lawyer/politician in my nativeland during the course of the> > next federal election. My question to all of you will be why> > did you wait for me to say something? Am I the only one paying> > any attention. Even Jesus got mad a time or two and tore up a> > temple when he saw all the money changing hands in a place> > that should not be concerned about such things. But forget> > about the money for a minute. What did he have to say about> > anyone that harmed a child? Rest assured I will remind you.> > Although I ain't religious, I must say that Jesus
had more of> > sand than most men and he made some very good points about> > what is right and what is wrong. Can any of you even hold a> > candle to Byron? He has at least one friend that will back him> > up all the way down the line. I don't mind dying it is what I> > didn't do while I was living that will haunt me in in my> > grave. What is the golden rule these days? Is it truly a fact> > that he with the gold makes the rules. Do you think voters> > agree with that fact? What say you?> >

> Canadian Corruption> > >> > > Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.> > >> > > RCMP
Incompetence & Cover up.> > >> > > Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada> > >> > > How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and> > convict itself? After years of asking the Canadian Legal> > System to do its job, it's long past time to inform the public> > myself about this lack of action or justice.> > > If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health> > Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court> > of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL> > SYSTEMS CONTROL,at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates your> > younger sister Susan, at 12
years old, and in grade 8, what> > would you do?At 12 years old she was the youngest child> > ever,in Grand Bank,to have a baby. I am willing to take any> > tests and answer all questions regarding my entire life. All> > he has to do is take one blood test. It's time for him to stop> > manipulating our legal system and face the truth which I have> > been telling the legal System,and anyone else who would> > listen, all of my life.I didn't just awake one morning and> > decide to accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal> > animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no> > education, no family, no hometown, no self- esteem or> > self-respect and no past, present or future as a contributing> > person.> > >> > > By the time I
was 14 years old I was responsible for 9 younger> > children, all of us abused and molested while our hometown> > either joined in, bothered us about our situation, or looked> > the other way and said we were all trouble. Our mother has> > always been a hypochondriac and married prostitute in a town> > of 2500 people. She can go blind instantly, become a cripple> > instantly, go insane instantly and even convinced the doctors> > at our Health Science Center 4 years ago she was dying of> > cancer. They called her family and said she had a maximum of> > two weeks to live, but out of every situation she can> > instantly become well. This person is a disgrace to the human> > race and also so are all those who support her. I am Byron> > Prior, the oldest of her 12 children.> > > (A) I was sexually
abused by my mother from age 4 to 14.> > >> > > (B) Physically beaten by my mother until I bleed because I> > tried to stop her friends and family from molesting my younger> > sisters.> > >> > > (C) Sent next door with my mother's gay boyfriend almost daily> > for money from age 5 to 14.> > >> > > (D) Brought to her drunk girlfriend's summer cabin to be> > sexually abused for money.> > >> > > (E) Had to clean the blood from my 4 year old sister after
she> > was sexually molested by our grandfather and left on the> > kitchen floor in a pool of blood.> > >> > > (F) Had to watch while my oldest sister had three miscarriages> > and two children by the age of 15. One child for a member of> > the Newfoundland Government when she was 12, and a second> > child when she was 15 for another Politician, a girl, Majorie> > and a boy, Arron. In 1983 the girl, age 15, was given an> > illegal abortion in Montreal with everything arranged and paid> > for with spending money for her and my sister Joan, by a> > friend of the family. This girl has worked for Hickman's> > family business from high school to this day. Five of my> > sisters and one brother suffered similar abuse as I did.>
> > Why is this situation allowed to continue for more than 40> > years and ruin all my families lives? Is it because,> > > (A) Our mothers past customers are politically connected and> > run our legal system.> > >> > > (B) Our mothers past customers are Grand Bank business men> > whose children are now politicians.> > >> > > (C) One of our mothers family is a big wheel with organized> > crime all of his adult life and is a partner to politicians.> > >> > > (D)
Is it because two of her past customers are Salvation Army> > officers, who came by to help us but became customers as well.> > (E) Is it because all of North America is corrupt and a family> > of 12 really means nothing to anyone when business and> > politics are concerned in an economy controlled by corruption.> > (F) Is it to cover up Child rape and corruption by T. Alex> > Hickman and a business family with influence and business> > contacts all across Canada. The legal system now tells us> > justice for my family and I are three charges against one> > mentally delayed man with a judge and jury at the T. Alex> > Hickman building in the same town where we spent our entire> > lives with abuse and persecution. Two R.C.M.P. officers and> > the Crown prosecutors office will make no effort to have the> > location changed. Again there will be NO
JUSTICE SERVED and as> > much covered up as possible. This I'm told will begin in Sept.> > 2001, at Grand Bank, NFLD I spoke with the Crown Prosecutor on> > Sept,18/01. He said his office has been trying to get the> > complete investigation reports from the RCMP for more than two> > years now and to this date still hasn't received them. He said> > this was in his experience, the first time he had ever seen> > such an unexplained delay to get information. On Nov 29/01 I'm> > told by Victim services, this has changed to Jan.11/02 for a> > trial date to be set.> > >> > > To whom it may concern: 04/13/98 There are many horrors that I> > can recall from childhood. Byron's too frequent trips to the> > woodshed next door; his having to sleep in the
same bed as our> > Mother; his little hands, palms down, being held on the hot> > coal stove burner; the never ending beatings with belt> > buckles; braided nylon ropes; old- fashioned ironing cords;> > hot tea thrown in our faces or the face of my Father; knives> > and forks thrown at us; hot grease thrown at us or our Father;> > continual molestation - sexual - to myself and other siblings;> > continual verbal and emotional abuse; at eight years old I was> > locked in the cupboard under the stairs for hours with rats> > crawling around me because my little brother had misplaced his> > baby bottle while I was in charge of him; continual> > abandonment when Mother would take her vacation and leave us> > at seven and eight years old to take care of ourselves and the> > babies; being forced to quit school to go to work to provide> > yet
more money for our beloved Mother; my younger brother,> > Allan, being thrown into jail for no legitimate reason, other> > than she wanted him out of the house - by the way; if you> > check, you will also find that there is no record of his> > incarceration; the abuse that we suffered was, and remains,> > never ending........ Our lives have been destroyed. We all> > suffer from severe emotional problems. We have extreme> > difficulty trusting others. We cannot form loving> > relationships. It is very difficult for us to allow others to> > get that close to us without pushing them away. All we ever> > wanted was someone to love us for who we were; but, when we> > get close to others, we tend to sabotage those relationships -> > unconsciously. The cycle of abuse continued with my own> > daughter. My younger brother, Randell, molested her from
the> > age of four years. This fact my daughter was afraid to confide> > to me until a year and a half ago. May God have mercy on his> > soul because "I Don't"!!!! Both Byron and myself have tried to> > have those in authority - RCMP, Social Services, Clergy and> > Teachers help us, but, our cries for help fell on deaf ears.> > We were, to them, a disposible family of liars and children> > with overactive imaginations. Nothing can make the nightmares> > go away. Even the sleeping pills don't work anymore. It has to> > end! There has to be justice and a sense of closure for all of> > us. Please, if we stop this cycle of insanity from happening> > to other innocent children, then maybe our lives would have> > not totally been in vain. You are our hope. Please help us to> > find justice.> >
> Sincerely Yours,> > > Sharl (Donna) Prior> > >> > > April 14, 1998> > > A letter of Shame;> > > This letter concerns what happened to my family and myself.> > The things that I remember are also the things I try to> > forget. I'm not very good with words so I will only tell you a> > few things of many which have happened within my family.> > Leather belts, ironing cords, ropes were only some things I> > was beaten with so many times I can't count. Verbal and mental> > abuse, the same humilating things that were done to my sisters> > and brothers. Girls having to pull down their pants and pea
in> > their underwear for our mothers long time friend, for money. I> > remember our mother going into a bedroom with him and coming> > out some time later. We have a brother and sister (who I love)> > who look and act like this guy. I expect, without much doubt,> > are his. I remember the abuse to my father, a man I loved with> > all my heart. Attacks on him with anything our mother could> > put her hands on, knives, hot water, chasing him out of the> > house. This man was home maybe a day every ten, and she would> > blame him for everything and when Dad wasn't around, we were> > blamed for everything, which was anything. This is a woman who> > every chance she had would call the police on me to try to> > have me charged with something. This was when she couldn't> > beat me anymore because I was a little older, but she still> > had to
have control over me. This was a small town in> > Newfoundland with a population of 3500 people. So she would> > have me taken away from my home by the police and I would have> > nowhere else to go, this was control over me and she knew it.> > I would have to kiss ass just to have a roof over my head. (Of> > course this was after my father had passed away. He was afraid> > of her but he would never have let her do this to me.) This is> > a woman that had me put in jail during Christmas and New> > Year's when I was very young. This was for trying to teach my> > niece her homework, she said I had to ask her. Education was> > not something she was concerned about for her kids. All she> > wanted was when I had turned 15 was to get out of school and> > go to work in the fish plant so I could pay my way every week.> > She would loan me $20 and I would
have to repay her $40 plus> > rent. This woman has a lot of problems. I do not hate her> > because she is my mother but I do not like her as a person.> > > I finally got out and moved to Ontario, uneducated with no> > direction, but out. I really haven't had any contact with her> > since then and have not seen her since. I think because of all> > these things and many more which as happened to me and things> > I saw that had happened to other members of my family is the> > reason I have a hard time to meet anyone, develop a> > relationship, or hold down a job. I'm always lost, I don't> > know if I should see a doctor or if it's just me, I'm lost.> > The way I am now is the way the rest also is, it must be> > because of her, take a look, it has to be. I'm writing this> > letter now so that this
woman and the others who knew what was> > happening but did nothing face up and admit what happened. All> > of my family have the same problems and the same memories> > which affect our lives. This is something I have never spoken> > about with anyone, but now maybe it's time. Hopefully, this> > will help me start to became a real person a whole person.> > Please do what you know is the right thing to do.> > > Sincerely yours,> > > Allan Prior> > >> > > To Whom It May Concern:> > > July 24, 2001> > > My name is Byron Prior. I'm the oldest living of these
12> > children. I not only had to live through my abuse but, watch> > as the rest of my sisters and brothers were abused and raped.> > Three of my sisters raped, 1 by a grandfather at the age of 4,> > a second raped by T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, at age> > 11. A third sister raped by a young man in our home town. The> > legal system are only concerned with keeping all this under> > cover and protect themselves. Please people, if you have a> > heart, walk one day in my shoes and tell me you would just> > forget because these bureaucrats say so. I have copies of my> > full statement on all the details of what happened, which I> > gave the R.C.M.P. on March 9, 1998, 52.5 hours at their> > office. I will send it to anyone who will send me an E-mail> > address. I will never forget the abuse, shame, and persecution> > to this day,
from the animals who did this to my family.> > > Sincerely,> > > Byron Prior> > >> > > On April 3, 2000, the second in command of the R.C.M.P. for> > all of Canada, said in an interview from Toronto, organized> > crime totally controls Canadian businesses and affects every> > Canadians daily life, from video arcades to laundry mats. This> > is very sad, here in Canada we are lost and we all need help.> > Here in Newfoundland our Dictator, T. Alex Hickman, has had> > his hands in our Political and legal systems from 1957 to this> > very day. His family and friends control everything, including> > whether my family and I ever get justice for what was done
to> > us in the town of Grand Bank. We've tried for justice at least> > 9 times from Police, Social Services, Clergy and Family> > members. This last attempt started on March 9/98. On July> > 24/98 an RCMP officer told me they have enough information to> > charge our mother and one boyfriend now.> > >> > >> > > On February 25/00 an RCMP officer said he was recommending the> > justice department should lay 35 charges against several> > people. This officer was taken off the case, transferred from> > Grand Bank to St. John's custom's department position and his> > wife transferred to a new position in St. John's with> > Provincial social services department. To this day August> > 20/01
only 3 charges are laid against one mentally delayed> > boyfriend and no trial date set yet . The trial date has been> > set for April 29/02. On April 5/02 I spoke with the Crown> > Attorney, Ted Cardwell, he said the only two witnesses for the> > trial on our behalf will be my sister Joan and me. The> > investigating officer John Warr of the RCMP is not necessary,> > my therapist of two years is not necessary, my social worker> > from victim services is not necessary and my sister Joan's> > therapist is not necessary. It seems to me like the final> > verdict has already been decided and again for the victims> > there is no justice.> > >> > >> > > The Court did not proceed on April 29/02. It was
found by the> > Judge and both attorneys that they did not have an unbiased> > jury toward the defendant and another attempt to find a jury> > in this same town will be made again on May 21/02. This is> > also the home town of my family and I and I asked the Crown> > Attorney, at the beginning of this trial, if it could be held> > in a neutral town to be fair to my family and I. If you have> > read some of the statements in this web site guest book you> > can understand why I made this request. It seems all> > consideration is given for the defendant but none for the> > victims. The R.C.M.P. freely admit that they are in position> > of 3 statements I had given them about the abuse in our family> > when I was a child but for some reason will not make these> > statements available to me or my lawyer. I would like you to> > read this
request made of the R.C.M.P. by a local law firm on> > >> > > May 16/01 via fax (279-1871):> > > Royal Canadian Mounted Police> > > Marystown Detachment> > > Marystown, Nfld.> > > Attention: Constable Jackie Remillard> > > Dear Constable Remillard:: Re: Our Client - Mr Byron Prior> > Further to the above and to our various past communications,> > most particularly our letter of February 16/ 01, despite the> > passage of several months we have yet to receive the> > information requested at that time. As it is
ordinarily a> > straightforward matter to obtain, with that person's consent,> > the statements of a complainant we are at a loss to explain to> > our client why our request has not been answered to date. We> > would, therefore, appreciate your early attention to this> > matter and look forward to the immediate receipt of the> > requested material. Trusting the above to be satisfactory.> > > Yours very truly> > > BUDDEN, MORRIS> > > GEOFFREY E. BUDDEN> > >> > >> > > Questions for John Warr, R.C.M.P. lead investigator who will> > no longer speak
with me personally.> > > 1. Why would you say most of the R.C.M.P. Officers and Doctors> > in my case are retired and you couldn't find them now. Don't> > any of them get a pension? What address is that sent to?> > > 2. Why did you tell two witnesses who volunteered information> > - a lady from Garnish and a man from Fortune, that this case> > would be very messy and they should think very hard before> > volunteering information, you would contact them in a couple> > of days for an appointment. They both changed their minds> > about witnessing.> > > 3. Why didn't you question witnesses whose names you were> > given at the beginning of this case four years ago. People in> > Ontario and people 15 minutes
from your office. One witness> > #85 & 86 in my guest book on my website and others who have> > telephoned me.> > > 4. Why did you go to a Grand Bank business man, who had no> > information about this case, more than 2 years ago and tell> > him there was a very messy case coming up soon involving my> > family and I. Then immediately after you were transferred and> > only 3 charges laid against one person. 5. Why is the lead> > investigator not a necessary witness in this case? You> > investigated and recommended the charges be laid, you must> > have some information regarding this case.> > > 6. Why in 2 years of your investigation, did you not once> > approach or ask Harriett Prior one question at all?>
> > After all these years of reporting to the R.C.M.P. can> > everyone see why I have to inform the public myself. IT'S A> > DISGRACE.> > >> > > On April 19/00 our Prime Minister is in the Middle East> > fighting for Basic Human rights. Here in your own house Mr.> > Prime Minister we need Basic Human Rights also. We are now> > fighting in Afganistan for the rights of abused and persecuted> > people, most of whom are women, please allow my family and I> > some personal rights and dignity here in Canada. If anyone> > requires more info I have statements to Police, names and> > positions of all persons involved and letters from family> > members on what has happened to our dysfunctional family.>
> Please contact us at <mailto:byronprior13@aol.com>> > byronprior13@aol.com or call (709) 834-9822 Byron Prior. After> > you view our site please tell your friends and e-mail> > <mailto:pm@pm.gc.ca> pm@pm.gc.ca, or,> > > <mailto:paul@paulmartin.ca> paul@paulmartin.ca and tell him,> > Justice for The Prior family of Grand Bank NFLD. is long past> > due, you need to give them Justice today. Visit their website> > at> > > <http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse>> > http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse I Look forward to living with> > Democracy, Freedom and Justice for my family also, here in> > Canada.> > > For additional informational pages go to the links at the top> > left of our homepage. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,> > >> >
> To Whom It May Concern:> > > What I am about to disclose is extrememly painful for me but> > what I'm writing is completely honest to the best of my> > knowledge and recollection. I would like it to be known for> > the record that I have no desire to hurt anyone. All I am> > trying to accomplish is to help my brothers, sisters and> > myself get some closure in their lives; for them and for their> > families. For me, personally, I was and still am very strong.> > I endured nothing in comparision to some of my other siblings.> > I Love my Mother because she is my Mother and she did give me> > life; such as it was. However, there is no LOVE that compares> > with the love I have for my brothers and sisters. Therefore, I> > must tell the Gods honest truth. What I strongly feel for my> > Mother
though is a sense of pity. She is and always has been a> > Manic Depressant. She has taken so many drugs in her lifetime> > that I sometimes wonder if even she realizes the extent of the> > damage she has caused us all.> > > Besides, she never had a chance anyway. Her Mother was a> > diagnoised Manic Depressant and her Father was nothing short> > of a pervert. Uncle Max told me and Suzanne that Grandmother> > was a diagnoised Manic Depressant and her Mother before her. I> > have to wonder what went on in their lives and their home. I> > bet if Moms family were to be honest they would have many a> > story to tell. For me this whole story is regarding abuse.> > Mental, Physical and sexual abuse. Abuse upon ones own> > children. If I waver back and forth from one subject to> > another please bare
with me for I am trying to write this as> > it comes to me in all honesty. Of my youth I recall most of> > all is FEAR. Fear of MOM. Fear of life. Fear of Love. Fear of> > being unloved. Fear of not being accepted by my peers. Fear of> > failure. Fear of becomming a whore, a drunk, a drug addict and> > God forbid, the fear of becomming a murderer.> > >> > > By the grace of God I became none of the above. Unfortunately> > for some of my brothers and sisters they have had some> > difficulty dealing with the past and sometimes turned to drugs> > as an escape. But they have all done pretty well to date> > keeping themselves on track. We have no hardened criminals and> > no murderers among us which you may find amazing as the story> > unfolds. We
were all very strong individuals; we had to be in> > order to survive the ordeal. It has not been an easy road for> > any of us but we made it and maybe we can become a family for> > once in our lives. Maybe we can look each other in the eye> > someday and understand why we did and do the things we do. I> > Love each and everyone of my borthers and sisters so much. We> > all had so much potential if given even half a chance at life.> > Our Mother stole away our chances at life. She played us all> > one against the other from the day we were born. She still> > cont

Martha Stewart and me

Martha Stewart and her lawyers never responded even to hard copy sent to but her brother Frank certainly did and i only sent him one email with some important stuff attached.Ell after Frank and I talked he even invited me to come down fishing with him sometime..Obviously I also contacted many of Martha's friends and coworkers etc and they all ignored me as some sort of fool. Even when I sent them hard copy to prove what I said was True they laughed at me for some reason but it was nervous laughter all the same after that. The most damning stuff went to her son in law the lawyer BEFORE her trial began.. Martha knew what Comey knew about me. Now years later Comey was right in a way. The Martha Stewart matter wass all about liars. However he was the biggest liar involved.
I have no understanding why Martha Stewart allowed herself to go to jail when she undoubtedly knew how easily her brother and I could have saved her butt. The only explanation can be is that she truly is a crook. Read on before you doubt me as well

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Frankbigfut@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 1980 3:59 AM
Subject: Re: "I am not sure if you are Martha's brother"

Hey Frank
I thought I was right about you. I do respect your doubts and your defense of your sister.
Call me at 617 698 6549 house 617 240 6698 cell listen to me closley then check my work I can easily verify everything I tell you if you can surf the web at the same time. I will then give you the number of a lawyer who knows me and who is representing my wife he is speaking on Court TV very soon you should talk to him as well.
Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: Frankbigfut@aol.com
To: davidamos@comcast.net
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 11:07 AM
Subject: "I am not sure if you are Martha's brother"

Yes I am, & your subject matter is very interesting, indeed! I will be on Fox & Friends in the morning.(Friday 12th) in defense of Martha's plight. Is there anything I should say concerning this subject, since I am comming into this blind & ignorant regarding the TRUE facts of the case, & the PERSONALITIES behind the scenes, as somewhat portrayed in your brief. For instance, how did Cuti betray Martha in the fact that he didn't respond to this-your brief? This is powerful stuff -- what do the powers that be do with it -- these facts (if they are all true), in midstream? Most of all, not trying to be offensive, who are you? I am totally ignorant, starting from scratch.

Please reply Sincerely,

Frank


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: info@evascrivosalon.com
Sent: Friday, January 04, 1980 9:36 PM
Subject: Attn Eva RE Martha Stewart
Eva
I heard you and her brother, Frank. speak last night on TV. Although I don't pretend to judge or support Martha, I do wish to speak in her defense as well. I must applaud your sincere defense of a friend and his for a sister. She is lucky to have at least one that will speak as friend after so many fair weather ones have flown the coop. I demand no less from a brother and I think he dealt with that O'Reilly character very well and with dignity and intergrity without stooping down to play his game. As for you I say good for you, not only are you a pretty person you are a loyal soul as well. In my book the former merely catches my eye then the memory fades, the latter wins my respect and I never forget that. I think her brother has no choice but to stand by his kin if he is any sort of man. You on the otherhand acted out of free will against so many people willing to kick your friend when she is down. Yey for Eva! And a pat on the back for Frank. (I did email him)
That said I must tell some friend of Martha that I truly believe that I can help relieve her of her plight. Either she is not aware of my efforts or she has been convinced by her lawyers etc. that I am some sort of nut. I don't mind being called crazy but the last thing I am is a liar. If you wish you can give me a call (my cell is 617 240 6698 house 617 698 6549) and hear me speak and listen carefully to my answer to any question you wish to ask. Better yet listen to the names and details that come off the top of my head. Although I obviously know your number and email address, I will never bother you again to prove that I am no stalker or weirdo.
If you wish I will forward you an email that many people have already received and have done nothing about. It should prove to you that I am a very simple, sincere and serious man. I make no bones about what I am up to. It is the crooks that are prosecuting Martha that I am after. I am employing her celbrity status against them just as they have used it against her. I do all of this to proect my own family's interests and not out some pretense of being a fan of Martha or some other saintly motive. I don't know her as you do but I do know for certian that the FEDS are corrupt and have no right to torture her when they are the ones that truly deny justice for all. Obstruction of justice is there game not Martha's and they are the most profound of liars as they expound about the law and claim that her pants are on fire. I don't care that she is labeled as being nasty bitch, some folks call me an evil bastard. Sometimes the only way to get things done is to be as mean as a snake. In my opinion it is time for her and I send a little vengance in the proper direction. The best defense is a smashing offence. I think a proper bitch and an evil bastard although a very odd couple(we are worlds apart) should get on like a house on fire.
For the sake of your friend the next time you see her simply show her this email and ask if she has ever even heard of me. If not perhaps she should ask a question or two about me to her own legal counsel. The following is a link to where I store my files on the web. http://briefcase.yahoo.com/motomaniac_02186 They are open for public view. It is not a web site it is just storage. they are filed in such a way and with such labels so that I can quickly surf through them. If you wish just go to the file called "legal crap" then "latest stuff" then "responses" to see if I am for real then surf from there. Truth is stranger than fiction. I am certain that Martha would agree with at least that statement. This is my last attempt to contact her before I head south for a while.

Best Regards
David R. Amos

Harper and Bankers

Just Dave

May 10th, 2006
Prime Minister Stephen Harper,
Minister of Public Safety, Stockwell Day,
President of the Treasury Board, John Baird,
Ministers James Flaherty, and Vic Toews
C/o Bill Casey MP
103 Albion Street South,
Amherst, NS, B4H 2X2

Franky Boy McKenna, Deputy Chair,
John Bragg and John Thompson, Directors
Chris Montague Legal Counsel
C/o Jill Crosby, Bank Manager
TD Financial Group
620 Main Street
Sussex, NB, E4E 5L4

W. Geoffrey Beattie, Director
David Allgood, Legal Counsel,
C/o Sharon Armstrong, Bank Manager
Royal Bank of Canada
644 Main Street
Sussex, NB, E4E 7H9

John Manley PC, Director and
E. Jennifer Warren, Legal Counsel
C/o Maria Cormie, Bank Manager
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
761 Main St,
Moncton, NB. E1C 1E5

RE: Blowing the whistle on big banks and corrupt politicians too.

Hey,

Flaherty’s budget looming on the horizon tonight is gonna get the big OK from the Bloc EH? Well a mean old bike mechanic in the Maritimes has been waiting to chuck a wrench in the works of many a crooked beancounter. I just served your offices in hand some of the same material that Andre Arthur MP and Senator Kinsella received before the 39th Parliament began. I am also giving you other material and a political rant that they did not receive. The legal counsel of all the monstrous Canadian banks have shown me their arses, two for a month and three for almost two years. It is high time to boot you bankers out off bed with the corrupt politicians you depend on to cover up wrongs or sue you bastards too. N’est pas?
You can expect to see litigation against the Crown soon. The severe of lack integrity of people employed in public service to protect the public interests has caused me to prosecute a matter of public trust in Pro Se fashion. As is my right. I will do my best to hold accountable all those in public office, public service and the lawyers etc that have acted wrongfully against me. In the past I filed forms in the public record and in confidence, argued cops, sued treasury agents, lawyers, judges, an Attorney General who aspires to be a Governor and even a high priest. To no avail, I made thousands of phone calls, sent many more emails and sent mountains of letters proving my concerns and sincerity. To date no one has ever called me a liar but all of it was ignored all the same. If there were such a thing as an honest cop, lawyer or politician they could never deny that it is ridiculous that a whistleblower would have to go to such lengths to attempt to see Justice served in two purported Democracies. Pursuant to my quest for Justice, you will find enclosed hard copy of the material that I promised I would send to you before we meet in court. The copy of wiretap tape # 139 that all law enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA have refused investigate should be of the greatest concern to all of you right away. It is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court. Prepare to argue me about many more tapes and cases of other documents. The bankers and I may be arguing the Securities, Bank and Tax Fraud in the USA sooner than they think. The AT&T dudes should have known police surveillance tapes when they heard them. EH?
Whether you admit it or not, I know I have served upon you some of the irrefutable evidence that should have warranted the process to impeach George W. Bush years ago. All who sat in the 37th, 38th and now the 39th Parliament know why the Yankee DHS tried to take me away to Cuba on April 1st, 2003. It was because of my legitimate efforts to expose Bush and his cohorts BEFORE the War on Iraq began. For years legions of politicians, lawyers, cops, bankers and priests proved an Orwellian truth as they laughed at my ethical efforts to defend the rights and interests of my Clan. "In the time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" EH? Do you think your banks’ investors will laugh like your lawyers did? By law and the rules of your professions you must conduct yourselves ethically and hold matters in confidence. I do not. Now it is a rebel rouser’s turn to laugh as you turn page. Awful truths will put your fancy panties in a knot yet make me feel as free as my big balls do under my kilt. J
Please fell free to sue me if you disagree but you, Stevey Boy Harper got your party its mandate with rhetoric claiming to crack down on crime and hold the government accountable. Now that Conservatives have had the reigns of power for over three months, Stockwell Day at the very least must be well aware of all the secrets the two previous liberal governments kept from you and us Common Canadian Citizens. The secrets about me that most other Canadians do not give a damn about, do concern me greatly. Ask the Commissioner, John Reid, he must know of the cover up of my efforts to expose the well known rampant cross border public corruption that has caused my little Clan to suffer so. His office hung up on me on the very day he was speaking about the Conservatives’ new rules to Parliament. No doubt he knows of the evidence I have provided over the years to many Canadian law enforcement authorities that is considered a matter of public safety. Yet we all know it is not. Nevertheless it has caused three very corrupt Canadian Federal governments and all Provincial governments to willfully support the malice of Yankee State and Federal governments acting wrongfully against me. WHY?
Now Harper has shown us his true colours, too bad for you that the DHS did not manage to take me away to Cuba. EH Mr. Day? I must ask you in court someday soon if you have listened to the original wiretap tapes that I provided to CSIS and the RCMP before and after the federal election in 2004. It was done before I was falsely imprisoned in a Yankee jail. Why did the nasty Canadian Consulate officers in Boston refuse to accept any more of the Yankee wiretap tapes that my wife tried to give to them while I sat in jail held under the charges of "other" without bail or even being legally arrested or charged? As I sat in a jail in Beantown Eliot Spitzer, a Yankee in New York made the big score with my info. Yet he allowed Morgan Stanley to sue my wife? The 38th Parliament continued to ignore my plight throughout its mandate. As we all watched Bush pull off another very questionable election it appears only I saw Count Peter-Hans Kolvenbach fly to the USA to speak in aid of the very evil smoke and mirror show. EH?
Whereas all Canadian authorities have ignored my pleas for assistance for three years, I must sue the Crown to seek relief under the Charter for my government’s deliberate assistance in malicious prosecution and false imprisonment etc. Did you politicians think I was kidding when I said it in January on CTV News? The smirking newsman, Stevey Boy Murphy asked me clearly and I answered him plainly. It was watched live all over the Maritimes just minutes before the only time I was ever allowed to debate dumb Andy Scott in front of a live crowd as I ran against him for his seat in Parliament. Many common folks heard me say it and have commented about it in the months since. Some of them must have questioned some of their various MPs by now. I watched a friend confront his MP, Greg Thompson in front folks of two ridings. He gave all other candidates running against two seated Conservatives a copy of the letter he served upon Thompson in hand. Now you have your copy too. Thompson in front of witnesses promised to respond in writing to his constituent before polling day three months ago. Just as I suspected, the new Cabinet Minister broke his promise. I know for a fact in 2005 Greg Thompson, Bill Casey and Andy Scott ignored other constituents of theirs who brought hard copy of my material to their local offices personally while I was being illegally prosecuted in the USA. Obviously our MPs Liberal or Conservative have no respect for their own constituents if they are kin or friends of mine. EH?
Check the letter that Landslide Annie McLellan sent to me when she had Stockwell Day ‘s day job. Clearly she was compelled to answer me after so many high placed Yankees had already done so. She did what all Martinites have done in the past and blamed one of Chretien’s arseholes, Wayne Easter for my plight as a whistleblower. Stockwell Day did you get off your Jet Ski to follow the lead of liberals such as a dumb PEI farmer and a very malicious political lawyer from Nova Scotia? You will not provide me any assistance whatsoever as is required by the mandate of your office? None of your underlings even the nervous Marshal dude will do me the simple courtesy of calling me back just like your political cohorts never did? Your little Newfy buddy, Rob Moore forgot something just as Landslide Annie as the Minister of Justice did when Easter was Solicitor General. She did not have any idea what mechanism a layman would employ to hold many a corrupt Parliamentarian accountable. The answer is so simple to me. Sue the Bastards. Didn’t anyone notice I have done it in the past to many Yankees? I have changed my style and waited until some very corrupt public servants were out of public office so that they could not employ the weight of a corrupt justice system against me. Vic Toews will have his job cut out trying to defend the malice of all three recent government mandates two of them liberal against one Proud Canadian. EH? J
Whereas Federal Court in Canada does not allow me the right to a trial by jury and its Commissioner David Gourdeau has shown his arse too, I plan to do a double check in the USA. With luck, at about the same time my matters may begin in Fredericton, I will be seeking a jury in a Yankee Federal Court with a lawsuit against some very crooked Canadian political lawyers and their many Yankee associates acting against other Canadians, Yankees and me. In the "mean" time I have been lining up ducks while Jumping Jimmy Flaherty was drop kicking his wicked budget past the very confused corrupt clucking Chickenshits sitting as the opposition in the Chicken House. Tonight byway of the Bloc I am making my best fiercely political efforts to see that all Conservatives will be looking for a new day job far from the Hill in Upper Canada. Then I will give this material to other bankers when I judge the time is right. Any great mechanic knows that there is true magic in the timing of things. If a crook in opposition blinks and mentions me in a public forum even after the budget is allowed, it will be all over but the crying for George W, Bush and his lapdog, Stevey Boy Harper. Who may wish to mingle with the media soon is interesting. EH?
If the bankers who did not wish to call me back last month want this material explained, it is the task of the Thomson dudes, Jealous Johnny Manley and Franky Boy McKenna to do now. I did my best to make certain they knew everything over the years. The Thomson dudes claim to know everything that goes on in court in Canada and the USA. The Upper Canadian lawyer was Minister of Finance etc in the 37th Parliament, and the Maritimer was our Ambassador to the USA under the mandate of the 38th. They can explain the malice of Landslide Annie and her many cohorts in support of corrupt bankers etc. Better yet let the Yankee lawyer Michael Hefler and his Canadian counterpart Deborah Alexander explain their support of Putnam Investments, Brian Mulroney, Cendant Corp. and Franky McKenna’s old BMO crowd etc. Tell me, do ya think my name came up when they cooked a little deal between Citigroup and Scotia Bank recently? Jennifer Warren should be capable of explaining why Garfield Emerson quit the Rogers outfit recently. Geoffrey Beattie of Thomson Corp no doubt can explain why David Allgood is playing dumb. Need I say that the brotherhood of the bar and bankers make me as sick as politicians do?
The reason I ran against the aptly named lawyer, Rob Moore in 2004 should be painfully clear to all Canadians in recent days. Stevey Boy Harper is proving to all that he is a lapdog for Bush just like Franky Boy McKenna said of him years ago. I do not have put one word in the text of this letter in support of what many Proud Canadians are agreeing with in Frank Boy’s political dogma speech years ago in support of the reelection of Rotten Ralphy Goodale. The fact that Moore is now Canada’s Parliamentary Secretary for the Minister of Justice greatly offends me. All Canadians have the right to know why. If he or any other Canadian lawyer had acted as a proper officer of the court then my Clan would not be suffering from many wrongs right now. The Yankee Carpetbagger, David Lutz whom I had given this material to BEFORE Moore was elected in 2004 must agree. I am very curious what Rob Moore will say in Parliament in his own defense when I put him and Lutz in bed in a Canadian complaint.
Rob Moore can explain to all Canadians why I think the blood of four very honourable Canadian soldiers and countless others can be found on his hands and that of his cohorts. In June of 2004 during a debate at the Moss Glen Legion we were questioned in front of many people including David Lutz, I stated my position clearly with regards to War. In defense of our warriors I said that they must get the best training and weapons possible, then be kept home to defend our country. That is their job. Lutz a Yankee draft dodger nodded in agreement. Moore did not argue me because he did not need to. Less is more for Moore when matters are a sure thing. The Blue Coat got the seat he expected to win in Fundy just like my dog would have if she had worn his coat. However Moore and Lutz are lessor men than I because of their inaction as purportedly ethical men. If the lawyers in Moore and Lutz disagreed with all I wrote of them since, why didn’t they sue me to protect their reputations? The answer is the same as I have proven in the turncoat Bad Boy Billy Matthews versus Byron Prior matter in Newfoundland. Politically appointed Judges like Derek Green or lawyers like Bernard Roy controlling the show in court or Inquiry only cover up and delay awful truths. It is important that public corruption be argued in public view quickly. Thus I will sue Crown. Before anyone attempts to deny what I have just stated, study this material closely. Look how sending this material to any of you is truly redundant. The evidence that you or your associates and I crossed have paths many times in the past is irrefutable despite the fact that I can prove my many letters, phone calls and emails that I sent over the years. Turn the page, lawyers. It gets worse for you J
If any of you truly do not know who I am, it is the Fed’s fault, not mine. I can easily prove that the Feds have done no service whatsoever for the public they have an obligation to serve. The fact that the Feds have done their worst to keep my legitimate actions a whistleblower secret with false claims such as confidentiality or public security further serves to prove my point about rampant public corruption. To refute the false claims of secrecy, I must point out that much of my work can still be found in the public record of many courts in Canada, the USA and on the Internet as well. Last fall my wife saw a copy of wiretap tape # 139 in the docket of a Yankee court that anyone could listen to. I had filed that copy in a sealed envelope with that court in order to protect the Fourth Amendment Rights of the people recorded on it. As you can see by the documents I have provided that one year ago the District Attorney in Boston lost the many original wiretap tapes that I gave him in court in 2004. Nothing yet has been said about my lawyer in the USA sending 9 original wiretap tapes to the Senate Judiciary Committee in Congress this year on February 7th. So much for Yankees upholding the law EH? Canadians are no better.
As you can see despite my wife and my lawyer’s best efforts to stop them, the Yankees seized our home without warrants or due process of law. A couple more Yankee bankers and insurance dudes made out like the bandits they are. This was done while my children and I were in Canada last summer without a home. Nobody in Canada or the UN even bothered to care about our Human Rights. All of my pleas to the spendthrifts Adrienne Clarkson, Pierre Pettigrew and their replacements Michaelle Jean, Petey Baby MacKay were ignored despite our Canadian birthright and our rights under the Charter. Canada supported the theft of our property including many original wiretap tapes I had in my possession in our home.
I have been recently informed that Yankees have sold all of my possessions at a public auction including the wiretap tapes. However, much to chagrin of Yankees, I have proven that I have many more wiretap tapes in Canada and elsewhere. The aforesaid malicious auction of my property was done while my Clan is still awaiting a long delayed trial about the illegal actions against us. Our property was supposed to be safely stored according to the rules of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Public Safety until the matter was resolved. This latest malice begs the obvious question..
Whereas Yankee law enforcement authorities feel free to violate their Constitution and sell wiretap tapes of their citizens at public auction, why can’t I do the same? Interesting question. EH? Why should I as a Canadian Citizen care about the Civil Rights of Yankee mobsters and their families anymore when their evil government does not? Methinks I should sell a few on EBAY in Europe to see if I can recoup some of my losses ASAP. I could use the funds from the sale of the wiretap tapes to sue many lawyers etc in the USA and Canada. Look at the very dumb answers I got in 2003 from a crooked District Attorney in Massachusetts and the corrupt US Attorney in New Hampshire, before you try to claim that what I would be doing is illegal. The former is a good friend of Argeo P. Cellucci and the latter enforces federal code in the State where I now permanently reside. Both Yankees claim the tapes are not what I say they are but merely evidence in a probate action? What planet do Yankee lawyers come from?
I can’t be the only person on this planet who wishes to see George W. Bush impeached ASAP. Ask the fat dumb happy Yankee Michael Moore before you disagree. These tapes may fetch quite a price from story hungry dudes such as he. Truth is stranger than fiction and far more marketable and profitable with less money spent in production using real people instead of big name actors. Even clever lawyers must admit that wiretap tape # 139 makes one wonder what happened next. EH? Stay tuned dudes. Small portions of other tapes may be in your email inbox for you to listen to. Other politicians can read the text of this letter and listen to their Parliamentary email along with the rest of mine they have ignored for over three years. The many words of a fiercely political rant may be added as a postscript to the text of this letter and sent to the government’s opposition first. I must be fair. You dudes got this letter first. My next email may cause quite a stir amongst the clucking Chickenshits in the House. Canadians should find it very interesting indeed if one or more the smiling bastards decide to mention my name to the Speaker.
How they vote against the political pollution of hot air from the windbags of Baird and Flaherty that is stinking up the House is critical to our future. I see no need to let all the cats out of the bag in this letter to you but for fun just check my work. See me teasing Derek Burney and his boss Brian Mulroney? They know the Barbarian at the gate who is me knows what lawyers hold the keys that lock all political parties together on both sides of the 49th parallel. One nasty Yankee’s name is Harper too. J
That smiling bastard’s law office ain’t too far from the UN. EH? Depending how far left you are Michael Ignatieff,Canada’s Prince of Darkness or our Sexist Cerebral man knows the Yankee Harper quite well. Derek Burney and Karl Rove as aymen or Louis Freeh and the new General Counsel of the FBI as lawyers would likely agree with little ol me and on one thing. It is that bigassed Yankee lawyers like the one named Harper makes little liberal lawyers such as Humpty Dumpty, Land Slide Annie, Asinine Allan Rock, Franky Boy McKenna, and Johnny Jealous Manley look like the little lost puppies truly they are. Perhaps bankers etc will want Franky Boy McKenna to call some crooked cop he knows hanging out in his hometown to figure out how to handle me now. Before you do, check my work that I have provided to you to see what I have already given you many clues not to. I have had enough police harassment for any ten men to stand. My ghost or I will sue every cop that has tried to stop me from justifiably and legally seeking justice. There is no middle ground for any honest man to stand on in my battles against very corrupt justice systems in two purported Democracies. The interests of investors in many banks would be better served if the bankers chastised in public view a certain few employees who deliberately failed to uphold the law and protect the public’s interests invested in their bank and many other publicly held companies. From a Canadian’s perspective of the world I know that the interests of all Canadians are bought and sold on Yankee stock markets everyday. I know of many lawyers who should be knocked off their high horses ASAP. In fact I just named some them. EH?
Canadian politicians should know this before the vote on the budget becomes a matter of history. I truly believe that Conservatives will continue to follow Bush’s lead for the benefit of the bankers whose HQ’s surround Flaherty’s office. Like Bush he will try to take our country deep into debt. Bankers and politicians will do what they wish with the world, tis true. Trust that I don’t care the more the merrier for me in litigation. You dudes are about to meet a rather formidable layman in court. I have been studying and arguing law night and day for four years, all the while clearing each and every hurtle that rampant public corruption has thrown into my path to Justice. I will not pity any lawyer who chooses to stand in court beside the likes of Franky Boy, Landslide Annie and Humpty Dumpty. You can see that Harper has ignored the words of the Accountability Act with doubletalk if his pals need money for their party war chests. Our little Lord of NB and his buddy Brad Green affirmed that they knew the same truths that Rob Moore, Franky Boy and Landslide Annie did years ago. It was within a few days of the election and Humpty Dumpty’s Third World boat named after his wife was caught in Nova Scotia bringing cocaine to Canada along with more Blood Coal. Humpty Dumpty employed lawyer’s rhetoric and recused himself and Landslide Annie’s underlings made the matter evaporate. Harper just looked away in support even as Humpty Dumpty picked Franky Boy to be our Ambassador within the year to obviously support the Yankee’s malicious persecution of me rather than act within the scope of his employment as a public servant. If bankers do not understand my words, blame your own lawyers. David Allgood should have walked the talk of Chris Montague’s words about Red Flags in his speech on Feb 11th 2005 and called me back if he did not wish to argue me in court. When I called both of them Deborah Alexander, Ronald Sirkis and Jennifer Warren were past too late. They knew of wiretap tapes and Bank Fraud etc since 2004.
This year after the Conservative government accepted Franky Boy’s resignation and well before the TD Financial Group hired Franky Boy, I called his spokesperson Ruth McCrae. After a minor spit and chew ensued, she told me to sue her along with the law firm of McInnes and Cooper. A liberal talk show host Tom Young will soon affirm that I do not have to be asked twice to sue someone but I did call many partners of the aforesaid law firm to see if they agreed with Franky Boy and his outspoken gal. The words of the lawyer Costello, a partner who argues NB Power on behalf of the Venezuela and the silence of the rest affirmed that all apparently stood with McKenna including some of the former partners of Paterson and Palmer. Furthermore, Franky Boy should have disclosed everything about a potential lawsuit etc to the TD Financial dudes before accepting his new position. However I was very open and very honest with them as soon as I was aware of his new job. Now that Franky Boy and I are both back home in our old stomping grounds and I am on the warpath, John Manley may quit hustling the Ottawa Senators hockey team to CIBC. It would be wise to try to explain why Franky Boy praised Yankee success at pond hockey to the law partners of Burns and Levenson whom he partied with last fall instead of being a proper public servant and discussing with Yankees the failings of their partner, my Guardian Ad Litem Brian Bixby. J
For my benefit, I made it a point to look into Stevey Boy Harper’s pale blue eyes on June 19th, 2004 when he stopped in Sussex for ice cream the day after I debated Rob Moore the first time. We both knew each other at a glance. Lets just say I found nothing I admired behind Stevey Boy’s eyes. His soul is far meaner than Rob Moore’s. With luck on my side, this year my fellow Maritimers should be entertained and educated in a three-ring circus of a long awaited monumental hoe-down in court. Our little Lord’s justice system that his buddy, Cleveland Allaby was well paid to study in secret years ago will be the unwilling confused ringmaster to oversee the affair. When it comes to being showmen Franky Boy and I are on and even keel. We are both smiling bastards who crack a lot of jokes fearlessly in front of crowds. To his advantage, he is a lawyer whereas I am not. He is famous whereas I am not. Franky Boy is very wealthy, whereas I am not. On the other hand, I am honest whereas he is not. I have many friends that I can trust, whereas he does not. I have much evidence of many crimes he has covered up in his personal pursuit of lucre, whereas he has only fancy legal doubletalk. Franky Boy has climbed high up on the crooked totem pole of affluence pedaling his influence over common Maritimers without a common man’s conscience that is lost to all lawyers. Franky Boy and his many pals in banks and companies such as the Carlyle Group may gain the whole world at the expense of their own souls. However one pigheaded ethical soul will try hard to hold them all accountable by just knocking a few off their high horses. I also know there are many souls in the Maritimes who were entertained and understand the meaning of the old story of David versus Goliath or my name ain’t Dave. Watch me look into the eyes of the people I pick for a jury before I start chucking rocks in court.
Stevey Boy Harper and his little lawyer Rob Moore would not understand why I am humming the old tune sung the dude who loved to hang around mobsters but many other old farts like me will. They will understand why I am writing the letter in April and delivering it in hand to my MP Bill Casey in May. (I am sending Duccepe and Fortier the same material Allan Rock and Franky Boy received last May) To give the devil his due, that old dead Yankee Franky Boy sang "That’s Life" very well. Methinks that Stevey Boy’s big mistake was following the directions of Derek Burney and Karl Rove too closely. He really should learn to think for himself. He is flying too high in April for his own good in May. It seems that Harper don’t even know that what goes up always comes down. The higher they go the harder they fall. Ask Humpty Dumpty. The clucking chickens in opposition may shoot his government down in May without the effect he desires. To challenge the opposition to unseat him just because he is momentarily higher in the polls is dumb beyond belief. If Mulroney and his cohorts think Harper can win a majority in the House next time around simply by blaming the opposition for causing the election, they do not remember Humpty Dumpty’s big faux pas last year. I sincerely hope that next week holds a very bad day for many nasty political Maritimers who have kissed Upper Canadian fat fancy arses for years. It has always been Hard Times in the Maritimes and it is their fault. N’est Pas?
Time will tell the tale. Right now I can only wish that my efforts help knock Jumping Jimmy Flaherty out of his new jump boots and into the Newfy, Crosbie’s old mukluks from 1979. With any luck at all Luc Lavoie will not be so lucky anymore. He and all the other all clucking Conservatives will start singing for more Tequila from Sheila as Dominic LeBlanc learns how to play his Daddy’s kazoo. As I look towards the horizon in the direction of far off Upper Canada, I will dream of Petey Baby MacKay and his very punky hunky dory sinking beneath the waves of bullshit that has kept him afloat for years. There is no denying that I will chuckle as I imagine his very nasty ex sweetyfart Belinda Baby picking up the phone and calling Magna Entertainment’s Yankee VP Argeo P. Cellucci and its General Counsel Don Amos. Her Big Daddy Franky may want to rip them new arseholes for in order to shove each other’s head into. Clearly they did not do a good job protecting the interests of Stronach’s publicly held company from one pigheaded Maritimer who is serious gambling man in the big game called New World Order. I am still gambling that there is no honour amongst thieves and somebody will blink in order to protect their own butt. I too am wondering and ain’t betting on the ethics of any politician. For instance only a fool would bet on the ethics of Andre Arthur the Independent MP and if he will quit being as quiet as a mouse in the House. If the government goes down, I doubt he will get elected again. He had his chance to do the right thing just as Chucky Cadman did years ago. The Yankee midterm election is the biggest game in the world right now. Ask my Clan’s Senator Teddy Kennedy. J
I will wager that I do know why nobody wants to talk to or about me. The dark horse in this game is the one who will blink, when and where. Knowing who won’t say a word is easy. Strangely predicting who may be honest is tough. How sad is that? For instance Senator Kinsella’s malice against me was a nobrainer. I expected it about as much as that he would vote for Lynch in Fredericton. On the other hand Andre Arthur had no ethical reason whatsoever to ignore me particularly after reading things he has said in the past. His recent appointment to oversee the CRTC proves to me that he is a crooked as Hell. He must have known he was finally free from all the lawyers that had once chastised him in the past. They cannot hold him accountable for whatever he says in the House to a nationwide audience as an MP like they once did when he spoke on local radio. The chickenshit, Andre Arthur may be laying back and waiting for just the right point in time to start clucking into the Parliamentary record to make history in his own best interests. I don’t know. Nor do I care if he has a plan or is just holding to a backroom deal. I do know when we talked on the phone months ago, I could tell that he did not have any balls at all. The silence of a former big talking talk show host from Quebec spoke volumes to me months ago about why that Frenchman won’t mingle with the media he now oversees. His appointment to the committee that oversees the very dudes who once tortured him, stinks of backroom deal and a political payoff to me. All Andre Arthur or anyone else in the House had to do this month or in the years before was to have the sand to stand up and ask the Speaker in a question period on the record simply state the following. "Who the Hell is David Raymond Amos and what the Hell is talking about?" There I even wrote the script for him just in case he or anyone sprouts some testicles real soon. If anyone acts like an ethical Parliamentarian, it will be Rob Moore’s task to explain my affairs to the House. I will lay odds that if Andre Arthur or anyone else were certain that they could profit rather than suffer from such few words, they would. love to make history and become the hero who saved Democracy for us all.
Nobody will talk to me for the same reason Arthur is silent to everyone else. It is based in political deceit. Justice is always a matter of political will rather than the way that it should be. I am just wise enough to know I can be the most effective in finding a little justice when the political process is flux. Bernie Shapiro’s office and that of his fellow crook, Jean Fournier’s have denied receiving anything of mine from Andre Arthur or Noel Kinsella. That makes me understand that I am on the right track this time. When Shapiro’s office called me last year, they were nervous campers after I had made Parliament uphold an act and give Fournier a job so that I could complain to him about Senator Joe Day. The far from ethical parliamentary counselors are quite likely hiding under a rug somewhere in the House and praying Baird’s Accountability Act replaces them soon. Shapiro and Fournier are just playing dumb while waiting to duck out the back and scurry into the sunset with unearned severance pays in their purses. Once they are all out of public service, they will become just a few more paragraphs to me in a future complaint against many individuals out of public service I plan to sue. The rats abandoning Humpty Dumpty’s boat like David Dingwall and Howie Wilson should offend anyone with half a mind. Most ordinary folks have all but forgotten the Dingwall affair but I doubt most did not even know who the dude Howie Wilson was or how he assisted Landslide Annie in making Humpty Dumpty’s doings with Tainted Blood disappear on everyone else’s watch but mine. Does anyone but me remember where the bad blood came from and who made the deal with whom? I do. This brings me to why I find the Bloc so interesting these days. I know Ducceppe is a crooked as the rest but some other Bloc may want to fill his shoes. Humpty Dumpty’s loss was a given, to me. The loss of the Bloc and the Conservative gain was a surprise to everyone. It would be truly comical if their leader, Ducceppe were to act ethically on my behalf after all these years. It is not beyond the realms of possibility that he could be the next PM if the Bloc had the majority next time around. The other parties could be so decimated by his integrity that maybe a legion of Independents would inhabit the House. Less of a pipe dream would be that perhaps the Bloc could get the ten seats in Quebec from the Conservatives and truly make the Liberal history as well. C’est Vrai? I know what I just stated seems crazy but think about it for a minute. Ignore what crooked liberals such as the local talk show host, Tom Young may say of me being a nut. He retracted "the fool for a client spiel" in another matter when it suited his political agenda. He knows I was not nuts in my predictions about picking Speakers, the Tanker Malley affair or wiretap tapes too. Young was not wise to challenge a man such as I to sue him on live radio. I ain’t that foolish not to sue Jennifer Warren and Rogers Media J
. Whatever liberals such as Young and his cohorts in Rogers say about me negative or otherwise on the radio almost two years later is gravy after I had made my mission known byway of his own program. I openly declared that it was my Securities Fraud issues that should most concern my fellow Maritimers. Soon it is my turn to fall silent in the text of this letter anyway. However before I do become truly silent you may wish to know that some of you will receive this letter in your email and see it posted on the Internet at about the same time the budget vote becomes history. I cannot give you time to run political damage control. I have long understood your wicked game of hear, no evil, see no evil and speak no evil for your own benefit and not the people you claim to serve. I know that the things like Freedom and Justice that lawyers claim are so important in a Democracy are merely myths. Bankers and lawyers know as well as I that Freedom does not have prayer because Justice is bought and sold everyday to the highest bidder in the marketplace and the courts. Money is all the beancounters care about as they count the percentage points of gain and lawyers follow suit in their fees for assisting in the malice against us all. The corrupt Yankees that you people support have taught me a lot about how to deal with many crooked Canadians. The answer is simple. Make Justice a matter of political will particularly in a time of War.
Now that we all understand the wicked game, why mince words anymore? I am raising the stakes and laying some more of my cards on table before I summons you all to court. You do not have much time to decide if I am bluffing or not. Lets just say I have no doubt whatsoever why the blog in CTV W5 website was deleted recently after it had stood for almost a year. I save all blogs long before they are lost in cyber space. The words of the one within CTV’s W5 domain that was erased for the benefit of CIBC John Manley and the Thomson dudes will resurface somewhere else on the Internet in short order. Hard copy of the aforesaid blog and many others will be presented in various courts someday. Dempsey the lawyer, who has since fallen silent had apparently filed a complaint in BC about what anybody who has studied the banking profession knows to be true. Wise guys know the root of all evil is not exactly money but Filthy Lucre, the words that King James employed just once. Gain of control over the land is the name of the game. Money is just a clever paper tool that is based on nothing at all. The idea of money in the form of a banknote that is no longer based on gold but debt was invented and controlled by bankers and the same holds true for the notion of religion invented the banker’s cohorts the Roman who turned into priests of one god. It is money I must attack and seek because it is what the lawyers who made the rules for the benefit of bankers and priests claim I must do in order to play their wicked game. I did so out of the gate years ago. If you bother to check my work you will see that I employed my right to have the freedom to have no religion at all to attack what the smiling bastards hold most dear, their money.
The law is clear in matters of money and beancounters rely on such laws. It is against the law for a trustee to give money he holds in trust to any charity on his own accord. For a well-respected old lawyer to assist an ex FBI agent in his wrongs against the terms of a trust and without the knowledge and accent of the beneficiaries is interesting to say the least. To steal it and give it to a church that the beneficiaries have no faith in is particularly offensive especially when the Cardinal’s secretary is the offended person’s cousin. When I exposed to the Feds the fact that the crooks had also hid some of the stolen funds in a bank account in the name of a person whose estate was long closed, things got really bad. The people who are supposed to enforce the law turned against me for the benefit of crooked bankers. It took me awhile to understand why the Feds were behaving so poorly. The reason was all the pension funds of government employees controlled by Putnam Investments and the fact that they owned half of the Brookline Savings Bank, another publicly held company. Perhaps you dudes should read the fine print of the whistleblower form 211 that I filled out many years ago. Whereas bankers and priests employ many puppets in the form of politicians, lawyers, cops and priests to play their deadly game of World Control for them, it is the puppets I must deal with day to day. However I always knew who were sending the people to act against me. Bankers invented money and the miserable bastards known as Jesuits invented lawyers. Correct? The real nature of the wicked game is World Control or New World Order just as the carpetbaggers named Bush love to say. Before you dare to call me a liar, have the local liberal lawyer Dominic Leblanc and non elected Cabinet Minister Michael Fortier study the material I just sent to them. It is the same material Franky Boy McKenna, Deborah Alexander of the Scotia Bank and Petey Baby MacKay from Nova Scotia for example got back in 2004. As I said in the CTV blog it is just the tip of the iceberg. J
What I have just delivered in hand to the bankers and Bill Casey is different material than the liberals have ever received from me. Find the email within this material that the General Counsel of Bell Canada, Martine Turcotte sent me in 2004 and you will see that Bell Canada spent three days printing my files off the web. They still did not have it all by a long shot. Ask the serial killer and his cohorts the Feds about that simple fact. As I said earlier in this letter now that the Stevey Boy Harper, a lapdog for the Bush regime has shown all Canadians that his nasty arse is flying too high, it is high time that someone gives it a boot ASAP. I will take license and employ some of Franky Boy McKenna’s choice of words.
The only hope I see on the horizon in far off Parliament Hill to see that that our democracy is served can be found within the personal greed of members of the Bloc Quebecois. Yet that is the very party that wants to break up our country. Thus I think that what I see must be a mirage to give me false hope. All Canadians can see the Liberals are wandering around lost in the far from deserted halls of the House with no leader in sight. The Liberals crippled up old German Shepherd wants to talk to high school kids and the media in the Maritimes about the future of the liberal party but the kids and nobody else seems to care about Humpty Dumpty anymore. Everybody wants to talk to the Conservatives and they won’t talk to anybody unless Karl Rove and Derek Burney first bless the script. The annoying arsekissing terrier and boss of the NDP Jacky Jackass Layton is truly irrelevant. He has lost all credibility. Ask yourselves why the yapping little terrier is not willing to give the Conservatives the boot as he claims he did with the Liberals last year. Even Layton ‘s old buddy Bob Rae has quit the NDP and joined his old college roommate’s liberal crowd of wealthy thieves. Rae wants to lead liberals out of the desert for selfish reasons of his own. The first thing Rae, a pal of Landslide Annie bragged of on CTV the morning he announced he was running for leader was of his work within the Security Intelligence Review Committee. It seems he has chosen to forget my emails to him or the phone conversation we had late in the week before. I know Rae knows that Marion McGrath, the General Counsel of the SIRC has refused to do her god damned job just like Franky Boy’s old lieutenant Adleea Landry does. Because of that Bob Rae felt free pat to his own back about the work he did with the SIRC?
Marion MacGrath and many others whose names can be found within the enclosed documents have forever proven to me the malice of all politically appointed public servants. The cop, Dean Buzza of the arm of the RCMP known as IMET really pissed me off in March. I defy anyone to try to talk to the crooked lawyer, Paul Kennedy about him. IMET was created within a week or so of Ashcroft meeting with Easter in November of 2003. Amongst a host of public servants that know all too well what I say is true and ignore the law for personal gain is Rick Hancox and his cohorts within the New Brunswick Securities Commission. They are just like the lawyers of the Public Service Integrity Office, sneaky Howard Wilson, Bernard Shapiro, Jean T. Fournier and Paul Kennedy of the Public Complaints Against the RCMP crowd. All these people are worse than useless as tits on a bull. They are crooks. They should be fired and prosecuted immediately. At the very least the malicious public servants are definitely not entitled to severance pay a la David Dingwall.
There are many honest Canadians in the Maritimes looking for work. They could be hired to replace the corrupt politically appointed bureaucrats we have now. I am part of that public these bureaucrats etc are supposed to serve. I am also one of those over fifty folks that the CARP50 dudes hustle about where to invest our money. If the Cop Dean Buzza and his cohorts in IMET who had talked to CARP had done their job while I was running for a seat in Parliament and truly investigated the spike in Income Trust trading, many a banker etc would have had their panties in a knot for months. Instead the cops hush the CARP dudes up for the benefit of Rotten Ralphy Goodale and his banker buddies? Furthermore the far west Conservative M.K. Braaton deletes my words about Income Trusts from his blog after he allowed a Yankee Deputy Dog to attack my rep while running for a seat against his cohorts? Harper who claims Maritime roots and yet calls us defeatists has done a little service for all Canadians and unseated the wealthy corrupt liberals. More importantly he has proven in a timely fashion that he living is up to the Maritimer, Frank Boy’s description of him when he had a fine breakfast out west with the fancy former Minister of Finance two years ago. A true Maritimer who will never admit defeat has given many bankers who have a lot to lose fair warning that they should not side with Harper against me. J
Prior to printing this letter I will await the results of the budget vote. Just in case someone in the Bloc suprises me with a display of ethics. Yesterday and today I called many members of various entities known as Conservatives, Liberals, NDP, Bloc, US Congress, RCMP, FBI, CSIS, SRIC, the Fredericton Police Dept and New Brunswick Police Commission etc for the last time and waited one more day for someone honest to call me back. Nobody did and nobody ever will. Here is my humble opinion for what it is worth to the deaf ears of Upper Canadian bankers. Ed Clark should fire his new Deputy Chair of the TD Financial Group and his lawyer Chris Montague ASAP for the benefit of TD Bank’s shareholders. Lawyers and politicians are far easier to replace than repairing a bank’s damaged reputation. The same goes for the CIBC, John Manley and E. Jennifer Warren and of course the RBC and David Allgood.
Yea I know I am dreaming but at least you can never say that you did not know before I send the text of this letter in a email everywhere I can think of. That said guess who just played you all like fiddle? I not only made you litigants against me in my sad complaints but I may make this letter the introduction for a book that I have been writing for years. It is called "Pro Se Once Removed" as named in the first complaint that I ever filed. It is not a bad piece of work for a layman but I am far more proud of the second complaint I filed. I have not shown it to anyone other than litigants against me. It is a very rare Prima Facia complaint about legal malpractice that any lawyer should study. It has caused several Bills to be inspired in a very corrupt Yankee Statehouse. Thomson dudes should query it sometime. Two courts in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts must keep it in the public record forever. The matters began and ended in Dedham MA, hometown of Sumner Redstone and the stomping grounds of his old Harvard Law School pal, Charles J. Kickham Jr., my wife’s evil cousin. The matters were delayed and dismissed over a year after my opposition to Cardinal Law’s motion to dismiss was destroyed after the cases were removed illegally and doctored in federal court without any hearing whatsoever.
Clark Kent Irvin, the former Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security should know all about Truth Justice and the American Way. Ask him if US District Court docket # 02-CV-11686-RGS or Norfolk Superior Court docket # 02 01113 are worth checking out. I legally signed the complaint in my wife’s name as her attorney in fact after she had suffered a breakdown because of the wrongful actions against her by her kin and the justice system over mere matters of money. The Yankee Court accepted the sad complaint and filed in the last hour of work before July 4th, 2002. Within weeks I gave the US Secretary of State his copy byway of the Ambassador Argeo P. Cellucci to remind Yankees why their forefathers rebelled against the Crown (No taxation without proper representation). The rest is history.
Now that I have chucked my wrench, I must deal with a far more important matter I have at hand. Whereas my family needs a roof over their heads, I looked around to see which Maritime crooks live handy to where I’m camped right now. I decided there are Three Stooges in each big party that I should sue soon. To the left I see the easiest of all, Whining Wayne Easter. Landslide Annie confirmed her pal’s malice towards me during the 37th Parliament. Franky Boy McKenna is the very political banker/lawyer who worked against me in the USA under the mandate of the 38th Parliament for the benefit of Yankee banks. Plus he really pissed me off when he had too much fun with my G.A.L. while my wife and kids were in the streets around Beantown. Franky Boy’s old pal Andy Scot is a close tie with the Newfy Bad Boy Billy Matthews as the dumbest and nastiest of all Maritime Parliamentarians. It is the failure of the NDP and the Conservatives that they sit in the 39th Parliament today. To the right, are Rob Moore, Greg Thompson and Bill Casey for reasons I already explained. These Maritime Stooges have properties to fill the bill of my Clan’s needs. I will sue them along with my G.A.L., Bixby’s law firm in Canada in order to seek some immediate relief from the wrongs. I love teasing hostile laymen with a temper. Thus Wayne Easter and Greg Thompson will be a lot of fun in court. Ask the goddamned biblepounders Cardinal Law or Pat Robertson’s song and dance man Johnny Never Been Good Ashcroft why I love to argue lawyers.
Canadian lawyers should consider the following. Whereas the Crown stood with the USA and the Holy See against me it has caused the Queen to lose Sovereign Immunity in the USA on two counts. As soon as I crossed an international border with the former Governor General’s blessings in hand and into a Yankee jail, all MPs should have paid attention. Instead they ignored the fact I was held under the charges of "other" before Clarkson made her last Speech from the Throne to allow the 38th Parliament to begin. J
This is no conspiracy theory, as liberal talk show hosts like to suggest. You are looking at hard copy of the proof of what I say is true. Clearly before I went into the Yankee jail, I had notified many Canadian authorities and my Yankee lawyer etc that my US Mail to the Canadian Consulate in Boston had been blocked and directed elsewhere and that my Canadian Mail to the General Counsel of the RCMP had disappeared. That is Mail Fraud practised by two governments of two countries on the same day in order to cover up a conspiracy against me. The Canadian Consulate finally did come to visit me in jail after a few days with prodding from my friends and relatives but my Yankee lawyer friend never did. The Canadian public servants were bearing hard copy of more false allegations that have since disappeared from the public record. I told the Consulate off and went back to my cell and said Bingo to myself. The nut of Sovereign Immunity in regards to the Crown, the Holy See and the USA was cracked not once but twice in October of 2004. You hold the proof in your hands. Call me crazy and put it in writing in fact, I Double Dog Dare Ya To.
In closing I confess I have no false illusions. Any man with half a mind has understood for years why I must prosecute matters Pro Se. Ethical lawyers and politicians do not exist. They created the myth called Justice to suit their own selfish ends. I have no doubt whatsoever the weight of a corrupt justice system will try hard to smother my complaints. I expect all you to maintain standard operating procedure and ignore me as our government acts wrongfully on your behalf. I also know some common men like me will not. Some of us vote and invest money too. Some of us know our rights and interests are bought and sold on Yankee stock markets everyday for the benefit of crooks that ignore the public trust. Some of us are broke and can’t vote but are fierce political animals when the evils of longstanding governments are insufferable. It is not only our right but it is our duty to do so. I also know that many Canadians were raised to Hate War and are proud that much of the World recognizes us as Peacekeepers. Even the dumb as a post Stevey Boy Harper, a Canadian lapdog of the Yankee moron, George W. Bush and the Yankee Norfolk County Sheriff and his equally dumb Deputy Dog, Robert F. O’Meara must know at least that.

Cya’ll in Court:)

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
PO Box 234
Apohaqui, NB E5P 3G2

Mariitime and Yankee Arseholes

Just Dave
This email got jumbled together somewhat as I posted it I gave up on it and went back to work trying to stop Harpers Wicked War motion

Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 19:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David Amos"
Subject: Re: It is not Spam arsehole get a fucking lawyer
To: "Brown, Nick (LEG)" , aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, mail@ccla.org, advocacycollective@yahoo.com, frederictonartsalliance@yahoo.ca, wassef@nb.sympatico.ca, Premier@gnb.ca, michael.malley@gnb.ca, Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca, Shawn.GRAHAM@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca, roy.boudreau@gnb.ca, hedard.albert@gnb.ca, smcready@nbnet.nb.ca
CC: socialsciences@mta.ca, fdykeman@mta.ca, roly.macintyre@gnb.ca, Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, frank.branch@gnb.ca, rosemay.poirier@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca, David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, tony.huntjens@gnb.ca, Elvy.ROBICHAUD@gnb.ca, milt.sherwood@gnb.ca, Eric.ALLABY@gnb.ca, Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, dale.graham@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca, brad.green@gnb.ca, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca, leroy.armstrong@gnb.ca, mikemurphymla@hotmail.com, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca

You certainly do Nicky Baby Tanker has received Hard Copy of my material at least twice arsehole. I am entitled to an answer.

"Brown, Nick (LEG)" wrote:

It is spam you keep sending me. As for a lawyer we have no need to get one. Stop with your emails.

Nick BrownExecutive Assistant to the Speaker
1-506-470-1136 (cell)
1-506-453-2506 (work)

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos
To: Brown, Nick (LEG)
Sent: Tue May 16 23:14:59 2006
Subject: Re: It is not Spam arsehole get a fucking lawyer

Well then who is Tanker's goddamned lawyer if it ain't Cleveland

Allaby?"Brown, Nick (LEG)" wrote:

Okay but just remove me and michael from your email list
Nick BrownExecutive Assistant to the Speaker
1-506-470-1136 (cell)
1-506-453-2506 (work)

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos
To: Brown, Nick (LEG)
Sent: Tue May 16 22:38:37 2006
Subject: It is not Spam arsehole get a fucking lawyer"

Brown, Nick (LEG)" wrote:

Please stop sending me your spam emails

Nick BrownExecutive Assistant to the Speaker
1-506-470-1136 (cell)
1-506-453-2506 (work)

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos
To: Brown, Nick (LEG)
Sent: Tue May 16 22:34:20 2006
Subject: David Wilkins knew about New Brunswick before he came to Canada

This was when he wasthe Speaker of the House in South Carolina

David Amos wrote:

Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Years ago I introduced my concerns with the IRS to Cellucci in Canada
To: HSP@scstatehouse.net

I did so in a proper fashion before it became necessary to sue anyone. It is not my job to prosecute criminal actions. That is as you know the task of the various law enforcement authorities. However Cellucci was mistaken when he thought I was bluffing. Ashcroft made a bigger boo boo when he thought the Secret Service could take me away to Cuba and get me out of his hair. Whatever may transpire between you and I in the future, you can never say that I was not straight up with you out of the gate. This and the following emails contain a lot of text. Any man considering becoming the latest US Ambassador to Canada should study every single word. The emails do me a a service as well in that they save me paper, toner and US postage. Lets just say I truly hope that you are the honest man I have been looking for. I do not care about your political standing. I am seeks friends not more foes. As an honest Republican you should understand your party can easily replace the president and maintin its integrity. Bush popoularity is at an all time low and the ecomony is in the toilet. The you have wild cards like me that may just be successful in seeing justice served for the benefit of the public trust in two countries. Bush may be able to cover up my concerns in the USA but not in the UN and Canada too. There are no degrees of honesty no matter what party line you Kow Tow to. Any lawyer knows that EH? Why not aim high if you do the right thing ASAP hell you could be the next President I have pickled every Democrat in sight. Check my work before you call me a liar.

David Amos wrote:

Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos Subject: I just talked to ya Stevey Boy thanks for showng me your arse so fast
To: stephenb@cba.org, john.e.lowman@esso.ca, jfuhrer@ridoutmaybee.com, jharris@myersfirm.com, leila.gosselin@calgary.ca, CWade@Heenan.ca, gavin.wyllie@bellnet.ca, wdanson@mccuaig.com, george@mcallister-law.com, cmasse@mccarthy.ca, gordon.murphy@aegoncanada.ca, mcornish@cavalluzzo.com, kirsten.embree@fmc-law.com, susandumont@telus.net, Brian.Carr@fmc-law.com, pjrenaud@duncanandcraig.com, christian.whalen@gnb.ca, cba@unb.ca, cbanb@cbanb.com, jean.trahan@gnb.ca, Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca, cuba_onu@cubanmission.com, cuba@un.int

Christian R.C. Whalen, I just called you too and was put on hold while trying to explain my concerns. I hate that. May I suggest that you sit up and pay attention and act within the scope of your employment once you get back from lunch. The fact that I can use a phone and send emails must at least prove that I am human too and have at least the same rights as you. Rest assured I will be giving you hard copy once I return home in order to prove what I say is true. Putting me in jail or on hold will no longer do. Just so you all know, there is no need to send your organization, the CBA hard copy. Your buddies George McAllister and Jeff Mockler amongst many others in Fredericton got it last year. I received their malevolent answers before I was was falsely imprisoned in the USA. I bet Georgey Boy and Elizabeth Weir are shitting bricks right now after what they have said in the newspaper about the insurance industry last year and the fact that old Hank Greenburg of AIG is in a world of trouble. When Elliot Spitzer went forward and sued Marsh McLellen whilst I was in jail it really pissed me off. I wonder if he and McAllister understand the term "personal injury" because they certainly failed to uphold the law and assisted John Ashcroft in my false imprisonment under the charges of "other" These emails just prove that you all knew the truth before I take up my matters with the UN and then come home to run for Parliament again. We all know Franky McKenna and Allan Rock ain't worth a damn when it comes to speaking for the best interests of our fellow Canadians. Who knows maybe there is some other country that will assist and honest pigheaded Maritimer to expose the awful truth for the benefit of all people excepting lawyers of course. By water Cuba is a close neighbor may we should become better friends. Rest assured if there is no one who will stand with me I will still sue your entire organization for failing the public trust placed in your profession. Methinks the Maritimes should separate from Canada and claim our natural resoures as our own. Lawyers know the maritimes is far from poor why else would buffons such as Franky McKenna and Bernard Lord get to rub elbows with all the rich and powerful? Danny Williams talks the talk should I walk the walk and inspire a true separation? If that were to come about I will wager many lawyers would move to Toronto or Montreal. Everybody knows most Maritimers hate lawyers because they are the ones that have caused us to suffer so while Upper Canadians such as Paul Martin's many cohorts have gotten wealthy off of our assests. Stephen Harper don't give a good god damn about the Maritimes in fact he has called us defeatists. Well he has met one that will challenge his thinking anyway of the week and six times on Sunday. What say you? Wanna call me a liar?

David Amos wrote:

Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Here is some heavy reading for ya
To: mdavid@shadleybattista.com, kilgour@parl.gc.ca

David Amos wrote:
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 09:16:35 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Here is some heavy reading for ya
To: EaganBraude@969fmtalk.com

David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:54:17 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: The most effective email for Thelma
To: atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca, doodyw@sen.parl.gc.ca, murral@sen.parl.gc.caCC: spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca, jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca, prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca, plamom@sen.parl.gc.ca, lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca

David Amos wrote:

Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:08:14 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: The most effective email for Thelma
To: info@traderinafishbowl.com, warren.tolman@hklaw.com, dan@dankennedy.net, w.kirtz@neu.edu, howiecarr@wrko.com, bzelnick@bu.edu, n.daniloff@neu.edu, barnicle@969fmtalk.com, info@grahamdefense.orgCC: johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca, McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca, cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, ethics@harvard.edu, INFO7@elections.ca, inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca, cotlei@parl.gc.ca, Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us, Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us, Jack.Hart@state.ma.us, Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us, Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us, Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us, Daphne.Thompson@gems2.gov.bc.ca, coulter.osborne@oico.on.ca, WayneGreen@mail.gov.nl.ca, gallanpm@gov.ns.ca

Hey
Yesterday morning I put one over the bow of a bunch of bad acting Yankees in Beantown. I got a very predictable response from them, nothing. It seems they struck themselves dumb. It comes to them naturally, I might add. They seem to think the whole world revolves around them and their Big Digs and by-elections. Yet while I was teasing those dumb bastards what was far more important to me and my fellow Canadians was the budget vote up home. If Martin's government fell and my name came up as part of the cause of it, shit would roll down hill and I could impeach Georgie Bush in a New York minute. Then the Yankees would sit up and pay attention. It was a small wonder to me that the Conservatives refrained from voting and Georgie Bush picked up the phone and made his peace with the snake, Paul Martin. Thus far everything has gone as I have predicted. However everybody does not know about me and the UN yet. Now there is a different kettle of fish. While everybody felt their own fat arses were so important and my dumb ass was not worth a damn, I was still playing the political game on many fronts. Watch out when I line them up. That said, I listened with interest this morning to the Virgin Fat Bastard on Fox News to hear what he had to say. The most offensive things he said were about Canada and how we don't matter. Perhaps he should have read what I gave to Murdoch's General Counsel, Mr. Siskland last year. There is good reason Canada does not want Fox on its airwaves. It is Fox that does not matter. Plus does VB think Canadians do not buy and sell on the stock market as well? Hell it is a Canadian firm called Thomson that sells all you Yankee lawyers your information that makes you appear so wise. They sell their shares on the Yankee Stock exchange and their General Counsel is right here in CT. I also heard what VB had to say about Reilly and his speach in front of the Taxpayer Dudes. Does Fox forget the fact that I sued Reilly, the IRS and everybody else years ago for not collecting Taxes? Then I heard from another Mike Sullivan who writes for the Herald and talks on Fox. What he had to say was truly comical if you know what I know about what he don't know about. How many Mike Sullivans are there in Massachusetts anyway? He had a lot to say about the stock market. Perhaps he should confer with two other Mikey Sullivans to get the real scoop. One produces Frontline and the other is the US Attorney. Then if he wants to make some serious dough as a whistleblower perhaps he should talk to me. I will forward an email about the Media that contians a Tiff file that should properly introduce the three Mikey Sullivans. I waited for the results of the budget vote to write my wife's last affidavit and then I am gone. You find what court she files it in. I ain't telling it would spoil my fun when I get back to Beantown in time for Tax Day up home. The Bloc Quebecois can call for a confidence vote anytime they want. Everybody knows how easy it is for me to piss off Frenchmen. I put it under the heading of sport. Read on or not I don't care this email just saves me a lot of toner and paper and Us Postage in order to support my final mailings to expose Public Corruption. I am at the top of the heap it is time to deliver the Coup de Grace in order to cause an Confidence Vote in Canada. The bad acting Yankees can do nothing to stop me now. Good bye Yankees. I do not wish you a Good Day.

"OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada's minority Liberal government won a crucial budget vote on Wednesday after the official opposition Conservative Party abstained to ensure the administration stayed in power. But Conservative leader Stephen Harper, who says Canadians have no desire for another election so soon after the vote last June, did not rule out voting against Ottawa's spending plans in the next few weeks. This, too, could trigger an election. Legislators approved the budget by 132-73. The government had declared each of the budget votes to be a matter of confidence that could spark an early election. The Liberals and the Conservatives are not enthusiastic about a new election since neither party has gained support since last June's vote, when the Liberals lost their majority in Parliament. The Liberals hold 133 of the 308 seats in the House of Commons, with the Conservatives holding 99, the Bloc Quebecois 54, and the New Democratic Party 19. There are two independents and one seat is vacant. "It's not in the national interest to have an election now," Harper said before the vote. His party -- created 15 months ago through the union of the Alliance and Progressive Conservative parties -- holds its first policy convention next week.

"David Amos wrote:
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:12:57 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: The most effective email for Thelma
To: HJMcClure2@msn.com

I truly believe that this email is the most important and timely email for Thelma and my little Clan as well. There is a lot more to this email than what first meets the eye. However if someone like Dick Gregory could have someone like Bill Cosby introduce Thelma to Martha Stewart and she could introduce what I know about lawyers and the SEC crooks to her. All of our troubles would be over when Martha Stewart gets mad as a wet hen. No kidding. It is hard for me to explain but very easy to do. The only problem I have is that nobody believes me. Maybe it is Thelma's credibility and friends are what I need to get the job done because I am too much of a radical. However if I were not such a fierce character I would not have been able to do what I did. Talk about a Catch 22 EH?

David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:45:28 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Governor M. Jodi Rell I just callel your office
To: mbevis@nhpr.org

David Amos wrote:
From: "David Amos"
To: "moto maniac" ,
,Subject: Fw: Governor M. Jodi Rell I just callel your office
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:23:10 -0500

----- Original Message -----

From: David Amos
To: dennis.schain@po.state.ct.us ; Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; attorney.general@po.statect.us ; chris.beaman@mail.house.gov
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 10:10 AM
Subject: Governor M. Jodi Rell I just callel your office

Shame on you Ms. Rell. I read your spiel about Ethics and wanted to talk to you or your lawyers about Attorney General Blumenthal and his actions with Elliot Spitzer and many other people connected with your State involving Securities Fraud before I sued your State. Whomever the woman was answered your phone demanded to know my business. Either she is very malicious or as dumb as a post. She only managed to be able to repeat what I said but seemed incapable of independent thought to answer a simple question and introduce me to your lawyers. Therefore I will sue you in federal court in order to meet them but not before calling Blumenthal to testify at my Trial. Long before that time you will have received Hard Copy of what Blumenthal had received under the reign of your former Governor and will stress test your ethics byway of Martha Stewart as soon as she gets out of jail. Meanwhile obviously I am telling the world what I think of Connecticut and all of its crooks. Tell me honestly. Whom do you do the common people will believe, me or a bunch of Yankee Carpetbaggers? I read about Howard Coble teasing Martha Stewart in prison. I truly hope she gets to return the favor. However Coble likely already knows that I will be suing him along with the Free Agent the loser/lawyer John Edwards.If I were you I would have your dim witted help read this real slow a couple of times because many other people are receiving this email as well. Martha Stewart alone will make the shit hit the fan once she see her copy. However perhaps you had better have your lawyers contact me real fast because my evidence of crimes are far more powerful than hers and Martha would need my support to sue those that have offended her. I am making my best effort to embarrass you into ethical conduct. If that doesn't rest assured I will sue.November 14, 2003Lawrence J Lasser, Juan M. Marcelino, 342 Warren St, 360 ForestBrookline, MA 02445 Bridgewater, MA 02324Phone 617 566-5253 Phone 508 279-3341Hey fellas,Seems to me you two played dumb too long, then resigned from your lucrative positions way past too late. I know that you and I know you underestimated me. I know your prompt but secretive resignations from your posts are simply part of a cover-up and fraudulent attempt to display ethical behavior at a state, federal and private level. Is this an honourable act? Would Mr. Marcelino swear to it with "Scout's Honor"? I know you, Mr. Lasser, know your Kickham neighbors. You do cruise the same haunts. Watch out for Uncle Franky, if you see him behind the wheel of that 4x4. He is as blind as a bat. Why Safety Insurance gave him a good driver discount I will never understand. He has never even had a driver's license. Watch out for Uncle Bill as well, I know he drinks and drives. Good thing for him has many buddies in the Cop Shops. I also know you know about my appearance at the Brookline Savings Bank Shareholders meeting. You must have known about my contact with George Putnam before attending. What you may not know about is the Kickham's Court Ordered Second Accounts that were filed the same week. The documents are hereto enclosed. Have your best lawyer explain the ramifications to you. Then ask him if he will defend you after you receive a copy of my complaint. The instant he admits that he has read it and does not affirm the crimes of Charles J. Kickham Jr. I will sue him too. If no lawyer will talk to you, give Mr. Marcelino a call. He is a lawyer. He can't be too busy these days and his concerns are the same as yours. I am sending you both the same documents that I sent every U.S. Attorney but only he gets a copy of the tape. Lucky for you, Mr. Lasser, that you are not a lawyer.Seems to me that both of you and I may go toe to toe Pro Se. Even under the Patriot Act, the First Amendment and Freedom of Religion still stands. Watch me reel you in under the Rico laws for three times the total loss because of the conspiracy. If any lawyer disagrees, dare him to send me a letter. The transcripts of the Feb 8/02, May 16/02 and Oct 16/02 hearings in Norfolk Probate Court are enclosed for your review. Seems to me that the worm has turned. I hope the Kickhams live long enough to go to jail. None of us can predict the future but I got a feeling that my kid's future is looking brighter every day. Pretty soon they are gonna have to wear shades. As for me I has always been lucky. I have been living on borrowed time since I was three years old. All doctors were betting I would never come out of the coma. Would you like to make a little wager as to whether or not I complete my task before slipping back into the coma? One thing is for certain. Because you are now reading this letter you can never play dumb no more. Say hey to Chucky, Willy, Franky, Mr. Koski, Mr. Randazzo, Mr. Chapman and Mr. Tripp for me.

David R. Amos
Cya'll in Court;)
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186

Conn. AG Sues Marsh & McLennan, ACE
Friday January 21, 4:26 pm ET By Laura Walsh, Associated Press Writer

Connecticut Attorney General Blumenthal Sues Broker Marsh & McLennan, Insurer ACE HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) -- Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal on Friday sued insurance brokerage giant Marsh & McLennan Inc. and a unit of the Bermuda-based ACE Ltd. insurance company for illegal commissions in connection with an $80 million state contract.It was the latest in a series of actions that Blumenthal has taken since New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer filed suit last October against Marsh & McLennan, which is headquartered in New York, for bid rigging, price fixing and demanding incentive fees from insurance companies in exchange for sending more property and casualty business their way.AIG, Marsh Execs Plead Guilty to FraudTuesday February 15, 3:46 pm ET By Joseph A. Giannone NEW YORK (Reuters) - A former senior executive at Marsh & McLennan Cos. Inc. (NYSE:MMC - News ) and two executives from American International Group Inc. (NYSE:AIG - News ) pleaded guilty to fraud charges stemming from New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's sweeping investigation of fraud in the insurance industry.May 29th, 2004Thomas P. Puccio Brendan V. Sullivan Jr.c/o The Law offices of Thomas P. Puccio c/o Williams & Connolly LLP230 Park Avenue, Suite 301 725 Twelfth St., N.W.New York, New York 10169 Washington, DC 20005 RE: CorruptionSirs,I called and emailed both of your offices yesterday. Today someone called me from CT (203 964-0156) stating it was on Mr. Puccio’s behalf. He asked me what I knew of Cendant. Now I support my statements to him with these enclosures that are exactly the same material sent to Mr. Ferguson of the Federal Reserve Bank quite a while ago. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. I have also enclosed copies of two letters sent to the lawyers employed by Cendant Corp and a copy of a filing in Plymouth Probate Court in which the actions of Cendant Corp are mentioned.I do not know nor do I judge the actions of your clients, Walter Forbes and Kirk Shelton. I do state that the Office of the US Attorney prosecuting them has no right to complain of anyone for not upholding the law. There is also the irrefutable fact that the lawyers now employed by Cendant Corp and at least two of its Directors , Brian Mulroney and William Cohen, both of whom are well known lawyers/politicians, have proven to me that they have a total disregard for upholding the law. They are far from worthy of the Public Trust. I will be filing my own complaints against them soon.Feel free to argue me if you disagree but I think I have just served upon you a very big stick to use in the defense of your clients. Perhaps you should use it for the benefit of all. Although I am heading home to run for Parliament, rest assured I shall listen for the news of their present prosecution. I have also included a copy of a letter to Richard Blumenthal, the Attorney General of Connecticut, that has thus far gone unanswered. Perhaps you should ask him why he has chosen to ignore my allegations that should support the defense of your clients. At the very least I will call you as witnesses to my complaints. Perhaps you should consider my merits as a defense witness on your client’s behalf. I must say I would make fairly formidable rebuttal witness against the actions of any government lawyer. If you doubt me ask Assistant Attorney General Robb Quinan if I am capable of filling a courtroom. Say hey to Martha Stewart’s lawyers for me will ya? The fact that Feds are now prosecuting one of their own Secret Service Agents is just to funny in light of what I have sent to all parties involved in that matter. Please impress us all with a fine display of ethical conduct befitting your profession.Cya’ll in CourtJ David R. Amos153 Alvin Ave Milton MA. 02186Connecticut Attorney General April 15th, 2004Richard Blumenthal P.O. Box 120, Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0120RE: CorruptionSir,Please find enclosed exactly the same documents etc. that were received by the Solicitor General Ted Olson a while ago. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as an officer of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. Please be the man I hope you are and not like the Attorney Generals in New York and Massachusetts. As you can see, I do not have much respect for Yankee lawyers but it does not follow that I hate them all. I have found one ethical lawyer who will speak for my wife as I hit the road and I am a proud father of two Yankees and am married to one. I can’t hate everyone. Please study this stuff and respond to me.A couple of days ago I sent you an email that should have prompted you to ask me for more information if you are truly concerned about the actions of Big Banks and their recent mergers. When I received no reply, I called your office, and tried to inform the lady that answered of my concerns and of my sincere effort to make you aware. She had no time or interest in talking to me and told me to send my stuff to you by US Mail.I am very curious if, when and what you may say about my concerns. As a father you must understand me. However the lawyer in you confuses me. I seek a friend not a foe. I have enough enemies. I have seen that you have been quite popular in your campaigns on behalf of the little guy and the people of your state obviously like you enough to keep you in office for so long. I must stress test your ethics in pursuit of a friend.I know about other things far more important than crooked lawyers, bankers or mobsters. The sad part is many others do to but are too afraid to speak up. Therefore I must become a politician in order to try to speak of it in Parliament so I can expose the truth in such a way that others don’t suffer from it. If perchance I fail and you have proven to me that you are ethical, my ghost will make certain that you will know all that I once knew. I do not have a death wish. I am just laying low for a bit. If the bastards corner me, I will turn as mean as a snake. As one father to another I will ask you this. What is the point in raising happy children and sending them out to live in a miserable world? Shouldn’t we protect the future of all of the children for the benefit of our own? Whether or not I receive response from you, I must call you to court to testify. I sincerely hope that you will stand with me and not against me.

Cya'll in Court:)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA 02186

January 8, 2004
John R. Cuti and Robert G. Morvillo
Hann M. Maazel Rebecca A. Monck andEmery, Cuti, Brinckerhoff & Abady, PC John J. Tigue, Jr. c/o545 Madison Avenue Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, New York, NY 10022 Iason & Silberberg, P.C.Phone: 212 763-5000 565 Fifth AvenueFax: 212 763-5001 New York, NY 10017Phone 212 856-9600

John Keker Fax 212 856-9494Keker & Van Nest LLP710 Sansome Street Richard M. StrassbergSan Francisco, CA 94111 Goodwin Procter, LLAPhone: 415 391-5400 599 Lexington AvenueFax: 415 397-7188 New York, NY 10022Phone: 212 813-8859Wayne M. Carlin , Fax: 212 355-3333 Alix Biel, Edwin H. NordlingerMark K. Schonfeld, Caren N. Pennington Mary Jo White, US Attorneyand Doria G. Bachenheimer Michael S. Schachter her AssistantSecurities and Exchange Commission Criminal Division233 Broadway One St. Andrew's PlazaNew York, New York 10279 New York, NY 10007Phone: 646 428-1510 Phone: 212 637-2631Fax: 646 428-1981
RE: Corruption
Hey,
No one should ever say that I didn’t diligently try to make you people act ethically and professionally while many of your friends tried very hard to impeach me. Each of you know that I tried to contact you to stop the very improper political persecution and prosecution of Martha Stewart, Peter Bacanovic and Frank Quattrone. Over the past six months I have made each of you very well aware of my standing against the corruption within the government and you all know that I can easily prove it. Now I will drag you all to a place all lawyers fear to tread. It is the witness stand. Imagine having to swear to tell the truth and suffer through my questioning. The first law firm that I notified was Goodwin Procter, LLP at Exchange Place, Boston, MA I did so byway of a fellow member of Goodwin Proctor, F. Dennis Saylor IV. It was done the instant I became aware that he was nominated for a position as a judge in the US District Court. I have no doubt they know exactly who I am.It was not necessary to notify David J. Apfel and Richard M. Strassberg but I did call and fax them out of courtesy. Thus far I have heard nothing from them and do not expect to. No one else has contacted me. F. Dennis Saylor IV has known the truth since August of 2002 and he failed to act ethically in his bid to become a judge of the US District Court. In fact I have yet to receive even an acknowledgement from Mr. Saylor that I even exist. It seems I must complain of him and his law firm in order to receive a response. F. Dennis Saylor IV should have also acted in the best interest of the client of Goodwin Proctor, Peter Bacanovic and brought into the light the fact that the matter of The USA v. Martha Stewart et al is merely a case of the pot calling the kettle black. The US Attorney Office claims that it is all about lying. They should be very familiar with that act. The SEC are simply attacking celebrities with some very vague charges to put on a smoke and mirror show to take the public’s eyes off of their own many sins. Every single one of you knows that I am the ultimate rebuttal witness against the government on behalf of the aforesaid defendants. Each of you also know that the instant that I speak in a widely witnessed public forum, the jig is up for many a corrupt government employee, politician and lawyer in private practice. I can only imagine your many discussions about what to do about me and my allegations. Why did it never dawn upon you to simply tell the truth and let the cards fall where they may for the benefit of all? The only possible answer is that you failed to uphold the law because of you hold your own personal self interests above your client’s interests or the public trust.Over the past two weeks I was particularly vocal in many ways and in many forums that there is a hard rain about to fall upon the justice system and the political arena because I was doing my best rain dance and I had caught a few drips. The reason I could not come forward earlier in the aforesaid defendant’s behalf was because I did not wish to prevent the Secret Service, the FBI and the IRS from finally acting within the scope of their employment and investigating the Bank Fraud and Tax Fraud within the Brookline Savings Bank that was reported with a Form 211 six months ago. I could not be certain as to whether or not the FEDs would become overcome by a sudden fit of honesty because of all the politicians I put over the pork barrel in the last six months. I know I tried hard to make them act responsibly but the bell just tolled today. Now I will sue them all as individuals. They are no longer sheltered by immunity as government employees. I have received no response from any of them. Although the Inspector General of the DHS promised to take a look but he is gonna keep it a secret from me. I don’t care what he thinks is proper in my opinion he has already broken Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics hereto attached within the enclosed documents. I will not be further delayed. I will file my first federal complaint very soon.Sooner or later the defendants, Martha Stewart, Peter Bacanovic and Frank Quattrone, are going to hear of my efforts in their defense. Methinks that all of you will have hell to pay when the shoe is on the other foot. At the very least byway of the US Mail to you I have reaffirmed the fact that I have made you witnesses to my pursuit of justice. You will be named as such in my pending complaint.I know it is a little redundant to send some of your offices the same documents again but there are a few others that you may not have seen and I wish to make certain that you all receive the same stuff so that you will be all on an even keel when I summons you to court. In my opinion John Keker has not offended me or anyone else as of yet. I just made him aware of me yesterday and without enough stuff to prove to him my sincerity. Now he should display his best ethical behavior very quickly before I file my complaint. After that point in time I will consider him way past too late.Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter with all enclosures recently received by the CEO of Taxpayers against Fraud and a copy of a letter sent to The IRS six months ago with the form 211 and the evidence, Also included is a copy of letter sent to me by Francis Galvin and a copy of my response to him and Elliot Spitzer. They have ignored me too long and Spitzer in his malice even turned off his fax machine on me in order to ignore me. The copy of wiretap tape number 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it maybe properly investigated. I have also sent an exact copy of this letter with all of its enclosures to the following:New York State Ethics Commission Thomas J. Cahill, Chief Counsel39 Columbia Street Departmental Disciplinary CommitteeAlbany, New York 12207-2717 61 Broadway, 2nd FloorPhone: 518 432-8207 New York, New York 10006Fax: 518 432-8255 Phone: 212 401-0800Fax: 212 401-0810Don’t you think its high time someone does the right thing? After all each of you swore before the Bar that you would in order to practice law for a fee. Say hey to Martha, Peter and Frank for me will ya. It’s my turn to take a vacation and employ voicemail. I am tired of waiting for someone to call. I know you don’t wish me well but you all better hope I don’t die as well.Cya’ll in CourtJ David R. AmosPO Box 2South Acworth, NH 03607Governor Rell Testifies in Favor of Ethics, Campaign and State Contract ReformsAppears Before Committee to Promote Reform PackageGovernor M. Jodi Rell took her message of reform in state ethics, campaign finance and the awarding of state contracts before a legislative committee today, declaring that the state has “a historic opportunity” to “show the people of Connecticut that we are serious about change” with genuine, comprehensive reform.“Enacting the reforms I have proposed will send a strong message to the people of Connecticut,” Governor Rell told the General Assembly’s Government Administration and Elections Committee. “That message will be that state government is open and accessible to them – not just to the favored few. That state government is here to work for them – not for the special interests. And that state government is using their hard-earned tax dollars wisely – and not squandering them in cozy deal-making.”Since taking office seven months ago Governor Rell has made ethics reform the focal point of her administration. She has proposed a sweeping package of reforms promoting “fairness over favoritism.” Governor Rell’s personal appearance before the committee underscored the depth of her commitment to reforming state ethics, political campaigns and contracting processes.In her testimony, Governor Rell said, “Over the past few years, revelations of scandal and corruption here in Hartford – and in city halls across our state – shook people’s confidence in our system. I have kept a steady focus on restoring public faith in our state government since taking office July 1. Now it is time to make even bigger and bolder gains through legislative action.“We can take advantage of new leadership and a new spirit of civility and bipartisanship that exists in this building to satisfy the public’s desire for reform. We have a historic opportunity to literally rewrite our laws. To set the highest standards. To make it clear that Connecticut expects the best.“I look forward to seeing these bills arrive on my desk for signature,” Governor Rell told the GAE members. The bills will “show the people of Connecticut that we are serious about change … that we are serious about regaining and keeping their trust by upholding the highest standards of ethics and integrity in our state government.”Governor Rell testified in support of six bills in her reform package:An Act Concerning the Citizen’s Ethics and Government Integrity CommissionThis act creates a restructured and improved Ethics and Government Integrity Commission. It will focus the Commission’s resources and work on a stronger training and education component without compromising its enforcement responsibilities. It also compartmentalizes functions to avoid conflicts of interest, creates clear lines of responsibility and establishes a structure that makes an important distinction between the enforcement and advisory functions of the Commission.New restrictions will also govern the actions and activities of Commission members to limit potential conflicts of interest.An Act Concerning a Code of EthicsThis bill will allow a judge to reduce or revoke the pensions of public officials or state employees who are found guilty or plead guilty to a serious crime relating to their employment or the office they hold.This bill would also:· Prevent state employees and public officials from hiring a contractor to provide personal services, if that contractor does business with their agency· Close several so-called “revolving door” loopholes to restrict the actions of a state employee moving to a job in the private sector· Take important steps to tighten gift restrictions· Require local Connecticut governments to adopt a Code of EthicsAn Act Concerning Ethical Standards for State ContractingThis bill imposes new requirements and new limits on companies seeking to do business with the state. It would:* Require these companies to report any state employee or public official who solicits a gift * Hold private companies responsible if they violate “revolving door” restrictions when hiring former state employees * Require that all large state contracts would have to include a summary of state ethics laws as part of the actual contract (and subcontract) language.An Act Concerning Campaign FinanceThis act seeks to limit the influence of special interests by prohibiting lobbyists and people doing business with the state from contributing to races for statewide office or the legislature. It also prohibits lobbyists from fundraising or soliciting contributions from their clients.In addition, the bill:· Lowers limits on contributions for all statewide and legislative offices, and applies these lower limits to political parties, Political Action Committees (PACs) and individuals.· Limits the number of PACs for each legislative caucus· Prohibits “ad books,” in which sponsors buy advertising in another fund-raising technique that the Governor called “just a gimmick for getting around the law.”· Provides an incentive to encourage citizen participation and hold down the cost of campaigns through a tax deduction for contributions to candidates who voluntarily accept spending limits· Includes an advance notification provision to stop the troubling trend of surprise negative attack adsAn Act Concerning a State Contracting Standards BoardThe Contracting Standards Board will be charged with establishing contracting standards and practices that apply across the board, without exception, to all state agencies. They will:· Give small, minority- and women-owned businesses an equal opportunity to obtain state business, and· Encourage increased competition for state businessThe Contracting Standards Board will assume the duties of the State Properties Review Board and have the authority to:· Conduct compliance audits of state agencies· Review the substance of agency contracts, a great improvement of the Attorney General’s present authority to review contracts as to form· Under certain conditions, the Board will have the authority to review and terminate an individual contract for cause and to suspend or disqualify a contractor from state business for a period of time.An Act Concerning False ClaimsThis measure encourages private citizens to get involved in cleaning up state government. It empowers individuals with knowledge of potential fraud to initiate lawsuits and win a percentage of any money recovered by the state.It also creates new penalties for those who try to steal from taxpayers and the state.

----- Original Message -----

From: David Amos
To: wpc-cpa@farris.com ; goodale@sasktel.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 1:52 PM
Subject: Fw: You can't fool me McGuinty I'm too stupid

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: dalton.mcguinty@premiergov.on.ca
Sent: Tuesday,
February 15, 2005 8:25 PM
Subject: You can't fool me McGuinty I'm too stupid

You lawyers are all the same but at least you can never say that you didn't know. I will call and leave a message with my cell phone I will have proof of that contact as well.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: david.anderson1@sasktel.net Cc: anderd@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 5:30 PM
Subject: Fw: FYI I just called

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: fbastien@bell.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 5:02 PM
Subject: Fw: FYI I just called

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: info@ccr-ny.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 4:50 PM
Subject: FYI I just calledYou are way past too late act ethical now

----- Original Message -----

From: David Amos
To: INFO7@elections.ca ; ombudsman@npr.org ; ombudsman@washpost.com
Cc: info@cfif.org ; 2020@abc.com ; niteline@abc.com ; cnn.feedback@cnn.com ; info@cnbc.com ; comments@foxnews.com ; world@msnbc.com ; today@nbc.com ; dateline@nbc.com ; newshour@pbs.org ; atc@npr.org ; letters@latimes.com ; letters@nytimes.com ; editor@usatoday.com ; editors@interactive.wsj.com ; letters@newsweek.com ; letters@time.com ; letters@usnews.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:55 PM
Subject: My name is beginning to be Blogged

Attn Mr. Jeffrey A. Dvorkin
I just called you and left a message. I have crossed paths with NPR before and just shook my head and went on alone to do what I had to do. It has already proven to me that it is no better than any other Media controlled by the wealthy few. So as I went about proving what everybody knows in that public corruption is rampant and way out of control. I figured I would prove the Media is a big player against the public's best interests and the only possible way for ordinary folk to know simple truths is what they can weed out for themselves from the truth and fiction found in the internet. I truly believe it is every bit the important tool the printing press was centuries ago before rich folks bought them all. I contacted you Mr. Dvorkin because you are the most outspoken ombudsman on the web and you used to work for CBC in my native land. I am not surprised that you have not called me back yet. Everybody else does as well. As you can see I have sent this to many others just to rub that fact in. Why would you be any different than any of them? I will send only one more email to you and the others immediately after this one. I contains much text that should concern your former rivals at CTV in Canada and all Big Media in general. There is also attached just one small Tiff file that should properly serve to embarrass Frontline at PBS. After the end of the day I will ignore you too. Turn about is fair play.I go to great lengths to check my own ethics constantly in order that none of my words may ever be impeached. In that regard I do agree with your following statements in particular. Most blogs are slanted and political just like the media. However not all are and since my battles are with both sides of the political fence in an sincere effort to expose the truth, I simply don't care who says what of me. It is far better than being ignored as NPR and its ilk have done. I will be comfortable with the fact that most ordinary people are more than capable to sort out who is a liar and who is not. I will let my work stand on its own and say no more to anyone. I am starting to bore myself as much as I have bored my friends long ago. Enough is enough.I do not deny the possibility that you may have no idea as to who I am, If in fact you don't, it only further serves to prove my point that blogging will be the only way to reveal the truth that media willingly ignores in pursuit of its own interests and that of its owners. However after my phone call and my emails you can never claim that anymore. In my opinion the freedom of the press is a myth and any individual is only free if he resists oppression upon his freedom. It is up to you to challenge me in disagreement or run and hide your head in the sand. My work cannot be undone. I am quite simply begging you to stress test my ethics to the max. The sooner the better for the benefit of all. Following your words and that of some others are several motions affidavits, answers and counterclaims that have been filed in two courts in two countries. I can further support all that I say is true with many emails that contain scans of legal documents letters and responses etc etc. If anyone responds to me by the end of the day. am asks for it. I will forward a rather large Tiff file that contains many legal documents, letters and response etc. It was exactly the same material that I sent to the Solicitor General Theodore Olson just before he quit his job while I was running for Parliament. IT is also exactly the same material that I served upon the Canadian Border Guards to send to their boss, the Solicitor General Anne McLellan to let her know I had made it home as was about to do my best to make all HELL break loose in an ethical and timely fashion. Six months after I sent one hell of a letter to Elections Canada I just received the funniest response yet. It seems everybody is nervous that I am going to come home and run again very soon. I am about to call their lawyer you answered me and ask her what the heel she did with her copy of wiretap tape numbered 139.

"Skews Narrow?
Many listeners tell me that the media -- NPR included -- doesn't skew left as much as it skews narrow. The range of issues needs to be broader, they say. NPR could do more to ensure that it allows other points of view -- from the right and the left -- on the air. But not just the usual well-worn suspects like Bill O'Reilly from Fox News. In recent days, O'Reilly has admonished NPR for not having him on public radio to sell his book. But NPR has no obligation to put O'Reilly or any other shameless self-promoter on the radio. There are a number of younger, more interesting thinkers and journalists from both sides of the spectrum that deserve to be heard and considered. Perhaps fewer "think tankers" from the East Coast. More witty conservatives and liberals (yes, they exist). P.J. O'Rourke? Al Franken? Maybe even Bernard Goldberg.". "In DenialNPR interviewed a number of academics and journalists about this story. The academics seemed to be in denial, tending to pooh-pooh the importance of this story for American journalism overall.But others such as Bob Steele from The Poynter Institute and Tom Rosenstiel from the Project for Excellence in Journalism took the opposite view: that CBS' mistake will have consequences for all news organizations and for some time to come.After other recent scandals involving the BBC, The New York Times and USA Today, it is sometimes hard to believe that journalistic ethics are being given more than lip service these days. Yet, there are reasons to be optimistic.Rays of Hope? First, we must acknowledge that the blogs have truly arrived. It is hard for journalists who have led a sheltered life without public accountability to acknowledge that those days are over. Second, it will be tough for ombudsmen and women to admit that their unique role as overseers on behalf of the public is also changing. We need to make room on the bench and give the bloggers a place at the dinner table. The question remains: who's for dinner?NPR listeners have always been quick to point out our errors and lapses, and in a non-partisan way. The blogs are different because many are explicitly political. It will be interesting to see if the "blogosphere" still has as much impact on mainstream journalism once the election is over.Third, while the bloggers will make life uncomfortable for the media, ultimately, it is a sign of a healthy democratic give-and take. A question for the bloggers is, "what are your standards? How can the rest of us know that your sources are reliable?"Making the rich and powerful squirm is a short-lived measure of journalistic success -- both for the mainstream media and presumably, for the blogs.Bloggers must be as accountable to the public as they demand the rest of us must be. That means there should be some consequence for spreading false or partial information. Any thoughts on what those consequences might be would be a useful discussion.More, Not Less Investigative JournalismCBS' failure will create a climate of timidity inside some organizations when it comes to investigative journalism. It may be understandable, but it would also be a mistake. There are still a number of unanswered questions about this story.
Ethics for Investigative JournalistsFinally, CBS' problems should remind us of the ethical obligations of investigative journalism. Aly Coln from the Poynter Institute has reissued the guidelines for those organizations (like NPR) that want to enter into this area. (See link at bottom of page.)They are worth posting in every cubicle. I especially like Aly's idea that every investigative unit should appoint a "contrarian" whose role is to question everything.In my experience, the failure of investigative units occurs exactly because expressing doubts is seen as not being "on board." Skepticism inside the news organization is also a valuable journalistic tool.In that spirit, NPR needs to do some clearing up of one of its own sources."The following words of David Limbaugh's from out of the Heritage Foundation are truly hilarious to me. When one considers what I sent them last year that have thus far been ignored they will laugh too. As a double check I sent the same stuff to him as well to no avail but at least his brother's lawyer Roy Black responded to me. It aided in me forever proving some lawyers are too snotty for their own damned good."Men in Black" is a primer on the United States Constitution as well as a clarion call to liberty lovers to wake up to the alarming damage the Court continues to inflict on our republic. Levin documents how the Court has morphed into a super-legislature, legislating from the bench rather than honoring its constitutional role of interpreting the laws.To be fair to the right here is proof that left wing lawyers are as crooked as the right wing dudes.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: ecassel1@cox.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:24 PM
Subject: Fw: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Graham.B@parl.gc.ca Cc: epeterso@justice.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 12:44 AM
Subject: Fw: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments

Hey Bill
Please explain this lawsuit to me real slow. It is by your buddy Billy Matthews against Byron Prior in Newfoundland after you drew my friend's plight to Irwin Cotler's attention? He did finally respond to Byron with a not my job attitude on the very same day Paul Martin's coal boat was caught with the load of cocaine in Sidney. Furthermore I know what I sent you in my emails last year before I can home to run for Parliament against your party. In return you bastards allow me to be summoned back to the USA to be sent straight to jail without due process of law. Now don't that just piss me off. Methinks I will send

Bloc Quebecois chickenshits

Date:
Wed, 10 May 2006 23:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
From:
"David Amos"
Subject: Maybe the Parliamentarians will read my emails after they have listened to some EH?
To: Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca, Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov, duffy@ctv.ca, tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com, Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us, Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us, Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us, Kandalaw@mindspring.com, kmdickson@comcast.net, trvl@hotmail.com, patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov, fbinhct@leo.gov, oldmaison@yahoo.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, michael.malley@gnb.ca, EGreenspan@144king.com, josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca, racing.commission@state.ma.us, dwatch@web.net, freeman.c@parl.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, graham.b@parl.gc.ca, arthur.a@parl.gc.ca
CC: nwnews@cknw.com, davidamos@bsn1.net, BBACHRACH@bowditch.com, david.allgood@rbc.com, mackay.p@parl.gc.ca, stronach.b@parl.gc.ca, moore.r@parl.gc.ca, thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, toews.v@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca, casey.b@parl.gc.ca, mlevine@goodmans.ca, brae@goodmans.ca, steve.moate@utoronto.ca, sarah.mann@rci.rogers.com, rep@karenyarbrough.com, dc@thepen.us, paul.neuman@asm.ca.gov, info@afterdowningstreet.org, gearpigs@hotmail.com, alltrue@nl.rogers.com, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca

May 10th, 2006

Bernard Shapiro, Ethics Commissioner Jean T. Fournier, Senate Ethics Officer
C/o Bill Graham MP Jerry Grafstein
House of Commons The Senate of Canada
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6 Ottawa, ON K1A 0A4

Maxime Bernier MP Bernard Shapiro, Ethics Commissioner
C/o Michael Fortier C/o Gilles Duceppe and Carole Freeman MP
The Senate of Canada, House of Commons
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A4 Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6

RE: Rampant Public Corruption
Hey
Harper’s puppet masters, Burney and Mulroney gave me the idea to support the lust of the Liberal Senate to make history like some of them did long ago with Joey Clark. I hope the Senators stop the Conservative mandate in its tracks in May rather than depend on the non-existent ethics of the Bloc. Shame on you all and the political whore, Gilles Duceppe in particular to make me play such political games. You dudes from Quebec yap of sovereignty all day long then mouth your support of Harper’s attack on all our sovereignty just because he kicked your fancy French arses in the last election? Perhaps you should listen to the attachment in your next email before we meet in court.
Pursuant to my many phone calls and email to all of you over the years, you will find enclosed as I promised Hard Copy of exactly the same material sent to Allan Rock, Franky Boy McKenna and the FBI exactly one year ago and many others today. The true copy of the Yankee police surveillance wiretap tape #139 is served upon you as officers of the court in order that it may be investigated. Now that my family has been without their home and their father for almost a year everything I said to the crooked lawyers McKenna and Rock holds particularly true for all of you today. You people forgot we are human too. Do with your irrefutable knowledge of crime what you will in your own selfish best interests as I prepare to file my first complaint in Canada to defend my freedom and argue you in court.
The words in the above paragraphs were all that I was going to say to you people especially after all the times I have tried to make contact with you in the past. However the Conservatives were flying way too high in April for me not to try to shoot the government’s mandate down in May. I have been busy lining up liberal ducks that lost their positions in the last election to drag into court to embarrass Conservatives with. Derek Burney and Mulroney have ordered their puppet, Harper to dare the opposition to cause an election merely because he is temporarily higher in the polls. That is just like Humpty Dumpty did last fall. He got a great kick in the balls and suffered a great fall with that sort of thinking. C’est vrai?
The need has arisen to teach Harper’s puppetmasters Burney and Mulroney a hard lesson about history repeating itself right now. Thus I must remind the nasty Upper Canadian political warhorse, Big Bad Billy Boy Graham of his own words of barely a month ago. "The Liberal Party is ""perfectly capable"" of fighting an election even without a new leader in place if the need arises, Interim Leader Bill Graham insisted Tuesday. Mr. Graham, appearing on CBC Newsworld dismissed suggestions that the party is stuck with the Conservative agenda in the coming session because it is not set to go back to the polls."
Graham while you trying to sprout some balls of your own this spring, I want you to know that Byron Prior read me the letter you pal Cotler wrote to him at your request after polling day was history in 2004. If the current Minister of Justice were an ethical man, he would have given a copy of Cotler’s letter long ago to the Speaker so that all Parliamentarians could have discussed the former Minister of Justice ethics and accountability. What say you? If anyone should pay attention to this letter it is the Bloc. I am trying to be fair even though Ms. Freeman’s snotty assistant threatened to throw my material in the trash. Andre Arthur and the Conservatives made the Bloc look like buffoons in the last election. Tonight is the Bloc’s big chance for payback if anyone in the Bloc has the sand to act ethically ASAP.
In the "mean" time why doesn’t somebody just do their job and call the liberal, Aldééa Landry or the lawyer, Marian McGrath, of the Security Intelligence Review Committee at 613 990-5866 to get the low down about what I am up too? They do report to Parliamentarians. N’est pas? Yea, I know it is a waste of time. You all must know of my concerns particularly with the budget vote ce soir or the new women in the Bloc camp, Freeman and Barbot, would have called me back months ago. N’est pas?
As I line up French ducks, I often think of you, Michael Fortier. I suspect you have heard my name cursed quite a bit lately. The fact that you were picked rather than elected to sit in the House as a Cabinet Minister by your pals Burney and Mulroney makes me curse you too. I well remember your smirk as the wicked Speech from the Throne became history on April 4th. I saw it just before Marion McGrath called me back and laughed at me. The memory of a bald evil looking lawyer who was with Mulroney’s law firm and the TD Bank too poking the tips of his fingers together with glee makes me see red a lot. The Frenchman can hear a trueconservative Maritimer curse a blue streak if he says my name in just the right company to his Newfy buddy the aptly named lawyer, Rob Moore. Methinks that little biblepounder could lose his cool and turn the air as blue as Humpty Dumpty’s balls.
Why bullshit each other? You all know I am the guy who has caused John Manley, Brian Tobin, Allan Rock and Franky Boy McKenna not to want to be the leader of the liberal party. Tobin worked for Magna and obviously McKenna got this material twice and Rock once thus far. Trust me I made certain that I could prove that John Manley should know much about my issues with Bankers and publicly held Corps. Furthermore I sent a lot of people an email and even posted it on the Internet within a blog or two the reason Belinda crossed the floor last year. Don Amos General Counsel and Paul Cellucci VP of Magna Entertainment know all about the many wiretap tapes etc and the evidence of other crimes I have. Quite frankly so does almost everybody else of political import in two countries for over three years. You are looking at the proof that on July 16th, 2002 I gave my material to the CBC and Paul Cellucci in Ottawa before I began to prosecute my first complaint in a Pro Se fashion in the USA. If you bother to notice I am doing the same thing now but in a far larger scale and that is after running for a seat in Parliament twice and studying a lot of law day and night for years. This ethical Maritimer and fierce political animal is ready and chomping at the bit to Raise a Lot of Hell. I will leave it to you to speculate as to whether or not I am successful. However I must inform you I have nothing left to lose. Thus legions of lawyers will find me one genuine pain in the ass in the near future. I am relying on the truth in the old saying that "there is no honour amongst thieves" so if the liberals and the Bloc were truly clever they would figure out some way to side with me quickly.
From my point of view whatever remains of the liberal party that emerges from its rumble for its own benefit should boot out all the lawyers that sat in the 37th, 38th and 39th Parliament. One thing that can be easily replaced is a lawyer or a politician. A political party’s reputation is very hard to regain. Mulroney proved that for ya. Didn’t he? Every now and then Canadians will slap most if not all the offenders of the pubic trust out of office. History has proven that many times. Do you not think it will repeat itself? Look at how many times Harper has proven he looks down on Canadians with contempt even though he has only a minority government. The fool has already proven to all what he really is. Why do the opposition even hesitate if they were not as corrupt as he? I will do my best to see that the Conservatives do not last long in power or my name ain’t Dave. I think the key to Harper’s demise could still be a few words from the MP Andre Arthur but someone else could still scoop him as early as tonight and become a Canadian hero who may become a Prime Minister someday.
Listen the portions of the wiretap tape in your email right now and remember that I gave nine wiretap tapes to the Suffolk county District Attorney in open court in September of 2004 and my lawyer gave nine original ones to Senator Arlen Specter on Feb 7th. Do you see Bush’s loss of support since then? I do. Interesting EH? Think fast. I have been getting some interesting calls for a change. I am not the only person on the planet who wants to see George W. Bush impeached ASAP. I have given up on my sense of ethical conduct and decided to give copies of wiretap tapes to anyone that wants them despite what law enforcement may wish to say about it.
I explained my reasons to Stevey Boy Harper and a bunch of bankers today. All Canadian and Yankee law enforcement authorities I have managed to speak to over the years falsely claim that they cannot address my own issues with me because it is a matter of public safety and must be kept secret. Bullshit. The only people that could claim that my matters are secret are the people in CISIS or the DHS. They are trying to protect is their own nasty arses at the expense of mine. All the bureaucrats I talk to lately appear to be lost. John Shuttle in the PCO office is for example does not know who in his office Harper is going to can or hold accountable. Two political bosses, Landslide Annie and Pierre Pettigrew have slipped out the back and effected a getaway with a fine pensions.. Small wonder Stockwell Day and Petey Baby MacKay refuse to call me back. EH? As always they are confused. Tis my turn to ignore all you political lawyers for awhile and watch Harper government make ready for its high diving act. I have no wish to speak to you now unless it is in a very public fashion. None of the behind closed doors in confidence crap for me anymore. The people of two countries and my little Clan in particular have the right see my simple truths out in the open and argued. To that end, I would prefer to question you in court under oath. Thus consider yourselves notified that if I am ever allowed the due process of law I will call you to testify. You can be a hostile witness if you wish. In truth I think it would be more fun. I must find a way to entertain ordinary folks like me because most Canadians are bored with all the political shenanigans that you fools embrace.
If you have any questions about my matters before I call you to court to testify about what you have received, perhaps you should contact the women at SIRC or the CISIS people whose work they are supposed to check. I suspect that they will tell you what they know of me is a secret and a matter of public safety. Too bad so sad for you. Cry me a river about the reasons that you never bothered to call me back. I ain’t holding my breath waiting for a Fed to do their job anymore. I am suing the Crown. Under the Charter I have the definite right to no false imprisonment in another country supported with false allegations served upon me by my own consulate while I sat in jail with no bail and held under the charges of "Other". If Stevey Boy Harper or Paul Martin were I, they would have sued the Crown the instant they came screaming out of jail. Am I any less of a man than they are just because I am as poor as a church mouse? I my book money does not make a man, his word does. You dudes take oaths all the time. A man like me fails to see the need. Should not everything one says in serious matters be true? Why the need for an oath, especially when speaking for others for a fee?
You all work for the good of the common man in the House of Commons. EH? FYI, most of us common men know your secret. The doubletalk of mandates etc only serves to prove your dishonesty. The reason you will not act within the scope of your employment ain’t a matter of Public Safety at all. Rampant Public Corruption ain’t a closely guarded secret. It is common knowledge that is as old as man himself. It is my fondest wish to bring great shame upon the legal profession and all employed in law enforcement. You have all sworn oaths to uphold the law and delay and deny no one for lure or malice. All have proven to me that you work hard to do the opposite and betray the public trust for personal gain. For my own protection and satisfaction, I have written a journal and secured copies of it in many places with supporting evidence. Your names can be found within. I cannot depend on justice being served in the purported Democracy that stands in Canada right now or ever. You choose the part you wish to play on the little stage I have set for you. I will record the truth of your actions or inaction with the faith that sooner or later the truth will be known about what I have managed to do.
Enough said, tis time for me to run to the UPS store. I cannot trust the Canada Post with this stuff. Afterwards I am going back to the woods and write something kinda important. My ancestors lived by the following motto, me too. I added my two bits worth and a smiley face too. The Yankee store that Ambassador Wilkins frequents don’t own the rights to it yet. EH?
Cya’ll in Court J and Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB E5P 3G2

Wiretap Tapes Impeach Bush

Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David Amos"
Subject: oldmaison@yahoo.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, michael.malley@gnb.ca, EGreenspan@144king.com, josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca, racing.commission@state.ma.us, dwatch@web.net, freeman.c@parl.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, graham.b@parl.gc.ca, arthur.a@parl.gc.ca

Call me a liar now. I Double Dog Dare Ya. Methinks I may sell a few wiretap tapes on Ebay in Europe. Maybe some soul over there will want to impeach Bush ASAP.
Cya'll in Court or Hell :) C'est la Meme Chose. N'est Pas?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Mr. Specter:

I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal
FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.

Very truly yours,
Barry A. Bachrach
Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com

Just Dave

Carp50 etc
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:39:00 -0800 (PST)
From: "David Amos"
Subject:
Fwd: RE: Cya'll in Federal Court
To:
trvl@hotmail.com, kmdickson@comcast.net, oldmaison@yahoo.com, Gary.Bennewies@ipsos-na.com, david.saffran@ipsos-reid.com, Darrell.Bricker@ipsos-na.com, Premier@gnb.ca, michael.malley@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, politicsnb@hotmail.com, news@fredfm.ca, perriercanadian@hotmail.com, Madeleine.DUBE@gnb.ca, Paul.ROBICHAUD@gnb.ca, Percy.Mockler@gnb.ca, kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, rosemay.poirier@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca, David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, ckro@nbnet.nb.ca, cktp@nb.aibn.com, cimsfm@nbnet.nb.ca, senator@feinstein.senate.gov, Kandalaw@mindspring.com, fbinhct@leo.gov, josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca, wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, lgold.blcanada@b-l.com, Rep.LindaDorcenaForry@Hou.State.MA.US, Rep.MichaelMoran@Hou.State.MA.US, canada@canadianembassy.org, brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca, Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca, racing.commission@state.ma.us, dwatch@web.net, general.info@thomson.com, ombud@globe.com, dan@djflynn.com, adams_sammon@msn.com, pduchastel@gmail.com
CC:
eopsinfo@state.ma.us, OIG@ftc.gov, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca, cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, Martin.P@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca, tracy.parsons@pcparty.org, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, icurman@shaw.ca, Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca, ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, graham@grahamsteele.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, guyjl@rushcomm.ca, michael.baker@ns.sympatico.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca, justice@gov.nl.ca, MKBRAATEN@GMAIL.com, davidamos@bsn1.net, mackay.p@parl.gc.ca, stronach.b@parl.gc.ca, moore.r@parl.gc.ca, solberg.m@parl.gc.ca, strahl.c@parl.gc.ca, thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, toews.v@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca, casey.b@parl.gc.ca, hearn.l@parl.gc.ca, duffy@ctv.ca, tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com
David Amos wrote:

Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:07:03 -0800 (PST)From: David Amos Subject: RE: Cya'll in Federal CourtTo: M.Taylor@50plus.com, Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca, Shawn.GRAHAM@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca, roy.boudreau@gnb.ca, hedard.albert@gnb.ca, donald.arseneault@gnb.ca, denis.landry2@gnb.ca, rick.doucet@gnb.ca, carmel.robichaud@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca, burt.paulin@gnb.ca, scott.targett@gnb.ca, ronald.ouellette@gnb.ca, sales@oxfordfrozenfoods.com, bev.harrison@gnb.ca, Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, peter.mesheau@gnb.ca, Joan.MACALPINE@gnb.ca, news889@rogers.com, markw.campbell@rci.rogers.com, cfannews@nb.aibn.com, mike.brown@c103.com, infomorning@moncton.cbc.ca, nouvellesradioatlantique@radiocanada.ca, aitkens@moncton.radio-canada.ca, sjinfoam@saintjohn.cbc.ca, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca, mbsnews@nb.aibn.com, cfjufm@nbnet.nb.ca, news@radiomoncton.com, choix@radiomoncton.com, news@radioabl.com, dmabee@newsongfm.com, joyfm@nbnet.nb.caCC: landal@landalinc.com, tdir@td.com, inquiries@cibcmellon.com, tdshinfo@td.com, socialsciences@mta.ca, fdykeman@mta.ca, aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com, Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, stuart.jamieson@gnb.ca, Margaret-Ann.BLANEY@gnb.ca, victor.boudreau@gnb.ca, rick.brewer@gnb.ca, Brenda.FOWLIE@gnb.ca, claudewilliams@gnb.ca, lindahache@gnb.ca, tony.huntjens@gnb.ca, Elvy.ROBICHAUD@gnb.ca, milt.sherwood@gnb.ca, Eric.ALLABY@gnb.ca, Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, dale.graham@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca, brad.green@gnb.ca, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca, leroy.armstrong@gnb.ca, mikemurphymla@hotmail.com, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca, roly.macintyre@gnb.ca, Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, frank.branch@gnb.ca, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca, cjem.nouvelsport@nb.aibn.com, cjpn@nbnet.nb.ca, news@cjri.fm, ckleinfo@nbnet.nb.ca, cknb@nb.sympatico.ca, Steve.bessant@citcomm.com, news@life1075.com, mail@thetide.ca, wcrq@wqdy.fm
Hey
CARP thanking me for the info just won't do anymore. However thank you for acknowledging the fact that you know I am still breathing and mad as hell but at least still having a little fun politicking against all the smiling bastards who screw us all. Just so ya know Michelle. I am over fifty. I consider the possiblity of a heart attack as something serious that should not be ignored. By the same logic your Advocacy Team should not ignore the fact that I am considering suing CARP. If your people do not understand why, talk to the people I have talked to in your offices in the past. Somebody named Sky would be a good place to start. Then perhaps you should call the nasty cop Dean Buzza at IMET. Ask him if I didn't sound as serious as a heart attack last week when I demanded that he get off his ass and act within the scope of his employment. Crooked cops who talk tough don't scare me a bit. If the people who advise the over fifty folks were truly wise you would not waste my precious time anytime and call me ASAP before i embarass you out of your business. In case you haven't figured it out I am protecting your rights and interests too. We should be on the same side of this battle against the rampant public corruption that Stevey boy Harper lamented about in order to get elected for the benefit of his buddy George W. Bush. the only true thing that Franky Boy McKenna ever said was that Harper was a lapdog for Bush and he said in rally of the liberal kissarses wanting to getting their big bad old buddy Rotten Ralphie Goodale reelected to sit in the very wicked 38th Parliament.
Here is my number 506 434 1379 This time please do not allow the person who calls me to play dumb. That only serves to piss me off and I do not want my blood pressure up any higher. Delay me or deny me if you wish but know this. Before I summons CARP to court I will send your lawyers the very same material that New Brunswick Securities Commission just bounced back to me . Lets just say I am very curious to see if a copy of a wiretap tape will give your lawyers a stroke and finally make them see the light. One of your lawyers if he is truly a clever camper would ask Mr. Emerson why he quit Rogers Media long after he and I had a long talk but just before I head to court. I would be greatly interested in his response.I already know he is a liar I just want someone to witness fast I can prove it. There is no denying that I can be as mean as snake. That comes with old age N'est Pas? To put it simply I have no time for Bullshit anymore. Methinks we should be friends not foes. What say you?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Michelle Taylor wrote:

Subject: RE: Cya'll in Federal CourtDate: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:30:18 -0500From: "Michelle Taylor" To:
Dear Mr. Amos:

Thank you for forwarding this mesage to CARP, Canada's Association for the Fifty-Plus.

Regards,

CARP Advocacy Team

-----Original Message-----From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 9:55 PMTo: agoracosmopolite@on.aibn.com; l.catalli.sonier@gnb.ca; Jacqueline.Boyer@gnb.ca; coi@gnb.ca; dan.bussieres@gnb.ca; johnw.betts@gnb.ca; mmcgowan@stu.ca; mcomeau@stu.ca; michael.comeau@gnb.ca; cy.leblanc@gnb.ca; CBARLOW@GG.CA; ftardif@pptc.gc.ca; cbutler@pco-bcp.gc.ca; amacleod@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Sylvia.Patenaude@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca; ctownley@psc-cfp.gc.ca; brian.sacho@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; kincaidb@scc-csc.gc.ca; rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca; Marie-Claude.Dussault@ccra-adrc.gc.ca; lucie.drouin@chrc-ccdp.ca; gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; jacques.pilote@crtc.gc.ca; pierrette.lacroix@elections.ca; louise.gravel@cic.gc.ca; hunterg@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; clgascon@fja.gc.ca; maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca; deborah.macnair@justice.gc.ca; sschryer-belair@lcc.gc.ca; plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; hasheyd@coxhanson.caCc: broy@pattersonpalmer.ca; jturner@millerthomson.com; lbouchard@dwpv.com; lmorphy@dwpv.com; wbrock@dwpv.com; jlaskin@torys.com; richard.dearden@gowlings.com; Moore.R@parl.gc.ca; pnphanratty@hotmail.com; canada@canadianembassy.org; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca; Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca; racing.commission@state.ma.us; dwatch@web.net; josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us; info@pco-bcp.gc.ca; fbinhct@leo.gov; ted.tax@justice.gc.ca; Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca; info@apex.gc.ca; carp; Layton.J@parl.gc.ca; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.caSubject: Re: Cya'll in Federal Court
Hey Mr. Stokes
Thanks for the suggestion. As you should know the most glaring example of a company that has been raping the Maritimes with abandon for many years is obviously the Irving Empire. However lately there are some very nasty new players on the scene such a PCS and Corridor Resourses etc etc. I am very busy these days and I am not a journalist. You people are though yet it seems you would rather me say the awlful truth than yourselves because of some possible lawsuit EH?
So be it. I will because it is not slander if one's words are true. Perhaps you should consider checking my work and then come to court sometime in order to listen to me argue all the smiling bastards. You can have much of my work in a click of the button of my mouse. But first please allow me to introduce you to the New Brunswick Securities Commission. I got a rather interesting response from them today whilst I was in Fredericton. They have ignored my concerns for almost a year but now that Bernie Lord's government is getting tipsy, it appears all the bad actors want to show me their arse just in time for me to boot it.
It is Securities Commissions such as this that allow many publicly held companies such as Corridor Resources or Magna Entertainment etc to get away with many things rather than remind them of the law and on how they should conduct business in an ethical fashion. That said, these Commisssions have no say whatsoever over the Irving Empire and that is truly bad. It is a privately held corporation that knows very well the power of money and on how to pay off greedy politicians in order to get anything they want. In the nutshell of the Maritimes that is quite simply everything. It seems that I am the only Maritimer who is not afraid of the ghost of mean old KC Irving and his monoply game. It has always been hard times in the Maritimes. We lament about it all the time but our apathy and fear of the Irvings etc gives us the govenments we deserve.
Print this if you wish. You are off the hook that Irving's lawyers threaten ordinary folks with. I am fearless yet never reckless with the truth. I stand by my own words and invite anyone to sue me if they think I am a liar and wish to argue me. I hate it when the chickenshits send crooked cops against me bearing false allegations in a faint hearted effort to shut me up. It does the smiling bastards no good and only serves to make matters worse.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

Rick Hancox Executive Director February 24th, 2006 c/o Suzanne Ball Senior Legal Counsel
and Manon Losier General Counsel
and Secretary to the New Brunswick
Securities Commission
85 Charlotte Street, Suite 300
Saint John, NB E2L 2J2
RE: Securities Fraud and Public Corruption
Sir,
Pursuant to our conversation today please find enclosed exactly the same material sent to the eight other provincial Attorney Generals in Canada before I returned to my native land again this year. Obviously the AGs Brad Green and Tom Marshall have known the truth of my matters since the summer of 2004. They have maliciously ignored my false imprisonment in the USA for their own political benefit. The tapes enclosed are exactly the same copies that were served upon the lawyers acting for Rogers Media byway of their newsman Tom Young today. As you listen to the tape you will hear that I mentioned your Commission on air in Saint John weeks ago. Methinks you should have called me then instead of waiting for me to contact you again today.
The tapes and the CD of wiretap tape #139 are served upon the Commission's lawyers Ms. Ball and Ms. Losier as in confidence as officers of the court in order that my allegations of illegal wiretaps by crooked law enforcement authorities may be finally properly investigated ASAP by ethical law enforcement authorities. Hopefully this will be done before I sue the Crown about my false imprisonment but I am not holding my breath. April 3rd is coming fast. Upon your study of these documents you will see that I have not yet given the Yankee SEC all of my evidence of Securities Fraud. However every Attorney General in Canada has been made well aware of it for quite sometime before the SEC declared it was willing to investigate the actions of the former Minister of Finance Ralph Goodale. To date not one person has responded me nor did me the simple courtesy of returning my calls or emails as you finally did today.
Clearly I must complain of the Crown myself without delay before further harm is done to my Clan. Rest assured I will be calling you, Mr. Hancox and the lawyers within your Commission to testify at a trial of my matters in Federal Court in Fredericton. A very pigheaded yet ethical Maritimer knows that justice has been delayed way past too long for the benefit of public corruption and not the public trust. I will not wait for anyone on public service to act within the scope of their employment anymore. To put it simply, after our conversation today I had no faith that you were willing to do your job.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB E5P 3G2

agoracosmopolite@on.aibn.com wrote:
Bonjour Mr. David Raymond Amos, We respectfully invite you to consider a Letter to the Editor, i.e.., How Free Trade undermines Maritime Economic Development. We had heard you make some representation about a U.S. company which truck out Maritime 'wealth', as a result of not having similar .provincial resources rights as Alberta, Many Maritimes would be potentially interested in such an editorial.Merci.Office of John StokesThe Canadian National Newspaperinternet site: http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com

Just Dave

Just Dave

Date:
Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:
"David Amos"
Subject:
RE: The game is on
To:
"aleblanc" , oldmaison@yahoo.com, mail@ccla.org, advocacycollective@yahoo.com, frederictonartsalliance@yahoo.ca, wassef@nb.sympatico.ca, Premier@gnb.ca, michael.malley@gnb.ca, Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca, Shawn.GRAHAM@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca, roy.boudreau@gnb.ca, hedard.albert@gnb.ca, smcready@nbnet.nb.ca, Info@jackcarr.ca
CC:
socialsciences@mta.ca, fdykeman@mta.ca, roly.macintyre@gnb.ca, Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, frank.branch@gnb.ca, rosemay.poirier@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca, David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, tony.huntjens@gnb.ca, Elvy.ROBICHAUD@gnb.ca, milt.sherwood@gnb.ca, Eric.ALLABY@gnb.ca, Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, dale.graham@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca, brad.green@gnb.ca, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca, leroy.armstrong@gnb.ca, mikemurphymla@hotmail.com, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca
Hey Abe Baby LeBlanc
Sometimes less is more EH? Thus I was silent for a while but you really did't think you had run me off. Did ya? I have been kinda busy writing a lot of important stuff to screw the Crown with in federal Court.
Thatt said, remember not too long ago when you told me to go fuck myself on a phone that I could not prove contact with? Well as soon as you hung up I talked about it live on Tom Young's radio show with the Bill Carr dude who was speaking for him while he took a little time off. As i was speaking apparently one of John Bragg's lawyers downstairs in Eastlink thought there was a bomb in the building when there was not. The real bomb no doubt went off a couple of days when Tanker farted in your face as you kissed his nasty arse. Now that I have read Tommy Boy's malevolent opinions of the Super Tanker sinking our little Lord's boat that could never have floated without liberal support merely because all you smiling bastards just what a pension you did not earn. The scene recorded in the Irving rag is not the truth at all. even a kissarse like know as well as I Abe Baby that it is private conversations in backroom deals just like the one you and I had that stops the shit from hitting the fan and spreading it all over you crooked bastards.
For the record Abe. As you well know I ain't a shy man and I don't mince words with crooks. So let me clearly state for the record before I begin to sue the Crown that You and all your nasty friends and sneaky foes can go fuck yourselves as well.
Click "Read on'" in this blog Frenchie. Yankees are starting to bullshit about us too. The Yankee is a liar but I will swear by every word of my email that that crooked bastard posted within his blog.

http://www.freespeech.com/index.php?/weblog/i_find_myself_being_mentioned_in_parliamentary_circles_in_canada/ Veritas vincit
David Raymond Amos



Wrong answer Abe especially after our little spit and chew on the phone on Friday afternoon Say hey to your buddies Chucky LeBlanc (no doubt your kinsman) and the fat bastard called Tanker.
If you don't like my words please sue me. Saves me the costs of filing against you and your cohorts who want a fine pension at the expense of the public interest.
Love and Kisses (for Chucky's benefit)
Dave


aleblanc wrote:
I would prefer not receiving your e-mails please remove my name from your list.
-----Original Message-----From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]Sent: April 3, 2006 7:37 PMTo: charles leblanc; mail@ccla.org; advocacycollective@yahoo.com; frederictonartsalliance@yahoo.ca; wassef@nb.sympatico.ca; Premier@gnb.ca; michael.malley@gnb.ca; Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca; Shawn.GRAHAM@gnb.ca; brian.kenny@gnb.ca; roy.boudreau@gnb.ca; hedard.albert@gnb.caCc: socialsciences@mta.ca; fdykeman@mta.ca; aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com; roly.macintyre@gnb.ca; Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca; frank.branch@gnb.ca; rosemay.poirier@gnb.ca; Jody.CARR@gnb.ca; Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca; tony.huntjens@gnb.ca; Elvy.ROBICHAUD@gnb.ca; milt.sherwood@gnb.ca; Eric.ALLABY@gnb.ca; Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca; dale.graham@gnb.ca; wally.stiles@gnb.ca; kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca; brad.green@gnb.ca; eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca; bev.harrison@gnb.ca; leroy.armstrong@gnb.ca; mikemurphymla@hotmail.com; T.J.Burke@gnb.caSubject: The game is on
While Andre Arthur is tipping a glass with the Speaker I predicted would prevail I must begin writing my first complaint to file in Federal Court Fredericton because this is the Province in which I was born and raised. Chucky knows I come from down the road from him in Dorchester and moved to Fredericton with my father's family when Louis Robichaud centralized the government years ago. A fellow Maritimer should understand why I have no wish to bump bellies with Upper Canadian lawyers like Peter Millikin or Billy Graham until I absolutely have to.
Petey Baby kept his job as Speaker today simply because he is logically the second best choice for Stevey Boy Harper to have. I still maintain as I said on Ground Hog Day that he should have got Andre Arthur to take the chair just as Bernie Lord did with Tanker. Who knows what deals were struck behind closed doors but I know for certain I laid down the law to Arthur's assistant whilst he watched the Circus tent unfold today. Tomorrow Michelle Jean pitches it and then the Circus begins. both in Parliament Hill and in Federal Court in Fredericton.
Maybe Arthur will call me back after he has had a drink or two but I doubt it. In my book he is already way past too late for me not to mention his name within my complaint. Arthur should have called me back months ago when I stuck my hand out to him as a fellow Independent months ago. However he really should have called me ASAP as soon as the UPS man landed at his door one week ago. Last week was an eternity for me because of what happened to my Clan in Beantown USA.
Even though Stevey Boy Harper got his wish in another seat or two advantage in the House piggies made of straw. It still ain't enough of an advantage to allow his government to stand if any sort of scandal breaks out byway of some lone wolf like me or Byron Prior blowing as hard as hell.
What happened today on the Hill or in Fredericton on the 28th was just the same shit different day tis all. Our little local Lord has the same problem as Harper if somebody blinks and his government topples. Believe it or not what happened in chucky blog is a far different kettle of fish and really rather unusual in the cyber world of blogger. Chucky just may get his wish and become famous after all. In my humble opinion he should not delete the blog he threatens to. He should promote it to make himself a the hero he lusts to be. Chucky can do what he wishes. It is my job to throw mud in the eyes of the people who supported my false imprisonment for their own gain.
Is anybody having any fun yet? I doubt it too. Even I am feeling as mean as snake and yet I am still laughing at the nonsense of it all. The masks of virtue that the talking heads display on the TV don't fool silly little me. I may be rude but at least I am honest. The smiling bastards on TV have great manners and no integrity whatsoever. I have gone to great lengths to prove it. I just need to entertain ordinary folks like me to make them want to watch me have some fun poking holes in the stuffed shirts. If I get Maritimers talking and laughing enough my concerns will be resolved as a matter of political will and justice will be served in the usual fashion. The trick is to make the smiling bastards worry about their own interests and the Maritimers mad about how theirs are being abused. The smiling bastards have proven many times they have no regard whatsoever for the public trust placed in them to protect the public interests. I just have to remind everyone of the awful truth and the political house of cards will fall just like the little piggies houses of straw. The only thing the Speakers of any House worry about is their power, wages and pension. Tanker should speak up . If he did I have no doubt hthe people he represents would applaud and reelect him as some sort of righteous Independent. Only you me and the other dudes that get this email will have another tale to tell Eh Chucky? The obvious question is whay don't you tell it first in your Blog? Tanker won't sue ya because he knows you would call me as witness. After all I wrote it didn't I. You blog it and quote me thats all. Interesting EH? Tis time for you to think about something. EH? Wouldn't it be fun to prove that you were the one to make somebody blink? Steal my thunder I quite simply don't care. you have about a day or so to decide. Then maybe I will blog it myself as you suggested.
Now I must address you buddy Vaughn's questions. just like a lawyer the unnamed blogger has neither confirmed nor denied that he is the person I think is asking the questions within you blog. However I am glad that they are being ask even though his sarcasm pisses me off. He know full well what I am talking about and what I am saying is true. If it is not Vaughn doing your bidding byway of the blog he has gotten the last couple of email you did anyway. Most importantly Vaughn confirmed way back in 2004 that he was in possession of the very same material dudes such as Cleveland Allaby and your buddy Danny Boy Bussieres got last Monday. Quite frankly it does not matter to me if this dude is Vaughn or not. Vaughn is already an important witness for me. He should be thankful he is not a lawyer no matter how much he pretends to be one. i have enough enemies it is only lawyers or laymen who choose to attack me that I am preparing to sue. Check my work I have sued some pretty big bad bastards before. Don't think that I will not do it again once I have my ducks lined up.
Anyway chucky here is your unnamed blogger's questions. My answer follows.

Well, that makes some sense anyway. So how are these New Brunswick lawyers involved? Are you saying that none of them will represent you or what? You are sending them this wiretap evidence for what reason? If it's federal court why are you even in New Brunswick, all the lawyers in this province are idiots and irving lackeys. Why not go to Toronto where there are at least some civil liberties lawyers.
The trouble is, I don't know of any legal grounds that 'forces' the canadian government to intervene in a foreign country's legal system. If somebody plants coke on you in columbia and you get caught, then plead with canada to help you out, you'll be out of luck. Under the charter canadians have fewer rights than americans.
Our 'terror laws' are the mirror image of the US's, but never even had moranda rights or anything ike that. In Canada, you are simply f&&&&& if you cross the state, as any native, environmentalist, protestor, or civil rights attorney will tell you. I don't know of a single case where somebody successfully sued, even David Milgaard was given a settlement since it was dragging out so long. Natives have tried suing for years. However, it's easy to talk from the outside. But if Ernst Zundel couldn't sue for being held for almost a decade with no charges against him in Canada, I don't see how far a lawsuit against Canada for not intervening in a foreign country will go.
# posted by Anonymous : 2:15 PM

The tif file attached should answer Vaughn's quandary in Chucky's blog about why I think my lawsuit should prevail. Obviously September 11th, 2004. Talk to the Arar crowd of lawyers making the score with their fees if you do not understand me. The Canadian government did intervene. It willfully and maliciously assisted in my false imprisonment in the USA. The Crown is accountable.
Here is what happened. Prior to returning home to Canada I was inspired to run for a seat because of the answer I had received from the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety the long gone Landslide Annie McLellan. Her answer informed me that I must go political ASAP or my family would lose everything. If you had bothered to contact me back in 2004 Vaughn I would have shown you another complaint from 2002 that not many people have seen. It proved long ago I had this plan in mind. I know that matters are dismissed all the time and nobody gets justice. Only political will will ever make the justice dept pretend that they conduct themselves ethically for awhile.
Anyway while I was running for a seat in the 38th Parliament I was summoned across the yankee border to be arraigned in a criminal matter. The complaint was unsigned because everybody knew it was illegal and fraudulent to boot. All they wanted was for me to come to the border and the DHS could come into play and take me away under the prior false allegations of a presidential threat. they use the better safe than sorry policy all the time. I could not be in Boston stalking a lawyer whilst running for Parliament in Canada further. Everybody knew the lawyer making false allegations against me was a lair. My arguments with her in courts proving her own perjury has caused her to be fired from three law firms thus far as they try hard to disassociate themselves from her actions. She and her former law firms admit it kinda sorta in the usual way legal liars do. The feds wanted rid of me once and for all because I was causing quite a little stink in the backrooms up hear plus everybody knew I was sniffing around for Whitey Bulger. Talk to Constable Jim Case or Byron Prior in Newfoundland if you don't believe me.
I covered my arse big time up here and then I went go to the Yankee court to answer the arraignment as summoned with glee. I loved the prospect of finally getting a jury of my peers as is my right when labelled as a criminal. All I was demanding was for the matter to be heard in the proper jurisdiction and venue as is my right as well. When I stood before that court I did not recognize its jurisdiction over me because it was just a sub court of a municipal court. I demanded to know what the matter was about because I was not given any information about what the matter was about and the police and the district attorney had refused to speak to me. the DA had claimed in writing that they were not involved.
The man who had laid the charges against me was a clerk magistrate and not even a lawyer. It had been already argued to the Supreme Court and proven that it was very illegal for a clerk magistrate of a municipal court to lay charges against a man not in jail let alone running for a seat in Parliament in another country. I got all the necessary documents from the court to prove that the attempted prosecution of me was malicious on Sept 3rd, 2004. I then returned to Canada and served upon many Canadian law enforcement authorities the proof of the malice. It was just what I had predicted would happen to the New Brunswick Police Commission before leaving Canada on sept 2nd. The most notable person i sent my material to would have to be Ms, Longo the General Cousel of the Crown Corp known as the RCMP. another Crown Corp known as Canada post took the money and gave a receipt but refused to deleiver the material or send it back and has deneied to this very day that the parcel was ever sent despite the fact i have a receipt. they just challenge me to sue them. Rest assured i shall but that is why Andre Authur and John shuttle got the same material byway of the Yankee firm known as the UPS. It seems they may have a valid complaint because i know for a fact the Canada post is very political. Under the charter I have the right to privacy with my papers don't I. Well where is my god damned mail. Hell I even filed it all attached to my affadavit in a matter in Sussex Provincial Court on Sept 9th and gave the Sussex RCMP some wiretap tapes to seal the deal.
On Sept 3rd the Yankee Judge named Coffey who my wife informed me later was my neighbor had heard the District Attorney admit that I had just given them 9 original wiretap tapes. he was quick to ask me for a motion to dismiss because he did not want to hear anymore. I refused because if I did that would recognize that court's jurisdiction and I demanded that the malicious prosection be exposed in a US Federal Court during the due process of law so to speak. So he and i agreed to have a hearing on Oct 1st about the matter and i could file an affidavit stateing my issues and filing more evidence in order to remove the matter to federal court and far away from his bench. On Oct 1st I returned and after having the judge witness my signature and my filing the affidavit with a great deal of documentation to support my defence. I informed the judge he should recuse himself because of the fact that we were neighbours. Coffey properly did so immediately. the matter was delayed to much later in the day when the court was largely cleared of ordinary folks as witnesses and the a very malevolent circus started between me and one of Massachusetts nastiest judges. She is the judge that Janet Reno gave two million dollars to back in 1999 in order to torture men. The hoedown between me and Judge Sidney Hanlon is well remembered by many ordinary folks that witnessed our arguments in Dorchester.
As far as what happened on Oct 1st I still do not know all that was said or why I went to jail. One minute I was arguing and embarrassing the ADA and the next minute I was in a glass cage and could not hear a thing. my next stop was the downtown boston Psych Ward of a city jail and the jailors could not tell me why I was there simply because they did not know. I had not been arrested and there was no bail order. they were in the dark as much as I. In fact after the Canadian consulate came to see me three guards came into my cell in the middle of the night to ask me what the hell was going on. I asked them had they never met a political prisoner before and explained to them that they would be called as witnesses someday and that I bore them no malice even though I had been pretty fierce with them. taking away my freedom is one thing but deny me coffee and cigarettes too and you have an animal on your hands. Their problem was I knew my rights and would not allow them to make a false move. After they unlocked the door to the hole. they shoved me in i still would not come out until they asked me nicely kinda like Chucky just did.
That said the Canadian Consulate in Boston finally felt compelled to visit me in jail after my friends raised a lot of hell up here and my wife had served them a copy of the pile of documents that were sent to them the week before had been forwarded by the US mail to somewhere else that they could not say because it was a matter of public safety to even receive mail from me. the Canadians in Boston accepted the document from my wife but refused to take the wiretap tape she tried to given for no stated reason. When i was visited by the Consulate I demanded to know why i was in jail because all my jailer's computer's said was "other" The Canadian consulate were quick to say I was in jail because I had threatened Judge Coffey and gave me the documents to support signed in Judge Sidney Hanlon's hand. I took the documents gratefully and then demanded to know why they refused the wiretap tape s from my wife. they refused to tell me to so I threw them out of my god damned jail and went back to my cell pissed off. Later i was bailed out by good buddies and i stood before Judge Hanlon once again. I asked her directly why i was in jail and she would not say. I told her what the Canadian Consulate said and she said it was untrue and that I did not threaten Judge Coffey. then i showed her the documents signed in her own hand and the facts she stated were not only absurd but out right lies. If I had threatened Judge Coffey he would have handled it immediately it would not be necessary for another Judge to Claim it days later. The plan between Canada and the USA to be rid of me was in my face obvious when the Judge attempted to keep the papers the Canadian Consulate had given me. Trust that that is just the beginning of a 22 month legal battle to get a jury in the USA in the proper court with jurisdiction.
Never mind my said but true tale for a minute because I I know for a fact most folks only care about things if it affects them other wise the rest of the world can go to Hell right?
Well that is my rant but think about this real slow Vaughn you are the activist not me. However the Feds can never deny my evidence of Bank Fraud, securities Fraud and Tax Fraud. All issues are under the federal code of the USA. However Canadian interests are bought and on Yankee stock markets every day. We have an interest in the fact that the Yankee entities such as the SEC and the FTC etc are filled with crooks who help global corp rape and pillage our assests under the guise of such things as NAFTA. A wannabe lawyer and actvist such as your self would be impressed at how far i have gone proving the wickedness in the games that you protest. The best way i know of the get the bastards is to make them eat their own words and then fall on their own swords. All of the evil in this old world is dreamt up or supported by the profession you wish to be a part of. Perhaps you should reconsider and do as I do. Take some of my evidence of foul play check and make certain it is true and attack them Pro Se. Two fellas attacking the same bastards separately can have more effect than one. Near as I can gather you tried to run for city council or whatever because Bruce Noble stopped you from becoming a lawyer. Is that true? If so why not let me help you embarrass that fat bastard. He was in the same classes as me in high School and he was far from memorable then. Brucy Baby’s wits do not intimidate me. I would love to argue him in fact that is why I played hard ball with the Fredericton Police dept when they broke the law in their actions against me.

Hows that for an answer Vaughn? Now read the tiff file and study what I gave Chucky years ago. Will ya?

Ides of March

March 15th, 2005

Gregory J. Glennon Kevin J. Mahoney
51 Nottinghill Rd. 545 Concord Avenue, Suite 22
Boston, MA 02135 Cambridge, MA 02138

Timothy N. Schofield Thomas M. O'Brien
120A Sutherland Rd., 89 Hobart St.
Boston, MA 02135 Boston, MA 02135

RE: Public Corruption with the malicious assistance of your Profession

Hey Dudes,
I must say that I am a very happy man not to be in your shoes today as you look around and wonder about your friends and associates. Three of you bastards act like you work diligently in defence of people charged with crimes. The fourth works just as diligently for Tom Reilly who is trying to imprison me for simply seeking justice served upon him. Three seek political office to uphold the Public Trust when as lawyers you have already proven to me you have no understanding of how to uphold the law.
The fourth amongst you don’t give a good goddamn about anything except his own pursuit of lucre. He pisses and moans about the injustices in the system he makes his living within while he fishes on the internet for new clients. However once he encounters a layman far more ethical than the man he claims to be, he is quick to offend and run for cover by hanging up the phone. Mahoney, you solicited my phone call. You returned it and I saved your voicemail. In your hustle you offer a 25-minute consultation for free yet were hostile to me out of the gate? Methinks that you knew exactly who I was and were attempting to scare me off. Two minutes and a quick fuck you, don’t hold for me. It just pissed me off. So in return I play you like a fiddle. If you do not appreciate my choice of words, sue me. I dare ya. It will save me the costs of filing on you. I think you are scum and would dearly love to argue you in front of a jury of my peers in a federal court.
After calling each of you March 2nd and managing to speak to two of you personally, obviously there is no need to explain why I have sent you this material. I am remaining true to my word, which is something none of you will ever understand. To supplement the emails already sent, I have enclosed exact copies of the same material I served upon two Solicitor Generals last year before I ran for Parliament and was sent straight to jail for my efforts. The CD of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as "officers of the court" in order that it may be properly investigated. The Yankee Solicitor General, Teddy Olson quit his job while I was campaigning up home last June but the Canadian Solicitor General, Landslide Annie has thus far hung on to hers. If any of you can explain to me in an ethical fashion, in writing, signed in your hand how the US Attorney could legally edit the Defendant, Cardinal Law from my complaint before filing his ridiculous "ex parte" motion, I will eat your hat and let you off the hook. Good luck.
If you dudes have any questions about my concerns and allegations take it up with your Congressman, Mikey Capuano. His answer to me is hereto attached for your review. Rest assured I will be suing him. Join him if you wish. Better yet for your own benefit ask the Suffolk County ADA Alicia McDonnell if you can view her files to see if I am a liar. If she won’t show you, ask yourself why. I ain’t talking to any more Yankee lawyers until after my pending criminal trial is over and I begin suing the bastards including her.
I will take up my concerns with our brand new Canadian Ambassador in Washington, Franky McKenna to see if he wishes to act within the scope of his Employment and protect my righteously dumb arse. Yankees are about to see something quite special as two pigheaded Maritimers from the same point on the map but from different planets argue tooth and nail about pork etc. It should be quite an entertaining circus no matter who prevails between Franky and I. We are both fairly adept showmen and neither of us pull our punches. His has power and money. I have the truth. Veritas Vincit EH? Maybe. Who knows, but you can’t blame me for trying. Yankee lawyers claim that they seek Truth, Justice and the American Way all the time. As you view my material you can see that Clark Kent Irvin Inspector General Department Homeland Security forever proven that to be untrue. Maybe an alien layman will get the job done despite all the apathy.
Shame on each of you. When I called you I was seeking friends not foes. What would you do if you were I and you had been sent byway of an illegal complaint made by a clerk to the Physc Ward of a Downtown Boston jail controlled by the very Sheriff that had supported perjury against you in federal court? Think fast before I sue you too. I do not have to wait six months for an answer like I do a FED. What say I put you dudes on my witness list? If you were hostile, I would have fun making you try to keep your stories straight. I am used to your tricks. As you no doubt can tell, I have a very low tolerance for liars that are lawyers. My contempt towards your profession is well known and justified. Hell, read Mahoney’s words within his web site. He goes on and on about it more than I do. I saved his words just in case I need to use them against him some day.
FYI, if any of you do not prove to me that you have contacted the FBI and the US Attorney with your newfound knowledge of crime ASAP, I will be suing you in a New York minute once my Criminal Trial is over. If you opt to bounce back this material your malice will be proven. You will merely afford me the opportunity to recycle expensive materials to screw another nasty lawyer with. I am accustomed to that trick as well. Why not act just act ethically according to the Rules of Professional Conduct that allow you to practice law for a fee before someone else does so and forever embarrasses you right out your profession? Can you really trust a lawyer not to turncoat on his friends to protect his own rep and pocketbook? This is not an ethical dilemma but is certainly one Hell of a Catch 22 for any lawyer or politician to receive. EH?
Cya'll in Court :)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, David A. Woodman of South Acworth hereby certify that on March 15th, 2005 the Ides of March and Primary day for a few political wannabes I served upon the following lawyers at the addresses stated below a true copy of the attached document and the material provided by the fool, David R. Amos. This was done with two witnesses and pictures were taken to prove that it was done and record our fun.

Gregory J. Glennon Kevin J. Mahoney
51 Nottinghill Rd. 545 Concord Avenue, Suite 22
Boston, MA 02135 Cambridge, MA 02138

Timothy N. Schofield Thomas M. O'Brien
120A Sutherland Rd., 89 Hobart St.
Boston, MA 02135 Boston, MA 02135

David A. Woodman
P.O. Box 2
South Acworth. NH 03607

Me and Bush

The Associated Press
WASHINGTON — No longer will the attorney general be photographed in front of two partially nude statues in the Great Hall of the Department of Justice.
The department spent $8,000 on blue drapes that hide the two giant, aluminum art deco statues, said spokesman Shane Hix. For aesthetic reasons, he said, the drapes were occasionally hung in front of the statues before formal events.
The drapes provide a nice background for television cameras, Hix said. ABC News reported that Attorney General John Ashcroft ordered the statues covered because he didn’t like being photographed In. front of them.
Since the terrorist attacks of Sept.11, Ashcroft has been photographed several times in front of the female statue that represents the Spirit of Justice. The statue has its arms raised and a toga draped over its body, but a single breast is completely exposed.
Albuquerque Journal Wednesday January 30, 2002
















Sent by Certified US mail September 28, 2003

Hon. Alberto R. Gonzales H. Marshall Jarrett, Counsel
Counsel to the President Office of Professional Responsibility
The White House 20 Massachusetts Ave. N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20500 Suite 5100
Fax (202) 456-2461 Washington, D.C. 20530 2330
Phone (202) 456-1414 Fax (202) 514-4371
Phone (202) 514-3365

Senator Edward M. Kennedy David D. Aufhauser, General Counsel
317 Russell Senate Office Building, Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20510 1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Fax (202) 224-2417 Washington, D.C. 20220
Phone (202) 224-4543 Fax (202) 622-6415
Phone(202) 622-2000

Attorney General John Ashcroft Inspector General Gregory Sullivan
U.S. Department of Justice One Ashburton Place,
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Room 1311
Washington, DC 20530-0001 Boston, MA 02108
Fax (202) 307-2825 Fax (617) 723-2334
Phone (202) 353-1555 Phone (617) 727-9140
Re: My Beef with Corruption.
Sirs,
Please find enclosed:
1. A copy of six letters to and from a US Attorney and a District Attorney and one
from Ted Kennedy and one to Bill Delahunt proving the need to expose wiretap taps in an unrelated State Action. Many lawyers now possess a copy of the following wiretap tape. The Fourth Amendment violations cannot be denied. The letter to Bill Delahunt explains why I was compelled to solve the ethical dilemma for you. Tomorrow in a sincere effort to seek justice I tell the world on the public record during the pending hearings in Norfolk Superior Court. The Clerks of Norfolk Superior Court picked the day and time of the showdown in State Court. I however shall pick the place and time to file my next complaint in a federal court.
2. One CD playable on any form of CD player that contains a copy of wiretap tape numbered 139
one of many mentioned to you months ago. Be careful what you do with your copy it is served upon you in confidence as an Officer of the Court in order that it and many others are properly investigated.
3. A copy of the Cinderella Affidavit sold to me by the Carver Police Dept. This was the second
Affidavit. The one read to the Clerk in Wareham was never given to me. The new Affidavit was composed and dated the following day and the cop refused to sign and affirm his own bullshit. Mr. Ashcroft that document is obscene not the last word in the last sentence. I heard how you are so easily offended by nice tits on Statues etc. Trust me, you and I are from different planets the argument between you and I is gonna be hilarious to say the least. My dumb ass is gonna sue your righteous ass and as I told the FBI on October 15th, 2002, I will sue every lawyer who attempts to defend you until you show your face and defend yourself Pro Se against me man to man and before the Bar and heard by a jury of our peers.
If I drop off the face of this planet, I demand that y’all be interrogated in Cuba without counsel and tortured if necessary by Alan Dershowitz. That is what the Agents of the DHS were prepared to do to me on April 1st the same should hold true for you. It is you that has no regard for the Constitution not I. It is you who should suffer first from the offences against the Constitution caused by the Patriot Act. It is only the lady justice with the nice hooters that will make you fall on her sword. Shame on y’all and your little dogs of war too.
4. A copy of what happened on me birthday in Norfolk Probate Court. WOW.
5. A copy of my recent filing in the above stated matter requesting an oral argument with
Robert L. Quinan Jr. I am gonna enjoy the debate to the max.
6. A copy of my recent filing in the above stated matter requesting an oral argument with
Walter M. Lupan. He must be the most nervous lawyer of all.
7. A copy of one of my letters sent to all US Attorneys.
9. A copy of my letter to the elusive lawyers of the DHS.
9. A copy of the Court Order setting the time for my showdown with the Kickham BUDDYS.
(Bunch of Unethical Dandy Dam Yankee Solicitors) Go to http:// briefcase.yahoo.com/motomaniac_02186 to see all that I wish to reveal. You might as well I have already posted this letter on the web for the world to read.
I figure tomorrow is High noon at the OK Coral and I am gonna face them all alone just like Ol Coop did in the movies. As Ol Ben once said anyone who is willing to trade freedom for safety, deserves neither. The Congress should have considered his words before passing the so-called Patriot Act. That Act is an insult to the word identifying it. As for me the New Hampshire license plate says all that needs to be said. It says it. I live it. I am a simple, sincere and serious man with lots of sand who doesn’t take shit from anyone. I will stand against anyone that offends my Clan and never back down. Can you tell that I am having fun picking a fight? Check me work and your ethics. I dare you to sue me.
Cya’ll in Court:)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186